Crooked Nose: Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes.

Purpose: To highlight a detailed analysis of aesthetic and functional rhinoplasty outcomes utilizing the most recent highly validated Standardized Cosmesis Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for Middle Eastern crooked nose patients. Methods: A longitudinal cohort study scrutinizing preoperative rhinoplasty patients' satisfaction retrospectively and their postoperative outcomes prospectively. The patients fulfilled the Arabic SCHNOS during postoperative follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative responses were recorded and then reviewed and analyzed. Results: This study included 41 patients with a mean age of 27.8 years. Females represented 41.5% of patients. About 73% of patients had a history of trauma. 90% of patients underwent primary procedures for crooked nose correction. Twelve patients (29.3%) underwent surgery for functional reasons, and twenty-six (63.4%) had it for both aesthetic and functional issues. There was a statistically significant difference regarding changes in SCHNOS regarding nasal obstruction scores (SCHNOS-O) and nasal cosmesis scores (SCHNOS-C) (p < 0.001). These findings coincided with a substantial reduction of all SCHNOS items postoperatively (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship between changes in (SCHNOS-O) or (SCHNOS-C) pre-and postoperatively and either age, sex, history of trauma, or type of surgery. However, a statistically significant difference was detected when assessing the relationship between changes in SCHNOS-O and the reason for surgery. Conclusion: A thorough knowledge of three-dimensional pathology and time-associated changes is required to achieve optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes for crooked nose patients. The use of highly validated questionnaires like SCHNOS in clinical practice is highly encouraged to modify and trace surgical techniques to the most appropriate and successful ones for the patients.

Dorsal Preservation Versus Structural Techniques and Their Application.

Structure rhinoplasty and preservation rhinoplasty are 2 popular philosophies that can be used alone or in combination to provide a hybrid approach. Structure rhinoplasty is the leading option for revision rhinoplasty and utilizes cartilage grafting techniques to support and reconstruct the nose. Preservation rhinoplasty spares bone, cartilage, ligaments, and soft tissues to minimize the need for grafting and preserves the favorable features of the nose. Structural preservation rhinoplasty uses dorsal preservation in the upper two-thirds of the nose and structure rhinoplasty in the lower third. This hybrid approach has great utility in primary, revision, and reconstructive rhinoplasty.

Management of the Crooked Nose: Structural, Preservation, or Camouflage Techniques.

The asymmetric nose is challenging for even the most experienced rhinoplasty surgeons. It has often been referred to as the crooked, twisted, and deviated nose and describes any nose that has deviation of the nasal dorsum and pyramid from the facial midline. This article summarizes the senior author's (SPM) approach and application of structural and preservation concepts to correct the underlying causes of the crooked nose.

Evaluation and Management of Lateral Wall Insufficiency.

Successful treatment of nasal airway obstruction depends on accurate diagnosis of the underlying etiology. Lateral wall insufficiency (LWI) is a common cause of obstructed nasal breathing and should be recognized and treated accordingly by the rhinoplasty surgeon. LWI refers to dynamic collapse of the lateral nasal sidewalls at the internal (zone 1) and external (zone 2) nasal valves. This article serves as an overview of the important aspects in evaluation and management of LWI.

Evaluation of Rhinoplasty Information from ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude for Readability and Accuracy.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the readability, accuracy, quality, and completeness of ChatGPT (Open AI, San Francisco, CA), Gemini (Google, Mountain View, CA), and Claude (Anthropic, San Francisco, CA) responses to common questions about rhinoplasty. METHODS: Ten questions commonly encountered in the senior author's (SPM) rhinoplasty practice were presented to ChatGPT-4, Gemini and Claude. Seven Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons with experience in rhinoplasty were asked to evaluate these responses for accuracy, quality, completeness, relevance, and use of medical jargon on a Likert scale. The responses were also evaluated using several readability indices. RESULTS: ChatGPT achieved significantly higher evaluator scores for accuracy, and overall quality but scored significantly lower on completeness compared to Gemini and Claude. All three chatbot responses to the ten questions were rated as neutral to incomplete. All three chatbots were found to use medical jargon and scored at a college reading level for readability scores. CONCLUSIONS: Rhinoplasty surgeons should be aware that the medical information found on chatbot platforms is incomplete and still needs to be scrutinized for accuracy. However, the technology does have potential for use in healthcare education by training it on evidence-based recommendations and improving readability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Surgical complications in combined rhinoplasty and endoscopic sinus surgery.

KEY POINTS: Complications in combined surgery are equivalent to ESS but are higher than rhinoplasty alone. The most common complications are pneumonia, stroke, and epistaxis. Rhinoplasty surgeries with graft use have a higher risk of complications.

Preservation Rhinoplasty by the Ones Who Do It: A Worldwide Survey.

Dorsal preservation (DP) rhinoplasty techniques, including surface techniques (STs) and foundation techniques (FTs) have garnered significant attention internationally over the past few years. The practice patterns and opinions from 117 of these surgeons were surveyed from a cohort of these surgeons who participate in an online Evidence-Based Rhinoplasty Research Group. The findings of the survey are merely a snapshot of the international rhinoplasty community's practices, yet did capture data from surgeons from a diverse geographic, years of experience, and training background. STs were most used for the bone changes, and the high-strip technique was preferred for the cartilaginous septal surgery. STs are mostly performed by younger surgeons (<10 years of experience), whereas FTs were more common in older surgeons (10-30 years of experience). STs were considered more stable (p < 0.001), more predictable (p < 0.001), and associate with a shorter learning curve (p = 0.015). Revision surgery rates were not different. Regarding why many surgeons using DP still perform structural rhinoplasty, the most cited concern was hump persistence/recurrence. In summary, among surgeons using DP rhinoplasty techniques, the majority perform DP in over half of their primary rhinoplasty surgeries, highlighting the importance of updating educational programs in medical training, conferences, and courses.

Rhinoplasty Outcomes in Patients With Symptoms of Body Dysmorphia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with symptoms of body dysmorphia often seek consultation for aesthetic rhinoplasty. While body dysmorphic disorder is a formal psychiatric diagnosis, recent evidence indicates that patients with symptoms of this condition who seek rhinoplasty may experience increased satisfaction with their appearance following surgery. OBJECTIVES: To determine the psychological impact of rhinoplasty in patients screened preoperatively and postoperatively with a body dysmorphia screening questionnaire. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent aesthetic and/or functional rhinoplasty by a single surgeon from June 2021 to April 2023. Adult patients with a complete preoperative and postoperative Body Dysmorphic Disorder-Aesthetic Surgery questionnaire (BDDQ-AS), Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey-Obstruction and Cosmesis (SCHNOS), and visual analog scale (VAS) were included. Patient characteristics and outcomes were analyzed, stratifying by BDDQ-AS screen. RESULTS: One-hundred fifteen patients (88% female) met criteria for inclusion. There was an 83% resolution rate of BDDQ-AS positive screening following rhinoplasty. Positive BDDQ-AS screening status preoperatively and postoperatively correlated with worse aesthetic satisfaction (all P < .002). No patient-reported outcome measures were indicative of which patients with a BDDQ-AS positive screen preoperatively would experience "resolution" postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Body dysmorphia screening resolution following surgical intervention correlated with improved patient aesthetic satisfaction, pointing to a potential positive psychological impact of undergoing rhinoplasty.

Sliding Spine Relocation Surgery with Anterior Septal Reconstruction.

Study Design: Technical note. Objective: The lower nasal architecture is dependent on caudal septal integrity. Deviations of the caudal septum can compromise nasal airflow. The presence of anterior nasal spine deviations contributes to septal and medial crural shifting with ipsilateral encroachment. It is essential to identify nasal spine deviation during surgery in order to reconstruct the septum in a midline position at its base. This allows an appropriate management plan that creates a better functional and aesthetically pleasing outcome. A stable midline anterior nasal spine is warranted to support the newly reconstructed straight caudal strut, which can be effectively corrected by anterior septal reconstruction. Methods: The proposed method intends to combine anterior nasal spine centralization with correcting caudal septal deviation and nasal obstruction through a modified extracorporeal septoplasty technique. We describe a novel technique to centralize the deviated anterior nasal spine using the piezoelectric device by performing a contralateral adjacent ostectomy and en-bloc relocation and fixation of the anterior nasal spine with microplates and screws. Results: This surgical approach creates a stable caudal septum and a centrally positioned anterior nasal spine, which improves nasal airflow and ensures a stable repair. Conclusion: Sliding spine relocation surgery with anterior septal reconstruction repositions a deviated anterior nasal spine and corrects caudal septum deviation, that can impair the nasal airway.

Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey in Japanese (J-SCHNOS).

BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty is one of the most popular plastic surgery techniques. The evaluation of both functional and cosmetic aspects of rhinoplasty is essential for planning and assessing surgery results. The Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) is a validated questionnaire used to assess both functional and aesthetic symptoms in patients with nasal problems, and it has been translated into several languages. The purpose of this study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the SCHNOS in Japanese among patients undergoing rhinoplasty. METHODS: This was a prospective validation study of the Japanese version of the SCHNOS (J-SCHNOS). The first phase involved translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the SCHNOS. The second phase included validation of the J-SCHNOS among native Japanese speakers. RESULTS: In total, 357 participants completed the final version of the J-SCHNOS (219 males and 138 females; mean age 43.4 years). The J-SCHNOS showed high internal consistency with excellent Cronbach's alpha values for both obstruction (SCHNOS-O) (0.96) and cosmetic (SCHNOS-C) (0.93) domains. The reproducibility was high, with an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.9 for all items. Exploratory factor analysis showed unidimensional structures in both the SCHNOS-O and the SCHNOS-C. CONCLUSION: The J-SCHNOS is a reliable and valid tool to assess the severity of nasal problems in patients undergoing rhinoplasty.

Comparison of Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes Between Dorsal Preservation and Spreader Flap Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Preservation rhinoplasty is a novel and increasingly utilized method in nasal plastic surgery. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the functional and aesthetic outcomes of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty, a new and interesting method, with conventional hump resection. METHODS: A total of 84 rhinoplasty applicants were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The first group underwent convention dorsal hump resection with spreader flap midvault reconstruction and the second group underwent dorsal preservation rhinoplasty with the modified subdorsal strip method. Aesthetic and functional outcomes, including residual hump, nasal width, projection, and rotation, were evaluated after 1 year with the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS), visual analog scale (VAS), and image analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients with a mean age of 30.96 ± 6.75 years were recruited, of whom 15 (17.6%) were male. There were no significant differences in confounding variables between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in residual hump (P = .11), nasal width (P = .37), projection (P = .70), rotation (P = .79), VAS (P = .81), or SCHNOS (P = .90) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dorsal preservation rhinoplasty with the modified subdorsal strip method may have comparable aesthetic and functional outcomes to spreader flaps midvault reconstruction.

Gaze Patterns of Normal and Microtia Ears Pre- and Post-Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: To understand attentional preferences for normal and microtia ears. METHODS: Eye-tracking technology was used to characterize gaze preferences. A total of 71 participants viewed images of 5 patients with unilateral microtia. Profile images of patient faces and isolated ears including normal, microtia, and post-reconstruction microtia ears were shown. Total time of fixation in predefined areas of interest (AOI) was measured. Inferential statistics were used to assess significance of fixation differences between AOIs within and between facial or auricular features. RESULTS: The ear received most visual attention in lateral view of the face (1.91 s, 1.66-2.16 s) [mean, 95% CI], followed by features of the "central triangle"-the eyes (1.26 s, 1.06-1.46), nose (0.48 s, 0.38-0.58), and mouth (0.15 s, 0.15-0.20). In frontal view, microtia ears received less attention following surgical reconstruction (0.74 s vs. 0.4 s, p < 0.001). The concha was the most attended feature for both normal (2.97 s, 2.7-3.23) and reconstructed microtia ears (1.87 s, 1.61-2.13). Scars on reconstructed ears altered the typical visual scanpath. CONCLUSION: The ear is an attentional gaze landmark of the face. Attention to microtia ears, both pre- and post-reconstruction, differs from gaze patterns of normal ears. The concha was the most attended to subunit of the ear. Attentional gaze may provide an unbiased method to determine what is important in reconstructive surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 134:3136-3142, 2024.

Telehealth Usage in Otolaryngology: A Comparative Study Pre- and Post-COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased telehealth utilization in outpatient otolaryngology settings. While other studies on telehealth usage in otolaryngology settings have focused on demographic disparities during the pandemic, none have yet assessed how these demographic disparities have evolved from before versus after the pandemic. This study examines 4 recent consecutive years of demographic and clinical data from a large hospital system to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic has changed demographic patterns in telehealth utilization. We demonstrate substantial increases in the number of otolaryngology patients participating in telehealth since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic but with no differences in patient distributions by race or ethnicity over time. We also found that telehealth patients, on average, were younger, more likely to be English-speaking, and more likely to be female. While these disparities widened slightly after the start of the pandemic, they were also present prior to the pandemic.

