Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT-based interpretations of maxillary impacted canines compared to those of conventional radiography: An in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging has become widespread in diagnosing impacted teeth in the context of orthodontic treatment. However, the diagnostic accuracy of this 3D imaging tool has not been comprehensively evaluated yet. The objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of employing CBCT imaging in the three-dimensional (3D) localization of maxillary impacted canines compared to the use of traditional two-dimensional (2D) imaging, and (2) to calculate sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy values for specific variables assessed in 3D and 2D. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An adult cadaver skull with permanent dentition was employed and 15 simulations of maxillary canine impactions were created. Two sets of 2D and 3D radiographic images were obtained. The two sets of images were evaluated by eleven postgraduate orthodontic students. Cochran's Q tests, Friedman's tests, and then McNemar's, McNemar-Bowker's and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare Observers' responses in 3D and 2D with the gold standard values. RESULTS: Insignificant differences were found between the CBCT-based interpretations and the gold standard (GS) concerning the labiopalatal position (P=0.34), labiopalatal and mesiodistal inclination (P=0.66 and P=0.194, respectively), whereas the mesiodistal and vertical positioning showed significant differences (P=0.002 and P<0.001, respectively). The percentages of agreement between the 2D- and 3D-based interpretations were acceptable in terms of labiopalatal and mesiodistal inclinations (71.5% and 77.5%, respectively). Remarkably higher values of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for the CBCT-based interpretations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of CBCT outweighed that of 2D radiography in the labiopalatal localization of maxillary impacted canines, contact relationship with adjacent teeth and resorption diagnosis. 3D-based assessments and the gold standard had high percentages of agreement especially for the labiopalatal position evaluation and the proximity diagnosis.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Imaging in Detecting and Measuring Dehiscence and Fenestration in Patients With Class I Malocclusion: A Surgical-Exposure-Based Validation Study.

Background No study has evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in detecting bone defects in orthodontic patients with Class I malocclusions. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CBCT in detecting dehiscences and fenestrations before orthodontic treatment compared to the gold standard i.e., the actual clinical detection of bone defects on surgical exposure. Methods A validation study was undertaken at the Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus between 29 August 2018 and 1 November 2020. The sample included 16 patients who had Class I malocclusion with moderate crowding on the lower anterior teeth. Results The proportion of dehiscence diagnosed on CBCT images was approximately two-and-a-half times greater than that found on direct examination i.e., 42.7% versus 17.7%, respectively. The proportion of fenestrations was almost three times greater when diagnosed on CBCT images compared to the gold standard i.e., 39.5% versus 13.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of CBCT imaging in detecting dehiscence and fenestration was 100%. The specificity of CBCT imaging ranged from 45.5% to 86.7% and from 50% to 86.7% for dehiscence and fenestration detection, respectively. Also, the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT imaging ranged from 44% to 87.5% and from 56% to 87.5% for dehiscence and fenestration detection, respectively. Conclusions The proportion of dehiscence diagnosed on CBCT images was approximately two-and-a-half times greater than that found on direct examination, and the proportion of fenestrations was almost three times greater when diagnosed on CBCT images compared to the gold standard. The CBCT overestimates the dimensions of the linear measurements compared to those measured by the gold standard.

Evaluation of the Levels of Pain, Discomfort, Functional Impairments and Satisfaction With the Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) When Leveling and Aligning Crowded Teeth: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background Only a few studies have reported levels of pain, discomfort, functional impairments, and patients' satisfaction after undergoing periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO). Therefore, the objectives were to evaluate postoperative pain, discomfort, functional impairments, and satisfaction following this surgical intervention. Methods A prospective cohort study was undertaken at the Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, between August 2018 and November 2020. The sample consisted of 16 patients (4 males, 12 females, mean age: 21±3.05 years) with moderately crowded lower anterior teeth who underwent full-thickness vestibular flap elevation followed by cortical cuts using piezosurgery. Then a bovine xenograft was applied before reflecting the flap and suturing. Fixed orthodontic therapy was then initiated. Questionnaires were administered to assess the levels of pain, discomfort, and oral functional problems using a visual analog scale (VAS) at one day, seven days, 14 days, and 28 days after surgery. The level of satisfaction was also assessed at 28 days postoperatively. Friedman's test was employed, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for post-hoc tests with an adjusted alpha level. Results On the first day following the PAOO, the mean values of perceived pain, discomfort, swelling, mastication difficulties, swallowing problems, limitation in jaw movements were 80.00, 80.63, 68.13, 78.13, 55.00, and 64.38, respectively. These mean values dropped significantly in the following assessment times (P<0.001). At 28 days following the PAOO, the mean satisfaction score was 84.94±22.46. All patients mentioned that they took painkillers after the surgical intervention. Conclusions On the first day following surgery, patients perceived high levels of pain and discomfort, moderate to severe levels of swelling and chewing difficulties, and suffered from restricted jaw movement. These levels decreased significantly in the following assessment times. Patients' satisfaction with the PAOO procedure was high.

Systematic Review: Is High-Energy Laser Therapy (HELT) With Flapless Corticotomy Effective in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement?

The objective of this review was to critically and systematically appraise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of high-energy laser therapy (HELT) with flapless corticotomy in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement and the associated untoward effects. We searched eight databases electronically in August 2021: PubMed®, Medline®, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Scopus®, Web of Science™, Trip, and PQDT OPEN from ProQuest. Another search was done in the reference lists of the included studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in which patients had received fixed orthodontic treatment combined with HELT-assisted corticotomy in comparison with traditional orthodontic treatment. Cochrane's risk of bias (RoB2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Five RCTs and one CCT were included in this review (155 patients). The HELT-based corticotomy around the upper canines led to a greater canine retraction at the first and second months (P < 0.001). In the third month, no statistically significant differences were noticed. In one RCT focusing on incisor intrusion, the irradiated upper incisors showed a greater intrusion speed than that of the control group (4.587 mm in 59 days vs. 3.78 mm in 95.8 days, respectively). No significant side effects associated with the application of HELT were reported. According to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach, the quality of evidence supporting these findings was low to moderate. Although the acceleration of tooth movement appeared to be significant at least in the first two months, there was low to moderate evidence concerning the efficacy of HELT-based flapless corticotomy in the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement. There is a need for more well-conducted high-quality RCTs.

The efficacy of low-level laser therapy versus paracetamol-caffeine in controlling orthodontic separation pain and changes in the oral-health-related quality of life in Class I malocclusions: A 3-arm, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the analgesic effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and paracetamol-caffeine in controlling orthodontic pain induced by elastomeric separators, as well as changes in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). METHODS: A total of 54 patients (22 male, 32 female; mean age [standard deviation]: 21.68 [±2.77]) participated in the study. Elastomeric separators were placed mesially and distally to the first molars in the upper and lower dental arches. The first group (n = 18) received a single dose of aluminum gallium arsenide (GaAlAs) laser irradiation (808 nm; 350 milliwatts; 3.5 joule/point) with a placebo medication. The laser beam was applied buccally and lingually at the center of the first molar roots and the adjacent teeth (2nd molar and 2nd premolar) in both the upper and lower dental arches bilaterally. The second group (n = 18) received paracetamol-caffeine tablets (3 times daily for the first couple of days after separator insertion, and as needed for the rest of the week), with a placebo light-emitting diode (LED) light; patients in the third group (n = 18) were exposed to the 2 placebo procedures. An 11-point numeric rating scale was used to assess spontaneous and chewing pain perception immediately and at 1 hour, 24 hour, 48 hours, and 1 week after separator placement. The short version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) was used to evaluate OHRQoL at 48 hours and at 1 week after separator placement. RESULTS: Pain perception reached its peak at 24 hours after separator placement (median values: 3, 3, 6.5 for spontaneous pain, and 6, 6, 8 for chewing pain in the LLLT, drug, and control groups, respectively). LLLT relieved the induced pain more than did the placebo procedures (P = 0.002 for spontaneous pain, P = 0.012 for chewing pain). Orthodontic separators worsened patients' OHRQoL scores during the entire week, especially at 48 hours after placement (median OHIP-14 score: 21, 25, 24 in the LLLT, drug, and control groups, respectively). In comparison with the control group, LLLT slightly increased the "physical pain" domain score (P = 0.015) and the "psychological disability" domain score of the scale (P = 0.010) after 48 hours, as well as the "psychological disability" domain score 1 week after separator placement. CONCLUSIONS: The pain levels were similar in the laser and drug groups. The LLLT group had decreased pain, compared with the placebo group. Paracetamol-caffeine and LLLT were unable to enhance the overall OHRQoL.