Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
1.
Gastroenterology ; 166(5): 872-885.e2, 2024 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320723

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Genetic testing uptake for cancer susceptibility in family members of patients with cancer is suboptimal. Among relatives of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), The GENetic Education, Risk Assessment, and TEsting (GENERATE) study evaluated 2 online genetic education/testing delivery models and their impact on patient-reported psychological outcomes. METHODS: Eligible participants had ≥1 first-degree relative with PDAC, or ≥1 first-/second-degree relative with PDAC with a known pathogenic germline variant in 1 of 13 PDAC predisposition genes. Participants were randomized by family, between May 8, 2019, and June 1, 2021. Arm 1 participants underwent a remote interactive telemedicine session and online genetic education. Arm 2 participants were offered online genetic education only. All participants were offered germline testing. The primary outcome was genetic testing uptake, compared by permutation tests and mixed-effects logistic regression models. We hypothesized that Arm 1 participants would have a higher genetic testing uptake than Arm 2. Validated surveys were administered to assess patient-reported anxiety, depression, and cancer worry at baseline and 3 months postintervention. RESULTS: A total of 424 families were randomized, including 601 participants (n = 296 Arm 1; n = 305 Arm 2), 90% of whom completed genetic testing (Arm 1 [87%]; Arm 2 [93%], P = .014). Arm 1 participants were significantly less likely to complete genetic testing compared with Arm 2 participants (adjusted ratio [Arm1/Arm2] 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.78-0.98). Among participants who completed patient-reported psychological outcomes questionnaires (Arm 1 [n = 194]; Arm 2 [n = 206]), the intervention did not affect mean anxiety, depression, or cancer worry scores. CONCLUSIONS: Remote genetic education and testing can be a successful and complementary option for delivering genetics care. (Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT03762590).


Sujet(s)
Carcinome du canal pancréatique , Prédisposition génétique à une maladie , Dépistage génétique , Tumeurs du pancréas , Mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients , Télémédecine , Humains , Tumeurs du pancréas/génétique , Tumeurs du pancréas/psychologie , Tumeurs du pancréas/diagnostic , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Carcinome du canal pancréatique/génétique , Carcinome du canal pancréatique/psychologie , Carcinome du canal pancréatique/diagnostic , Carcinome du canal pancréatique/thérapie , Prédisposition génétique à une maladie/psychologie , Appréciation des risques , Sujet âgé , Anxiété/psychologie , Anxiété/diagnostic , Anxiété/étiologie , Adulte , Dépression/diagnostic , Dépression/génétique , Dépression/psychologie , Conseil génétique/psychologie , Mutation germinale , Famille/psychologie
2.
JACC Adv ; 1(3)2022 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36147540

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: State-of-the-art genetic risk interpretation for a common complex disease such as coronary artery disease (CAD) requires assessment for both monogenic variants-such as those related to familial hypercholesterolemia-as well as the cumulative impact of many common variants, as quantified by a polygenic score. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to describe a combined monogenic and polygenic CAD risk assessment program and examine its impact on patient understanding and changes to clinical management. METHODS: Study participants attended an initial visit in a preventive genomics clinic and a disclosure visit to discuss results and recommendations, primarily via telemedicine. Digital postdisclosure surveys and chart review evaluated the impact of disclosure. RESULTS: There were 60 participants (mean age 51 years, 37% women, 72% with no known CAD), including 30 (50%) referred by their cardiologists and 30 (50%) self-referred. Two (3%) participants had a monogenic variant pathogenic for familial hypercholesterolemia, and 19 (32%) had a high polygenic score in the top quintile of the population distribution. In a postdisclosure survey, both the genetic test report (in 80% of participants) and the discussion with the clinician (in 89% of participants) were ranked as very or extremely helpful in understanding the result. Of the 42 participants without CAD, 17 or 40% had a change in management, including statin initiation, statin intensification, or coronary imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Combined monogenic and polygenic assessments for CAD risk provided by preventive genomics clinics are beneficial for patients and result in changes in management in a significant portion of patients.

3.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 14(11): 1021-1032, 2021 11.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34625409

RÉSUMÉ

Up to 10% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carry underlying germline pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes. The GENetic Education Risk Assessment and TEsting (GENERATE) study aimed to evaluate novel methods of genetic education and testing in relatives of patients with PDAC. Eligible individuals had a family history of PDAC and a relative with a germline pathogenic variant in APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, or TP53 genes. Participants were recruited at six academic cancer centers and through social media campaigns and patient advocacy efforts. Enrollment occurred via the study website (https://GENERATEstudy.org) and all participation, including collecting a saliva sample for genetic testing, could be done from home. Participants were randomized to one of two remote methods that delivered genetic education about the risks of inherited PDAC and strategies for surveillance. The primary outcome of the study was uptake of genetic testing. From 5/8/2019 to 5/6/2020, 49 participants were randomized to each of the intervention arms. Overall, 90 of 98 (92%) of randomized participants completed genetic testing. The most frequently detected pathogenic variants included those in BRCA2 (N = 15, 17%), ATM (N = 11, 12%), and CDKN2A (N = 4, 4%). Participation in the study remained steady throughout the onset of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Preliminary data from the GENERATE study indicate success of remote alternatives to traditional cascade testing, with genetic testing rates over 90% and a high rate of identification of germline pathogenic variant carriers who would be ideal candidates for PDAC interception approaches. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Preliminary data from the GENERATE study indicate success of remote alternatives for pancreatic cancer genetic testing and education, with genetic testing uptake rates over 90% and a high rate of identification of germline pathogenic variant carriers who would be ideal candidates for pancreatic cancer interception.


Sujet(s)
Protéine BRCA1/génétique , Protéine BRCA2/génétique , Prédisposition génétique à une maladie , Dépistage génétique/méthodes , Mutation germinale , Tumeurs du pancréas/génétique , Appréciation des risques/méthodes , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Carcinome du canal pancréatique/génétique , Carcinome du canal pancréatique/anatomopathologie , Carcinome du canal pancréatique/thérapie , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Modèles génétiques , Tumeurs du pancréas/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs du pancréas/thérapie , Participation des patients , Facteurs de risque , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Télémédecine , Jeune adulte
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE