Isospora belli infection after isolated intestinal transplant.

Isospora belli is a protozoan that only affects humans, after ingestion of Isospora's oocysts. Immunocompetent patients usually do not develop the infection. Immunocompromised hosts may have profuse diarrhea with other gastrointestinal symptoms. Treatment is based on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In 2006 we performed an isolated intestinal transplantation in a patient with ultra-short bowel syndrome. Neither rejection nor clinical problems occurred after transplant, but signs of intestinal inflammation were seen in every protocol biopsy starting at the first month post transplant. Almost 3 months after the procedure, the patient was re-admitted with diarrhea. I. belli infection was diagnosed by detection of the oocysts in stool samples. Antibiotic treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was initiated with excellent outcome and without relapses. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of isosporosis in a small bowel recipient.

Quality of life in celiac disease patients: prospective analysis on the importance of clinical severity at diagnosis and the impact of treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Celiac disease (CD) patients are affected in their quality of life (QoL). Our objectives were to assess differences in quality of life of patients according to the clinical presentation at diagnosis, and to determine the time-course impact of a gluten-free diet. PATIENTS/METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 132 newly diagnosed adult CD patients and 70 healthy controls using self-administered questionnaires: the Short Form-36 health survey, the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale; the Beck Depression Inventory both, at diagnosis and at 3-, 6- and 12-months on treatment. RESULTS: At diagnosis, patients with classical symptoms (n=97) exhibited a significantly more pronounced alteration of all items of the three questionnaires than atypical/silent cases (n=35) (p<0.01 to <0.00001). Silent CD patients had even better baseline scores (p<0.05 to <0.00001). Treatment produced a substantial and rapid (3-month) improvement of most outcome measures in classical and atypical patients but not in asymptomatic cases. Both subgroups attained comparable final scores with no differences comparing strictly adherents with partially compliant. CONCLUSIONS: Atypical/silent celiac disease patients have a significantly better baseline quality of life than those with classical symptoms. Treatment induces a rapid and significant improvement in symptomatic cases but not in silent patients with all subgroups having similar 1-year scores comparable to healthy controls.

Clinical utility of counting intraepithelial lymphocytes in celiac disease intestinal mucosa / Utilidad clínica del recuento de linfocitos intraepiteliales en la mucosa intestinal para el diagnóstico de enfermedad celíaca

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our aims were to establish the clinical utility of assessing the intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) density in intestinal biopsies from a large series of individuals and to determine the best threshold discriminating celiac disease (CD) patients and controls in two populations with different pre-test prevalence. METHODS: We prospectively performed intestinal biopsy and CD-related serology in 349 subjects undergoing upper GI endoscopy. While 116 had symptoms suggestive of a small bowel disorder (high prevalence), 233 individuals were randomly selected from patients referred to endoscopy because upper GIsymptoms (low prevalence). Diagnosis of CD was based on the concordance of classical histological features and a positive CD serology. RESULTS: While 58 patients had a newly diagnosed CD (52 in the high and 6 in the low prevalence groups), 291 subjects did not meet diagnostic criteria of the disorder. Patients had a highly significant greater IEL density than controls (p < 0.00001). Based on the ROC curve, a count of 22.8 IEL/100 epithelial cells had the highest performance for diagnosing CD in the overall population and for subjects in the high pre-test probability subgroup and 22.5% was ,he best cut-off for those diagnosed in the low risk population (area under the curves: 0.979, 0.979 and 0.993, respectively). An abnormal CD serology confirmed the diagnosis of CD in all the four patients with counts below 22.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that an IEL density of 22.8% is an adequate threshold to discriminate CD patients and controls in individuals irrespective of the prevalence of the disorder.

