Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Afr Health Sci ; 21(4): 1692-1700, 2021 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35283954

RÉSUMÉ

Study Design: A prospective study of 130 patients attending the Government Dental and Maxillofacial Hospital (now Maxillofacial unit, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital), Port Harcourt, between August 2018 and September 2019. Objective: To examine the factors that affect the occurrence of a bacteremia associated with oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures, and the types of bacteria causing this bacteremia, and establish the need or otherwise for prophylactic antibiotics in, 'at risk' patients. Methods: 130 healthy adult patients requiring various oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures under local anesthesia using 2% lidocaine with 1: 100,000 adrenaline, were screened bacteriologically to determine the occurrence of a bacteremia. 5 milliliters of venous blood was collected from the antecubital vein of each patient preoperatively and within 3 minutes postoperatively. The samples collected were cultured and bacteriological identification done and analyzed. Results: Bacteremia was found in 43 (33.1%) of 130 patients postoperatively. In patients undergoing extractions, bacteremia occurred more frequently when teeth were extracted due to inflammatory dental diseases. There was no statistical correlation between the occurrence of a bacteremia and the number of teeth extracted (p>0.05). Of the 70 isolates obtained postoperatively, 5 (6.4%) were aerobes, 51 (65.4%) were facultative anaerobes (including microaerophiles) and 14 (17.9%) were anaerobes. Among the facultative anaerobes (including microaerophiles), the most frequently isolated bacteria genera were species of Staphylococcus (25.7%), Streptococcus spp. (17.1%) and Streptococcus viridans (15.7%) and among the anaerobes, Bacteriodes spp. (8.6%) were the most frequently isolated. All the isolates were sensitive to azithromycin, amikacin, imipenem and meropenem. However, 3 (30%) of the isolates were resistant to amoxicillin, which is a commonly used drug for antimicrobial prophylaxis. Conclusion: This study shows the occurrence of bacteremia in Nigerians following various oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures and that the observed bacteremia was not dependent on the patient's age or gender. This study emphasizes the need for antibiotic prophylaxis in those patients who are at risk of developing complications from bacteremia. Amoxicillin as this study shows will not be an effective antibiotic prophylactic agent in a majority of patients. The author therefore recommends the use of azithromycin as an alternative prophylactic agent in those patients.


Sujet(s)
Bactériémie , Adulte , Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Antibioprophylaxie/effets indésirables , Bactériémie/épidémiologie , Bactériémie/microbiologie , Humains , Nigeria/épidémiologie , Études prospectives
2.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 97(7): 992-6, 2005 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16080669

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: To document the etiology and clinical data of patients with fractures of the zygomatic complex seen in two university teaching hospitals in Nigeria and to compare the findings with other studies in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A six-year retrospective study involving 134 patients with zygomatic complex fractures. These patients were selected from a pool of 960 patients who sustained maxillofacial fractures during the period under review. Recorded were demographic, etiologic and clinical data as well as radiologic findings, treatment and postoperative complications. The Chi-squared test was used to test for significance and p values < 0.05 were regarded as significant. RESULTS: 76.1% were males and 23.9% females. Most (46.3%) patients were aged 21-30 years and road traffic accidents (82.1%) caused the most injuries (p < 0.05). Regarding the site of fracture, 88.8% of the patients had fractures of the zygomatic bone, 8.2% had fractures of the arch, and 3.0% had fractures of both the zygomatic bone and arch. The most frequently associated maxillofacial fracture was mandibular (21.0%). The commonest clinical feature was subconjunctival ecchymosis (63.4%), while the commonest radiologic findings were fractures at the zygomatico-frontal and zygomatico-maxillary sutures (38.8%). The Gillies approach (23.4%) was the commonest method of reduction. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that road traffic accidents are responsible for most zygomatic complex fractures in our environment. Urgent enforcement of road traffic legislation is therefore necessary to minimize zygomatic complex fractures due to road traffic accidents. It also showed a low utilization of technological advances in the imaging and treatment of these fractures. These may play a role in the frequency of postoperative complications.


Sujet(s)
Accidents de la route/statistiques et données numériques , Fractures du zygoma/étiologie , Accidents de la route/prévention et contrôle , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Enfant , Femelle , Hôpitaux universitaires/statistiques et données numériques , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Nigeria/épidémiologie , Procédures de chirurgie maxillofaciale et buccodentaire/méthodes , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs de risque , Fractures du zygoma/épidémiologie , Fractures du zygoma/chirurgie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE