Search for autoantibodies against the HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope in the human eye in intermediate uveitis.

PURPOSE: Molecules bearing the immunogenic HNK-1 epitope are present in the inner connective tissue layer and epithelia of the ciliary body. We investigated whether autoantibodies to these molecules can be detected in patients with intermediate uveitis, which affects the ciliary body. METHODS: Serum was collected from 9 patients with intermediate uveitis, and from 6 controls with idiopathic iritis and 3 controls with sarcoid uveitis, representing nongranulomatous and granulomatous uveitis, respectively. The sera were used as polyclonal antibodies to immunostain 3 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded normal human donor eyes by the avidin-biotinylated peroxidase complex method. RESULTS: No immunostaining in the ciliary body could be detected using the sera from patients with intermediate uveitis or from the controls. Serum within blood vessels was nonspecifically immunolabelled with the secondary anti-human anti-serum. CONCLUSION: No autoantibodies against the HNK-1 epitope or other antigens of the ciliary body could be demonstrated in patients with intermediate uveitis. It is unlikely that such autoantibodies against the HNK-1 epitope have a role in intermediate uveitis.

The expanding clinical spectrum of ocular lyme borreliosis.

OBJECTIVE: To delineate the clinical manifestations of ocular Lyme borreliosis, while concentrating on new symptoms and findings and the phase of appearance of ophthalmologic disorders. DESIGN: Observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients with Lyme borreliosis-associated ophthalmologic findings previously reported from the Helsinki University Central Hospital in addition to 10 new cases that have since been diagnosed. INTERVENTION/TESTING: The patients underwent medical and ophthalmologic evaluation. The diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis was based on medical history, clinical ocular and systemic findings, determinations of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot analysis, the detection of DNA of B. burgdorferi by polymerase chain reaction, and exclusion of other infectious and inflammatory causes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ocular complaints, presenting ophthalmologic findings, and the stage of Lyme borreliosis were recorded. RESULTS: Four patients presented with a neuro-ophthalmologic disorder, five had external ocular inflammation, 10 patients had uveitis, and one had branch retinal vein occlusion. One patient developed episcleritis and one patient developed abducens palsy within 2 months of the infection incident. In the remaining 14 patients in whom the time of infection was traced, the ocular manifestations appeared in the late stage of Lyme borreliosis. Two patients with a neuro-ophthalmologic disorder and one with external ocular inflammation experienced severe photophobia, whereas the main reported symptom of the patients with uveitis was decreased visual acuity. Four patients with external ocular disease and one with a neuro-ophthalmologic disorder experienced severe periodic ocular or facial pain. Retinal vasculitis developed in seven patients with uveitis. CONCLUSIONS: Lyme borreliosis can cause a variety of ocular manifestations, which develop mainly in the late stage of the disease. Photophobia and severe periodic ocular pain can be characteristic symptoms of Lyme borreliosis. In the differential diagnosis of retinal vasculitis, Lyme borreliosis should be taken into account, especially in endemic areas.

The laboratory diagnosis of ocular Lyme borreliosis.

BACKGROUND: A study was carried out to evaluate indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunoblot analysis, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the diagnostic work-up of ocular Lyme borreliosis. METHODS: Twenty patients with ocular Lyme borreliosis were examined. IgG and IgM antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi were measured by ELISA in serum, and in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) when indicated, and immunoblot analysis of B. burgdorferi IgG antibodies in serum was performed. A nested PCR was used to detect a segment of a gene coding for B. burgdorferi endoflagellin. The samples used in PCR testing were serum and CSF and in isolated cases conjunctiva and vitreous. RESULTS: Seventeen patients had elevated Borrelia antibodies in serum or CSF by ELISA. Seven patients, including two with negative ELISA, had a positive immunoblot. Seven of the 13 patients in whom PCR was examined during clinically active disease had a positive PCR result. Immunoblot analysis gave a negative result from the sera of five PCR-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: For efficient diagnosis of ocular Lyme borreliosis, immunoblot analysis and PCR should be used in addition to ELISA. A positive PCR seems to be associated with a negative immunoblot.

The significance of serum anti-Borrelia antibodies in the diagnostic work-up of uveitis.

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of testing uveitis patients for anti-Borrelia antibodies in an area endemic for Lyme borreliosis. METHODS: We examined 161 uveitis patients for serum antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi by Lyme ELISA. Antibodies were determined in patients with uveitis of unknown etiology and non-selectively from patients with an established diagnosis. RESULTS: Concentrations of antibodies to B. burgdorferi were elevated in 26 uveitis patients (16.1%), with elevated IgG in 11 of them (6.8%). In four of these patients Lyme borreliosis was a highly suggestive cause of uveitis because of a history of tick bites, systemic symptoms, response to antibiotic therapy, and/or a positive polymerase chain reaction result. Other causes of uveitis were ruled out. All these patients had vitritis. CONCLUSIONS: Non-selective testing of uveitis patients for Lyme antibodies is not reasonable even in endemic areas. We recommend using the Borrelia antibody test only in cases of uveitis of unknown cause, especially in patients with vitritis or other symptoms of Lyme borreliosis.

The etiology of uveitis: the role of infections with special reference to Lyme borreliosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the distribution of different uveitis entities and to evaluate their associations with infections, especially Lyme borreliosis. METHODS: During a one-year period 160 consecutive uveitis patients were evaluated in a university clinic. Selected tests were performed depending on the medical history of the patient and the clinical picture of the ocular inflammation. RESULTS: Uveitis was classified into selected entities for 74.4% of the patients. A direct infection was suggested to be linked with uveitis in 23 patients (14.4%). Lyme borreliosis, toxoplasmosis, and herpetic infections were the most frequently seen, in seven patients (4.3%) each. All patients with Lyme uveitis had manifestations of the posterior segment of the eye, such as vitritis, retinal vasculitis, neuroretinitis, chorioretinitis, or optic neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Infections are an important cause of uveitis in a university clinic. Lyme borreliosis is a newly recognised uveitis entity which should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of intermediate or posterior uveitis in areas endemic for Lyme borreliosis.

Ocular manifestations and treatment of Lyme disease.

Ocular manifestations in Lyme disease have been considered rare. In surveys and epidemiologic studies the possibility of ocular Lyme disease has usually not been taken into account. Patients with late ocular. Lyme disease may be seronegative by routine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, but immunoblot or detection of Borrelia DNA by polymerase chain reaction may help in diagnosing those cases. An ophthalmologist may suspect the diagnosis of Lyme disease in inflammatory ocular syndromes with unusual biomicroscopic or angiographic findings. Intraocular Lyme disease is usually treated with intravenous ceftriaxone or cefotaxime. Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction may occasionally complicate the antibiotic treatment of ocular manifestations. Overtreatment with ceftriaxone should be avoided because of a possibility of biliary complications.

Long-term follow-up of chronic Lyme neuroretinitis.

PURPOSE: The authors report sequential fluorescein angiographic and color photographic findings of the fundi and response to treatment in a patient with chronic Lyme neuroretinitis. METHODS: A Lyme enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with purified 41-kd flagellin as antigen was used to detect immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and vitreous. The changes were documented by fluorescein angiography and color photography tests performed during a 5 1/2 year follow-up. RESULTS: The diagnosis of Lyme neuroretinitis was based on the history of erythema migrans and positive Lyme enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests from cerebrospinal fluid and vitreous and by the exclusion of other infectious and systemic diseases and uveitis entities. Fluorescein angiography results disclosed bilateral chronic neuroretinal edema with areas of cystoid, patchy, and diffuse hyperfluorescence peripapillary and in the macular areas. The hyperfluorescent lesions enlarged despite a 9-month period of antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Lyme borreliosis may cause neuroretinitis with unusual angiographic findings. Chronic Lyme neuroretinitis may be unresponsive to antibiotic therapy.

Diagnosis and clinical characteristics of ocular Lyme borreliosis.

PURPOSE: To establish a diagnosis, in a group of patients we studied the characteristics of ocular Lyme borreliosis. METHODS: During a two-year period, 236 patients with prolonged external ocular inflammation, uveitis, retinitis, optic neuritis, or unexplained neuro-ophthalmic symptoms were examined for Lyme borreliosis. Antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi were measured by indirect ELISA and western blot. Cerebrospinal fluid was also analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Ocular Lyme borreliosis was diagnosed in ten patients on the basis of medical history, clinical findings, and serologic test results. Results of ELISA disclosed that five patients were seropositive, two patients showed borderline reactivity, and three patients were seronegative. Four of the five patients with borderline or negative results by ELISA had a positive result by western blot analysis. In one seropositive patient, polymerase chain reaction verified a gene of B. burgdorferi endoflagellin from the vitreous and cerebrospinal fluid specimen. In five of the six patients with known onset of the Borrelia infection, the ocular disorder appeared as a late manifestation. Abnormalities of the posterior segment of the eye, such as vitreitis, retinal vasculitis, neuroretinitis, choroiditis, and optic neuropathy were seen in six patients. Bilateral paralytic mydriasis, interstitial keratitis, episcleritis, and anterior uveitis were seen in one patient each. CONCLUSIONS: Late-phase ocular Lyme borreliosis is probably underdiagnosed because of weak seropositivity or seronegativity in ELISA assays. Ocular borrelial manifestations show characteristics resembling those seen in syphilis.