Patient Outcomes in Lateral Crural Repositioning and Reconstruction in Revision Rhinoplasty.

Background: In revision rhinoplasty, lateral crural repositioning/reconstruction is considered a complex maneuver. The aim of this study is to measure patient outcomes after lateral crural repositioning/reconstruction in revision rhinoplasty. Methods: In this retrospective case series, patients who underwent revision rhinoplasty with lateral crural repositioning/reconstruction for functional, cosmetic, or combined purposes were reviewed. Preoperative Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) scores, functional and cosmetic visual analog scales (VAS-functional [F] and VAS-cosmetic [C]), and lateral wall insufficiency (LWI) grades were compared with their respective postoperative scores. Results: Forty-two patients were identified who underwent lateral crural repositioning. The mean postoperative follow-up for ≤6 months (PO1) and >6 months (PO2) was 3.1 (standard deviation [SD] 1.7) and 11.5 (SD 5.3) months, respectively. At both postoperative periods, significant improvement (p < 0.05) in patient-reported outcomes was observed in mean SCHNOS-Obstruction, SCHNOS-Cosmesis, VAS-F, and VAS-C scores. The postoperative changes in LWI scores (Δ) were significant on both sides at zone 1 at PO1 (p < 0.05) and PO2 (p < 0.05), and at PO2 on the left side (p < 0.05) only, for zone 2. Conclusion: Lateral crural repositioning with reconstruction is an effective maneuver in revision rhinoplasty in a subset of patients and specifically helps to improve nasal tip aesthetics while preserving function.

Outcomes of Diced Cartilage Dorsal Augmentation in Dorsal Aesthetic Deformities.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of diced cartilage graft for dorsal augmentation in rhinoplasty. Methods: In a retrospective study, patients who underwent rhinoplasty with dorsal augmentation using diced cartilage graft from June 2017 to December 2021 were identified. Patients with complete preoperative and at least one postoperative Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey-Cosmesis (SCHNOS-C) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were included in the study. Postoperative periods were classified into ≤6 and >6 months. Mean preoperative outcome scores were compared with postoperative scores utilizing a Paired t-test, and postoperative scores were compared utilizing a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: A total of 71 patients with a median age of 36 years, range (18-74) fit inclusion criteria. Majority were female patients 49 (69%). The postoperative period ranged from 17 days to 3.5 years. The mean follow-up period (standard deviation) for ≤6 and >6 months was 2.8 (1.5) and 14.2 (6.3) months, respectively. A decrease in mean SCHNOS-C, SCHNOS item 8, and an increase in VAS scores (p < 0.0001) were seen at both postoperative time periods compared with preoperative levels. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that dorsal augmentation with diced cartilage graft is an effective technique in correcting dorsal aesthetic deformities.

Prevalence and Characteristics Associated with Positive Body Dysmorphic Disorder Screening Among Patients Presenting for Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery.

Background: Many patients with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) seek out cosmetic surgery to alleviate their symptoms of distress related to a perceived defect in their appearance; however, the prevalence and risk factors for BDD among patients with cosmetic concerns have not been well characterized. Methods: We screened adult patients presenting to the clinic from June 2021 through September 2022 for BDD using the BDD Questionnaire-Aesthetic Surgery (BDDQ-AS) who were seen in consultation for rhinoplasty, aging face, and injectables. Results: Among 488 patients, the prevalence of screening positive for BDD was 41.0%. The prevalence of a positive BDD screen was highest among patients who were younger (p = 0.02), and those who had a positive self-reported psychiatric history (p = 0.02). Among rhinoplasty patients, those with aesthetic/cosmetic motivations, and those seeking revision rhinoplasty had higher rates of positive BDD screen. Higher scores on the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey-Nasal Obstruction Score (SCHNOS-O) (p = 0.01) and Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey-Nasal Obstruction Score-Nasal Cosmesis Score (SCHNOS-C) (p < 0.0001) were predictive of a positive BDD screen, while question 5 of the SCHNOS was highly predictive of positive BDD screening (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our study characterizes relationships between positive BDD screening and age, gender, self-reported psychiatric history, and motivations for consultation, among patients seen for cosmetic surgery evaluation in a facial plastic and reconstructive surgery setting.