RÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Bevacizumab is the only therapeutic target approved for patients with persistent, recurrent or advanced cervical cancer from a phase III study that combined with chemotherapy; it proves a significant increase in overall survival. To retrospectively assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab as the first-line treatment in patients from usual clinical practice with recurrent/persistent or advanced cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 for 6-8 cycles and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks up to progression or unacceptable toxicity. The endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rates (RR) and toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included from January 2014 to June 2017, with a median follow-up 10, 1 months. Eleven percent had recurrent/persistent disease and 89% had metastatic disease at diagnosis. The prior exposition to platinum was 70%. The median PFS and OS were 9, 6 and 21, 5 months, respectively. There was an increase of fistula formation (22%). All of them had pelvic and peritoneal disease at the beginning of treatment and previous treatment with chemoradiotherapy; non-incidence differences were found according to the type of platinum agent used. There were two treatment-related deaths, one from intestinal perforation and another from severe sepsis. CONCLUSION: Finally, although our study does have certain limitations, we believe that it can provide useful information and encouraging evidence that the routine use of bevacizumab as part of first-line treatment of patients with advanced cervical cancer may be associated with outcomes comparable with those obtained in GOG240 study.
Sujet(s)
Adénocarcinome/traitement médicamenteux , Protocoles de polychimiothérapie antinéoplasique/usage thérapeutique , Carcinome épidermoïde/traitement médicamenteux , Récidive tumorale locale/traitement médicamenteux , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/traitement médicamenteux , Adénocarcinome/anatomopathologie , Adulte , Bévacizumab/administration et posologie , Carboplatine/administration et posologie , Carcinome épidermoïde/anatomopathologie , Cisplatine/administration et posologie , Essais cliniques de phase III comme sujet , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Récidive tumorale locale/anatomopathologie , Paclitaxel/administration et posologie , Pronostic , Études rétrospectives , Taux de survie , Tumeurs du col de l'utérus/anatomopathologieRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Concurrent radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC), but RT plus epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors is an effective option when CT is not appropriate. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with an improved prognosis in LA-HNSCC; however, it has not been fully studied as a prognostic factor after RT + EGFR inhibitors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Immunohistochemical expression of p16INK4A and PCR of HPV16 DNA were retrospectively analyzed in tumor blocks from 52 stage III/IV LA-HNSCC patients treated with RT + EGFR inhibitors. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: DNA of HPV16 was found in six of 52 tumors (12 %) and p16 positivity in eight tumors (15 %). After a median follow-up time of 45 months (6-110), p16-positive patients treated with RT + EGFR inhibitors showed an improved DFS (2-year DFS 75 vs. 44 %, HR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.06-0.99, p = 0.047) compared with p16-negative patients. These differences were outperformed when compared by HPV16 status (2-year OS rates of 83 vs. 58 %, HR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.02-0.99, p = 0.049 and 2-year DFS rates of 83 vs. 45 %, HR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.02-0.99, p = 0.049). In the Cox regression analysis with OS as the end point, ECOG 0-1 was the only prognostic factor independently associated with a good prognosis in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: In this study, p16/HPV16-positive patients with LA-HNSCC treated with RT + EGFR inhibitors showed a better survival, not confirmed in multivariate analysis.