Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Crit Care Explor ; 5(1): e0844, 2023 Jan.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36699254

RÉSUMÉ

Immunocompromised status, with and without stem cell transplant, confers a worse prognosis in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. An improved understanding of the biochemical profile of immunocompromised children with acute respiratory distress syndrome would inform whether specific pathways are targetable, or merely bystanders, in order to improve outcomes in this high-risk subgroup. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify a biomarker profile of immunocompromised children, with and without stem cell transplant, independent of illness severity. DESIGN SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of intubated children with Berlin-defined acute respiratory distress syndrome with existing biomarker measurements conducted in a large academic PICU between 2014 and 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Biomarker levels were compared between immunocompetent and immunocompromised children, with and without stem cell transplant, both prior to and after adjusting for severity of illness. RESULTS: In 333 children with acute respiratory distress syndrome, 84 were immunocompromised, of whom 39 had a stem cell transplant. Circulating neutrophil levels were strongly correlated with biomarkers, with 14 of 18 measured proteins differentially expressed in patients with versus without neutropenia. In order to identify biomarker levels independent of severity of illness, acute respiratory distress syndrome etiology, and neutrophil levels, we computed predicted (log-transformed) biomarker levels after adjusting for confounders using linear regression and then compared these severity-adjusted levels between immunocompetent and immunocompromised (with and without stem cell transplant) subjects using analyses of variance and post hoc Bonferroni. After multivariable adjustment, 11 biomarkers were higher in immunocompromised subjects without stem cell transplant, relative to immunocompetent, implicating endotheliopathy (angiopoietin-2), tissue damage (procollagen type III N-terminal peptide), and innate immunity. A single biomarker, C-C motif chemokine ligand 22, was lower in immunocompromised subjects with and without stem cell transplant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Immunocompromised children with acute respiratory distress syndrome were characterized by elevations in pro-inflammatory and endothelial damage biomarkers. Our study provides insight into mechanisms underlying the molecular heterogeneity of this population and potentially identifies targetable pathways to mitigate their increased mortality risk.

2.
J Arthroplasty ; 35(5): 1228-1232, 2020 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32115328

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Controlling postoperative pain and reducing opioid requirements after total knee arthroplasty remain a challenge, particularly in an era stressing rapid recovery protocols and early discharge. A single-shot adductor canal blockade (ACB) has been shown to be effective in decreasing postoperative pain. The purpose of the present study is to compare the efficacy of an anesthesiologist administered ACB and a surgeon administered intraoperative ACB. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty were prospectively randomized to receive either an anesthesiologist administered (group 1) or surgeon administered (group 2) ACB using 15 mL of ropivacaine 0.5%. Primary outcomes were pain visual analog scale, range of motion, and opioid consumption. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were randomized to group 1 and 29 to group 2. Opioid equivalents consumed were equal on postoperative day (POD) 0, 1, and 2. Patients in group 1 had statistically less pain on POD 0, but this did not reach clinical significance and there was no difference in pain on POD 1 or 2. Patients in group 1 had significantly increased active flexion POD 1, but there was no difference in active flexion on POD 0 or 6 weeks postop. There was no difference in patient satisfaction with pain control or short-term functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: Surgeon administered ACB is not inferior to anesthesiologist administered ACB with respect to pain, opioid consumption, range of motion, patient satisfaction, or short-term functional outcomes. Surgeon administered ACB is an effective alternative to anesthesiologist administered ACB.


Sujet(s)
Bloc nerveux , Chirurgiens , Anesthésiologistes , Anesthésiques locaux , Humains , Douleur postopératoire/prévention et contrôle , Études prospectives , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE