Visual impairment in FOXG1-mutated individuals and mice.

The Forkead Box G1 (FOXG1 in humans, Foxg1 in mice) gene encodes for a DNA-binding transcription factor, essential for the development of the telencephalon in mammalian forebrain. Mutations in FOXG1 have been reported to be involved in the onset of Rett Syndrome, for which sequence alterations of MECP2 and CDKL5 are known. While visual alterations are not classical hallmarks of Rett syndrome, an increasing body of evidence shows visual impairment in patients and in MeCP2 and CDKL5 animal models. Herein we focused on the functional role of FOXG1 in the visual system of animal models (Foxg1(+/Cre) mice) and of a cohort of subjects carrying FOXG1 mutations or deletions. Visual physiology of Foxg1(+/Cre) mice was assessed by visually evoked potentials, which revealed a significant reduction in response amplitude and visual acuity with respect to wild-type littermates. Morphological investigation showed abnormalities in the organization of excitatory/inhibitory circuits in the visual cortex. No alterations were observed in retinal structure. By examining a cohort of FOXG1-mutated individuals with a panel of neuro-ophthalmological assessments, we found that all of them exhibited visual alterations compatible with high-level visual dysfunctions. In conclusion our data show that Foxg1 haploinsufficiency results in an impairment of mouse and human visual cortical function.

Expanding the phenotype associated with FOXG1 mutations and in vivo FoxG1 chromatin-binding dynamics.

Mutations in the Forkhead box G1 (FOXG1) gene, a brain specific transcriptional factor, are responsible for the congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Until now FOXG1 point mutations have been reported in 12 Rett patients. Recently seven additional patients have been reported with a quite homogeneous severe phenotype designated as the FOXG1 syndrome. Here we describe two unrelated patients with a de novo FOXG1 point mutation, p.Gln46X and p.Tyr400X, respectively, having a milder phenotype and sharing a distinctive facial appearance. Although FoxG1 action depends critically on its binding to chromatin, very little is known about the dynamics of this process. Using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, we showed that most of the GFP-FoxG1 fusion protein associates reversibly to chromatin whereas the remaining fraction is bound irreversibly. Furthermore, we showed that the two pathologic derivatives of FoxG1 described in this paper present a dramatic alteration in chromatin affinity and irreversibly bound fraction in comparison with Ser323fsX325 mutant (associated with a severe phenotype) and wild type Foxg1 protein. Our observations suggest that alterations in the kinetics of FoxG1 binding to chromatin might contribute to the pathological effects of FOXG1 mutations.