Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Ultra-processed food (UPF) intake has been associated with a higher risk of obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. The initial data on the relationship between UPF consumption and cancer risk were derived from retrospective observational studies with conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies aimed to investigate the association between UPF consumption and gastrointestinal cancer risk. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for prospective cohort studies that compared the highest vs the lowest level of UPF consumption according to NOVA food classification and reported the risk of gastrointestinal cancers by subsite. The association with cancer was quantified as hazard ratios (HR) using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Five prospective cohort studies were included in this review comprising 1,128,243 participants (241,201 participants in the highest and 223,366 in the lowest levels of UPF consumption). The mean follow-up ranged from 5.4 to 28 years. The highest UPF consumption was significantly associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (HR 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.21; P = 0.01; I2 = 31%), colon cancer (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.02-1.23; P = 0.02; I2 = 0%), and non-cardia gastric cancer (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.02-2.00; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%) compared with the lowest UPF intake. However, no association was found between high UPF consumption and hepatocellular, esophageal, pancreatic, gastric cardia, and rectal cancer. DISCUSSION: The highest level of UPF consumption was significantly associated with colorectal and non-cardia gastric cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) have clinical benefits for treating several atopic diseases. However, consensus on its use for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is lacking. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of MAbs versus placebo for treating EoE. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes were changes in peak esophageal eosinophils count/high power field (HPF) and mean esophageal eosinophils count/HPF. The secondary outcomes were changes in the EoE-Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS), Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS), dysphagia score, and adverse events (AEs). We compared binary outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI). Considering the diversity of mechanistic properties of MAbs, a pre-specified subgroup analysis by MAb mechanism of action was performed for all outcomes, provided that at least two studies were in each subgroup. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. RESULTS: 6 RCTs were included (533 patients). Compared to placebo, MAbs led to a significant reduction in peak esophageal eosinophils count/HPF (MD -0.78; CI 95% -0.87, -0.6801) and mean esophageal eosinophils count/HPF (SMD -0.79; CI 95% -1.5, -0.08). Moreover, MAbs significantly reduced EoE-HSS scores (grade score: SMD -9.31; 95% CI -13.95, -4.6701; stage score: SMD -10.18; 95% CI -15.06, -5.31), EREFS (SMD -5.95; CI 95% -9.19, -2.71) and dysphagia score (SMD -1.79; CI 95% -3.36, -0.23) without increasing AEs compared to placebo. Among those MAbs whose mechanism of action includes the blockage of the receptor for IL-13 (Dupilumab, QAX576, and RPC4046), the scores of EoE-HSS grade, EoE-HSS stage, EREFS, and dysphagia were significantly reduced, and they presented a similar risk of overall and serious AEs compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: MAbs seem effective and safe in reducing esophageal eosinophil infiltrate, EoE-HSS score, EREFS score, and dysphagia symptoms in patients with EoE. However, further evidence is needed to establish its place in EoE management.

Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (PRG) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) are minimally invasive gastrostomy techniques for individuals requiring prolonged enteral feeding. Recent meta-analyses concerning their efficacy and safety mainly included retrospective studies and yielded conflicting results. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare efficacy, safety, and procedure time between PRG and PEG for enteral feeding. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible RCTs comparing PRG and PEG for enteral feeding through February 23, 2024. The primary outcome was technical success. The secondary outcomes were (1) adverse events (AEs), (2) mortality, and (3) procedure time. We used the random-effects model to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% CIs for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. RESULTS: Five RCTs with 544 patients (268 PRG and 276 PEG) were included. There was similar technical success (RR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.98-1.05; I² = 35%; moderate certainty of evidence because of inconsistency), overall mortality (RR = 1.25; 95% CI = 0.63-2.47; I² = 47%; very low certainty of evidence because of inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision), and overall AEs risk (RR = 1.06; 95% CI = 0.63-1.76; I² = 81%; low certainty of evidence because of inconsistency and imprecision) between the two groups. However, compared with PEG, the procedure time was longer in the PRG group (MD = 19.35 min; 95% CI = 0.95-37.75 min; I² = 98%; very low certainty of evidence because of inconsistency and imprecision). CONCLUSION: PRG and PEG demonstrate similar efficacy and safety; however, the endoscopic technique may boast a shorter procedure time.

EUS- versus ERCP-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Increasing evidence supports EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as a potential alternative to ERCP-guided biliary drainage (ERCP-BD) in the primary treatment of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both techniques as the initial approach for MBO. METHODS: We systematically searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials comparing both techniques and reporting at least one of the outcomes of interest. The pooled estimates were calculated using the random-effects model, and I2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: We included 6 randomized controlled trials (577 patients). There were no significant differences between both groups in terms of stent patency (mean difference [MD], 8.18 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -22.55 to 38.91), procedure time (MD, -6.31 minutes; 95% CI, -12.68 to 0.06), and survival (MD, 4.59 days; 95% CI, -34.23 to 43.40). Technical success (risk ratio [RR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.13), clinical success (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.08), overall adverse events (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.24-1.43), and cholangitis (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.39-3.61) were also similar between groups. However, the hospital stay was significantly shorter (MD, -1.03 days; 95% CI, -1.53 to -0.53), and the risk of reintervention (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.88), postprocedure pancreatitis (RR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.66), and tumor ingrowth/overgrowth (RR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.70) were significantly lower with EUS-BD. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-BD and ERCP-BD had similar efficacy and safety as the initial approach for MBO. However, EUS-BD had a significantly lower risk of reintervention, postprocedure pancreatitis, tumor ingrowth/overgrowth, and reduced hospital stay.

Cold endoscopic mucosal resection versus cold snare polypectomy for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Cold resection of colorectal lesions is widely performed because of its safety and effectiveness; however, it remains uncertain whether adding submucosal injection could improve the efficacy and safety. We aimed to compare cold endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) versus cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for colorectal lesions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The primary outcome was complete resection. Secondary outcomes were procedure time, en bloc resection, and adverse events (AEs). Prespecified subgroup analyses based on the size and morphology of the polyps were performed. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference, with corresponding 95%CIs, for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I 2 statistics. RESULTS: 7 RCTs were included, comprising 1556 patients, with 2287 polyps analyzed. C-EMR and CSP had similar risk ratios for complete resection (RR 1.02, 95%CI 0.98-1.07), en bloc resection (RR 1.08, 95%CI 0.82-1.41), and AEs (RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.41-1.32). C-EMR had a longer procedure time (mean difference 42.1 seconds, 95%CI 14.5-69.7 seconds). In stratified subgroup analyses, the risk was not statistically different between C-EMR and CSP for complete resection in polyps<10 mm or ≥10 mm, or for complete resection, en bloc resection, and AEs in the two groups among nonpedunculated polyps. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that C-EMR has similar efficacy and safety to CSP, but significantly increases the procedure time. PROSPERO: CRD42023439605.

Remimazolam versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Propofol has a favourable efficacy profile in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, however adverse events remain frequent. Emerging evidence supports remimazolam use in gastrointestinal endoscopy. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares remimazolam and propofol, both combined with a short-acting opioid, for sedation of adults in gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomised controlled trials comparing efficacy-, safety-, and satisfaction-related outcomes between remimazolam and propofol, both combined with short-acting opioids, for sedation of adults undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. We performed sensitivity analyses, subgroup assessments by type of short-acting opioid used and age range, and meta-regression analysis using mean patient age as a covariate. We used R statistical software for statistical analyses. RESULTS: We included 15 trials (4516 subjects). Remimazolam was associated with a significantly lower sedation success rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.991; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.984-0.998; high-quality evidence) and a slightly longer induction time (mean difference [MD] 9 s; 95% CI 4-13; moderate-quality evidence), whereas there was no significant difference between the sedatives in other time-related outcomes. Remimazolam was associated with significantly lower rates of respiratory depression (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.30-0.56; high-quality evidence), hypotension (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.35-0.51; moderate-quality evidence), hypotension requiring treatment (RR 0.25; 95% CI 0.12-0.52; high-quality evidence), and bradycardia (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.30-0.58; high-quality evidence). There was no difference in patient (MD 0.41; 95% CI -0.07 to 0.89; moderate-quality evidence) and endoscopist satisfaction (MD -0.31; 95% CI -0.65 to 0.04; high-quality evidence) between both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam has clinically similar efficacy and greater safety when compared with propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopies.

PREVALENCE OF SERRATED POLYPS AND THEIR ASSOCIATION WITH SYNCHRONOUS COLORECTAL ADVANCED ADENOMAS.

•This study revealed a similar prevalence of clinically significant serrated polyps and advanced adenomas among patients who underwent colonoscopy. •Multivariate analysis demonstrated an association between clinically significant serrated polyps and synchronous advanced adenomas, though the strength of this association was stronger for proximal advanced adenomas. •Large serrated polyps and sessile serrated adenomas were associated with proximal advanced adenomas. Background - Serrated lesions are the precursors of up to one-third of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and share molecular and epidemiological features with interval CRC. Previous studies have reported wide variation in serrated polyp prevalence and diverse magnitude of its relationship with synchronous advanced adenomas.Objective - Describe the prevalence of serrated polyps and evaluate their association with synchronous advanced adenomas. Methods - The study is a retrospective analysis of 1208 colonoscopies performed in patients aged 45 to 75, predominantly for CRC screening. Data on the prevalence of serrated polyps subsets and advanced adenomas were collected, and multivariate analysis were performed to identify the association between serrated polyps and synchronous advanced adenomas. Results - The prevalence of clinically significant serrated polyps (CSSP), large serrated polyps (LSP), and sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) were 11.3%, 6%, and 3.7%. CSSP were associated with synchronous advanced adenomas (OR 2.121, 95%CI 1.321-3.406), regardless of proximal (OR 2.966, 95%CI 1.701-5.170) or distal (OR 1.945, 95%CI 1.081-3.499) location, while LSP (OR 2.872, 95%CI 1.425-5.787) and SSA (OR 5.032, 95%CI 2.395-10.576) were associated with proximal advanced adenomas. Conclusion - The prevalence of CSSP and advanced adenomas were alike. CSSP is a risk factor for advanced adenomas, and the strength of this association is stronger for proximal advanced adenomas. LSP and SSA are associated with proximal advanced adenomas.

Prevalência de pólipos serrilhados e sua associação com adenomas avançados colorretais síncronos / Prevalence of serrated polyps and their association with synchronous colorectal advanced adenomas

ABSTRACT Background: Serrated lesions are the precursors of up to one-third of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and share molecular and epidemiological features with interval CRC. Previous studies have reported wide variation in serrated polyp prevalence and diverse magnitude of its relationship with synchronous advanced adenomas. Objective: Describe the prevalence of serrated polyps and evaluate their association with synchronous advanced adenomas. Methods: The study is a retrospective analysis of 1208 colonoscopies performed in patients aged 45 to 75, predominantly for CRC screening. Data on the prevalence of serrated polyps subsets and advanced adenomas were collected, and multivariate analysis were performed to identify the association between serrated polyps and synchronous advanced adenomas. Results: The prevalence of clinically significant serrated polyps (CSSP), large serrated polyps (LSP), and sessile serrated adenomas (SSA) were 11.3%, 6%, and 3.7%. CSSP were associated with synchronous advanced adenomas (OR 2.121, 95%CI 1.321-3.406), regardless of proximal (OR 2.966, 95%CI 1.701-5.170) or distal (OR 1.945, 95%CI 1.081-3.499) location, while LSP (OR 2.872, 95%CI 1.425-5.787) and SSA (OR 5.032, 95%CI 2.395-10.576) were associated with proximal advanced adenomas. Conclusion: The prevalence of CSSP and advanced adenomas were alike. CSSP is a risk factor for advanced adenomas, and the strength of this association is stronger for proximal advanced adenomas. LSP and SSA are associated with proximal advanced adenomas.

RESUMO Contexto: Lesões serrilhadas são precursoras de até um terço dos casos de câncer colorretal (CCR) e compartilham características moleculares e epidemiológicas com o CCR de intervalo. Estudos prévios relataram ampla variação na prevalência de pólipos serrilhados e na magnitude da sua relação com adenomas avançados sincrônicos. Objetivo: Descrever a prevalência de pólipos serrilhados colorretais e avaliar sua associação com adenomas avançados sincrônicos. Métodos: O estudo é uma análise retrospectiva de 1208 colonoscopias realizadas em pacientes com idades entre 45 e 75 anos, predominantemente para rastreamento de CCR. Dados sobre a prevalência de subtipos de pólipos serrilhados e de adenomas avançados foram coletados, e análises multivariadas foram realizadas para identificar a associação entre pólipos serrilhados e adenomas avançados sincrônicos. Resultados: A prevalência de pólipos serrilhados clinicamente significativos (PSCS), pólipos serrilhados grandes (PSG) e adenomas sésseis serrilhados (ASS) foi de 11,3%, 6% e 3,7%, respectivamente. PSCS foram associados a adenomas avançados sincrônicos (OR 2,121, IC95% 1,321-3,406), independentemente da localização proximal (OR 2,966, IC95% 1,701-5,170) ou distal (OR 1,945, IC95% 1,081-3,499), enquanto PSG (OR 2,872, IC 95%1,425-5,787) e ASS (OR 5,032, IC95% 2,395-10,576) foram associados a adenomas avançados proximais. Conclusão: A prevalência de PSCS e de adenomas avançados foi semelhante. PSCS é um fator de risco para adenomas avançados, e a força dessa associação é maior para adenomas avançados proximais. PSG e ASS estão associados a adenomas avançados proximais.

ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND IN THE EVALUATION OF UPPER SUBEPITHELIAL LESIONS.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound is considered the best imaging test for the diagnosis and evaluation of subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to describe the endosonographic characteristics of upper gastric subepithelial lesions and our experience using endoscopic ultrasound for evaluation of such lesions. METHODS: Retrospective data study of 342 patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of subepithelial lesions. RESULTS: Lesions of the fourth layer were more common in the stomach (63.72%) than in the esophagus (44.68%) and duodenum (29.03%). In stomach, 81.1% of the lesions ≥2 cm, and 96.5% ≥3 cm, were from the fourth layer. Endosonographic signs that could be related to malignant behavior, such as irregular borders, echogenic foci, cystic spaces and/or size greater than 3 cm were identified in 34 (15.81%) lesions at the first endoscopic ultrasound evaluation. Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration did the diagnosis in 21 (61.76%) patients who were submitted a puncture. Three (12.0%) lesions of 25 who were submitted to regular endoscopic ultrasound surveillance increased the size. CONCLUSION: Stomach is the organ most affected with subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract and the fourth layer was the most common layer of origin. More than 80% of gastric subepithelial lesions from the fourth layer are ≥2 cm. Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of subepithelial lesions has been very important for stratification into risk groups and to determine the best management.

ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND IN THE EVALUATION OF UPPER SUBEPITHELIAL LESIONS / Ultrasson endoscópico na avaliação das lesões subepiteliais do trato digestivo alto

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound is considered the best imaging test for the diagnosis and evaluation of subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract.ObjectiveThe present study aims to describe the endosonographic characteristics of upper gastric subepithelial lesions and our experience using endoscopic ultrasound for evaluation of such lesions.MethodsRetrospective data study of 342 patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of subepithelial lesions.ResultsLesions of the fourth layer were more common in the stomach (63.72%) than in the esophagus (44.68%) and duodenum (29.03%). In stomach, 81.1% of the lesions ≥2 cm, and 96.5% ≥3 cm, were from the fourth layer. Endosonographic signs that could be related to malignant behavior, such as irregular borders, echogenic foci, cystic spaces and/or size greater than 3 cm were identified in 34 (15.81%) lesions at the first endoscopic ultrasound evaluation. Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration did the diagnosis in 21 (61.76%) patients who were submitted a puncture. Three (12.0%) lesions of 25 who were submitted to regular endoscopic ultrasound surveillance increased the size.ConclusionStomach is the organ most affected with subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract and the fourth layer was the most common layer of origin. More than 80% of gastric subepithelial lesions from the fourth layer are ≥2 cm. Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation of subepithelial lesions has been very important for stratification into risk groups and to determine the best management.

ContextoA ecoendoscopia é considerada o melhor método de imagem para diagnosticar e avaliar as lesões subepiteliais do trato digestivo.ObjetivoO presente estudo tem como objetivo fazer uma análise dos casos submetidos a ecoendoscopia para avaliação de lesões subepiteliais do trato digestivo alto.MétodosForam analisados de forma retrospectiva 342 pacientes submetidos a ecoendoscopia para avaliação de lesões subepiteliais.ResultadosLesões da quarta camada foram mais comuns no estômago (63,72%) do que no esôfago (44,68%) e no duodeno (29,03%). No estômago, 81,1% das lesões >2 cm, e 96,5% >3 cm, eram da quarta camada. Sinais endossonográficos que poderiam ser relacionados com o comportamento maligno, como bordas irregulares, focos ecogênicos, espaços císticos e/ou tamanho maior que 3 cm foram identificados em 34 lesões (15,81%) na primeira avaliação com ecoendoscopia. Aspiração por agulha fina guiada por ultrassom endoscópico fez o diagnóstico em 21 (61,76%) dos pacientes que foram submetidos a punção ecoguiada. Três (12,0%) lesões das 25, que foram submetidas a vigilância pela ecoendoscopia, aumentaram de tamanho.ConclusãoO estômago é o órgão mais afetado pelas lesões subepitelias do trato gastrointestinal alto, sendo a camada muscular própria a camada de origem mais comum. Mais de 80% das lesões gástricas subepiteliais da quarta camada são >2 cm. A avaliação ecoendoscópica das lesões subepiteliais tem sido muito importante para a estratificação em grupos de risco e para determinar a melhor conduta.

Relationship between cagA-positive Helicobacter pylori infection and risk of gastric cancer: a case control study in Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

CONTEXT: Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer related death worldwide. Although Helicobacter pylori has been classified as a class I carcinogen, the presence of infection is not a factor that alone is able to lead to gastric cancer, and one of the possible explanations for this is the existence of different strains of H. pylori with different degrees of virulence. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between cagA-positive H. pylori and gastric cancer, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of this bacterial strain. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with gastric cancer were matched by sex and age (± 5 years) with 58 patients without gastric cancer, submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. All patients were evaluated for the status of infection by H. pylori (through urease test, histological analysis and PCR for the genes ureA and 16SrRNA) and by cagA-positive strain (through PCR for cagA gene). RESULTS: Evaluating the presence of infection by cagA-positive H. pylori, it was verified that the rate of infection was significantly higher in the group with gastric cancer when compared with the matched controls, occurring in 62.1% and 29.3%, respectively (OR = 3.95; CI 95% 1.543-10.096). CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between cagA-positive H. pylori strain and risk of gastric cancer.

Relationship between caga-positive Helicobacter pylori infection and risk of gastric cancer: a case control study in Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil / Relação entre infecção por Helicobacter pylori linhagem cagA-positiva e risco de câncer gástrico: um estudo caso-controle em Porto Alegre, Brasil

CONTEXT: Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer related death worldwide. Although Helicobacter pylori has been classified as a class I carcinogen, the presence of infection is not a factor that alone is able to lead to gastric cancer, and one of the possible explanations for this is the existence of different strains of H. pylori with different degrees of virulence. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between cagA-positive H. pylori and gastric cancer, using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of this bacterial strain. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with gastric cancer were matched by sex and age (± 5 years) with 58 patients without gastric cancer, submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. All patients were evaluated for the status of infection by H. pylori (through urease test, histological analysis and PCR for the genes ureA and 16SrRNA) and by cagA-positive strain (through PCR for cagA gene). RESULTS: Evaluating the presence of infection by cagA-positive H. pylori, it was verified that the rate of infection was significantly higher in the group with gastric cancer when compared with the matched controls, occurring in 62.1 percent and 29.3 percent, respectively (OR = 3.95; CI 95 percent 1.543-10.096). CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between cagA-positive H. pylori strain and risk of gastric cancer.

CONTEXTO: O câncer gástrico é a segunda causa mais comum de mortes relacionadas à neoplasia em todo o mundo. Embora o Helicobacter pylori seja classificado como um carcinógeno classe I, a presença da infecção não é um fator que isoladamente possa conduzir ao câncer gástrico e, uma das possíveis justificativas, é a existência de diferentes linhagens de H. pylori com diferentes graus de virulência. OBJETIVO: Investigar a associação entre H. pylori cagA-positivo e câncer gástrico, utilizando a reação em cadeia de polimerase (PCR) para a detecção desta linhagem bacteriana. MÉTODOS: Vinte e nove pacientes com câncer gástrico foram pareados por sexo e por idade (± 5 anos) com 58 pacientes sem câncer gástrico, submetidos a endoscopia digestiva alta. Todos os pacientes foram avaliados quanto à presença de infecção pelo H. pylori (com teste da urease, análise histológica e PCR para os genes ureA e 16SrRNA) e pela linhagem cagA desta bactéria (com PCR para o gene cagA). RESULTADOS: Avaliando a presença de infecção por H. pylori cagA-positivo, verificou-se que a taxa da infecção era significativamente mais alta no grupo de pacientes com câncer gástrico, quando comparado com o grupo controle, ocorrendo em 62,1 por cento e em 29,3 por cento, respectivamente (OR = 3,95; CI 95 por cento 1,543-10,096). CONCLUSÕES: Há associação entre H. pylori cagA-positivo e risco de câncer gástrico.

Outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in selected head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a relatively simple and safe method of providing access for enteral feeding. The procedure is usually performed in hospitalized patients. The feasibility of PEG as an outpatient procedure has not been well estabilished in the medical literature. The main objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of PEG as an outpatient procedure in a selected group of head and neck cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, head and neck cancer subjects in good clinical condition were selected and enrolled in a close follow-up protocol of outpatient PEG. The clinical and demographic variables evaluated were age, gender, early complications, and timing of PEG. RESULTS: Of a total of 136 PEG patients, 129 (94.8%) were discharged 3 h after the procedure. Three were excluded from the study and four were hospitalized because of moderate abdominal pain. The rate of minor complications was 17.6% (local pain, 7.4%; wound infection, 6.6%; abdominal pain, 2.9%; hematoma, 0.7%). Major complications occurred in 2.2% of the procedures (buried bumper syndrome, 1.5%; early tube displacement, 0.7%). There was no mortality. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory placement of gastrostomy tubes is viable and safe in head and neck cancer patients in good clinical condition. The early complication rates are similar to those described for hospitalized patients. Unnecessary admissions are avoided and costs of hospitalization are reduced.

Short segment Barrett's esophagus and distal gastric intestinal metaplasia.

BACKGROUND: Short segment Barrett's esophagus is defined by the presence of <3 cm of columnar-appearing mucosa in the distal esophagus with intestinal metaplasia on histophatological examination. Barrett's esophagus is a risk factor to develop adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. While Barrett's esophagus develops as a result of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease, intestinal metaplasia in the gastric cardia is a consequence of chronic Helicobacter pylori infection and is associated with distal gastric intestinal metaplasia. It can be difficult to determine whether short-segment columnar epithelium with intestinal metaplasia are lining the esophagus (a condition called short segment Barrett's esophagus) or the proximal stomach (a condition called intestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia). AIMS: To study the association of short segment Barrett's esophagus (length <3 cm) with gastric intestinal metaplasia (antrum or body) and infection by H. pylori. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight-nine patients with short segment columnar-appearing mucosa in the esophagus, length <3 cm, were studied. Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease were recorded. Biopsies were obtained immediately below the squamous-columnar lining, from gastric antrum and gastric corpus for investigation of intestinal metaplasia and H. pylori. RESULTS: Forty-two from 89 (47.2%) patients were diagnosed with esophageal intestinal metaplasia by histopathology. The mean-age was significantly higher in the group with esophageal intestinal metaplasia. The two groups were similar in terms of gender (male: female), gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and H. pylori infection. Gastric intestinal metaplasia (antrum or body) was diagnosed in 21 from 42 (50.0%) patients in the group with esophageal intestinal metaplasia and 7 from 47 (14.9%) patients in the group with esophageal columnar appearing mucosa but without intestinal metaplasia. CONCLUSION: Intestinal metaplasia is a frequent finding in patients with <3 cm of columnar-appearing mucosa in the distal esophagus. In the present study, short segment intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus is associated with distal gastric intestinal metaplasia. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and H. pylori infection did not differ among the two groups studied.

Short segment Barrett's esophagus and distal gastric intestinal metaplasia / Esôfago de Barrett de segmento curto e metaplasia intestinal gástrica distal

BACKGROUND: Short segment Barrett's esophagus is defined by the presence of <3 cm of columnar-appearing mucosa in the distal esophagus with intestinal metaplasia on histophatological examination. Barrett's esophagus is a risk factor to develop adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. While Barrett's esophagus develops as a result of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease, intestinal metaplasia in the gastric cardia is a consequence of chronic Helicobacter pylori infection and is associated with distal gastric intestinal metaplasia. It can be difficult to determine whether short-segment columnar epithelium with intestinal metaplasia are lining the esophagus (a condition called short segment Barrett's esophagus) or the proximal stomach (a condition called intestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia). AIMS: To study the association of short segment Barrett's esophagus (length <3 cm) with gastric intestinal metaplasia (antrum or body) and infection by H. pylori. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight-nine patients with short segment columnar-appearing mucosa in the esophagus, length <3 cm, were studied. Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease were recorded. Biopsies were obtained immediately below the squamous-columnar lining, from gastric antrum and gastric corpus for investigation of intestinal metaplasia and H. pylori. RESULTS: Forty-two from 89 (47.2 percent) patients were diagnosed with esophageal intestinal metaplasia by histopathology. The mean-age was significantly higher in the group with esophageal intestinal metaplasia. The two groups were similar in terms of gender (male: female), gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and H. pylori infection. Gastric intestinal metaplasia (antrum or body) was diagnosed in 21 from 42 (50.0 percent) patients in the group with esophageal intestinal metaplasia and 7 from 47 (14.9 percent) patients in the group with esophageal columnar appearing mucosa but without intestinal metaplasia. CONCLUSION: Intestinal metaplasia is a frequent finding in patients with <3 cm of columnar-appearing mucosa in the distal esophagus. In the present study, short segment intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus is associated with distal gastric intestinal metaplasia. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and H. pylori infection did not differ among the two groups studied.

