Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Clin Transl Sci ; 17(9): e13873, 2024 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39250326

RÉSUMÉ

C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 17 (CCL17) is a chemokine that binds and signals through the G-protein coupled CC-chemokine receptor 4 and has been implicated in the development of inflammatory and arthritic pain. GSK3858279 is a high-affinity, first-in-class, monoclonal antibody, binding specifically to CCL17 and inhibiting downstream signaling. In this phase I, randomized, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period, incomplete-block crossover study (NCT04114656), the analgesic effects and safety of intravenous GSK3858279 were assessed in a battery of evoked acute pain assessments on healthy, adult (aged ≥18 years), male participants. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either one placebo (0.9% w/v NaCl) dose followed by two GSK3858279 doses (PAA treatment sequence), or one GSK3858279 dose followed by two placebo doses (APP treatment sequence). The co-primary end points were ultraviolet B heat pain detection threshold (°C), cold pressor time to pain tolerance threshold (PTT, sec), and electrical PTT (mA, single stimulus). Twenty-one participants were enrolled (PAA = 11; APP = 10). Mean age (standard deviation) was 29.3 (7.9) years for PAA, 31.1 (7.7) years for APP. No significant differences were observed in the analgesic effect between GSK3858279 and placebo for any end point. Exposure to GSK3858279 was similar between Period 1 (APP sequence), and Periods 2 and 3 (PAA sequence), with some GSK3858279 carry-over. Changes in serum CCL17 levels were consistent with the expected GSK3858279 activity. All drug-related adverse events were mild in intensity and caused no discontinuations. The absence of an efficacy signal in this acute pain model does not preclude efficacy in chronic pain states.


Sujet(s)
Chimiokine CCL17 , Études croisées , Volontaires sains , Mesure de la douleur , Humains , Mâle , Adulte , Méthode en double aveugle , Chimiokine CCL17/sang , Jeune adulte , Seuil nociceptif/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Adulte d'âge moyen , Analgésiques/administration et posologie , Analgésiques/effets indésirables , Administration par voie intraveineuse , Douleur/traitement médicamenteux , Douleur/diagnostic , Douleur/étiologie
2.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0273170, 2022.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35969632

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Inhaler technique errors are common in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment, potentially leading to poor disease management. Our pooled analysis approach assessed correct use and ease-of-use of a placebo ELLIPTA dry-powder inhaler (DPI) in patients with COPD. METHODS: Adults with COPD from open-label/non-blinded studies evaluating a placebo ELLIPTA DPI and reporting outcomes of correct use (based on the ELLIPTA DPI patient information leaflet [PIL]) and/or ease-of-use were included. Correct use and ease-of use at study end were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. Data from patients in the placebo ELLIPTA DPI arm of each study were pooled, and the intent-to-treat (ITT) population was used for all analyses. RESULTS: Four placebo ELLIPTA DPI studies, reporting correct use (n = 4) and ease-of-use (n = 2), were included in the analysis. The ITT population comprised 1232 patients (mean age 66.2 years). For the primary endpoint, 80.1% (n = 975/1217) of patients demonstrated correct use at study end (95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.8%-82.3%). For the secondary endpoint, 95.7% (n = 797/833) of patients rated placebo ELLIPTA DPI use "easy"/"very easy" at study end (95% CI: 94.1%-97.0%). Correct use and "easy"/"very easy" user ratings remained high across younger (40-64 years) and older (≥65 years) age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Across age groups, most patients used the placebo ELLIPTA DPI correctly and rated it "easy"/"very easy" to use. Consistent with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2021 report, our findings emphasize that proper training and clear instructions on PILs are important for optimal inhaler use.


Sujet(s)
Inhalateurs à poudre sèche , Broncho-pneumopathie chronique obstructive , Administration par inhalation , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Bronchodilatateurs/usage thérapeutique , Conception d'appareillage , Humains , Poudres , Broncho-pneumopathie chronique obstructive/traitement médicamenteux
3.
Thorax ; 77(12): 1187-1192, 2022 12.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35131893

