Assessment of the in-plane biomechanical properties of human skin using a finite element model updating approach combined with an optical full-field measurement on a new tensile device.

Human skin is one of the most important organ of the body. The assessment and knowledge of its properties are very useful for clinical or cosmetic research. Many techniques are used to measure the mechanical properties of this organ, like suction, indentation, torsion or tension tests. The aim of this paper is to present a new device based on tension technique and combining mechanical and optical measurements. The whole procedure used to assess the displacement field as described, and first results of tests performed in vivo are shown.

Non contact method for in vivo assessment of skin mechanical properties for assessing effect of ageing.

The assessment of human tissue properties by objective and quantitative devices is very important to improve the understanding of its mechanical behaviour. The aim of this paper is to present a non contact method to measure the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo. A complete non contact device using an air flow system has been developed. Validation and assessment of the method have been performed on inert visco-elastic material. An in vivo study on the forearm of two groups of healthy women aged of 23.2±1.6 and 60.4±2.4 has been performed. Main parameters assessed are presented and a first interpretation to evaluate the reduced Young's modulus is proposed. Significant differences between the main parameters of the curve are shown with ageing. As tests were performed with different loads, the influence of the stress is also observed. We found a reduced Young's modulus with an air flow force of 10 mN of 14.38±3.61 kPa for the youngest group and 6.20±1.45 kPa for the oldest group. These values agree with other studies using classical or dynamic indentation. Non contact test using the developed device gives convincing results.

Eye irritation responses in rabbit and man after single applications of equal volumes of undiluted model liquid detergent products.

A criticism of the use of the rabbit low-volume eye test to determine eye irritation hazard for man is the lack of comparative data in man and rabbit with undiluted products. To address this, such a study has been performed in man and rabbit using undiluted model liquid detergents. The hypothesis tested was that if, under identical test conditions, the effects in the rabbit were the same or greater than the response in man, then it is valid to use the low-volume eye test to assess eye irritation hazard for man. The studies were carried out using 29 human volunteers and 12 rabbits. The effects in the rabbit were unequivocally greater than the effects observed in man, but clearly less than the expected response from these types of product in the Draize test. The results from this study confirm the sensitivity of the rabbit as a test species, and support the use of the low-volume eye test to assess eye irritation hazard for man. Any in vitro/ex vivo alternative to assess eye irritation should be developed against the rabbit low-volume eye test or human data where available.