Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 166
Filtrer
1.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 176(10): 829-838, 2020 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32312498

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Attention is the process which enables to preferentially select salient or relevant stimuli and to attenuate the response to irrelevant incoming stimuli. Migraine is characterized by both attentional alterations and an abnormal sensory processing to external stimulations. The aim of the study was to investigate potential interactions between self-perceived attentional difficulties and sensory hypersensitivity in migraine patients. METHODS: Forty-six episodic migraineurs without aura and 46 healthy controls filled out questionnaires on self-perceived attention difficulties and self-reported sensitivity to visual, auditory and olfactory stimulations. RESULTS: Compared to controls, migraineurs reported significantly higher levels of attention difficulty and sensory sensitivity. Sensory hypersensitivity correlated significantly with self-perceived attentional difficulties in migraineurs (P=0.002), but not with migraine disability or levels of anxiety or depression. Ictal and interictal sensory sensitivities were significantly correlated in migraineurs within visual (P<0.001), auditory (P<0.001) and olfactory (P=0.001) modalities. CONCLUSION: This study shows for the first time an association between self-reported attentional difficulties and multimodal sensory hypersensitivity. Studies combining behavioral and physiological measures of sensory processing and attention processes are necessary to further understand the peculiar vulnerability of migraineurs to sensory stimuli.


Sujet(s)
Migraines , Anxiété , Attention , Cognition , Humains , Enquêtes et questionnaires
2.
Eye (Lond) ; 34(10): 1897-1902, 2020 10.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31959885

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: To report our 14-year experience with orbital exenteration and assess risk factors for poor prognosis by focusing on conjunctival melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted in our tertiary care centre (Jules Gonin Eye Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland) between 2003 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥18 years with a follow-up >12 months, without metastatic spread at the time of surgery. Data recorded were age, gender, tumour histology, surgical technique, postoperative complications, surgical margin status, local recurrence, postoperative radiation beam therapy and metastatic status. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with a mean age of 63.2 years (38-92) were included. Conjunctival melanoma was the most frequently identified tumour (n = 14, 56%) followed by conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (n = 4, 16%), sebaceous carcinoma (n = 3, 12%), choroidal melanoma (n = 2, 8%) and basal cell carcinoma (n = 2, 8%). Eighteen tumours (72%) originated from the conjunctival tissue. Clear surgical margins were achieved in 21 (84%) patients. Fourteen (56%) patients experienced distant metastases and died from metastatic spread after a mean follow-up of 52.3 months (6-120). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 96%, 72% and 60%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, positive surgical margins, local recurrence and metachronous metastases were associated with a decreased OS (p = 0.002, p = 0.005 and p = 0.007, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, positive surgical margins and metachronous metastases were also associated with a decreased OS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.042, respectively). Conjunctival melanoma was not associated with a poorer prognosis (p = 0.280). CONCLUSION: Free surgical margins are needed to increase OS. To achieve clearer surgical margins, neoadjuvant targeted therapies/immunotherapies may be considered.


Sujet(s)
Tumeurs de la conjonctive , Mélanome , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Tumeurs de la conjonctive/chirurgie , Hôpitaux , Humains , Mélanome/chirurgie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Récidive tumorale locale/épidémiologie , Éviscération de l'orbite , Études rétrospectives
3.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 35(1): 160­166, 2020.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31184634

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of bone-anchored dental implant placement at the same time as orbital exenteration compared with delayed implant placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective comparative study was conducted in a single tertiary care center between December 2003 and December 2017. Patients who underwent bone-anchored implant placement at the same time as orbital exenteration were included (group 1) and compared with patients who underwent delayed implant placement (group 2). The main outcome was the 1-year success rate of implant osseointegration. The secondary outcomes were the 5-year success rate of osseointegration, postoperative complications, and time between orbital exenteration and prosthesis placement. RESULTS: Ten and 11 patients (21 and 22 implants) with a mean follow-up of 50.2 and 48.5 months were included in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Patients in group 1 were significantly older (69.7 vs 61.2 years, P = .026). No significant differences were found between both groups regarding tumor type and location, prior treatments, smoking status, and postoperative radiation beam radiotherapy. The 1- and 5-year success rates of osseointegration were 95.5% and 93.3% in group 1, and 100% and 100% in group 2, respectively (P = .488 and P = .450 between both groups). One implant did not osseointegrate in group 1 due to osteitis. Ethmoidal fistula was the most common postoperative complication found in both groups (P = .670). The mean time between orbital exenteration and episthesis placement was 8 (3 to 14) vs 11 (3 to 15) months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .467). CONCLUSION: Placing implants at the same time as orbital exenteration is a viable procedure. It reduces surgical morbidity and allows placement of implants in a nonirradiated area.


