Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Revascularization Versus Amputation in Patients Presenting With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in Maryland.

INTRODUCTION: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) aimed to expand Medicaid, enhance health care quality and efficiency, and address health disparities. These goals have potentially influenced medical care, notably revascularization rates in patients presenting with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). This study examines the effect of the ACA on revascularization vs amputation rates in patients presenting with CTLI in Maryland. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the Maryland State Inpatient Database comparing the rate of revascularization to rate of major amputation in patients presenting with CLTI over 2 periods: pre-ACA (2007-2009) and post-ACA (2018-2020). In this study, we included patients presenting with CLTI and underwent a major amputation or revascularization during that same admission. Using regression analysis, we estimated the odds of revascularization vs amputation pre- and post-ACA implementation, adjusting for pertinent variables. RESULT: During the study period, 12,131 CLTI patients were treated. Post-ACA, revascularization rate increased from 43.9% to 77.4% among patients presenting with CLTI. This was associated with a concomitant decrease in the proportion of CLTI patients undergoing major amputation from 56.1% to 22.6%. In the multivariate analysis, there was a 4-fold odds of revascularization among patients with CLTI compared to amputation (OR = 4.73, 95% CI 4.34-5.16) post-ACA. This pattern was seen across all insurance groups. CONCLUSION: The post-ACA period in Maryland was associated with an increased revascularization rate for patients presenting with CLTI with overall benefits across all insurance types.

Trends in Suicides and Homicides in 21st Century America.

BACKGROUND: Violent deaths, including suicides and homicides, pose a significant public health challenge in the United States. Understanding the trends and identifying associated risk factors is crucial for targeted intervention strategies. AIM: To examine the trends in suicides and homicides over the past two decades and identify demographic and contextual predictors using the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System online database. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of mortality records from 2000 to 2020 was conducted, utilizing multivariate regression analyses. Covariates included age, race, sex, education, mental health conditions, and time period. Age-adjusted rates were employed to assess trends. RESULTS: Over the 20 years, there was an upward trajectory in suicide rates, increasing from approximately 10/100,000 to over 14/100,000 individuals, which is a notable increase among American Indians (100.8% increase) and individuals aged 25 years and younger (45.3% increase). Homicide rates, while relatively stable, exhibited a significant increase in 2019-2020, with African Americans consistently having the highest rates and a significant increase among American Indians (73.2% increase). In the multivariate regression analysis, Individuals with advanced education (OR= 1.74, 95% CI= 1.70 - 1.78), depression (OR = 13.47, 95% CI = 13.04 - 13.91), and bipolar disorder (OR = 2.65, 95% CI = 2.44 - 2.88) had higher odds of suicide. Risk factors for homicide include African Americans (OR = 4.15, 95% CI = 4.08 - 4.23), Latinx (OR = 2.31, 95% CI = 2.26 - 2.37), people aged 25 years and younger, and those with lower educational attainment. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the changing demographic pattern in suicides and homicides in the United States and the need for targeted public health responses. Means restriction, universal suicide screening, addressing mental health stigma, and implementing broad interventions that modify societal attitudes toward suicide and homicides are essential components of a comprehensive strategy.

The relationship between neighborhood economic deprivation and asthma-associated emergency department visits in Maryland.

Background: Asthma represents a substantial public health challenge in the United States, affecting over 25 million adults. This study investigates the impact of neighborhood economic deprivation on asthma-associated Emergency Department (ED) visits in Maryland, using the Distressed Communities Index (DCI) for analysis. Methods: A retrospective analysis of Maryland's Emergency Department Databases from January 2018 to December 2020 was conducted, focusing on asthma-associated ED visits. Results: The study involved 185,317 ED visits, majority of which were females (56.3%) and non-Hispanic whites (65.2%). A significant association was found between increased neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and asthma-related ED visits. The poorest neighborhoods showed the highest rates of such visits. Compared to prosperous areas, neighborhoods classified from Comfortable to Distressed had progressively higher odds for asthma-related ED visits (Comfortable: OR = 1.14, Distressed OR = 1.65). Other significant asthma predictors included obesity, female gender, tobacco smoking, and older age. Conclusion: There is a substantive association between higher asthma-related ED visits and high neighborhood economic deprivation, underscoring the impact of socioeconomic factors on health outcomes. Public health implications: Addressing healthcare disparities and improving access to care in economically distressed neighborhoods is crucial. Targeted interventions, such as community health clinics and asthma education programs, can help mitigate the impact of neighborhood disadvantage.

Race, Insurance, and Socioeconomic Influences on Outcomes Following Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass.

The effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) might be shadowed by disparities in outcomes related to patient race and insurance type. We determine the influence of patient race/ethnicity and insurance types on complications following RYGB. We performed a retrospective analysis using data sourced from the National Inpatient Sample Database (2010 to 2019). A multivariate analysis was employed to determine the relationship between patient race/ethnicity and insurance type on RYGB complications. The analysis determined the interaction between race/ethnicity and insurance type on RYGB outcomes. We analyzed 277714 patients who underwent RYGB. Most of these patients were White (64.5%) and female (77.3%), with a median age of 46 years (IQR 36-55). Medicaid beneficiaries displayed less favorable outcomes than those under private insurance: Extended hospital stay (OR = 1.68; 95% CI 1.58-1.78), GIT Leak (OR = 1.83; 95% CI 1.35-2.47), postoperative wound infection (OR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.38-2.55), and in-hospital mortality (OR = 2.74; 95% CI 1.90-3.95).

Impact of the Kidney Allocation Revision on Access to Kidney Transplantation and Outcomes in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The 2014 Kidney Allocation System (KAS) revision aimed to enhance equity in organ allocation and improve patient outcomes. This study assesses the impacts of the KAS revision on renal transplantation demographics and outcomes in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study utilizing the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (OPTN/SRTR) database from 1998 to 2022. We compared recipient and donor characteristics, and outcomes (graft failure and recipient survival) pre- and post-KAS revision. RESULTS: Post-KAS, recipients were significantly older (53 vs 48, P < .001) with an increase in Medicaid beneficiaries (7.3% vs 5.5%, P < .001). Despite increased graft survival, HR = .91 (95% CI 0.80-.92, P < .001), overall recipient survival decreased, HR = 1.06 (95% CI 1.04-1.09, P < .001). KAS revision led to greater racial diversity among recipients and donors, enhancing equity in organ allocation. However, disparities persist in graft failure rates and recipient survival across racial groups. DISCUSSION: The 2014 Kidney Allocation System revision has led to important changes in the renal transplantation landscape. While progress has been made towards increasing racial equity in organ allocation, further refinements are needed to address ongoing disparities. Recognizing the changing patient profiles and socio-economic factors will be crucial in shaping future policy modifications.

The association between community-level economic deprivation and incidences of emergency department visits on account of attempted suicides in Maryland.

Background: Suicide is a major cause of mortality in the United States, accounting for 14.5 deaths per 100,000 population. Many emergency department (ED) visits in the United States are due to attempted suicides. Suicide attempts predict subsequent completed suicides. Socioeconomic factors, such as community-level socioeconomic deprivation, significantly affect many traditional risk factors for attempted suicides and suicides. Aim: To determine the association between community-level socioeconomic deprivation and ED visits for attempted suicide in Maryland. Methods: A retrospective analysis of attempted suicides in the Maryland State Emergency Department Database from January 2018 to December 2020. Community-level socioeconomic deprivation was measured using the Distress Community Index (DCI). Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify the association between DCI and attempted suicides/self-harm. Results: There were 3,564,987 ED visits reported in the study period, with DCI data available for 3,236,568 ED visits; 86.8% were younger than 45 years, 64.8% were females, and 54.6% non-Hispanic Whites. Over the study period, the proportion of ED visits due to attempted suicide was 0.3%. In the multivariate logistic regression, compared to prosperous zones, those in comfortable (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88, p < 0.01), Mid-Tier (OR = 0.76, 95%CI:0.67-0.86, p < 0.01), At-Risk (OR = 0.77; 95%CI: 0.65-0.92, p < 0.01) and Distressed zones (OR = 0.53; 95% CI:0.42-0.66, p < 0.01) were less likely to visit the ED for attempted suicide. Conclusion: Prosperous communities had the highest rate of attempted suicides, with the risk of attempted suicide increasing as individuals move from the least prosperous to more prosperous areas.

Causal Effects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Implementation on Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Survival: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) accounts for a substantial number of cancer cases in the United States, with a significant prevalence and mortality rate. The implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has the potential to impact cancer-specific survival among NHL patients by improving access to healthcare services and treatments. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the impact of the implementation of the ACA on cancer-specific survival among patients diagnosed with NHL. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective analysis, we leveraged data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to assess the impact of the ACA on cancer-specific survival among NHL patients. The study covered the years 2000-2020, divided into pre-ACA (2000-2013) and post-ACA (2017-2020) periods, with a three-year washout (2014-2016). Using a Difference-in-Differences approach, we compared Georgia (a non-expansion state) to New Jersey (an expansion state since 2014). We adjusted for patient demographics, income, metropolitan status, disease stage, and treatment modalities. RESULTS: Among 74,762 patients, 56.2% were in New Jersey (42,005), while 43.8% were in Georgia (32,757). The pre-ACA period included 32,851 patients (51.7% in Georgia and 56.7% in New Jersey), and 27,447 patients were in the post-ACA period (48.3% in Georgia and 43.4% in New Jersey). The post-ACA period exhibited a 34% survival improvement (OR=0.66, 95% CI 0.58-0.75). ACA implementation was associated with a 16% survival boost among NHL patients in New Jersey (OR=0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95). Other factors linked to improved survival included surgery (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.91), radiotherapy (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82), and married status (OR=0.67, 95% CI 0.64-0.71). CONCLUSION: The study underscores the ACA's potential positive impact on cancer-specific survival among NHL patients, emphasizing the importance of healthcare policy interventions in improving patient outcomes.

Profiles and Outcomes of Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the United States.

Introduction Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major contributor to adverse pregnancy outcomes both in the United States and globally. As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise, the incidence of GDM is anticipated to increase as well. Despite the significant impact of GDM on maternal and neonatal health, research examining the independent associations between GDM and adverse outcomes remains limited in the U.S. context. Objective This study aims to address this knowledge gap and further elucidate the relationship between GDM and maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Method We performed a retrospective study using data from the United States Vital Statistics Records, encompassing deliveries that occurred between January 2015 and December 2019. Our analysis aimed to establish the independent association between GDM and various adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The multivariate analysis incorporated factors such as maternal socioeconomic demographics, preexisting comorbidities, and conditions during pregnancy to account for potential confounders and elucidate the relationship between GDM and the outcomes of interest. Result Between 2015 and 2019, there were 1,212,589 GDM-related deliveries, accounting for 6.3% of the 19,249,237 total deliveries during the study period. Among women with GDM, 46.4% were Non-Hispanic Whites, 11.4% were Non-Hispanic Blacks, 25.7% were Hispanics, and 16.5% belonged to other racial/ethnic groups. The median age of women with GDM was 31 years, with an interquartile range of 27-35 years. The cesarean section rate among these women was 46.5%. GDM was identified as an independent predictor of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, including cesarean section (OR=1.40; 95% CI: 1.39-1.40), maternal blood transfusion (OR=1.15; 95% CI: 1.12-1.18), intensive care unit admission (OR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.10-1.21), neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR=1.53; 95% CI: 1.52-1.54), assisted ventilation (OR=1.37; 95% CI: 1.35-1.39), and low 5-minute Apgar score (OR=1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.03). Conclusion GDM serves as an independent risk factor for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, emphasizing the importance of early detection and management in pregnant women.

The impact of the affordable care act on access to bariatric surgery in Maryland.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to investigate the influence of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on the utilization of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures in Maryland. METHODS: Using the Maryland State Inpatient Database, this retrospective study compared all patients undergoing RYGB during the pre-ACA (2007-2009) and post-ACA (2018-2020) periods, including patient demographic factors, pre-existing conditions, and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: A total of 16,494 RYGB procedures were performed during the study period, of which 12,089 (73.3 â€‹%) were post-ACA. This was a 179.2 â€‹% increase in patients undergoing RYGB post-ACA; nearly triple that of the pre-ACA period. There was a significant decrease in uninsured patients (5.6 â€‹%-1.5 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.01) an increase in Black patients (32.1 â€‹%-46.8 â€‹%, p â€‹< â€‹0.01) and Medicaid beneficiaries (6.0 â€‹% pre-ACA to 17.8 â€‹% post-ACA, p â€‹< â€‹0.01). There were significant reductions in adverse outcomes (long hospital stays, hemorrhage, GIT leaks, and mortality) across all insurance types (all p â€‹< â€‹0.01). CONCLUSION: The ACA increased access to RYGB procedures, especially in Black and Medicaid recipients in Maryland, enhancing healthcare across all insurance types.