Effects of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation on the biomarker profile.

BACKGROUND: Following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), there are dynamic changes in the atrial myocardium associated with damage to and necrosis of atrial tissue and other procedure related changes in rhythm and anticoagulation. Early time-dependent changes in biomarkers of necrosis, inflammation, and coagulation have been reported. This study examines mid-term (4-8 weeks post-ablation) changes in biomarkers and explores their ability to predict AF recurrence at one-year. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (mean age 65.4 ± 9.7 years, 30% female) undergoing catheter ablation for AF had peripheral venous blood samples obtained at the time of ablation and 4-8 weeks later. All samples were processed to obtain plasma which was frozen for subsequent analysis. Coagulation studies were performed at the Northwestern Special Hemostasis Laboratory: VWF, ADAMTS13, PAI-1, D-dimer, and TAT complexes. A commercial lab analyzed samples for CRP, cystatin C, fibrinogen, galectin, IL-6, MMP-2, myoglobin, NT-proBNP, PAI-1, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TPA, and VWF. RESULTS: Significant changes were noted with higher levels of ADAMTS13 (p < 0.0001), fibrinogen (p = 0.004), MMP-2 (p = 0.0002), TIMP-2 (p = 0.003), and TPA (p = 0.001) compared to lower levels of TAT (p < 0.0001) and NT-proBNP (p = 0.0001) at follow up post-ablation. One year after ablation, AF had recurred in 11/26 (42%) of patients. None of the biomarker changes predicted the 1-year outcome, and there was no significant association with the use of warfarin versus rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF, there were significant changes in pre- vs post-ablation levels of multiple biomarkers. However, these changes were not associated with 1-year outcome of AF recurrence.

Safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in stenotic bicuspid aortic valve compared to tricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to surgical replacement for tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) stenosis. However, utilization of TAVI for aortic stenosis in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) compared to TAV remains controversial. METHODS: We queried online databases with various keywords to identify relevant articles. We compared major cardiovascular events and procedural outcomes using a random effect model to calculate odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: We included a total of 22 studies comprising 189,693 patients (BAV 12,669 vs. TAV 177,024). In the pooled analysis, there were no difference in TAVI for BAV vs. TAV for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), vascular complications, acute kidney injury (AKI), coronary occlusion, annulus rupture, and reintervention/reoperation between the groups. The incidence of stroke (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.1-1.39), paravalvular leak (PVLR) (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.26-1.61), and the need for pacemaker (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.06-1.26) was less in the TAV group compared to the BAV group, while incidence of life-threatening bleeding was higher in the TAV group. Subgroup analysis mirrored pooled outcomes except for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: The use of TAVI for the treatment of aortic stenosis in selective BAV appears to be safe and effective.

Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided radial artery catheterization in adult population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The radial artery (RA) is routinely used for both hemodynamic monitoring and for cardiac catheterization. Although cannulation of the RA is usually undertaken through manual palpation, ultrasound (US)-guided access has been advocated as a mean to increase cannulation success rates and to lower RA complications; however, the published data are mixed. We sought to evaluate the impact of US-guided RA access compared with palpation alone on first-pass success to access RA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials comparing US-guided with palpation-guided radial access in 2,432 adult participants was done. Hemodynamic monitoring was the most common reason for RA catheterization. Only 2 randomized controlled trials evaluated patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Ultrasound-guided radial access was associated with increased first-attempt success rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.35, 95% CI 1.16-1.57]) and decreased failure rate (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.87). There were no significant differences in the risk of hematoma (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-1.06), the mean time to first successful attempt (mean difference 25.13 seconds, 95% CI -1.06 to 51.34) or to any successful attempt (mean difference -4.74 seconds; 95% CI -22.67 to 13.18) between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided technique for RA access has higher first-attempt success and lower failure rate compared with palpation alone, with no significant differences in access site hematoma or time to a successful attempt. These findings support the routine use of US guidance for RA access.