The Diagnostic Yield of Prenatal Genetic Technologies in Congenital Heart Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The objective was to evaluate: (i) the proportion of prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease (CHD) associated with an abnormal quantitative fluorescence-PCR (QF-PCR), chromosome microarray (CMA), and exome sequencing (ES) result; and (ii) the diagnostic yield of these technologies based on CHD category and presence of extra-cardiac anomalies (ECAs). METHODS: This prospective cohort study was set across 12 UK foetal medicine centres. All cases underwent QF-PCR, CMA, and ES, and the diagnostic yield in n = 147 cases of prenatally diagnosed CHD was assessed. RESULTS: In 34.7% (n = 51/147), a genetic diagnosis was obtained. Using a stepwise testing strategy, the diagnostic yield for QF-PCR, CMA, and ES was 15.6% (n = 23/147), 13.7% (n = 17/124), and 10.2% (n = 11/107), respectively. Abnormal QF-PCR/shunt (septal) defects 31.4% (n = 11/35), p = 0.046, and abnormal CMA/conotruncal anomalies 22.7% (n = 10/44), p = 0.04, had significant associations. Monogenic variants were commonest in complex CHD 36.4% (n = 4/11). Multisystem CHD had a greater diagnostic yield overall compared to isolated OR 2.41 (95% CI, 1.1-5.1), particularly in association with brain and gastrointestinal tract anomalies. The proportion of variants of uncertain significance was 4.7% (n = 5/107) with ES, with none in the CMA group. CONCLUSION: In the era of prenatal ES, there remains an important role for QF-PCR and CMA. Identification of monogenic pathologic variants further allows delineation of prognosis in CHD.

Second-trimester prenatal diagnosis of Nager syndrome with a deletion including SF3B4 detected by chromosomal microarray.

Nager syndrome is a rare, complex malformation syndrome, for which there is limited information on prenatal genetic testing. Clinical diagnosis of Nager syndrome, which can be caused by deletions encompassing SF3B4 gene, is possible prenatally. Prenatal chromosomal microarray can aid genotype-phenotype correlation in pregnancies with structural abnormalities seen on ultrasound.

Evolution of a prenatal genetic clinic-A 10-year cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To (a) evaluate the proportion of women where a unifying genetic diagnosis was obtained following assessment of an observed pattern of fetal anomalies and (b) assess trends in genetic testing in a joint fetal-medicine genetic clinic. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study of all women attending the clinic. Outcomes included (a) indication for referral, (b) genetic test performed and (c) diagnoses obtained. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2019, 256 patients were referred and reviewed, of which 23% (n = 59) were consanguineous. The main indication for referral was the observed pattern of fetal anomalies. Over 10 years, the number of patients reviewed increased from 11 to 35 per annum. A unifying genetic diagnosis was obtained in 43.2% (n = 79/183), the majority of which were diagnosed prenatally (50.6% [n = 40/79]). The main investigation(s) that was the ultimate diagnostic test was targeted gene panel sequencing 34.2% (n = 27/79), with this and exome sequencing becoming the dominant genetic test by 2019. Pregnancies reviewed due to an abnormal karyotype or microarray decreased as an indication for referral during the study period (21.6% [n = 16/74] 2008-2012 vs 16.5% [n = 30/182] in 2012-2019). CONCLUSION: A prenatal genetic clinic with a structured multi-disciplinary team approach may be successful in obtaining a unifying prenatal genetic diagnosis.

Exome Sequencing for Prenatal Detection of Genetic Abnormalities in Fetal Ultrasound Anomalies: An Economic Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: In light of the prospective Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes (PAGE) study, this paper aimed to determine the additional costs of using exome sequencing (ES) alongside or in place of chromosomal microarray (CMA) in a fetus with an identified congenital anomaly. METHODS: A decision tree was populated using data from a prospective cohort of women undergoing invasive diagnostic testing. Four testing strategies were evaluated: CMA, ES, CMA followed by ES ("stepwise"); CMA and ES combined. RESULTS: When ES is priced at GBP 2,100 (EUR 2,407/USD 2,694), performing ES alone prenatally would cost a further GBP 31,410 (EUR 36,001/USD 40,289) per additional genetic diagnosis, whereas the stepwise would cost a further GBP 24,657 (EUR 28,261/USD 31,627) per additional genetic diagnosis. When ES is priced at GBP 966 (EUR 1,107/USD 1,239), performing ES alone prenatally would cost a further GBP 11,532 (EUR 13,217/USD 14,792) per additional genetic diagnosis, whereas the stepwise would cost a further additional GBP 11,639 (EUR 13,340/USD 14,929) per additional genetic diagnosis. The sub-group analysis suggests that performing stepwise on cases indicative of multiple anomalies at ultrasound scan (USS) compared to cases indicative of a single anomaly, is more cost-effective compared to using ES alone. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Performing ES alongside CMA is more cost-effective than ES alone, which can potentially lead to improvements in pregnancy management. The direct effects of test results on pregnancy outcomes were not examined; therefore, further research is recommended to examine changes on the projected incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

Prenatal chromosomal microarray testing of fetuses with ultrasound structural anomalies: A prospective cohort study of over 1000 consecutive cases.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the diagnostic yield of prenatal submicroscopic chromosome anomalies using prenatal array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH). METHOD: Prospective cohort study conducted between March 2013 and June 2017 including fetuses where an elevated nuchal translucency (NT) or structural anomaly was identified on ultrasound and common aneuploidy testing was negative. aCGH was performed using an 8-plex oligonucleotide platform with a genome wide backbone resolution of greater than 200 kb and interpretation in line with American College of Medical Genetics guidance. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred twenty-nine fetuses were included; 371 fetuses with an increased NT (32.9%) and 758 with a structural anomaly (67.1%). The rate of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) and variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was 5.9% (n = 22) and 0.5% (n = 2) in the elevated NT group and 7.3% (n = 55) and 0.8% (n = 6) in the mid-trimester anomaly group. No pathogenic CNVs were identified in fetuses with an NT less than 4.0 mm. Multisystem and cardiac anomalies had the greatest yield of pathogenic CNV with a 22q11.2 microdeletion present in 40% (12/30). CONCLUSION: Prenatal aCGH is a useful diagnostic tool in the investigation of fetuses with a significantly elevated NT or structural anomaly. With time and experience, rates of pathogenic CNVs have increased, and VUS have reduced, supporting the prenatal application of increasingly high resolution aCGH platforms.

Exome sequencing in the assessment of congenital malformations in the fetus and neonate.

Major congenital anomalies are often associated with perinatal mortality, long-term morbidity and prolonged hospitalisation. Prenatal ultrasound remains the principle diagnostic test for many anomalies, but despite this up to one-third are only identified in the neonatal period. The primary step in determining underlying aetiology is to define accurately the phenotype by recognition of dysmorphology (both prenatally and postnatally). The potential introduction of next-generation sequencing, primarily through exome sequencing, into perinatal practice may improve the pathological diagnostic yield. However, clinicians must understand both the benefit and potential harms of this technology in facilitating the discovery of relevant pathogenic variants in the diagnosis and management of congenital malformations.

Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Fetal structural anomalies, which are detected by ultrasonography, have a range of genetic causes, including chromosomal aneuploidy, copy number variations (CNVs; which are detectable by chromosomal microarrays), and pathogenic sequence variants in developmental genes. Testing for aneuploidy and CNVs is routine during the investigation of fetal structural anomalies, but there is little information on the clinical usefulness of genome-wide next-generation sequencing in the prenatal setting. We therefore aimed to evaluate the proportion of fetuses with structural abnormalities that had identifiable variants in genes associated with developmental disorders when assessed with whole-exome sequencing (WES). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, two groups in Birmingham and London recruited patients from 34 fetal medicine units in England and Scotland. We used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to evaluate the presence of genetic variants in developmental disorder genes (diagnostic genetic variants) in a cohort of fetuses with structural anomalies and samples from their parents, after exclusion of aneuploidy and large CNVs. Women were eligible for inclusion if they were undergoing invasive testing for identified nuchal translucency or structural anomalies in their fetus, as detected by ultrasound after 11 weeks of gestation. The partners of these women also had to consent to participate. Sequencing results were interpreted with a targeted virtual gene panel for developmental disorders that comprised 1628 genes. Genetic results related to fetal structural anomaly phenotypes were then validated and reported postnatally. The primary endpoint, which was assessed in all fetuses, was the detection of diagnostic genetic variants considered to have caused the fetal developmental anomaly. FINDINGS: The cohort was recruited between Oct 22, 2014, and June 29, 2017, and clinical data were collected until March 31, 2018. After exclusion of fetuses with aneuploidy and CNVs, 610 fetuses with structural anomalies and 1202 matched parental samples (analysed as 596 fetus-parental trios, including two sets of twins, and 14 fetus-parent dyads) were analysed by WES. After bioinformatic filtering and prioritisation according to allele frequency and effect on protein and inheritance pattern, 321 genetic variants (representing 255 potential diagnoses) were selected as potentially pathogenic genetic variants (diagnostic genetic variants), and these variants were reviewed by a multidisciplinary clinical review panel. A diagnostic genetic variant was identified in 52 (8·5%; 95% CI 6·4-11·0) of 610 fetuses assessed and an additional 24 (3·9%) fetuses had a variant of uncertain significance that had potential clinical usefulness. Detection of diagnostic genetic variants enabled us to distinguish between syndromic and non-syndromic fetal anomalies (eg, congenital heart disease only vs a syndrome with congenital heart disease and learning disability). Diagnostic genetic variants were present in 22 (15·4%) of 143 fetuses with multisystem anomalies (ie, more than one fetal structural anomaly), nine (11·1%) of 81 fetuses with cardiac anomalies, and ten (15·4%) of 65 fetuses with skeletal anomalies; these phenotypes were most commonly associated with diagnostic variants. However, diagnostic genetic variants were least common in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency (≥4·0 mm) in the first trimester (in three [3·2%] of 93 fetuses). INTERPRETATION: WES facilitates genetic diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies, which enables more accurate predictions of fetal prognosis and risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. However, the overall detection of diagnostic genetic variants in a prospectively ascertained cohort with a broad range of fetal structural anomalies is lower than that suggested by previous smaller-scale studies of fewer phenotypes. WES improved the identification of genetic disorders in fetuses with structural abnormalities; however, before clinical implementation, careful consideration should be given to case selection to maximise clinical usefulness. FUNDING: UK Department of Health and Social Care and The Wellcome Trust.

Molecular autopsy by trio exome sequencing (ES) and postmortem examination in fetuses and neonates with prenatally identified structural anomalies.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic yield of combined exome sequencing (ES) and autopsy in fetuses/neonates with prenatally identified structural anomalies resulting in termination of pregnancy, intrauterine, neonatal, or early infant death. METHODS: ES was undertaken in 27 proband/parent trios following full autopsy. Candidate pathogenic variants were classified by a multidisciplinary clinical review panel using American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. RESULTS: A genetic diagnosis was established in ten cases (37%). Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in nine different genes including four de novo autosomal dominant, three homozygous autosomal recessive, two compound heterozygous autosomal recessive, and one X-linked. KMT2D variants (associated with Kabuki syndrome postnatally) occurred in two cases. Pathogenic variants were identified in 5/13 (38%) cases with multisystem anomalies, in 2/4 (50%) cases with fetal akinesia deformation sequence, and in 1/4 (25%) cases each with cardiac and brain anomalies and hydrops fetalis. No pathogenic variants were detected in fetuses with genitourinary (1), skeletal (1), or abdominal (1) abnormalities. CONCLUSION: This cohort demonstrates the clinical utility of molecular autopsy with ES to identify an underlying genetic cause in structurally abnormal fetuses/neonates. These molecular findings provided parents with an explanation of the developmental abnormality, delineated the recurrence risks, and assisted the management of subsequent pregnancies.

Clinical utility of exome sequencing in the prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies: A Review.

Advances in prenatal genomics have enabled the assessment of not only the sub-microscopic structure of chromosomes using chromosomal microarray analysis, but also the detection of "pathogenic variants" to the resolution of a single base pair with the use of next generation sequencing. Research is emerging on the additional prenatal diagnostic yield that exome sequencing offers when structural fetal anomalies are detected on ultrasound examination, in particular the identification of monogenic abnormalities defining prognosis and recurrence of anomalies. Primarily assessed using fetal DNA obtained by invasive techniques (amniocytes or chorionic villi), this technology is progressing into a non-invasive approach using maternal plasma. There are several challenges, to be addressed before this technology can be introduced into routine clinical practice. These are primarily technical and interpretational but also relate to service provision; cost-effectiveness; turn-around time; patient acceptability and ethical dilemmas. With adequate pre- and post-test counselling many of these challenges may be overcome and such counselling has to be multi-disciplinary, involving clinical geneticists, genetic scientists, paediatricians, perinatal pathologists and fetal medicine subspecialists. There is therefore a need for obstetricians to have an understanding of the clinical utility, application, advantages and challenges of such technologies before introduction into routine clinical practice.

The first antenatal diagnosis of KBG syndrome: a microdeletion at chromosome 16q24.2q24.3 containing multiple genes including ANKRD11 associated with the disorder.

The loss of ANKRD11 gene confirms the diagnosis of KBG syndrome but does not elucidate the pediatric phenotype providing a counseling challenge. With the expansion of prenatal diagnosis, and the potential to perform whole-exome sequencing antenatally, we must describe the genetic abnormalities, antenatal ultrasound findings, and phenotype concurrently to facilitate counseling.

Parental experiences of prenatal whole exome sequencing (WES) in cases of ultrasound diagnosed fetal structural anomaly.

OBJECTIVE: To explore parental experiences of whole exome sequencing (WES) for prenatal diagnosis and ascertain what influenced their decision-making to undergo testing. METHOD: Twelve women comprised a purposeful sample in a series of semistructured interviews. All had received a fetal anomaly diagnosis on ultrasound. A topic guide was used, and transcripts were thematically analyzed to elicit key themes. RESULTS: Five main themes (parental experiences of prenatal WES, need for information, consent/reasons for prenatal WES, sources of support for prenatal WES, and return of WES findings to families) emerged, some with multiple subthemes. CONCLUSIONS: Parents desired as much information as possible and appreciated information being repeated and provided in various formats. Many struggled with clinical uncertainty relating to the cause and prognosis following a fetal anomaly diagnosis and found it difficult to balance the risks of invasive testing against their need for more definitive information. Parents trusted their clinicians and valued their support with decisions in pregnancy. Testing was sometimes pursued to reassure parents that their baby was "normal" rather than to confirm an underlying genetic problem. Parents were motivated to undergo WES for personal and altruistic reasons but disliked waiting times for results and were uncertain about what findings might be returned.

Prenatal Detection of PIK3CA-related Overgrowth Spectrum in Cultured Amniocytes Using Long-range PCR and Next-generation Sequencing.

Mutations in PIK3CA are associated with overgrowth spectrum disorders including excessive growth in some areas of the body and the central nervous system. Alterations in PIK3CA occur as somatic, postzygotic events and confer a mosaic genotype with variability in phenotypic expression being commonly observed. We describe the second reported prenatal diagnosis of a PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum disorder. The prenatal ultrasound features in this case enabled the presumptive, prospective diagnosis to be made which was then confirmed by genetic testing. Subsequent parental testing for mutations in PIK3CA demonstrated normal genotypes. Identification of this mutation prenatally enabled prospective information to be provided to the family and facilitated multidisciplinary perinatal management.

Prenatal whole exome sequencing: the views of clinicians, scientists, genetic counsellors and patient representatives.

OBJECTIVE: Focus groups were conducted with individuals involved in prenatal diagnosis to determine their opinions relating to whole exome sequencing in fetuses with structural anomalies. METHOD: Five representatives of patient groups/charities (PRGs) and eight clinical professionals (CPs) participated. Three focus groups occurred (the two groups separately and then combined). Framework analysis was performed to elicit themes. A thematic coding frame was identified based on emerging themes. RESULTS: Seven main themes (consent, analysis, interpretation/reinterpretation of results, prenatal issues, uncertainty, incidental findings and information access) with subthemes emerged. The main themes were raised by both groups, apart from 'analysis', which was raised by CPs only. Some subthemes were raised by PRGs and CPs (with different perspectives). Others were raised either by PRGs or CPs, showing differences in patient/clinician agendas. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal consent for whole exome sequencing is not a 'perfect' process, but consent takers should be fully educated regarding the test. PRGs highlighted issues involving access to results, feeling that women want to know all information. PRGs also felt that patients want reinterpretation of results over time, whilst CPs felt that interpretation should be performed at the point of testing only. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The experience of pregnant women with a diagnosis of fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO).

OBJECTIVE: to gain insight into the experiences and perspectives of pregnant women diagnosed antenatally with fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO) participating in an interventional fetal medicine randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analysed using Riessman's narrative analysis. SETTING: fetal medicine clinics within the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS). PARTICIPANTS: five pregnant women who were recruited as part of an RCT and two additional women who were recruited after the trial was terminated before completion. FINDINGS: three themes were identified and form the basis of this article: the use of technology in pregnancy, the loss of a normal pregnancy, and decision making in uncertainty. IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: undertaking qualitative research within an RCT can illuminate the experience of the condition being studied. Women's experience of a pregnancy where LUTO was diagnosed in the fetus entailed an emotional journey following the visualisation of the abnormality through the use of routine ultrasound screening. Women tried to make sense of the diagnosis in order to make the best, albeit less than ideal, decisions for themselves, their baby, and their family. Midwives are in a good position to support women through the emotional distress of diagnosis and to help them negotiate the uncertain terrain in which they make decisions.

"If it helps..." the use of microarray technology in prenatal testing: patient and partners reflections.

The objective was to gain insight into the experiences of women and their partners diagnosed with a fetal abnormality on prenatal ultrasound examination and receiving genetic testing including microarray. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were performed with women +/- their partners after receiving the results of prenatal genetic testing. Framework analysis was performed to elicit themes and subthemes. Five main themes were recognized; diagnosis, genetic testing, family and support, reflections of the treatment received and emotions. Our results showed that women recall being told about QFPCR for trisomy 13, 18, and 21 but often no further testing. Women expected the conventional karyotype and microarray result would be normal following a normal QFPCR result. There were frequent misconceptions by couples regarding aspects of counseling/testing. Communication of variants of unknown (clinical) significance (VOUS) presents a particularly difficult challenge. Good clear communication by health care professionals is paramount. When counseling women and their partners for fetal chromosomal testing it should be reinforced that although the most common, trisomy 13, 18, and 21 only account for some of the chromosomal changes resulting in abnormal scan findings. Couples should have literature to take home summarizing scan anomalies and reinforcing information about genetic testing.