Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Infect Dis Ther ; 13(9): 1929-1948, 2024 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995601

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics. METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05-72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16-0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-ß-lactamase producers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.

2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 51(8): 540-544, 2024 Aug 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647240

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Ng) is a public health priority because of the rapid evolution of antimicrobial resistance, the emergence of antibiotic resistance, and the absence of a vaccine against Ng. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in the minimum inhibitory concentration and resistance (R) or reduced susceptibility (DS) of Ng cases to ceftriaxone (CRO), azithromycin (AZM), tetracycline (TET), benzylpenicillin (PenG), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) during a 10-year period. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on an open cohort of Ng cases diagnosed on rectal, urethral, and pharyngeal samples at San Raffaele Scientific Institute, between September 2012 and February 2023. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics were determined by gradient-test strips. Bivariate linear regression models were applied on logarithmic minimum inhibitory concentrations values; Cochran-Armitage test was used to determine a linear trend in the proportions of resistant strains. RESULTS: A total of 436 Ng isolates from 352 individuals were analyzed. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of CRO and PenG reduced over time ( P < 0.001, P = 0.030), AZM increased ( P = 0.001), and CIP and TET did not change ( P = 0.473, P = 0.272). The percentages of resistant strains were as follows: PenG, 89.9%; TET, 90.8%; CIP, 48.2%; AZM, and 4.4%. CRO-DS strains were 8.7%, and only 1 case of CRO-R was identified. The proportion of resistant strains increased over time for AZM ( P = 0.007), TET ( P = 0.001), and CIP ( P < 0.001), whereas it decreased for PenG ( P < 0.001) and CRO-DS/R strains ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ng strains showed high susceptibility to CRO, although we identified cases of DS/R and observed high levels of susceptibility to AZM. Overall, the recommended primary regimen for Ng treatment was confirmed to be effective.


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens , Azithromycine , Gonorrhée , Tests de sensibilité microbienne , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Tétracycline , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/isolement et purification , Humains , Gonorrhée/épidémiologie , Gonorrhée/microbiologie , Gonorrhée/traitement médicamenteux , Études rétrospectives , Antibactériens/pharmacologie , Mâle , Adulte , Femelle , Azithromycine/pharmacologie , Italie/épidémiologie , Tétracycline/pharmacologie , Résistance bactérienne aux médicaments , Ciprofloxacine/pharmacologie , Ceftriaxone/pharmacologie , Urètre/microbiologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Jeune adulte , Benzylpénicilline/pharmacologie , Pharynx/microbiologie , Rectum/microbiologie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE