Long-term safety and efficacy of a fixed-combination halobetasol propionate 0.01%/tazarotene 0.045% lotion in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: phase 3 open-label study.

BACKGROUND: The topical corticosteroid halobetasol propionate (HP) and the retinoid tazarotene (TAZ) are effective in psoriasis treatment. To mitigate adverse cutaneous reactions observed with monotherapy, a fixed- combination HP 0.01%/TAZ 0.045% lotion has been developed for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term safety, efficacy and maintenance of response with HP/TAZ lotion. METHODS: This was a 1-year, multicentre, open-label study in 555 adults with psoriasis [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3 ('moderate') or 4 ('severe') and body surface area (BSA) of 3-12% at baseline]. HP/TAZ was administered once daily for 8 weeks and then intermittently as needed in 4-week intervals for up to 1 year based on achievement of treatment success [IGA score of 0 ('clear') or 1 ('almost clear')]. Maximum continuous exposure was 24 weeks. RESULTS: Of 550 participants with postbaseline safety data, 318 (57.8%) achieved treatment success during the study. Of those, 54.4% achieved treatment success within the first 8 weeks; retreatment was not required for >4 weeks in over half (55.3%), and 6.6% did not require any retreatment. Among participants enrolled for the full 52 weeks, 77.5% maintained BSA ≤5% on treatment. There were marked improvements in severity of itching, dryness and burning/stinging over the study course. The most common treatment-related adverse events were application site reactions of dermatitis, pruritus, pain and irritation. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed-combination HP/TAZ lotion provided maintained efficacy with a favourable tolerability and safety profile, supporting its use for the long-term treatment and management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Development and validation of the Axillary Sweating Daily Diary: a patient-reported outcome measure to assess axillary sweating severity.

BACKGROUND: Hyperhidrosis is estimated to affect ~ 4.8% of the US population, and most patients experience a negative psychological impact. Here, we describe development and psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess severity of axillary hyperhidrosis in clinical trials that meets current U.S. regulatory standards to support product approvals. METHODS: Three rounds of hybrid concept-elicitation/cognitive-debriefing qualitative interviews were conducted in adults with clinician-diagnosed primary axillary hyperhidrosis, followed by similar interviews in children/adolescents. The draft measure included diary items for presence, severity, impact and bothersomeness (basis of the Axillary Sweating Daily Diary [ASDD]), exploratory weekly impact items, and a single-item Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Phase 2 (adults only) and phase 3 (adults and children ≥9 years) clinical trial data were utilized to evaluate measurement properties of the resulting draft measure: floor/ceiling effects, nonresponse bias, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness were assessed. The primary concept of interest was axillary sweating severity (ASDD Item 2); however, additional supportive concepts were explored to allow for development of a comprehensive hyperhidrosis measure. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patient interviews were conducted (N = 21 adult and N = 8 children/adolescents), resulting in the ASDD (4 items, patients ≥16y) and child-specific ASDD-C (2 items ≥9y to <16y), as well as 6 Weekly Impact items and the PGIC (patients ≥16y). No floor/ceiling effects or response biases were identified. Consistency between hypothesized and observed correlation patterns between ASDD/ASDD-C items and other efficacy measures supported construct validity. Intraclass correlation coefficients supported test-retest reliability (0.91-0.93; Item 2). Large effect sizes (- 2.2 to - 2.4) demonstrated that the ASDD/ASDD-C Item 2 could detect changes in hyperhidrosis severity, supporting the measure's responsiveness. Patients perceiving a moderate improvement in symptoms on the PGIC experienced an average 3.8-point improvement on ASDD axillary sweating severity (Item 2); thus, a 4-point responder threshold was defined as a clinically meaningful change. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative and quantitative evidence support the reliability and validity of the ASDD/ASDD-C and its use in the clinical evaluation of axillary hyperhidrosis treatments. Further evaluation of this measure in future research studies is warranted to demonstrate consistent performance across different axillary hyperhidrosis populations and in different study contexts.

Efficacy and safety of the Janus kinase 1 inhibitor PF-04965842 in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: PF-04965842 is an oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor being investigated for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of PF-04965842 in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Patients in this phase II, placebo-controlled study (NCT02201524) were randomized to receive placebo, 200 mg once daily (OD), 400 mg OD or 200 mg twice daily (TD) PF-04965842 for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) at week 4. Study enrolment was discontinued on 25 June 2015 due to changes in the sponsor's development priorities. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were randomized and received at least one dose of PF-04965842 or placebo. The estimated treatment effect (active -placebo PASI change from baseline) and 90% confidence interval at week 4 was -5·1 (-9·2 to -1·0), -5·6 (-9·6 to -1·6) and -10·0 (-14·2 to -5·8) for the 200 mg OD, 400 mg OD and 200 mg TD groups, respectively. At week 4, the proportion of patients achieving PASI 75 was 17% for the placebo and 200 mg OD groups, 50% for the 400 mg OD group and 60% for the 200 mg TD group. There were more abnormal laboratory test results of clinical interest (low neutrophil, reticulocyte and platelet counts) in the 200 mg TD group compared with the OD treatment groups. No serious infections or bleeding events related to neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, respectively, were reported. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that treatment with PF-04965842 improves symptoms and is well tolerated in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis: results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar psoriasis is a variant of psoriasis vulgaris which can severely impair quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The main objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study were to assess the efficacy and impact on quality of life and work productivity of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis were randomized to either apremilast 30 mg bid or placebo for 16 weeks. At Week 16, all patients received apremilast 30 mg bid until Week 32. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a Palmoplantar Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (PPPGA) of 0/1 at Week 16. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who achieved a PPPGA of 0/1 at Week 16 between patients randomized to apremilast (14%) and placebo (4%; P = 0.1595). After 32 weeks of treatment with apremilast, 24% of patients achieved a PPGA of 0/1. In addition, apremilast was superior to placebo in achieving Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PPPASI) 75 (apremilast: 22%; placebo: 8%; P = 0.0499), in improving PPPASI (apremilast: -7.4 ± 7.1; placebo: -3.6 ± 5.9; P = 0.0167), Dermatology Life Quality Index score (apremilast: -4.3 ± 5.1; placebo: -0.8 ± 4.5; P = 0.0004) and in reducing activity impairment (apremilast: -11.0 ± 22.3; placebo: 2.5 ± 25.5; P = 0.0063). CONCLUSION: Despite the absence of a significant difference between apremilast and placebo in proportion of patients achieving a PPPGA of 0/1, the presence of significant differences observed for several secondary endpoints suggests that apremilast may have a role in the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis.

Drug survival of biologic therapy in a large, disease-based registry of patients with psoriasis: results from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR).

BACKGROUND: Drug survival is a marker for treatment sustainability in chronic diseases such as psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of these analyses was to assess survival of biologic treatments in the PSOriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR). METHODS: PSOLAR is a large, prospective, international, disease-based registry of patients with psoriasis receiving (or eligible for) systemic therapy in a real-world setting. Drug survival is defined as the time from initiation to discontinuation (stop/switch) of biologic therapy on registry. The number of patients who discontinued each treatment and the duration of therapy were recorded. Using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox-regression analyses [hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs)], time to discontinuation was compared across cohorts undergoing first-, second- or third-line treatment with ustekinumab, infliximab, adalimumab or etanercept. RESULTS: As of the 2013 data cut, 12 095 patients with psoriasis were enrolled in PSOLAR. Of the 4000 patients initiating any new biologic therapy, approximately 3500 started a first-line, second-line or third-line biologic therapy during the registry. Lack of effectiveness was the most common reason for discontinuation across biologic therapies. Based on the multivariate analysis, significantly shorter times to discontinuation were observed for infliximab [HR (95%CI) = 2.73 (1.48-5.04), P = 0.0014]; adalimumab [4.16 (2.80-6.20), P < 0.0001]; and etanercept [4.91 (3.28-7.35) P < 0.0001] compared with ustekinumab [reference treatment]) for first-line biologic use; results were similar for treatment effects for second/third-line therapies. Although limited in power, analyses in patients with concurrent psoriatic arthritis confirmed by a rheumatologist reflect observations in the overall psoriasis population. CONCLUSION: Drug survival was superior for ustekinumab compared with infliximab, adalimumab and etanercept in patients with psoriasis.

Photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate 80 mg g(-1) for severe facial acne vulgaris: a randomized vehicle-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Severe acne vulgaris has limited therapeutic options. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate photodynamic therapy (PDT) using topical methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL, 80 mg g(-1) ) as the photosensitizer in severe facial acne. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled multicentre trial in 153 patients (aged 12-35 years) with severe facial acne [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score 4; 25-75 inflammatory lesions with ≤ 3 nodules; 20-100 noninflammatory lesions]. Treatment (four treatments 2 weeks apart) involved incubation with MAL (n = 100) or vehicle cream (n = 53) for 1·5 h under occlusion, then illumination (635-nm red light, total dose 37 J cm(-2) ). IGA assessment and standardized lesion counts were performed before each treatment and 12 weeks after the first treatment. Treatment success was defined as improvement from baseline in IGA by ≥ 2 grades at 12 weeks. Safety assessments were for pain (10-cm visual analogue scale, immediately after illumination), erythema (four-point rating scale) and adverse events. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, PDT using MAL 80 mg g(-1) reduced inflammatory lesions vs. vehicle PDT (mean change -15·6 vs. -7·8, P = 0·006; mean percentage change -37·3% vs. -16·2%, P = 0·003). However, noninflammatory lesions did not decrease significantly (mean change -11·8 vs. -10·7, P = 0·85; mean percentage change -28·6% vs. -24·9%, P = 0·72). Treatment success rates were greater with MAL-PDT 80 mg g(-1) (44% vs. 26%, P = 0·013). Pain was low and manageable by briefly pausing illumination. There was similar pain or erythema with successive treatments. CONCLUSIONS: PDT using topical MAL 80 mg g(-1) and red light may offer promise for severe acne vulgaris.

Evidence and consensus-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of actinic keratosis: International League of Dermatological Societies in cooperation with the European Dermatology Forum: short version

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratosis (AK) is a frequent health condition attributable to chronic exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Several treatment options are available and evidence based guidelines are missing. OBJECTIVES: The goal of these evidence- and consensus-based guidelines was the development of treatment recommendations appropriate for different subgroups of patients presenting with AK. A secondary aim of these guidelines was the implementation of knowledge relating to the clinical background of AK, including consensus-based recommendations for the histopathological definition, diagnosis and the assessment of patients. METHODS: The guidelines development followed a pre-defined and structured process. For the underlying systematic literature review of interventions for AK, the methodology suggested by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was adapted. All recommendations were consented during a consensus conference using a formal consensus methodology. Strength of recommendations was expressed based on the GRADE approach. If expert opinion without external evidence was incorporated into the reasoning for making a certain recommendation, the rationale was provided. The Guidelines underwent open public review and approval by the commissioning societies.RESULTS: Various interventions for the treatment of AK have been assessed for their efficacy. The consenting procedure led to a treatment algorithm as shown in the guidelines document. Based on expert consensus, the present guidelines present recommendations on the classification of patients, diagnosis and histopathological definition of AK. Details on the methods and results of the systematic literature review and guideline development process have been published separately. CONCLUSIONS: International guidelines are intended to be adapted to national or regional circumstances (regulatory approval, availability and reimbursement of treatments).(AU)

Evidence- and consensus-based (S3) Guidelines for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis - International League of Dermatological Societies in cooperation with the European Dermatology Forum - Short version.

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratosis (AK) is a frequent health condition attributable to chronic exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Several treatment options are available and evidence based guidelines are missing. OBJECTIVES: The goal of these evidence- and consensus-based guidelines was the development of treatment recommendations appropriate for different subgroups of patients presenting with AK. A secondary aim of these guidelines was the implementation of knowledge relating to the clinical background of AK, including consensus-based recommendations for the histopathological definition, diagnosis and the assessment of patients. METHODS: The guidelines development followed a pre-defined and structured process. For the underlying systematic literature review of interventions for AK, the methodology suggested by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was adapted. All recommendations were consented during a consensus conference using a formal consensus methodology. Strength of recommendations was expressed based on the GRADE approach. If expert opinion without external evidence was incorporated into the reasoning for making a certain recommendation, the rationale was provided. The Guidelines underwent open public review and approval by the commissioning societies. RESULTS: Various interventions for the treatment of AK have been assessed for their efficacy. The consenting procedure led to a treatment algorithm as shown in the guidelines document. Based on expert consensus, the present guidelines present recommendations on the classification of patients, diagnosis and histopathological definition of AK. Details on the methods and results of the systematic literature review and guideline development process have been published separately. CONCLUSIONS: International guidelines are intended to be adapted to national or regional circumstances (regulatory approval, availability and reimbursement of treatments).

Effects of pimecrolimus cream 1% in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis who demonstrate a clinical insensitivity to topical corticosteroids: a randomized, multicentre vehicle-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Colonization with Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis (AD) is often associated with worsening of clinical symptoms. Staphylococcus aureus produces superantigens that contribute to cutaneous inflammation and corticosteroid (CS) resistance. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between CS insensitivity, S. aureus colonization and superantigen production in AD, and to explore the efficacy of pimecrolimus cream in CS-insensitive AD. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study. Seventy-three patients with AD, aged 2-49 years, who had a documented clinical insensitivity to topical CS, were recruited. The primary efficacy parameters combined laboratory (including S. aureus colonization, superantigens) and clinical assessments [including Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), whole body Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), pruritus assessment score, patient's assessment score of disease control]. RESULTS: An increase in S. aureus counts correlated with worsening of clinical score (week 6 vs. baseline) when assessed by IGA, pruritus severity and patient assessment. The presence of superantigens correlated with this worsening. During the 6-week double-blind phase, disease improvement in the pimecrolimus cream group was demonstrated by decreasing EASI scores compared with vehicle. Mean EASI scores for the head and neck showed greater improvement in the pimecrolimus cream group than in the vehicle group at all observed time points. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with clinical insensitivity to CS there was a significant positive correlation between S. aureus and disease severity. Results suggest that for some of these patients, treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% is useful, especially in the head/neck area.

Photodynamic therapy using aminolaevulinic acid for patients with nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratoses of the face and scalp: phase IV multicentre clinical trial with 12-month follow up.

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are the most common epithelial precancerous lesions, especially among individuals with light complexions. AKs are believed to progress to in situ squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and potentially, to invasive SCC. AKs and invasive SCCs share certain histopathological features and both share genetic tumour markers and p53 mutations. Given these facts, the treatment and management of AKs are integral components to quality dermatological health care. OBJECTIVES: Topical aminolaevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) has been extensively studied over the last several years. This study seeks to characterize further the efficacy and safety of ALA-PDT by extending previous work to: (i) assess the long-term recurrence rate of AKs that have resolved after ALA-PDT; (ii) to characterize the histopathology of treated AK lesions that do not completely respond to ALA-PDT or recur in long-term follow up; (iii) to characterize the histopathology of untreated clinically diagnosed AK lesions in the study population at baseline; and (iv) to evaluate ALA-PDT in darker skin types than previously studied. METHODS: Patients enrolled in this study had six to 12 discrete AK lesions, either on the face or the scalp. Individual AK lesions designated for treatment were graded as either grade 1 (lesions slightly palpable and more easily felt than seen) or grade 2 (moderately thick AKs, easily seen and felt). Patients with grade 3 (very thick and/or hyperkeratotic) lesions were excluded. For each subject, two lesions at baseline were randomized to biopsy, and were not followed as part of the study while the remaining lesions (target lesions) were treated with ALA-PDT (baseline and month 2, if required) and followed for 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 110 patients enrolled, 101 completed the study. The target AK lesions in the per-protocol population clearing completely in the first and second months following a single ALA-PDT treatment (baseline) were 76% and 72%, respectively. Sixty per cent of the patients received a second ALA-PDT treatment, limited to the target AKs still present at month 2. The percentage of treated target lesions that cleared completely peaked at 86% at month 4 then decreased gradually over time to 78% at month 12. The overall recurrence rate for all lesions that were noted to be cleared at some visit during the 12-month period was 24% (162/688). Of the 162 recurrent lesions 16 were lost to follow up, seven spontaneously cleared and 139 were biopsied. With respect to the lesions biopsied, 91% (127/139) were diagnosed histopathologically as AK, with the balance of lesions being SCC (nine of 139: 7%), basal cell carcinoma (one of 139: 0.7%) and other non-AK diagnoses (two of 139: 1%). The recurrence rate for histologically confirmed AKs was 19%. The clinical diagnosis of AK by investigators appeared to be accurate, with 91% (200/220) of the untreated clinically diagnosed AK lesions being histopathologically confirmed to be AK (AK, 142/220: 65%; advanced AK, 29/220: 13%; macular AK, 29/220: 13%). Despite concentrated efforts to recruit patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI, the distribution was as follows: I, 11%; II, 36%; III, 41%; IV, 11%; V, 2%. The demographics of this study population are typical of a patient population with AK. CONCLUSIONS: ALA-PDT was shown to be an effective and safe therapy for the treatment of AKs of the face and scalp in skin types I-V, with an acceptable rate of recurrence over 12 months of histologically confirmed AKs of 19%. Phototoxicity reactions were all expected, nonserious and had essentially resolved after 1 month post-treatment independent of skin type.

A randomized trial of the efficacy of a new micronized formulation versus a standard formulation of isotretinoin in patients with severe recalcitrant nodular acne.

BACKGROUND: Isotretinoin is very frequently the drug of choice for the management of severe recalcitrant nodular acne. Recently, a new micronized and more bioavailable formulation of isotretinoin has been developed that permits once-daily administration in lower doses than usually used with standard isotretinoin (Accutane), regardless of whether it is taken with or without food. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether micronized isotretinoin and standard isotretinoin are clinically equivalent. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy study, 600 patients with severe recalcitrant nodular acne were treated with either 0.4 mg/kg of micronized isotretinoin once daily without food (n = 300) or 1.0 mg/kg per day of standard isotretinoin in two divided doses with food (n = 300). Lesion counts were monitored over 20 weeks. RESULTS: Both treatment groups in this well-controlled clinical trial experienced an equivalent reduction in the number of total nodules (facial plus truncal). In addition, an equivalent proportion of patients achieved 90% clearance of the total number of nodules. Both formulations had similar results for other efficacy variables. CONCLUSION: Once-daily use of the micronized and more bioavailable formulation of isotretinoin under fasted conditions is clinically equivalent to the standard twice-daily formulation under fed conditions in the treatment of severe recalcitrant nodular acne.

Safety of a new micronized formulation of isotretinoin in patients with severe recalcitrant nodular acne: A randomized trial comparing micronized isotretinoin with standard isotretinoin.

BACKGROUND: Isotretinoin is a very effective drug for treating severe recalcitrant nodular acne. A new micronized formulation of isotretinoin has been shown to be clinically equivalent to standard isotretinoin with improved bioavailability and minimal food effect. The safety profile of the micronized formulation has not been described previously. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to report the incidence and intensity of adverse events found in a comparative, double-blind efficacy study that showed clinical equivalence of the new micronized formulation of isotretinoin and the standard isotretinoin formulation (Accutane). METHODS: Six hundred patients with severe recalcitrant nodular acne were treated with micronized isotretinoin (n = 300) under fasted conditions or standard isotretinoin (n = 300) under fed conditions. One cohort received single daily doses of 0.4 mg/kg of micronized isotretinoin without food and the other cohort received 1.0 mg/kg per day of standard isotretinoin in two divided doses with food. Adverse events were monitored during 20 weeks of drug therapy. RESULTS: The proportion of adverse events in most body systems was generally lower in patients receiving micronized isotretinoin than in those receiving standard isotretinoin. CONCLUSION: Micronized isotretinoin appears to have a safety profile similar to that of standard isotretinoin and to carry a lower risk of mucocutaneous events and hypertriglyceridemia.