Introducción: El recuento elevado de linfocitos intraepiteliales (LIEs) es un rasgo destacado aunque inespecífico de la enteropatía de la enfermedad celíaca (EC). Un recuento mayor a 40 LIEs/100 células epiteliales ha sido considerado por mucho tiempo esencial para el diagnóstico. Sin embargo, estudios recientes con escaso número de muestras han cuestionado este valor de corte. Objetivos: Determinar el rango normal de LIEs en biopsias intestinales y establecer su capacidad diagnóstica de EC en dos poblaciones con diferente prevalencia. Métodos: Realizamos prospectivamente biopsias de duodeno distal y serología para EC en 349 pacientesconsecutivos a quienes se les realizó una videoendoscopia digestiva alta. El grupo A consistió en 116 pacientes derivados a biopsia intestinal por síntomas sugestivos de malabsorción (considerados de alta prevalencia de EC) y el grupo B consistió en 233 pacientes randomizados entre quienes fueron derivados a endoscopía alta por síntomas gastrointestinales no sugestivos de EC (baja prevalencia de EC). El diagnóstico de EC se basó en criterios histológicos clásicos y serología positiva. Resultados: Cincuenta y ocho pacientes tuvieron EC (52 en el grupo de alto riesgo y 6 en el de baja prevalencia) y 291 individuos no tuvieron criterios de la enfermedad. Los pacientes tuvieron una densidad de LIEs significativamente mayor que los controles (p<0.00001). Basado en las curvas ROC, el conteo de 22.8 LIEs/100 células epiteliales tuvo la mejor sensibilidad y especificidad para el diagnóstico de EC en la población general y entre los sujetos con alta probabilidad y 22.5% fue el mejor valor de corte para la población de bajo riesgo (áreas bajo las curvas: 0.979, 0.979 y 0.993, respectivamente). Todos aquellos pacientes celíacos con recuento de LIEs por debajo de 22% (n=4), tuvieron serología positiva para EC. El clásico valor de 40% tuvo una sensibilidad del 55%. Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio confirma que una...

Clinical utility of counting intraepithelial lymphocytes in celiac disease intestinal mucosa / Utilidad clínica del recuento de linfocitos intraepiteliales en la mucosa intestinal para el diagnóstico de enfermedad celíaca

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our aims were to establish the clinical utility of assessing the intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) density in intestinal biopsies from a large series of individuals and to determine the best threshold discriminating celiac disease (CD) patients and controls in two populations with different pre-test prevalence. METHODS: We prospectively performed intestinal biopsy and CD-related serology in 349 subjects undergoing upper GI endoscopy. While 116 had symptoms suggestive of a small bowel disorder (high prevalence), 233 individuals were randomly selected from patients referred to endoscopy because upper GIsymptoms (low prevalence). Diagnosis of CD was based on the concordance of classical histological features and a positive CD serology. RESULTS: While 58 patients had a newly diagnosed CD (52 in the high and 6 in the low prevalence groups), 291 subjects did not meet diagnostic criteria of the disorder. Patients had a highly significant greater IEL density than controls (p < 0.00001). Based on the ROC curve, a count of 22.8 IEL/100 epithelial cells had the highest performance for diagnosing CD in the overall population and for subjects in the high pre-test probability subgroup and 22.5% was ,he best cut-off for those diagnosed in the low risk population (area under the curves: 0.979, 0.979 and 0.993, respectively). An abnormal CD serology confirmed the diagnosis of CD in all the four patients with counts below 22.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that an IEL density of 22.8% is an adequate threshold to discriminate CD patients and controls in individuals irrespective of the prevalence of the disorder.(AU)

Introducción: El recuento elevado de linfocitos intraepiteliales (LIEs) es un rasgo destacado aunque inespecífico de la enteropatía de la enfermedad celíaca (EC). Un recuento mayor a 40 LIEs/100 células epiteliales ha sido considerado por mucho tiempo esencial para el diagnóstico. Sin embargo, estudios recientes con escaso número de muestras han cuestionado este valor de corte. Objetivos: Determinar el rango normal de LIEs en biopsias intestinales y establecer su capacidad diagnóstica de EC en dos poblaciones con diferente prevalencia. Métodos: Realizamos prospectivamente biopsias de duodeno distal y serología para EC en 349 pacientesconsecutivos a quienes se les realizó una videoendoscopia digestiva alta. El grupo A consistió en 116 pacientes derivados a biopsia intestinal por síntomas sugestivos de malabsorción (considerados de alta prevalencia de EC) y el grupo B consistió en 233 pacientes randomizados entre quienes fueron derivados a endoscopía alta por síntomas gastrointestinales no sugestivos de EC (baja prevalencia de EC). El diagnóstico de EC se basó en criterios histológicos clásicos y serología positiva. Resultados: Cincuenta y ocho pacientes tuvieron EC (52 en el grupo de alto riesgo y 6 en el de baja prevalencia) y 291 individuos no tuvieron criterios de la enfermedad. Los pacientes tuvieron una densidad de LIEs significativamente mayor que los controles (p<0.00001). Basado en las curvas ROC, el conteo de 22.8 LIEs/100 células epiteliales tuvo la mejor sensibilidad y especificidad para el diagnóstico de EC en la población general y entre los sujetos con alta probabilidad y 22.5% fue el mejor valor de corte para la población de bajo riesgo (áreas bajo las curvas: 0.979, 0.979 y 0.993, respectivamente). Todos aquellos pacientes celíacos con recuento de LIEs por debajo de 22% (n=4), tuvieron serología positiva para EC. El clásico valor de 40% tuvo una sensibilidad del 55%. Conclusiones: Nuestro estudio confirma que una...(AU)