The economic burden of infertility treatment and distribution of expenditures overtime in France: a self-controlled pre-post study.

BACKGROUND: Recent cost studies related to infertility treatment have focused on assisted reproductive technologies. None has examined lower-intensity infertility treatments or analyzed the distribution of infertility treatment expenditures over time. The Purpose of the study was to analyse the size and distribution of infertility treatment expenditures over time, and estimate the economic burden of infertility treatment per 10,000 women aged 18 - 50 in France from a societal perspective. METHODS: We used French National individual medico-administrative database to conduct a self-controlled before-after analytic cohort analysis with 556 incidental women treated for infertility in 2014 matched with 9,903 controls using the exact matching method. Infertility-associated expenditures per woman and per 10,000 women over the 3.5-year follow-up period derived as a difference-in-differences. RESULTS: The average infertility related expenditure per woman is estimated at 6,996 (95% CI: 5,755-8,237) euros, the economic burden for 10,000 women at 70.0 million (IC95%: 57.6-82.4) euros. The infertility related expenditures increased from 235 (IC95%: 98-373) euros in semester 0, i.e. before treatment, to 1,509 (IC95%: 1,277-1,741) euros in semester 1, mainly due to ovulation stimulation treatment (47% of expenditure), to reach a plateau in semesters 2 (1,416 (IC95%: 1,161-1,670)) and 3 (1,319 (IC95%: 943-1,694)), where the share of expenses is mainly related to hospitalizations for assisted reproductive technologies (44% of expenditure), and then decrease until semester 6 (577 (IC95%: 316-839) euros). CONCLUSION: This study informs public policy about the economic burden of infertility estimated at 70.0 million (IC95%: 57.6-82.4) euros for 10,000 women aged between 18 and 50. It also highlights the importance of the share of drugs in infertility treatment expenditures. If nothing is done, the increasing use of infertility treatment will lead to increased expenditure. Prevention campaigns against the preventable causes of infertility should be promoted to limit the use of infertility treatments and related costs.

[The French "pill scare": Did women go to a gynecologist more often to have an easier access to the IUD?] / La « crise des pilules ¼ en France : les femmes ont-elles davantage consulté un.e gynécologue afin d'accéder plus facilement au DIU ?

BACKGROUND: In December 2012, a media controversy about negative side-effects of oral contraceptives on women's health, also called "pill scare", broke out in France. While several analyses highlighted a change in women's contraceptive practices following this media controversy, no analysis has been conducted to determine the possible changes in their choices of health professionals and its repercussions on their contraceptive use. METHODS: Our study is based on data from three population-based cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2010, 2013 and 2016 (Fecond 2010, Fecond 2013 and Baromètre Santé 2016) that collected information on women's contraceptive practices and the specialties of the health professionals having prescribed the methods they were using. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2016, women went to a gynecologist or a midwife more often than to a general practitioner for prescription of a reversible contraceptive method. However, their changes in visiting prescribers did not explain the changes in their contraceptive practices observed over the period. In 2016, access to health professional remained largely dependent on women's socio-demographic characteristics: older ones and those from a more privileged social background or living in urban areas were more likely to consult a gynecologist for prescription of their contraceptive method. On the other hand, consultations of midwives for contraceptive prescription were more frequent among women with children and among those who relied on public health insurance alone. CONCLUSION: Following the "pill scare" that occurred in France in December 2012, the decision by some women to use the IUD instead of the pill led them to change health professionals, and also led practitioners to change their prescribing practices.

Relationship between achieved personalized glycaemic targets and monitoring of clinical events in elderly diabetic patients.

AIM: Recent guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the elderly recommend adjusting the therapeutic target (HbA1c) according to the patient's health. Our study aimed to explore the association between achieving the recommended personalized HbA1c target and the occurrence of major clinical events under real-life conditions. METHODS: The T2DM S.AGES cohort was a prospective multicentre study into which 213 general practitioners recruited 983 non-institutionalized T2DM patients aged>65 years. The recommended personalized HbA1c targets were<7%, <8% and <9% for healthy, ill and very ill patients, respectively. Major clinical events (death from any cause, major vascular events and/or hospitalization) were recorded during the 3-year follow-up. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used for the analyses. RESULTS: Of the 747 patients analyzed at baseline, 551 (76.8%) were at their recommended personalized HbA1c target. During follow-up, 391 patients (52.3%) experienced a major clinical event. Of the patients who did not achieve their personalized HbA1c target (compared with those who did), the risk (OR) of a major clinical event was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.69-1.31; P=0.76). The risk of death, major vascular event and hospitalization were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.40-1.94; P=0.75), 1.14 (95% CI: 0.7-1.83; P=0.59) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.60-1.18; P=0.32), respectively. CONCLUSION: Over a 3-year follow-up period, our results showed no difference in risk of a major clinical event among patients, regardless of whether or not they achieved their personalized recommended HbA1c target. These results need to be confirmed before implementing a more permissive strategy for treating T2DM in elderly patients.

Heterosexual practices of women and men living with HIV attending hospital outpatient services (ANRS-VESPA2 survey): a French comparative study with the general population (CSF survey).

HAART has improved the well-being of many people living with HIV (PLWH). This study aimed at (i) comparing heterosexual practices between PLWH and the general population by gender, and (ii) identifying factors associated with sexual practices and at-risk behaviors in the two populations. Self-reported data were collected among PLWH attending hospitals (VESPA2 survey; n = 3022) and the general population (CSF survey; n = 10,280). Significant differences between the two samples were corrected for by implementing propensity score matching on both socio-demographic characteristics and sexual behavior in terms of number of partners. Men not reporting heterosexual intercourse were excluded. After matching, 61% of women (out of 707) and 68% of men (out of 709) were sexually active in both populations. PLWH practiced oral sex less than the general population and used condoms more consistently over the previous 12-month period, irrespective of having multiple sexual partners or not. For women living with HIV: those with several sexual partners and those consuming drugs over the previous 12 months were more likely to practice oral sex; those living in a couple for at least 6 years and migrants were less likely to practice anal intercourse. For men living with HIV: those reporting bisexual relationships and those with multiple sexual partners over the previous 12 months were more likely to practice anal heterosexual intercourse; migrants reported less oral sex, irrespective of HIV status. Error term correlations showed that anal intercourse was not linked to condom use for women or men from either population. Our results show that PLWH had a lower rate of heterosexual practices compared with the general population, and used condoms more often, irrespective of the number of sexual partners and strong cultural background (e.g., for Sub-Saharan African women). Further preventive information needs to be disseminated on the risk of infection transmission through heterosexual anal intercourse.

Incidence and remission of urinary incontinence at midlife: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Urinary incontinence (UI) is often considered to be an age-related disease that develops gradually as women grow older. Much remains to be learnt about factors that promote its incidence or its remission. Our objective was to assess its incidence and risk factors. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: French GAZEL cohort. POPULATION: A cohort of 4127 middle-aged women (aged 47-52 years at baseline) over an 18-year period (1990-2008). METHODS: UI was defined as 'difficulty retaining urine'. The question was asked at baseline and repeated every 3 years over an 18-year period. Two groups (UI incidence and remission) were analysed according to status at baseline (continent or incontinent). A multivariable analysis (Cox model) was used to estimate the risk factors for UI incidence and remission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual incidence and remission rates and risk factors for UI incidence and remission. RESULTS: The annual incidence and remission rates for UI were 3.3% and 6.2%, respectively. High educational level (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.28; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.05-1.55), parity, i.e. at least one baby versus no baby (HR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.19-2.27), menopause (HR = 5.44; 95% CI = 4.47-6.63), weight gain, i.e. for each kilogram change in weight (HR = 1.00; 95% CI = 1.00-1.02), onset of depressive symptoms (HR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.09-1.57) and impairment in health-related quality of life incidence (social isolation dimension [HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.04-1.60] and energy dimension [HR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.17-1.70]) were associated with an increased probability of UI. The factors associated with persistent UI were age (HR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.55-0.61), weight gain (HR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.98-0.99) and transition to menopausal status (HR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.19-1.99). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that, in our population of middle-aged women, age, menopause, weight gain, onset of depression and impaired health-related quality of life may promote UI.