Improving Transfer Times for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients to a Comprehensive Stroke Center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The transfer of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) must be rapid. Delays pose an obstacle to time-sensitive stroke treatments and, therefore, increase the likelihood of exclusion from endovascular stroke therapy. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the Stroke Rescue Program, with its goal of minimizing interfacility transfer delays and increasing the number of transport times completed within 60 minutes. METHODS: The Stroke Rescue Program was initiated to facilitate the rapid transfer of AIS patients from regional primary stroke centers (PSCs) to the network's CSC. The transfer process was divided into 3 time elements: transport 1 time (initial phone call from the PSC until emergency medical service [EMS] arrival at the PSC), emergency department (ED) time (EMS PSC arrival to PSC departure), and transport 2 time (PSC departure to CSC arrival). The total transport time target was set at less than 60 minutes. Protocols and procedures were implemented with a focus on decreasing the ED time. RESULTS: Comparing baseline (preimplementation) quarter (n = 21) to postproject quarter (1 year later, n = 31), the percent transported within 60 minutes increased from 62% to 81%. A statistically significant improvement was seen for both median ED time (23 minutes versus 14 minutes; U = 171, P < .01) and median total transport time (56 minutes versus 44 minutes; U = 199, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Interfacility transfer protocols minimizing the time paramedics spend in a PSC ED can significantly reduce total transfer time to a comprehensive stroke center.

A qualitative study of health problems, risk factors, and prevention among Emergency Medical Service workers.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors among Emergency Medical Service (EMS) workers are difficult to characterize and inconsistencies remain about their main health problems. OBJECTIVES: To identify main work-related health problems among EMS workers in the United States; identify risk factors at the organizational, task, and exposure level; identify prevention strategies; examine these issues between participants (EMS workers and supervisors). METHODS: Two types of qualitative research methods based on grounded theory were used: in-depth interviews with emergency medical technicians/paramedics (EMS workers) and focus groups (EMS workers and supervisors). RESULTS: Most participants reported similar health problems (musculoskeletal injuries) and the task related to these injuries, patient handling. Participants also reported similar physical exposures (ascending stairs with patients and patient weight). For organization/psychosocial factors, participants agreed that fitness, wages, breaks, and shift scheduling were linked with injuries, but overall, perceptions about these issues differed more than physical exposures. Lack of trust between EMS workers and supervisors were recurrent concerns among workers. However, not all organizational/psychosocial factors differed. EMS workers and supervisors agreed pre-employment screening could reduce injuries. Participants identified micro- and macro-level prevention opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: The grounded theory approach identified workers' main health problems, and the organizational factors and exposures linked with them. Perceptions about work organization/psychosocial exposures appeared more diverse than physical exposures. Prevention among all participants focused on mechanized equipment, but EMS workers also wanted more organizational support.