The static strength and modulus of fiber reinforced denture base polymer.

OBJECTIVES: Partial fiber reinforcements have been employed to strengthen dentures both during repair and in the manufacturing process. The reinforcing fibers can be evenly distributed in the denture base polymer or alternatively fiber-rich phase in the denture base polymer can form a separate structure. The aim of this study was to determinate static three-point flexural strength and modulus of denture base polymer that had been reinforced with different fiber reinforcements. METHODS: The test specimens (3 x 5 x 50 mm) were made of auto-polymerized denture base polymer and reinforced with different fiber reinforcements. The test groups were: (A) no fibers; (B) non-impregnated polyethylene fibers; (C) light-polymerized monomer impregnated glass fibers; (D) porous polymer preimpregnated glass fibers and (E) light-polymerized monomer-polymer impregnated glass fibers. The fibers were oriented parallel to the long axis of the specimen and embedded into the denture base resin on the compression side (n=7) or tension side (n=7). Dry specimens were tested with three-point static flexural strength test set-up at crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. RESULTS: The statistical analysis by two-way analysis of variance showed that the brand and the location of the fiber reinforcements significantly influenced the flexural strength (p<0.0001). However, the location of the fiber reinforcements did not influence the flexural modulus (p<0.722). SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that impregnated and preimpregnated fibers reinforce denture base polymer more than non-impregnated fibers. Fiber reinforcements placed on the tensile side resulted in considerably higher flexural strength and flexural modulus values compared with same quantity of fibers placed on the compression side.

Fatigue resistance and stiffness of glass fiber-reinforced urethane dimethacrylate composite.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Retentive properties of cast metal clasps decrease over time because of metal fatigue. Novel fiber-reinforced composite materials are purported to have increased fatigue resistance compared with metals and may offer a solution to the problem of metal fatigue. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the fatigue resistance and stiffness of E-glass fiber-reinforced composite. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve cylindrical fiber-reinforced composite test cylinders (2 mm in diameter and 60 mm in length) were made from light-polymerized urethane dimethacrylate monomer with unidirectional, single-stranded, polymer preimpregnated E-glass fiber reinforcement. Six cylinders were stored in dry conditions and 6 in distilled water for 30 days before testing. Fatigue resistance was measured by a constant-deflection fatigue test with 1 mm of deflection across a specimen span of 11 mm for a maximum of 150,000 loading cycles. The resistance of the cylinder against deflection was measured (N) and the mean values of the force were compared by 1-way analysis of variance (alpha = .05). The flexural modulus (GPa) was calculated for the dry and water-stored cylinders for the first loading cycle. Scanning electron microscopy was used to assess the distribution of the fibers, and the volume percent of fibers and polymer were assessed by combustion analysis. RESULTS: The test cylinders did not fracture due to fatigue following 150,000 loading cycles. Flexural modulus at the first loading cycle was 18.9 (+/- 2.9) GPa and 17.5 (+/- 1.7) GPa for the dry and water-stored cylinders, respectively. The mean force required to cause the first 1-mm deflection was 33.5 (+/- 5.2) N and 37.7 (+/- 3.6) N for the dry and water stored cylinders, respectively; however, the differences were not significant. After 150,000 cycles the mean force to cause 1-mm deflection was significantly reduced to 23.4 (+/- 8.5) N and 13.1 (+/- 3.5) N, respectively (P < .0001). Scanning electron microscopy highlighted fiber- and polymer-rich areas within the specimens and indicated that individual fibers were well impregnated with resin. The combustion analysis studies identified the fiber content to be 35.9 vol%. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the fatigue resistance of the fiber-reinforced material examined was increased; however, the reduction in flexural modulus of fiber-reinforced composites may restrict their use where high rigidity is required, such as in removable partial denture clasps.

Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts.

OBJECTIVES: Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) root canal posts have been introduced to be used instead of metal alloys and ceramics. The aim of this study was to investigate the flexural properties of different types of FRC posts and compare those values with a novel FRC material for dental applications. METHODS: Seventeen different FRC posts of various brands (Snowpost, Carbopost, Parapost, C-post, Glassix, Carbonite) and diameters, (1.0-2.1 mm) and a continuous unidirectional E-glass FRC polymerized by light activation to a cylindrical form (everStick, diameter 1.5 mm) as a control material were tested. The posts (n=5) were stored at room's humidity or thermocycled (12.000 x, 5 degrees C/55 degrees C) and stored in water for 2 weeks before testing. A three-point bending test (span=10 mm) was used to measure the flexural strength and modulus of FRC post specimens. RESULTS: Analysis of ANOVA revealed that thermocycling, brand of material and diameter of specimen had a significant effect (p<0.001) on the fracture load and flexural strength. The highest flexural strength was obtained with the control material (everStick, 1144.9+/-99.9 MPa). There was a linear relationship between fracture load and diameter of posts for both glass fiber and carbon fiber posts. Thermocycling decreased the flexural modulus of the tested specimens by approximately 10%. Strength and fracture load decreased approximately 18% as a result of thermocycling. SIGNIFICANCE: Considerable variation can be found in the calculated strength values of the studied post brands. Commercial prefabricated FRC posts showed lower flexural properties than an individually polymerised FRC material.