RACIONAL: Esôfago de Barrett de segmento curto é definido pela presença de mucosa semelhante à gástrica no esôfago distal, extensão <3 cm, com metaplasia intestinal na histopatologia. Esôfago de Barrett é fator de risco ao adenocarcinoma do esôfago. Enquanto esôfago de Barrett se desenvolve como resultado do refluxo gastroesofágico crônico, metaplasia intestinal da cárdia é conseqüência da infecção crônica pelo Helicobacter pylori e está associada à metaplasia gástrica distal. Epitélio colunar com metaplasia intestinal localizada no esôfago distal, extensão <3 cm (condição denominada de esôfago de Barrett de segmento curto) ou a mesma entidade localizada no estômago proximal (condição denominada de metaplasia intestinal da cárdia) por ser muitas vezes confundida. OBJETIVO: Estudar a associação de esôfago de Barrett segmento curto (extensão <3 cm) com metaplasia intestinal gástrica (corpo e antro) e infecção pelo Helicobacter pylori. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Participaram do estudo 89 pacientes com mucosa do esôfago distal semelhante à gástrica, extensão <3 cm. Os pacientes foram questionados sobre sintomas de doença do refluxo gastroesofágico. Biopsias foram obtidas imediatamente abaixo da transição escamocolunar e do corpo e antro gástrico para investigação de metaplasia intestinal e pesquisa de Helicobacter pylori. RESULTADOS: Quarenta e dois dos 89 (47,2 por cento) pacientes foram diagnosticados com metaplasia intestinal esofágica na histopatologia. A idade média foi significativamente mais alta no grupo com metaplasia intestinal esofágica. Nos dois grupos estudados (com e sem metaplasia intestinal de esôfago distal), a relação masculino/feminino, sintomas de doença do refluxo gastroesofágico e infecção pelo Helicobacter pylori foi semelhante. Metaplasia intestinal gástrica (corpo e antro) foi diagnosticada em 21 de 42 (50,0 por cento) dos pacientes com metaplasia intestinal esofágica e 7 de 47 (14,9 por cento) do grupo com mucosa colunar esofágica, mas sem evidência de metaplasia intestinal. CONCLUSÃO: Metaplasia intestinal é achado freqüente em pacientes com mucosa semelhante à gástrica no esôfago distal, extensão <3 cm. No presente estudo, metaplasia intestinal de segmento curto no esôfago está associada à metaplasia gástrica distal. A freqüência de sintomas de refluxo gastroesofágico e infecção pelo Helicobacter pylori não mostrou diferenças significativas nos dois grupos estudados.

Glomerulonefreite membranoproliferativa em pacientes com infecção pelo vírus da hepatite C: relato de três casos / Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection: report of three cases

A infecção por vírus da hepatite C (VHC) está associada com várias manifestações extra-hepáticas. O comprometimento renal mais frequente é a glomerulonefrite membranoproliferativa (GNMP) associada ou não à crioglobulinemia. São relatados três casos de GNMP em pacientes com infecção pelo VHC, com revisão de literatura. Em dois casos, os pacientes apresentaram diagnóstico de síndrome nefrótica e biópsia renal com evidência de GNMP. Na investigação detectou-se anti-VHC positivo, com presença de crioglobulinas e fator reumatóide positivo. Um dos pacientes recebeu terapia com interferon alfa associado à ribavirina, porém, houve suspensão das drogas devido aos efeitos colaterais; o outro paciente fez uso de interferon alfa isoladamente devido à insuficiência renal, sem resposta final do tratamento. Ambos evoluíram com doença reanl terminal, necessitando hemodiálise. O terceiro caso refere-se a um paciente com anti-HIV e anti-VHC positivos, com síndrome nefrótica e biópsia renal com GNMP. Não havia presença de crioglobulinas e fator reumatóide era negativo. O paciente fez tratamento com interferom alfa associado à ribavirina, com resposta ao final do tratamento e normalização da função renal.