Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
J Neurol Sci ; 461: 123052, 2024 Jun 15.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797140

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in older patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) is limited due to their exclusion from clinical trials. Our purpose is to evaluate the choice of DMTs in pwMS older than 50 years old in a real-world setting. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of pwMS from the Argentine MS and NMOSD Registry. We included patients under 35 and above 50 years old prescribed DMTs. Disease activity was categorized as highly active (HA) or not highly active (NHA), and DMTs were classified as low efficacy therapies (LET) or high efficacy therapies (HET). RESULTS: 1460 patients (65% females) were enrolled. The HA group comprised 241 patients, 198 young (82.2%) and 43 older (17.8%). The NHA group included 1219 patients, 893 young (73%) and 326 older (27%). In the NHA group, older patients received LET more frequently than younger patients (66% versus 44%; p < 0.01). In the HA group, older patients received LET in 61% of cases, whereas younger patients received HET in 71% (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The study shows the preference of LET in older patients regardless of disease activity. However it does not demonstrate a difference in disability in older patients based on low vs high efficacy DMTs used, probably due to the design of the study. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to address this issue.


Sujet(s)
Sclérose en plaques , Enregistrements , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études transversales , Sclérose en plaques/traitement médicamenteux , Sclérose en plaques/épidémiologie , Adulte , Facteurs âges , Argentine/épidémiologie , Sujet âgé , Facteurs immunologiques/usage thérapeutique
2.
J Clin Neurosci ; 89: 360-364, 2021 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34088579

RÉSUMÉ

The objectives of the present study were to describe the frequency of aggressive multiple sclerosis (aMS) as well as to compare clinical and radiological characteristics in aMS and non-aMS patients included in RelevarEM (NCT03375177). METHODS: The eligible study population and cohort selection included adult-onset patients (≥18 years) with definite MS. AMS were defined as those reaching confirmed EDSS ≥ 6 within 5 years from symptom onset. Confirmation was achieved when a subsequent EDSS ≥ 6 was recorded at least six months later but within 5 years of the first clinical presentation. AMS and non-aMS were compared using the χ2 test for categorical and the Mann-Whitney for continuous variables at MS onset and multivariable analysis was performed using forward stepwise logistic regression with baseline characteristics at disease onset. RESULTS: A total of 2158 patients with MS were included: 74 aMS and 2084 non-aMS. The prevalence of aMS in our cohort was 3.4% (95%CI 2.7-4.2). AMS were more likely to be male (p = 0.003), older at MS onset (p < 0.001), have primary progressive MS (PPMS) phenotype (p = 0.03), multifocal presentation (p < 0.001), and spinal cord as well as infratentorial lesions at MRI during disease onset (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSION: 3.4% of our patient population could be considered aMS. Men, patients older at symptom onset, multifocal presentation, PPMS phenotype, and spinal cord as well as brainstem lesions on MRI at clinical presentation all had higher odds of having aMS.


Sujet(s)
Sclérose en plaques/épidémiologie , Enregistrements/statistiques et données numériques , Adolescent , Adulte , Argentine/épidémiologie , Évolution de la maladie , Femelle , Humains , Imagerie par résonance magnétique/statistiques et données numériques , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Sclérose en plaques/imagerie diagnostique , Sclérose en plaques/anatomopathologie
3.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 46: 102582, 2020 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33296978

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Like MS prevalence, oligoclonal bands (OCB) frequency seems to follow a latitudinal gradient. Argentina is extensive, latitude-wise, and previous studies have not found an MS prevalence latitudinal gradient. Our aim is to describe OCB prevalence in MS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) patients included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry (RelevarEM) and to investigate if it follows a latitudinal gradient. METHODS: For each province, an average latitude was calculated, and OCB frequency was investigated. Multivariate logistical regression analysis and linear correlation were performed. Statistical analysis was repeated after excluding patients from centers using isoelectric focusing (IEF) in less than 95% of patients (CwIEF<95). RESULTS: We included 2866 patients. OCB where positive in 73.9% of patients. No association or correlation were found between OCB and latitude of residence, even after excluding patients from (CwIEF<95). CONCLUSION: OCB positivity does not follow a latitudinal gradient in Argentina. Also, OCB positivity is lower than described in other world regions.


Sujet(s)
Sclérose en plaques , Bandes oligoclonales , Argentine/épidémiologie , Humains , Focalisation isoélectrique , Prévalence
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE