The usefulness of peri-trigger female reproductive hormones (delta-FRH) in predicting oocyte maturation in normal ovarian reserve patients who received in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a retrospective study.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of peri-trigger female reproductive hormones (FRHs) in the prediction of oocyte maturation in normal ovarian reserve patients during the in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) procedure. Materials and Methods: A hospital database was used to extract data on IVF-ET cases from January 2020 to September 2021. The levels of female reproductive hormones, including estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone (P), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), were initially evaluated at baseline, the day of the trigger, the day after the trigger, and the day of oocyte retrieval. The relative change in E2, LH, P, FSH between time point 1 (the day of trigger and baseline) and time point 2 (the day after the trigger and day on the trigger) was defined as E2_RoV1/2, LH_RoV1/2, P_RoV1/2, and FSH_RoV1/2, respectively. Univariable and multivariable regression were performed to screen the peri-trigger FRHs for the prediction of oocyte maturation. Results: A total of 118 patients were enrolled in our study. Univariable analysis revealed significant associations between E2_RoV1 and the rate of MII oocytes in the GnRH-agonist protocol group (p < 0.05), but not in the GnRH-antagonist protocol group. Conversely, P_RoV2 emerged as a potential predictor for the rate of MII oocytes in both protocol groups (p < 0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed the significance of P_RoV2 in predicting oocyte maturation rate in both groups (p < 0.05), while the association of E2_RoV1 was not significant in either group. However, within the subgroup of high P_RoV2 in the GnRH-agonist protocol group, association was not observed to be significant. The C-index was 0.83 (95% CI [0.73-0.92]) for the GnRH-agonist protocol group and 0.77 (95% CI [0.63-0.90]) for the GnRH-antagonist protocol group. The ROC curve analysis further supported the satisfactory performance of the models, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.79 for the GnRH-agonist protocol group and 0.81 for the GnRH-antagonist protocol group. Conclusions: P_RoV2 showed significant predictive value for oocyte maturation in both GnRH-agonist and GnRH-antagonist protocol groups, which enhances the understanding of evaluating oocyte maturation and inform individualized treatment protocols in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during IVF-ET for normal ovarian reserve patients.

Effects of different doses of estrogen on ER expression and ovarian function in patients with unexplained recurrent abortion.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized trial. Objective: This study was designed to investigate the effects of different doses of estrogen on the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) in endometrial tissue and ovarian function in patients with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA). Methods: Eighty-eight patients with URSA in our outpatient department were randomly divided into three groups. They were treated with estradiol valerate (EV); standard dose of 4 mg/d (31 cases), high dose of 6 mg/d (27 cases) and 9 mg/d (30 cases). Progesterone was detected in the luteal phase, ovarian ovulation during follow-up treatment and the next month after drug withdrawal. ER expression in intima of EV 4 mg group, EV 6 mg group, and EV 9 mg group was detected by immunohistochemistry and PCR was performed before and 3 months after the treatment. Results: Anovulation of 88 URSA patients during hormone treatment was found as follows: 5 cases in the EV 4 mg group, 18 cases in the EV 6 mg group, 25 cases in the EV 9 mg group; Anovulation in the next month after drug withdrawal: 1 case in EV 4 mg group, 8 cases in EV 6 mg group, and 16 cases in EV 9 mg group. After stratified and grouped analysis, the expression of intimal ER in the EV 4 mg group, EV 6 mg, and EV 9 mg groups was significantly increased compared to before treatment in the 3 groups after treatment compared to before treatment (p < .05). There was no significant difference in ER expression between the three groups before and after treatment (p > .05). Conclusion: The higher the therapeutic dose of estrogen, the stronger the inhibition of ovarian ovulation, and the standard dose of estrogen has obvious advantages in increasing the expression of ER in intima. Limitation: 1) Insufficient sample size; 2) We need to increase the sampling time point to further observe the difference of estrogen in time effect, so as to obtain a more accurate action time of estrogen; 3) The longer-term effects of different doses of estrogen on intima were not studied, such as whether there are adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth, placental implantation, or premature exfoliation.