Acute Kidney Injury Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Incidence, Aetiology, Risk Factors and Outcomes.

We investigated the predictors, aetiology and long-term outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) following urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Acute kidney injury occurred in 198 (7.2%) of 2917 patients: 14.1% of AKI cases were attributed to cardiogenic shock and 5.1% were classified as atheroembolic renal disease (AERD). Significant risk factors for AKI included age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% confidence limits [CI] 1.03-1.06), diabetes (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.20-2.47), hypertension (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.03-2.00), heart failure (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.58-5.57), femoral access (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03-2.15), cardiogenic shock (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.19-3.37) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.80-5.47). One-year mortality after AERD was 44.4% and renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement 22.2% (compared with mortality 33.3% and RRT requirement 7.4%, respectively, in all other AKI patients). Mortality at 1 year was associated with AKI (OR 4.33, 95% CI 2.89-6.43), age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.09), heart failure (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.05-3.44), femoral access (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.41-2.95) and cardiogenic shock (OR 3.63, 95% CI 2.26-5.77). Acute kidney injury after urgent PCI is strongly associated with worse outcomes. Atheroembolic renal disease has a poor outcome and a high likelihood of long-term RRT requirement.

NIMO-CKD-UK: a real-world, observational study of iron isomaltoside in patients with iron deficiency anaemia and chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous iron is often used to treat iron deficiency anaemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD), but the optimal dosing regimen remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of high- versus low-dose intravenous iron isomaltoside on the probability of retreatment with intravenous iron in iron-deficient ND-CKD patients. METHODS: This real-world, prospective, observational study collected data from 256 ND-CKD patients treated for anaemia in the UK. Following an initial course of iron isomaltoside, patients were followed for ≥12 months. Iron dose and the need for retreatment were determined at the investigators' discretion. The primary study outcome was the need for retreatment at 52 weeks compared between patients who received >1000 mg of iron during Course 1 and those who received ≤1000 mg. Safety was evaluated through adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: The probability of retreatment at Week 52 was significantly lower in the >1000 mg iron group (n = 58) versus the ≤1000 mg group (n = 198); hazard ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]): 0.46 (0.20, 0.91); p = 0.012. Mean (95% CI) haemoglobin increased by 6.58 (4.94, 8.21) g/L in the ≤1000 mg group and by 10.59 (7.52, 13.66) g/L in the >1000 mg group (p = 0.024). Changes in other blood and iron parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. Administering >1000 mg of iron isomaltoside saved 8.6 appointments per 100 patients compared to ≤1000 mg. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. Of the patients who received ≤1000 mg of iron in this study, 82.3% were eligible for a dose >1000 mg. CONCLUSIONS: The >1000 mg iron isomaltoside regimen reduced the probability of retreatment, achieved a greater haemoglobin response irrespective of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment, and reduced the total number of appointments required, compared to the ≤1000 mg regimen. Many of the patients who received ≤1000 mg of iron were eligible for >1000 mg, indicating that there was considerable underdosing in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02546154 , 10 September 2015.

A prospective observational study of iron isomaltoside in haemodialysis patients with chronic kidney disease treated for iron deficiency (DINO).

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency is frequent in haemodialysis (HD) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and intravenous iron is an established therapy for these patients. This study assessed treatment routine, effectiveness, and safety of iron isomaltoside (IIM) 5% (Diafer®) in a HD cohort. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 198 HD patients converted from iron sucrose (IS) and treated with IIM according to product label and clinical routine. Data for IIM were compared to historic data for IS in 3-month intervals. The primary endpoint was to show non-inferiority for IIM versus IS in haemoglobin (Hb) maintenance. RESULTS: Most patients (> 60%) followed a fixed low-dose iron treatment protocol. Three minutes were required for preparation and administration of IIM. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) was used in > 80% of patients during both IIM and IS phases. The maintenance of Hb was similar with both iron drugs; the mean Hb level was 11 g/dL, and the mean change of 0.3 g/dL (95% confidence interval: 0.1, 0.5) for IIM 0-3 months compared to IS demonstrated non-inferiority. Nine adverse drug reactions were reported in 2% of patients administered IIM. All patients had uneventful recoveries. The frequency of metallic taste was higher with IS compared to IIM (34% versus 0.5%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: IIM is effective and well tolerated by CKD patients on HD. IIM was non-inferior to IS in maintenance of Hb, and had similar ESA requirements. The fast-push injection of IIM may enable logistical benefits in clinical practice, and the low frequency of metallic taste contributes to patient convenience. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02301026, study registered November 25, 2014.

Renal association clinical practice guideline on Anaemia of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Anaemia is a commonly diagnosed complication among patients suffering with chronic kidney disease. If left untreated, it may affect patient quality of life. There are several causes for anaemia in this patient population. As the kidney function deteriorates, together with medications and dietary restrictions, patients may develop iron deficiency, resulting in reduction of iron supply to the bone marrow (which is the body organ responsible for the production of different blood elements). Chronic kidney disease patients may not be able to utilise their own body's iron stores effectively and hence, many patients, particularly those receiving haemodialysis, may require additional iron treatment, usually provided by infusion.With further weakening of kidney function, patients with chronic kidney disease may need additional treatment with a substance called erythropoietin which drives the bone marrow to produce its own blood. This substance, which is naturally produced by the kidneys, becomes relatively deficient in patients with chronic kidney disease. Any patients will eventually require treatment with erythropoietin or similar products that are given by injection.Over the last few years, several iron and erythropoietin products have been licensed for treating anaemia in chronic kidney disease patients. In addition, several publications discussed the benefits of each treatment and possible risks associated with long term treatment. The current guidelines provide advice to health care professionals on how to screen chronic kidney disease patients for anaemia, which patients to investigate for other causes of anaemia, when and how to treat patients with different medications, how to ensure safe prescribing of treatment and how to diagnose and manage complications associated with anaemia and the drugs used for its treatment.

Diagnosis and Management of Iron Deficiency in CKD: A Summary of the NICE Guideline Recommendations and Their Rationale.

The UK-based National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has updated its guidance on iron deficiency and anemia management in chronic kidney disease. This report outlines the recommendations regarding iron deficiency and their rationale. Serum ferritin alone or transferrin saturation alone are no longer recommended as diagnostic tests to assess iron deficiency. Red blood cell markers (percentage hypochromic red blood cells, reticulocyte hemoglobin content, or reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent) are better than ferritin level alone at predicting responsiveness to intravenous iron. When red blood cell markers are not available, a combination of transferrin saturation < 20% and ferritin level < 100ng/mL is an alternative. In comparisons of the cost-effectiveness of different iron status testing and treatment strategies, using percentage hypochromic red blood cells > 6% was the most cost-effective strategy for both hemodialysis and nonhemodialysis patients. A trial of oral iron replacement is recommended in people not receiving an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) and not on hemodialysis therapy. For children receiving ESAs, but not treated by hemodialysis, oral iron should be considered. In adults and children receiving ESAs and/or on hemodialysis therapy, intravenous iron should be offered. When giving intravenous iron, high-dose low-frequency administration is recommended. For all children and for adults receiving in-center hemodialysis, low-dose high-frequency administration may be more appropriate.

Epoetin biosimilars in Europe: five years on.

Biosimilars have been developed for several biologic therapeutic agents, including erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). However, biosimilars cannot be assumed to be completely identical to the reference product, nor can two different biosimilars of the same reference product be considered equivalent. Accordingly, standards for approving biosimilars are distinct from those for generic versions of conventional pharmaceuticals.By late 2007, two biosimilar epoetins (HX575 and SB309) had been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), following a series of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence studies, as well as phase 3 clinical comparability evaluations. Additionally, the results of a limited number of postauthorization interventional or observational studies and quality comparisons were published subsequently on both products.The reported differences in glycosylation profiles between these epoetin biosimilars and their reference product, as well as the lack of long-term safety and efficacy evaluation, could indicate a need to develop a more comprehensive analysis of the available data, and to evaluate the post-authorization real-life data, in order to gain a better understanding of any potential implications of molecular structural or formulation differences on longterm safety and effectiveness.Switching between an original reference ESA and a biosimilar (and possibly also switching between biosimilar versions of the same product) should be regarded as a change in clinical management. Clinicians need to be fully involved in such decisions. Prescribing by brand name will prevent unintentional substitution by pharmacists and allow for effective pharmacovigilance, in accordance with recent EU directives. In this review, the authors have analyzed most of the published information on the two epoetin biosimilars, HX575 and SB309, to highlight the points that healthcare providers may need to consider when assessing an epoetin biosimilar.

Profile of peginesatide and its potential for the treatment of anemia in adults with chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis.

