Comparing different methods for olefin quantification in pygas and plastic pyrolysis oils: Gas chromatography-vacuum ultraviolet detection versus comprehensive gas chromatography versus bromine number titration.

In steam cracking, upstream pyrolysis oil hydroprocessing, and in many downstream processes, olefinic content is key to assess process performance and process safety risk associated with highly exothermic reactions. When looking to plastic pyrolysis oils as a potential feedstock, as well as downstream products such as pyrolysis gasoline (pygas), these materials contain unsaturated hydrocarbons which are not present in fossil feedstocks. Pygas is a product of pyrolysis and exhibits a large number of chemical structural similarities with plastic pyrolysis oils, especially in terms of olefins structure. Quantification of the unsaturation content (olefins and di-olefins) is extremely important in industry, hence the focus of this manuscript. Detailed hydrocarbon analysis with flame ionization detection is inadequate to fully characterize the hydrocarbon composition of such samples, especially when peaks are closely eluting, or even co-eluting. In this study, the gas chromatography coupled to vacuum ultraviolet (GC-VUV) detection method previously described for the analysis of liquid hydrocarbon streams1 and plastic pyrolysis oils2 has been compared with comprehensive gas chromatography (GC × GC) and the industry standard for olefin quantification (i.e., bromine number titration). Although based on different methodologies, a correlation between the olefin content obtained from GC-VUV and the bromine number titration method is hereby presented.

Method development and evaluation of pyrolysis oils from mixed waste plastic by GC-VUV.

The conversion of waste streams into a useable material through a recycling process is a hot topic. Waste streams can originate from domestic and industrial sources and range from plastic waste to medical waste to various industrial waste streams, both solid and liquid. In addition to waste circularity, circularity for bio-based waste streams and renewable sources are also being investigated. To simplify this complexity, this article presents a case study evaluating the output from the feedstock recycling of plastic waste originating from municipal solid waste. Plastic waste entering the environment is undesired, and many initiatives are working towards a plastics circular economy. Once disposed of, ideally, plastic waste should be either re-used or recycled in order to avoid incineration or disposal in landfills. Recycling waste plastic can occur either via mechanical recycling or feedstock (chemical) recycling, where feedstock recycling can occur for example, through gasification or pyrolysis technologies. This article will focus only on the oils obtained from the pyrolysis of mixed waste plastic. The output from pyrolysis has a different composition than traditional fossil-based hydrocarbon streams, and therefore, must be evaluated to correctly process as feedstock. The authors have previously shown that gas chromatography coupled to vacuum ultraviolet detection (GC-VUV) provides accurate identification and quantification of the hydrocarbon composition (paraffins, isoparaffins, olefins, naphthenes, and aromatics - PIONA) of fossil-based liquid hydrocarbon streams.1 Therefore, GC-VUV was evaluated for analysis of the pyrolysis oils from plastic waste. Using an in-house modified spectral library in combination with the PIONA+ software, accurate identification and quantification of the hydrocarbon composition of pyrolysis oils from C4 through C30+ was possible with a limit of detection of 0.1 wt.%. To the best of our knowledge, this article is the first example of accurate PIONA-type quantification of pyrolysis oils by GC-VUV.

Quantification of the composition of liquid hydrocarbon streams: Comparing the GC-VUV to DHA and GCxGC.

Hydrocarbons analysis is important in the oil and gas industry, as stream composition has a strong impact on plant operations. The composition of hydrocarbon streams vary across a plant, which makes the selection of analytical methods challenging. Traditional methods for the evaluation of liquid hydrocarbon streams include the Detailed Hydrocarbon Analysis (DHA); however, non-traditional methods, such as comprehensive gas chromatography (GCxGC), are also utilized in the chemical industry, including Dow. This work details a comparison of analytical techniques available for such analyses, specifically, DHA and GCxGC compared to the recently introduced GC-Vacuum Ultra Violet (GC-VUV) system. Numerous liquid hydrocarbon streams were blended together to generate a composite and extensive matrix in terms of composition. Paraffin, isoparaffin, olefin, naphthene, and aromatic (PIONA) results are presented for the three techniques. All of those methods obtained relative standard deviations lower than 1.3% for five injections a day for three days. Standard addition curves were utilized to accurately quantify specific compounds in a liquid hydrocarbon stream, and these results were compared to the GC-VUV PIONA+ and DHA quantification procedures.