Sujet(s)
Implants dentaires , Ostéo-intégration , Implantation de prothèse , Études de suivi , Humains , Durée opératoire , Études rétrospectives , Résultat thérapeutique
4.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 41(6): 492-506, 2018 Jun.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29954616

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: To assess demographic, clinical, radiological, pathological features, treatment and follow-up of periocular or/and orbital amyloidosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective monocentric study from January 2004 to April 2017 in patients diagnosed with histologically proven periocular or/and orbital amyloidosis. RESULTS: Six patients were included (2 females, 4 males). Mean age was 76.8 years (range 66-88 years). Mean time between first ophthalmological symptoms and diagnosis was 27 months (range 11-36 months). The main symptoms were subconjunctival infiltration (6 patients; 100%), periocular pain or discomfort (4 patients; 66.6%) and subconjunctival hemorrhage (1 patient; 16.6%). Clinical findings included ptosis (4 patients; 66.6%), keratitis (3 patients; 50%) leading to corneal perforation in one patient, and proptosis (3 patients; 50%). One-half of the patients showed bilateral involvement. AL amyloidosis was identified on immunohistochemistry in 5 patients (83.3%). One case of B cell marginal zone orbital lymphoma was diagnosed. Systemic work-up was negative for all patients. Treatment consisted of simple monitoring (1 patient; 16.6%), surgical debulking (3 patients; 50%), ptosis surgery (1 patient; 16.6%), eyelid or eyelash malposition surgery (2 patients; 33.3%) and orbital radiation beam therapy (2 patients; 33.3%). Mean follow-up was 14.6 months (range 6-36 months), and no progression nor recurrence were noted. CONCLUSION: Periocular or/and orbital amyloidosis is rarely encountered. Diagnosis is based on pathological examination, and immunohistochemistry analysis should always be performed to guide systemic work-up. Orbital lymphoma and multiple myeloma should be ruled out if AL amyloidosis is diagnosed. Progression is slow, and surgery is the mainstay of treatment in symptomatic patients. Long-term multidisciplinary follow-up is advocated.


Sujet(s)
Amyloïdose/diagnostic , Amyloïdose/thérapie , Maladies de l'orbite/diagnostic , Maladies de l'orbite/thérapie , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Amyloïdose/anatomopathologie , Maladies de la conjonctive/diagnostic , Maladies de la conjonctive/anatomopathologie , Maladies de la conjonctive/thérapie , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Mâle , Maladies de l'orbite/anatomopathologie , Études rétrospectives
6.
Bull Soc Pathol Exot ; 109(4): 287-295, 2016 Oct.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27686081

RÉSUMÉ

Vaccine trials against Ebola virus have been conceived and organized, in August 2014, after the epidemic started in three countries of West Africa. If the preparedness had been missing, the planners tried to anticipate the resistance to vaccination, in Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia. This article offers a retrospective view on the resistances to vaccination throughout its history, from smallpox inoculation to anti-polio vaccine. Resistances have been linked to the political contexts and the rejection of an oppressive power, either local or foreign, as well as mistakes and scientific uncertainties. The analysis of the historical factors of resistance leads to reverse the question: what convinces people to accept a vaccine trial, despite the obscurities of the immunization processes inside the body? The article hypothesizes that Guineans and West Africans face a dilemma similar to their counterparts in the past, whether or not to rally to an experimental immunization, the results of which are still pending. They may appropriate the Western beliefs about the efficacy of vaccines to their own ways of circumventing misfortune. Further field studies will be required to assess the role of the vaccinal trials and the response to the epidemic in the "convalescence" of these societies, being aware that the trials will not allow a complete assessment of the vaccines, because of the end of the epidemic.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins contre la maladie à virus Ebola/usage thérapeutique , Fièvre hémorragique à virus Ebola/prévention et contrôle , Vaccination , Protection civile/normes , Essais cliniques comme sujet , Épidémies de maladies , Épidémies , Guinée/épidémiologie , Fièvre hémorragique à virus Ebola/épidémiologie , Humains , Politique , Études rétrospectives , Échec thérapeutique , Vaccination/méthodes , Vaccination/normes , Vaccination/tendances
9.
Mol Cell Endocrinol ; 393(1-2): 120-8, 2014 Aug 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24953973

RÉSUMÉ

The only peripherally released orexigenic hormone, ghrelin, plays a key role in food intake and body weight regulation. Antagonizing the ghrelin receptor, GHS-R1a, represents a promising approach for anti-obesity therapy. In our study, two novel GHS-R1a antagonists JMV4208 and JMV3002, which are trisubstituted 1,2,4-triazoles, decreased food intake in fasted lean mice in a dose-dependent manner, with ED50 values of 5.25 and 2.05 mg/kg, respectively. Both compounds were stable in mouse blood, with half-lives of 90 min (JMV4208) and 60 min (JMV3002), and disappeared from the blood 8h after administration. Fourteen days of treatment with the ghrelin antagonists (20 mg/kg twice a day) decreased food intake, body weight and adipose tissue mass in mice with diet-induced obesity (DIO). These results are likely attributable to an impact on food intake reduction and an attenuated expression of the lipogenesis-promoting enzymes (acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 in subcutaneous fat and fatty acid synthase in subcutaneous and intraperitoneal fat). The decrease in fat mass negatively impacted circulating leptin levels. These data suggest that JMV4208 and JMV3002 could be useful therapeutic agents for the treatment of obesity.


Sujet(s)
Tissu adipeux/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Poids/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Consommation alimentaire/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Acides picoliniques/pharmacologie , Récepteurs à la ghréline/antagonistes et inhibiteurs , Triazoles/pharmacologie , Animaux , Relation dose-effet des médicaments , Souris , Souris de lignée C57BL , Acides picoliniques/composition chimique , Triazoles/composition chimique
12.
Neurophysiol Clin ; 43(1): 19-33, 2013 Jan.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23290173

RÉSUMÉ

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive neurostimulation tool with increasing therapeutic applications in neurology, psychiatry and in the treatment of chronic tinnitus, and with a growing interest in cognitive neuroscience. One of its side effects is the loud click sound generated simultaneously to the magnetic pulse, which depends both on the equipment and rTMS intensity. This impulse sound could transiently modify peripheral hearing mechanisms, and hence hearing thresholds, both in patients and in rTMS practitioners. Furthermore, if no precautions are taken, especially in subjects with several risks factors for hearing loss, it is possible that the repetition of exposure could lead to more definitive changes in hearing thresholds. These issues are often neglected, although they could have specific relevance in rTMS treatment for tinnitus or in auditory cognitive neuroscience. This review specifically deals with noise exposure during rTMS and its potential consequences on the auditory system. It provides several practical solutions to help minimize exposure.


Sujet(s)
Seuil auditif , Bruit/effets indésirables , Stimulation magnétique transcrânienne/effets indésirables , Stimulation acoustique/effets indésirables , Animaux , Cortex auditif/physiopathologie , Chinchilla , Cochlée/physiopathologie , Dispositifs de protection des oreilles , Céphalée/étiologie , Surdité due au bruit/étiologie , Surdité due au bruit/physiopathologie , Surdité due au bruit/prévention et contrôle , Humains , Consentement libre et éclairé , Imagerie par résonance magnétique , Émissions otoacoustiques spontanées/physiologie , Lapins , Réflexes anormaux , Réflexe stapédien , Facteurs de risque , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Acouphène/physiopathologie , Acouphène/thérapie
13.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 229(4): 395-8, 2012 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22496011

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Sclera is a very radioresistant tissue and scleritis after proton therapy has not been described so far. HISTORY AND SIGNS: Four female patients, aged between 31 and 74 years, were treated with proton therapy for uveal melanoma (height range: 2.2 - 3.5 mm), located in the macula, the superior equator and 2 in the ciliary body. All patients had a history of a previous or active inflammatory disease and developed scleritis after radiotherapy. THERAPY AND OUTCOME: Two patients had infectious scleritis and were treated with adequate antibiotic therapy. After systemic corticotherapy, 3 patients recovered completely; the remaining patient was managed with additional immunosuppressive treatment as well as a conjunctival and scleral graft, but has not become pain free yet. CONCLUSION: Scleritis is a possible complication after proton therapy, probably on an ischemic basis, where there is a predisposing factor such as inflammatory systemic disease.


Sujet(s)
Mélanome/radiothérapie , Tumeurs radio-induites/diagnostic , Tumeurs radio-induites/étiologie , Protons/effets indésirables , Sclérite/diagnostic , Sclérite/étiologie , Tumeurs de l'uvée/radiothérapie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Mélanome/complications , Adulte d'âge moyen , Tumeurs radio-induites/chirurgie , Radiothérapie conformationnelle/effets indésirables , Sclérite/chirurgie , Résultat thérapeutique , Tumeurs de l'uvée/complications
14.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd ; 229(4): 420-3, 2012 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22496017

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Choristomas are benign, congenital tumours composed of normal tissue in an abnormal location. Osseous choristomas represent the rarest form of epibulbar choristomas, with now 65 cases reported in the literature. We did a retrospective clinicopathological study of all patients with epibulbar osseous choristoma observed at our institution since 1982 and updated the last review of the literature. HISTORY AND SIGNS: Three Caucasian male patients, aged between 3 months and 11 years, were identified. All osseous choristomas were located under the superotemporal bulbar conjunctiva of the right eye. THERAPY AND OUTCOME: All lesions were managed with surgical excision. Histopathology revealed the presence of lamellar bone in all cases, one of which was associated with a dermolipoma. CONCLUSIONS: We report a small rare case series of 3 epibulbar osseous choristomas and did a review of the literature. In one patient, the osteoma was associated with a dermolipoma, corresponding to the fourth reported complex choristoma of this type, in an otherwise normal eye, in the literature.


Sujet(s)
Os et tissu osseux , Choristome/diagnostic , Choristome/chirurgie , Maladies de la choroïde/diagnostic , Maladies de la choroïde/chirurgie , Enfant , Humains , Nourrisson , Mâle , Résultat thérapeutique
16.
Neurophysiol Clin ; 40(5-6): 267-79, 2010.
Article de Français | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21093798

RÉSUMÉ

There is a growing and unprecedented interest in the objective evaluation of the subcortical processes that are involved in speech perception, with potential clinical applications in speech and language impairments. Here, we review the studies illustrating the development of electrophysiological methods for assessing speech encoding in the human brainstem: from the pioneer recordings of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR), via studies of frequency-following responses (FFR) to the most recent measurements of speech ABR (SABR) or ABR in response to speech sounds. Recent research on SABR has provided new insights in the understanding of subcortical auditory processing mechanisms. The SABR test is an objective and non-invasive tool for assessing individual capacity of speech encoding in the brainstem. SABR characteristics are potentially useful both as a diagnosis tool of speech encoding deficits and as an assessment tool of the efficacy of rehabilitation programs in patients with learning and/or auditory processing disorders.


Sujet(s)
Stimulation acoustique , Troubles de l'audition centrale/diagnostic , Perception auditive/physiologie , Potentiels évoqués auditifs du tronc cérébral/physiologie , Perception de la parole/physiologie , Parole , Troubles de l'audition centrale/rééducation et réadaptation , Électroencéphalographie , Humains , Troubles du développement du langage/diagnostic , Troubles du développement du langage/psychologie , Troubles du développement du langage/rééducation et réadaptation , Troubles du langage/diagnostic , Troubles du langage/psychologie , Troubles du langage/rééducation et réadaptation
20.
Eat Weight Disord ; 13(3): e67-74, 2008 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19011367

RÉSUMÉ

Energy homeostasis is controlled by a complex regulatory system of molecules that affect food intake and that are critical for maintaining a stable body weight during life. Ghrelin is a peptide of 28 amino acid synthesized predominantly by the stomach and the gut, which activate the type 1a growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor (GHS-R1a), a G-protein coupled receptor. The acylated form of ghrelin potently stimulates GH secretion both in vitro and in vivo in several animal species, including humans. Beside the endocrine effect, ghrelin shows also extraendocrine activities, including stimulation of feeding behaviour. Several classes of small synthetic peptide and non-peptide ligands of the GHS-R1a have been described and are able to release GH and stimulate food intake. However, in time, it appeared that the stimulating effects on GH secretion could be divorced from those on food intake, suggesting that more than a single receptor might be involved. Several experimental data have even questioned the physiological role of ghrelin in the control of GH secretion and energy metabolism. By using novel agonists, partial agonists, and antagonists for the GHS-R1a receptor, we have studied whether the stimulation of this receptor could account for the purported physiological role of ghrelin. Our results demonstrate that the ability to bind in vitro the GHS-R1a is not predictive of the in vivo biological activity of the compounds and that the endocrine and extraendocrine effects could be mediated also by receptors different from the GHS-R1a.


Sujet(s)
Comportement alimentaire/physiologie , Ghréline/physiologie , Hormone de croissance/métabolisme , Hormone de croissance humaine/métabolisme , Récepteurs à la ghréline/physiologie , Triazoles/effets indésirables , Analyse de variance , Animaux , Métabolisme énergétique , Ghréline/métabolisme , Homéostasie , Humains , Rats , Rat Sprague-Dawley , Récepteurs couplés aux protéines G/antagonistes et inhibiteurs , Récepteurs couplés aux protéines G/métabolisme , Transduction du signal/physiologie , Triazoles/administration et posologie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE