Identifying novel data-driven subgroups in congenital heart disease using multi-modal measures of brain structure.

Individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) have an increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairments. Given the hypothesized complexity linking genomics, atypical brain structure, cardiac diagnoses and their management, and neurodevelopmental outcomes, unsupervised methods may provide unique insight into neurodevelopmental variability in CHD. Using data from the Pediatric Cardiac Genomics Consortium Brain and Genes study, we identified data-driven subgroups of individuals with CHD from measures of brain structure. Using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; N = 93; cortical thickness, cortical volume, and subcortical volume), we identified subgroups that differed primarily on cardiac anatomic lesion and language ability. In contrast, using diffusion MRI (N = 88; white matter connectivity strength), we identified subgroups that were characterized by differences in associations with rare genetic variants and visual-motor function. This work provides insight into the differential impacts of cardiac lesions and genomic variation on brain growth and architecture in patients with CHD, with potentially distinct effects on neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Association of genetic and sulcal traits with executive function in congenital heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: Persons with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at increased risk of neurodevelopmental disabilities, including impairments to executive function. Sulcal pattern features correlate with executive function in adolescents with single-ventricle heart disease and tetralogy of Fallot. However, the interaction of sulcal pattern features with genetic and participant factors in predicting executive dysfunction is unknown. METHODS: We studied sulcal pattern features, participant factors, and genetic risk for executive function impairment in a cohort with multiple CHD types using stepwise linear regression and machine learning. RESULTS: Genetic factors, including predicted damaging de novo or rare inherited variants in neurodevelopmental disabilities risk genes, apolipoprotein E genotype, and principal components of sulcal pattern features were associated with executive function measures after adjusting for age at testing, sex, mother's education, and biventricular versus single-ventricle CHD in a linear regression model. Using regression trees and bootstrap validation, younger participant age and larger alterations in sulcal pattern features were consistently identified as important predictors of decreased cognitive flexibility with left hemisphere graph topology often selected as the most important predictor. Inclusion of both sulcal pattern and genetic factors improved model fit compared to either alone. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that sulcal measures remain important predictors of cognitive flexibility, and the model predicting executive outcomes is improved by inclusion of potential genetic sources of neurodevelopmental risk. If confirmed, measures of sulcal patterning may serve as early imaging biomarkers to identify those at heightened risk for future neurodevelopmental disabilities.

Association of Potentially Damaging De Novo Gene Variants With Neurologic Outcomes in Congenital Heart Disease.

Importance: Neurodevelopmental disabilities are commonly associated with congenital heart disease (CHD), but medical and sociodemographic factors explain only one-third of the variance in outcomes. Objective: To examine whether potentially damaging de novo variants (dDNVs) in genes not previously linked to neurodevelopmental disability are associated with neurologic outcomes in CHD and, post hoc, whether some dDNVs or rare putative loss-of-function variants (pLOFs) in specific gene categories are associated with outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2017 to June 2020 in 8 US centers. Inclusion criteria were CHD, age 8 years or older, and available exome sequencing data. Individuals with pathogenic gene variants in known CHD- or neurodevelopment-related genes were excluded. Cases and controls were frequency-matched for CHD class, age group, and sex. Exposures: Heterozygous for (cases) or lacking (controls) dDNVs in genes not previously associated with neurodevelopmental disability. Participants were separately stratified as heterozygous or not heterozygous for dDNVs and/or pLOFs in 4 gene categories: chromatin modifying, constrained, high level of brain expression, and neurodevelopmental risk. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were neurodevelopmental assessments of academic achievement, intelligence, fine motor skills, executive function, attention, memory, social cognition, language, adaptive functioning, and anxiety and depression, as well as 7 structural, diffusion, and functional brain magnetic resonance imaging metrics. Results: The study cohort included 221 participants in the post hoc analysis and 219 in the case-control analysis (109 cases [49.8%] and 110 controls [50.2%]). Of those 219 participants (median age, 15.0 years [IQR, 10.0-21.2 years]), 120 (54.8%) were male. Cases and controls had similar primary outcomes (reading composite, spelling, and math computation on the Wide Range Achievement Test, Fourth Edition) and secondary outcomes. dDNVs and/or pLOFs in chromatin-modifying genes were associated with lower mean (SD) verbal comprehension index scores (91.4 [20.4] vs 103.4 [17.8]; P = .01), Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition, scores (57.3 [17.2] vs 49.4 [11.2]; P = .03), and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition, working memory scores (73.8 [16.4] vs 97.2 [15.7]; P = .03), as well as higher likelihood of autism spectrum disorder (28.6% vs 5.2%; P = .01). dDNVs and/or pLOFs in constrained genes were associated with lower mean (SD) scores on the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning, Second Edition (immediate story memory: 9.7 [3.7] vs 10.7 [3.0]; P = .03; immediate picture memory: 7.8 [3.1] vs 9.0 [2.9]; P = .008). Adults with dDNVs and/or pLOFs in genes with a high level of brain expression had greater Conners adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder rating scale scores (mean [SD], 55.5 [15.4] vs 46.6 [12.3]; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance: The study findings suggest neurodevelopmental outcomes are not associated with dDNVs as a group but may be worse in individuals with dDNVs and/or pLOFs in some gene sets, such as chromatin-modifying genes. Future studies should confirm the importance of specific gene variants to brain function and structure.