A comparison of tazarotene 0.1% gel once daily plus mometasone furoate 0.1% cream once daily versus calcipotriene 0.005% ointment twice daily in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Both tazarotene (a retinoid prodrug) and calcipotriene (a synthetic analog of vitamin D3) are effective in the treatment of plaque psoriasis, but no reports in the literature directly compare the efficacy and tolerability of these 2 drugs. Tazarotene is commonly used in conjunction with a topical corticosteroid. In this study, tazarotene was used with mometasone furoate (a synthetic corticosteroid), and the 2-drug regimen was compared with calcipotriene monotherapy. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of tazarotene 0.1% gel once daily plus mometasone furoate 0.1% cream once daily with those of calcipotriene 0.005% ointment twice daily in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this multicenter, investigator-blinded, parallel-group study, adult patients with chronic, stable plaque psoriasis affecting 5% to 20% of their body surface area were randomly allocated to receive up to 8 weeks of treatment with either tazarotene 0.1% gel once daily (in the evening) plus mometasone furoate 0.1% cream once daily (in the morning) or calcipotriene 0.005% ointment twice daily. Patients were assessed at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, and 8 of treatment. Patients who demonstrated complete clearance of plaque psoriasis after 2 or 4 weeks of treatment and those whose psoriasis had improved > or = 50% after 8 weeks of treatment entered a 12-week posttreatment follow-up phase during which they applied only moisturizer. Patients were reassessed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of posttreatment follow-up. Physician-rated measures of efficacy included global improvement, plaque elevation, scaling, erythema, and percentage of body surface area involvement. Patient-rated assessments included efficacy of study treatment compared with previous therapies, comfort of treated skin, outlook for long-term control of psoriasis, and overall impression of treatment. RESULTS: Of 120 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis enrolled from 3 centers, 106 (88%) completed the study. No significant differences in baseline clinical variables were observed between the 2 groups. Twenty-seven patients (45%) in the tazarotene plus cortico-steroid group achieved marked improvement (> or = 75% global improvement) after 2 weeks of treatment compared with 15 patients (26%) in the calcipotriene group (P < or = 0.05). Between-group comparisons of the percentage of patients achieving complete or almost complete clearance (> or = 90% global improvement) did not reach statistical significance at any time point. When compared with the calcipotriene regimen, the tazarotene plus corticosteroid regimen resulted in significantly greater efficacy on trunk lesions in reducing plaque elevation (at the end of treatment and at week 4 of the posttreatment phase, P < or = 0.05), scaling (week 4 of treatment and week 4 of the posttreatment phase, P < or = 0.05), erythema (week 4 of treatment and at the end of treatment, P < or = 0.05), and percentage of body surface area involvement (weeks 2 and 4 of treatment, P < or = 0.01). In addition, the tazarotene plus corticosteroid regimen was significantly more effective in reducing the percentage of body surface area involvement in upper limb lesions (weeks 2 [P < or = 0.05] and 4 [P < or = 0.01] of treatment). Forty-two of 55 patients (76%) in the tazarotene plus corticosteroid group rated their medication as more or much more effective than previous therapies compared with 30 of 52 patients (58%) in the calcipotriene group (P < or = 0.05). Although adverse events (burning, pruritus, irritation, and erythema) occurred in a significantly greater proportion of patients who received tazarotene plus corticosteroid than in those who received calcipotriene (P < or = 0.05), 47 of 55 patients (85%) in both groups rated the comfort of their treated skin as "somewhat comfortable" or better and both groups had similar discontinuation rates due to treatment-related adverse events (3% and 5%, respectively). CONCL

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topical tetracaine in the treatment of herpes labialis.

BACKGROUND: Before the September 1996 approval of 1% penciclovir cream for the treatment of herpes labialis, no other prescription topical therapy was approved for the treatment of this recurrent viral disease affecting approximately 20% of the adult population of the United States. Local anesthetics, such as tetracaine, have been used in over-the-counter topical products, but are only labeled for the relief of pain and itching associated with cold sores and fever blisters. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a topical preparation of a tetracaine cream is safe and effective in the treatment of recurrent herpes labialis in immunocompetent patients. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the relative effectiveness and safety of 1.8% tetracaine equivalent in a cream base versus placebo in the treatment of herpes labialis in immunocompetent adults. In this study, patients applied medication up to 6 times daily until the lesions healed (scab loss), but for no more than 12 days. The patients were monitored on the day of enrollment, once during the course of treatment, and at a final visit after the lesions had healed. Patients assessed themselves the day of scab formation and the day the scab fell off. They also graded, on a daily basis, their perception of relief from itching and pain and the overall benefit. RESULTS: The results from 72 patients (35 = placebo; 37 = active) showed that scab formation occurred in a mean of 2.4 +/- 0.27 days for the placebo group and 2. 3 +/- 0.26 days for the active group. Healing time (scab loss) occurred in a mean 7.2 +/- 0.36 days for the placebo group and in 5. 1 +/- 0.35 days in the active group. The difference observed for healing time between the placebo and the active tetracaine cream was statistically significant (P =.0002). This represents an approximately 30% reduction in the healing time for the active group compared with the placebo group. In addition, the study patients ranked the benefit of their treatment on a daily basis and graded the overall benefit of the therapy at their final visit. The ranking was on a 1 to 10 index scale (1 = no benefit at all; 10 = very effective treatment). At the final visit there was a statistically significant difference in the benefit index for active preparation versus placebo for this subjective evaluation (placebo index, 5.9 +/- 0.6; active index, 7.3 +/- 0.48 [P =.0359]). The subjects also evaluated relief from itching and pain on a daily basis. Relief from itching was significantly greater in the active group than in the placebo group on days 2 and 3 after initiation of the treatment. Pain was not found to be severe in either the placebo or active treatment groups. At day 2 of treatment and beyond, pain scores never were greater than 3.2 +/- 0.28 for active on a scale in which 1.0 represented "no pain at all" and 10 represented "most severe pain imaginable." Although mean values for pain were always less for the active therapy, lesional pain scores never reached statistically significant lower values for active compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that a 1.8% topical tetracaine cream, when applied frequently, significantly reduces the healing time of recurrent herpes labialis lesions. Additionally, it is perceived by the study subjects to reduce itching of the lesions and to have a beneficial overall effect.

The effects of finasteride on scalp skin and serum androgen levels in men with androgenetic alopecia.

BACKGROUND: Data suggest that androgenetic alopecia is a process dependent on dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and type 2 5alpha-reductase. Finasteride is a type 2 5alpha-reductase inhibitor that has been shown to slow further hair loss and improve hair growth in men with androgenetic alopecia. OBJECTIVE: We attempted to determine the effect of finasteride on scalp skin and serum androgens. METHODS: Men with androgenetic alopecia (N = 249) underwent scalp biopsies before and after receiving 0.01, 0.05, 0.2, 1, or 5 mg daily of finasteride or placebo for 42 days. RESULTS: Scalp skin DHT levels declined significantly by 13.0% with placebo and by 14.9%, 61.6%, 56. 5%, 64.1%, and 69.4% with 0.01, 0.05, 0.2, 1, and 5 mg doses of finasteride, respectively. Serum DHT levels declined significantly (P <.001) by 49.5%, 68.6%, 71.4%, and 72.2% in the 0.05, 0.2, 1, and 5 mg finasteride treatment groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, doses of finasteride as low as 0.2 mg per day maximally decreased both scalp skin and serum DHT levels. These data support the rationale used to conduct clinical trials in men with male pattern hair loss at doses of finasteride between 0.2 and 5 mg.

Ketoconazole 2% shampoo in the treatment of tinea versicolor: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tinea versicolor is a common superficial fungal infection caused by a lipophilic yeast. This chronically recurring opportunistic infection is especially prevalent in tropical and semitropical regions. The topical short-term application of ketoconazole 2% shampoo may provide effective and safe therapy for tinea versicolor. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single application (1 day) versus three daily applications (3 days) of ketoconazole 2% shampoo versus placebo shampoo in the treatment of mycologically confirmed tinea versicolor. METHODS: Three hundred twelve patients were included in the primary analyses for this 31-day study. Global evaluation scores were measured on days 10 and 31 with a 5-point scale (1 = healed to 5 = worsening), and a cellophane tape test was done at baseline and days 3, 10, and 31. Efficacy was assessed by clinical response, defined as both a global evaluation score of 1 (healed) and a negative cellophane tape test on day 31. Signs and symptoms of tinea versicolor (scaling, itching, erythema, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation) also were evaluated at baseline, day 10, and day 31 with a 4-point scale (0 = absent to 3 = severe). RESULTS: Both regimens of ketoconazole shampoo were significantly (P < .001) more effective than placebo for rate of clinical response, global evaluation scores, and mycologic outcomes (cellophane tape test). The clinical response rates at day 31 were 73%, 69%, and 5% for the 3-day ketoconazole, 1-day ketoconazole, and placebo groups, respectively. The difference in the efficacy of the two ketoconazole treatment regimens was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between any of the treatment groups in the number of patients who experienced adverse events. No serious adverse events occurred and no patient withdrew from the trial prematurely because of an adverse event. CONCLUSION: Ketoconazole 2% shampoo, used as a single application or daily for 3 days, is safe and highly effective in the treatment of tinea versicolor.

Once-weekly fluconazole (150, 300, or 450 mg) in the treatment of distal subungual onychomycosis of the fingernail.

BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis is a prevalent infection of the nail caused primarily by dermatophytes. Fluconazole is active in vitro against the most common pathogens, penetrates into the nail bed, and is clinically effective in the treatment of a wide variety of fungal infections. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of oral fluconazole 150, 300, and 450 mg administered once weekly compared with placebo in the treatment of distal subungual onychomycosis of the fingernail caused by dermatophytes. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolling 349 patients with onychomycosis of the fingernails. Clinical and mycologic efficacy as well as measures of safety were assessed monthly for a maximum of 9 months of treatment, with additional safety visits occurring at weeks 2 and 6. For inclusion, patients were required to have clinically and mycologically documented onychomycosis of the fingernail caused by dermatophytes with at least 25% involvement of the target fingernail. After end of therapy, patients with improved or cured fingernails entered a blinded 6-month follow-up without drug treatment during which efficacy was assessed every 2 months. Efficacy was assessed by clinical (visual) and mycologic (microscopic and culture) measures. Clinical measures included assessments of the percentage of target nail involvement, measurement of the distance from the nail fold to the proximal onychomycotic border, and signs and symptoms of onychomycosis. RESULTS: Fluconazole was significantly superior to placebo in eradicating clinical and mycologic symptoms of onychomycosis, both at the end of active treatment and at 6 months after treatment (p=0.0001 for all efficacy measures). At the end of therapy, 91% to 100% of patients in the fluconazole groups were judged clinical successes, defined as reduction of the affected area of the target nail to less than 25% or cure, compared with 8% for placebo. Clinical cure rates at end of therapy were 76%, 85%, and 90% for fluconazole 150, 300, and 450 mg, respectively, compared with 3% for placebo. These clinical success and cure rates were largely maintained or improved during follow-up. Clinical relapse in cured patients during the follow-up period was very low (1.5% to 3.3%). Fluconazole demonstrated mycologic eradication rates of 89% to 100% at the end of treatment and 90% to 99% at the end of follow-up; for placebo the rates were 8% and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Fluconazole administered once weekly is safe and effective in eradicating distal subungual onychomycosis of the fingernail caused by dermatophytes.

Once-weekly fluconazole (450 mg) for 4, 6, or 9 months of treatment for distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail.

BACKGROUND: Fluconazole is a bis-triazole antifungal agent approved for the treatment of oropharyngeal, esophageal, and vaginal candidiasis, serious systemic candidal infections, and cryptococcal meningitis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate three different durations of once-weekly fluconazole for the treatment of onychomycosis of the toenail caused by dermatophytes. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled trial, 384 patients with distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail received fluconazole, 450 mg once weekly, or placebo for 4, 6, or 9 months. For inclusion, patients were required to have mycologically confirmed distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail with a large toenail at least 25% clinically affected but having at least 2 mm of healthy nail between the nail fold and the proximal onychomycotic border. Efficacy was assessed by clinical and mycologic (microscopic and microbiologic) measures at screening, at every treatment visit starting at month 3, and at months 2, 4, and 6 after therapy. Observed or volunteered adverse events were recorded and classified at all visits. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, very significantly superior clinical and mycologic results were achieved in all fluconazole groups compared with placebo (p=0.0001). This superiority was largely maintained over 6 months of follow-up. The clinical and mycologic responses of the 9-month treatment duration were significantly superior to the 4- and 6-month durations. Similar percentages of patients in the fluconazole and placebo groups reported adverse experiences for all three durations of the study. CONCLUSION: Results of this study support the efficacy and safety of fluconazole in the treatment of distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenail.