Superiority trial for the development of an ideal method for the closure of midline abdominal wall incisions to reduce the incidence of wound complications after elective gastroenterological surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The recent guidelines from the European and American Hernia Societies recommend a continuous small-bite suturing technique with slowly absorbable sutures for fascial closure of midline abdominal wall incisions to reduce the incidence of wound complications, especially for incisional hernia. However, this is based on low-certainty evidence. We could not find any recommendations for skin closure. The wound closure technique is an important determinant of the risk of wound complications, and a comprehensive approach to prevent wound complications should be developed. METHODS: We propose a single-institute, prospective, randomized, blinded-endpoint trial to assess the superiority of the combination of continuous suturing of the fascia without peritoneal closure and continuous suturing of the subcuticular tissue (study group) over that of interrupted suturing of the fascia together with the peritoneum and interrupted suturing of the subcuticular tissue (control group) for reducing the incidence of midline abdominal wall incision wound complications after elective gastroenterological surgery with a clean-contaminated wound. Permuted-block randomization with an allocation ratio of 1:1 and blocking will be used. We hypothesize that the study group will show a 50% reduction in the incidence of wound complications. The target number of cases is set at 284. The primary outcome is the incidence of wound complications, including incisional surgical site infection, hemorrhage, seroma, wound dehiscence within 30 days after surgery, and incisional hernia at approximately 1 year after surgery. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide initial evidence on the ideal combination of fascial and skin closure for midline abdominal wall incision to reduce the incidence of overall postoperative wound complications after gastroenterological surgery with a clean-contaminated wound. This trial is expected to generate high-quality evidence that supports the current guidelines for the closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies and to contribute to their next updates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR UMIN000048442. Registered on 1 August 2022. https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000055205.

A postoperative body weight increase is a novel risk factor for incisional hernia of midline abdominal incision after elective gastroenterological surgery.

PURPOSE: Midline abdominal incisions (MAIs) are widely used in both open and minimally invasive surgery. Incisional hernia (IH) accounts for most long-term postoperative wound complications. This study explored the risk factors for IH due to MAI in patients with clean-contaminated wounds after elective gastroenterological surgery. METHODS: The present study targeted patients enrolled in 2 randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative interventions for incisional SSI prevention after gastroenterological surgery for clean-contaminated wounds. The patients were reassessed, and pre- and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were collected. IH was defined as any abdominal wall gap, regardless of bulge, in the area of a postoperative scar that was perceptible or palpable on clinical examination or computed tomography according to the European Hernia Society guidelines. The risk factors for IH were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The study population included 1,281 patients, of whom 273 (21.3%) developed IH. Seventy-four (5.8%) patients developed incisional SSI. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.86, p = 0.031), high preoperative body mass index (OR, 1.81; 95% CI 1.19-2.77, p = 0.006), incisional SSI (OR, 2.29; 95% CI 1.34-3.93, p = 0.003), and postoperative body weight increase (OR, 1.49; 95% CI 1.09-2.04, p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for IH due to MAI in patients who underwent elective gastroenterological surgery. CONCLUSION: We identified postoperative body weight increase at one year as a novel risk factor for IH in patients with MAI after elective gastroenterological surgery.

Update of risk factors for surgical site infection in clean-contaminated wounds after gastroenterological surgery: An analysis of 1,878 participants enrolled in 2 recent randomized control trials for the prevention of surgical site infection.

BACKGROUND: Clean-contaminated wounds should be the main target for reducing the burden of harm caused by surgical site infection after gastroenterological surgery. METHODS: The present study targeted 1,973 patients enrolled in 2 randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative interventions for incisional surgical site infection prevention after gastroenterological surgery with clean-contaminated wounds. Patients were reassessed, and preoperative and postoperative variables were collected. Risk factors for surgical site infection were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The study population included 1,878 patients, among whom 213 (11.3%) developed overall surgical site infection and 119 (6.3%) developed incisional surgical site infection. A multivariate analysis revealed that steroid or immunosuppressant use (odds ratio 3.03; 95% confidence interval 1.37-6.73, P = .0064), open surgery (odds ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.83, P = .0167), and long operative time (odds ratio 2.31; 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.56, P < .001) were independent risk factors for incisional surgical site infection. Steroid or immunosuppressant use (odds ratio 2.62; 95% confidence interval 1.29-5.33, P = .0078), open surgery (odds ratio 2.13; 95% confidence interval 1.44-3.16, P < .001), and long operative time (odds ratio 2.92; 95% confidence interval 2.08-4.10, P < .001) were also independent risk factors for overall surgical site infection in the multivariate analysis. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis revealed that a long operative time (odds ratio 3.21; 95% confidence interval 1.69-6.1, P = .00378) was an independent risk factor for incisional surgical site infection in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. CONCLUSION: Even under current measures for surgical site infection prevention, surgeons should continue to make efforts to appropriately expand the indication of laparoscopic surgery and to reduce operative times even when performing laparoscopic surgery.

Indications and Outcomes of a Hybrid Method Combining Laparoscopic and Anterior Approaches for Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Introduction Surgery for complex inguinal hernia (IH) (recurrent IH or IH after radical prostatectomy (RP)) may be difficult because of the presumed scar or adhesion in the retropubic space. A hybrid method combining the laparoscopic and anterior approaches (HLAA) in a bidirectional surgical technique may be an option in complex IH cases. Methods Patients at our institution who underwent IH repair for complex IH using HLAA from April 2018 to November 2019 were included. We retrospectively evaluated the patient characteristics, IH diagnosis, intraoperative variables, complications, and hernia recurrence during the follow-up period. Results Twenty patients were involved in this study. Seven patients underwent hLAA for recurrent IH, whereas the remaining 13 underwent hLAA for IH after RP. Five patients had bilateral IH, all of whom had IH after RP. The type of IH was lateral in 21 patients, medial in six patients, and lateral and medial in two patients. Hernia repair was performed using a patch alone in two patients and a plug and patch in 18 patients. Seroma or hematoma was observed in five patients, and one patient experienced chronic pain. No hernia recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 24 months. Conclusion hLAA could facilitate precise diagnosis and intraoperative confirmation of repair for recurrent IH and IH after RP. The intraoperative findings and the cause of recurrence can be easily shared among surgeons in hLAA. Further investigations are necessary to determine the long-term efficacy of hLAA in a larger cohort.