Peginesatide is a synthetic, dimeric peptide that is covalently linked to polyethylene glycol (PEG). The amino acid sequence of peginesatide is unrelated to that of erythropoietin (EPO) and is not immunologically cross-reactive with EPO. Peginesatide binds to and activates the human EPO receptor, stimulating the proliferation and differentiation of human red cell precursors in vitro in a manner similar to other EPO-stimulating agents (ESAs). In Phase II and III studies in dialysis and predialysis patients, peginesatide administered once monthly was as effective as epoetin alfa given thrice weekly (dialysis patients) or darbepoetin given once weekly (nondialysis patients), in correcting anemia of chronic kidney disease as well as maintaining hemoglobin within the desired target range. In the dialysis population, the reported side-effect profile of peginesatide was comparable to that known with other marketed ESAs. In the nondialysis studies, compared with those treated with darbepoetin, patients treated with peginesatide experienced a higher adverse-effect profile. Peginesatide is likely to be licensed for treatment of renal anemia in dialysis patients and not in nondialysis patients. Despite this limitation, peginesatide is likely to prove valuable in treating dialysis patients because of its infrequent mode of administration, thereby allowing for a reduced number of injections, with associated better compliance, reduced cold storage requirement, and improved stock accountability. PEGylated therapeutic proteins can elicit immunological response to the PEG moiety of the therapeutic complex. Only long-term experience and post-marketing surveillance will address whether this immunological response will have any impact on the clinical efficacy or safety of peginesatide in clinical practice.

Dose-finding study of peginesatide for anemia correction in chronic kidney disease patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peginesatide is a synthetic, PEGylated, investigational, peptide-based erythropoiesis-stimulating agent. We report the first assessment of its efficacy and safety in correcting renal anemia in a population of 139 nondialysis chronic kidney disease patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Chronic kidney disease patients who were not on dialysis and not receiving treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the 12 weeks before study drug administration were sequentially assigned to one of 10 cohorts; cohorts differed in starting peginesatide dose (different body weight-based or absolute doses), route of administration (intravenous or subcutaneous), and frequency of administration (every 4 or 2 weeks). RESULTS: Across all cohorts, 96% of patients achieved a hemoglobin response. A dose-response relationship was evident for hemoglobin increase. Comparable subcutaneous and intravenous peginesatide doses produced similar hemoglobin responses. Rapid rates of hemoglobin rise and hemoglobin excursions >13 g/dl tended to occur more frequently with every-2-weeks dosing than they did with every-4-weeks dosing. The range of final median doses in the every-4-weeks dosing groups was 0.019 to 0.043 mg/kg. Across all cohorts, 20% of patients reported serious adverse events (one patient had a possibly drug-related serious event) and 81% reported adverse events (11.5% reported possibly drug-related events); these events were consistent with those routinely observed in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that peginesatide administered every 4 weeks can increase and maintain hemoglobin in nondialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Additional long-term data in larger groups of patients are required to further elucidate the efficacy and safety of this peptide-based erythropoiesis-stimulating agent.

Prevalence and management of anaemia in renal transplant recipients: data from ten European centres.

BACKGROUND: Although it is a known predictor of mortality, there is a relative lack of recent information about anaemia in kidney transplant recipients. Thus, we now report data about the prevalence and management of post-transplant anaemia (PTA) in Europe 5 years after the TRansplant European Survey on Anemia Management (TRESAM) study. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study enrolling the largest number of patients to date, data were obtained from 5,834 patients followed at 10 outpatient transplant clinics in four European countries using the American Society of Transplantation anaemia guideline. RESULTS: More than one third (42%) of the patients were anaemic. The haemoglobin (Hb) concentration was significantly correlated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r = 0.4, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, eGFR, serum ferritin, age, gender, time since transplantation and centres were independently and significantly associated with Hb. Only 24% of the patients who had a Hb concentration <110 g/l were treated with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent. The prevalence of anaemia and also the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents were significantly different across the different centres, suggesting substantial practice variations. CONCLUSIONS: PTA is still common and under-treated. The prevalence and management of PTA have not changed substantially since the TRESAM survey.

An unusual cause of hypertension and renal failure: a case series of a family with Alagille syndrome.

Alagille Syndrome (OMIM 118450) is a multisystem developmental disorder inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with variable expression. It commonly manifests in children with early cholestatic jaundice due to paucity of interlobular biliary ducts. Renal involvement is less common but can take various forms including renovascular disease, renal agenesis or hypoplasia, cystic renal disease, mesangiolipidosis, tubulointerstitial nephritis and renal tubular acidosis. We describe a family of Alagille syndrome with JAG 1 mutation running through at least two generations, affecting four members with variable phenotypic expressions and disease severity. Alagille syndrome should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adults with renovascular disease and children with agenesis/dysgenesis of kidney and reflux nephropathy even in the absence of hepatic disease. Renal transplant can be successful in these patients although living related donation may not be appropriate given the high penetrance and variable expression of this condition. This syndrome may cause symptomatic bradyarrhythmias as described in our series.

Stimulating erythropoiesis: future perspectives.

The introduction of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) nearly 20 years ago has revolutionised the management of patients with CKD, providing the opportunity for safe long-term anaemia correction without the attendant risks identified with blood products. Based on our expanding knowledge in this area, there are many exciting and innovative new approaches to anaemia correction that stand on, or are close to, the threshold of yielding products ready for clinical use. Recently, an Epo-related molecule called continuous Epo receptor activator has been licensed in Europe, and other molecules are in various processes of development, including Epo mimetic peptide. The search goes on for orally active antianaemic therapies, and several strategies are being investigated. Furthermore, it is now clear that in addition to the anaemia-correction properties of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, there is the potential for cytoprotection by prevention of cellular apoptosis. This effect could be used in the prevention of ischaemia-reperfusion injury as well as other conditions associated with acute kidney injury and other disease processes. The aim of this article is to discuss these possible future strategies, focusing in particular on those with a reasonable likelihood of a pharmaceutical product that is likely to be used clinically.

Biosimilars: opportunity or cause for concern?

Biopharmaceuticals are drug products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substances, and have revolutionised the treatment of many diseases. A number of biopharmaceutical patents are due to expire in the next few years, or have already expired. The subsequent production of follow-on products, or 'biosimilars' has aroused interest within the pharmaceutical industry as biosimilar manufacturers strive to obtain part of an already large and rapidly-growing market. The potential opportunity for price reductions versus the originator biopharmaceuticals remains to be determined, as the advantage of a slightly cheaper price may be outweighed by the hypothetical increased risk of side-effects from biosimilar molecules that are not exact copies of their originators. This review focuses on the issues surrounding biosimilars, including manufacturing, quality control, clinical efficacy and side effects, and how government and industry regulations are evolving to deal with these topics.

Anemia after renal transplantation.

Anemia in the setting of chronic kidney disease is a well-recognized phenomenon that is associated with decreasing renal function and deficiency of or resistance to erythropoietin. However, anemia in the post-renal transplantation setting has received comparatively less attention in the literature. In this review, we aim critically to appraise the available literature regarding posttransplantation anemia, concentrating in particular on the prevalence of posttransplantation anemia, its etiopathogenesis, potential effects on morbidity and mortality, and the rationale for intervention and treatment. Despite deficiencies in the literature, we conclude that posttransplantation anemia is a common phenomenon that can occur either early or late posttransplantation, and its causation is usually multifactorial and includes contributions notably from poor or decreasing renal function, immunosuppression, and iron deficiency. Conversely, there is a shortage of well-conducted prospective studies looking at the morbidity attributable to posttransplantation anemia and a lack of trial evidence to determine whether intervention improves patient morbidity and outcome.

European regulatory guidelines for biosimilars.

The impending arrival en masse of biosimilars on Western markets is placing drug regulatory agencies under pressure to realign their policies. Biosimilars require more rigorous assessments than traditional chemical generics. This is because of the molecular complexity of recombinant proteins, and the complexity of biological manufacturing processes. Small differences can arise in a recombinant protein product which are hard or impossible to detect with even state-of-the-art analytical techniques. Yet, these differences can have significant impact on the safety and efficacy of the drug. The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) has taken the lead in issuing guidelines, most of which are still under review. The guidelines advocate pre-clinical and clinical testing of biosimilars prior to market authorization, complemented by tailored pharmacovigilance plans. These guidelines provide a valuable base from which to develop in this evolving regulatory environment.

Impact of pre-transplant anaemia correction and erythropoietin resistance on long-term graft survival.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO)-hyporesponsive anaemia before transplantation is associated with a poorer graft outcome and lower patient survival. METHODS: A total of 15,051 kidney transplant recipients, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, were stratified as either rHuEPO hyporesponsive or rHuEPO responsive (using a threshold rHuEPO-treated haemoglobin level of 11 g/dl). They were followed for a median of 24 months. Outcomes included times from transplantation to graft failure (including patient death), return to dialysis or pre-emptive re-transplantation, and death with a functioning graft. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of graft failure was 50% for rHuEPO-hyporesponsive patients, compared with 41.7% for rHuEPO responders (P = 0.0091). Among rHuEPO-hyporesponsive patients, 41.7% returned to dialysis or underwent a pre-emptive re-transplantation, compared with 32% of rHuEPO responders (P = 0.0091). Death with a functioning graft occurred in 16.9% of rHuEPO-hyporesponsive and in 15% of rHuEPO-responsive patients (P = 0.3949). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed higher mortality and higher incidence of graft failure at 5 years for rHuEPO-hyporesponsive patients. It is unclear whether anaemia treatment per se or treatment of more severe co-morbidity resulting in hyporesponsiveness to anaemia treatment may be causally linked to reduced renal transplant outcomes.