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of switching from a pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI)-based to a dry powder inhaler (DPI)-based maintenance therapy versus continued usual care on greenhouse gas emissions (carbon dioxide equivalents, CO2e) and asthma control. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis was based on a subset of 2236 (53%) patients from the Salford Lung Study in Asthma who at baseline were using a pMDI-based controller therapy. During the study patients were randomised to fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) via the ELLIPTA DPI (switched from pMDI to DPI) (n=1081) or continued their usual care treatment (n=1155), and were managed in conditions close to everyday clinical practice. Annual CO2e (kg) was calculated for the total number of maintenance and rescue inhalers prescribed. Asthma control was assessed by the proportion of ACT responders (composite of ACT total score ≥20 and/or increase from baseline ≥3). RESULTS: The groups were well matched for demographic characteristics and baseline Asthma Control Test (ACT) total score (mean age: 49 years; mean ACT score: usual care, 16.6; FF/VI, 16.5). Annual CO2e kg per patient (maintenance plus rescue therapy) was significantly lower with FF/VI DPI treatment ('switch' group) than usual care (least squares geometric mean 108 kg (95% CI 102 to 114) vs 240 kg (95% CI 229 to 252), p<0.001). Asthma control was consistently superior over the 12 months in the FF/VI DPI group compared with usual care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients switching from a pMDI-based to a DPI-based maintenance therapy more than halved their inhaler carbon footprint without loss of asthma control. The remaining inhaler carbon footprint could be reduced through switches from pMDI to DPI rescue medications or alternative lower-carbon footprint rescue inhalers if available. Asthma control improved in both groups, with greater control demonstrated in those initiated on FF/VI DPI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01706198.


Sujet(s)
Asthme , Inhalateurs à poudre sèche , Humains , Adulte d'âge moyen , Aérosols-doseurs , Administration par inhalation , Asthme/traitement médicamenteux , Poudres/usage thérapeutique , Bronchodilatateurs/usage thérapeutique
4.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 56(1): 57-64, 2021 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33124762

RÉSUMÉ

RATIONALE: Asthma studies show many children use inhalers incorrectly even after instruction. For two age groups of children with asthma, we determined the proportions who used the once-daily ELLIPTA dry-powder inhaler (DPI) correctly, and who found it easy to use. METHODS: This was a multicenter, single-arm, stratified, open-label, placebo study (NCT03478657). Children aged 5-7 and 8-11 years were trained in, and required to demonstrate, correct placebo ELLIPTA DPI use at their first clinic visit. The inhaler was used at home once daily for 28 ± 2 days. On returning to the clinic, children were randomized to an age-appropriate, ease-of-use questionnaire that had been developed and validated previously, and which rated the inhaler as "easy" or "hard" to use. Following questionnaire completion, children were then asked to demonstrate correct inhaler use. Correct use and ease-of use were assessed in each age group (co-primary endpoints) and overall (secondary endpoints). RESULTS: Of 222 enrolled children, 221 completed the study. Among children aged 5-7 years, 92% (n = 81/88) demonstrated correct ELLIPTA use on their first attempt, compared with 93% (n = 124/133) aged 8-11 years. Of these children, 98% (5-7 years: n = 79/81; 8-11 years: n = 121/124) rated the inhaler easy to use. Overall, 93% (n = 205/221) demonstrated correct inhaler use on their first attempt, and 98% (n = 200/205) rated it easy to use. CONCLUSION: ELLIPTA DPI was used correctly and easily by most children on their first attempt without additional training.


Sujet(s)
Asthme/traitement médicamenteux , Inhalateurs à poudre sèche/méthodes , Administration par inhalation , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Soins ambulatoires , Établissements de soins ambulatoires , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Conception d'appareillage , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Poudres/usage thérapeutique , Enquêtes et questionnaires
5.
Eur Respir J ; 57(6)2021 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33334936

RÉSUMÉ

Suboptimal adherence to maintenance therapy contributes to poor asthma control and exacerbations. This study evaluated the effect of different elements of a connected inhaler system (CIS), comprising clip-on inhaler sensors, a patient-facing app and a healthcare professional (HCP) dashboard, on adherence to asthma maintenance therapy.This was an open-label, parallel-group, 6-month, randomised controlled trial in adults with uncontrolled asthma (asthma control test (ACT) score less than 20) on fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting ß-agonist maintenance therapy (n=437). All subjects received fluticasone furoate/vilanterol ELLIPTA dry-powder inhalers for maintenance and salbutamol/albuterol metered-dose inhalers for rescue, with a sensor attached to each inhaler. Participants were randomised to one of five CIS study arms (allocation ratio 1:1:1:1:1) reflecting the recipient of the data feedback from the sensors, as follows: 1) maintenance use to participants and HCPs (n=87); 2) maintenance use to participants (n=88); 3) maintenance and rescue use to participants and HCPs (n=88); 4) maintenance and rescue use to participants (n=88); and 5) no feedback (control) (n=86).For the primary endpoint, observed mean±sd adherence to maintenance therapy over months 4-6 was 82.2±16.58% (n=83) in the "maintenance to participants and HCPs" arm and 70.8±27.30% (n=85) in the control arm. The adjusted least squares mean±se was 80.9±3.19% and 69.0±3.19%, respectively (study arm difference: 12.0%, 95% CI 5.2-18.8%; p<0.001). Adherence was also significantly greater in the other CIS arms versus the control arm. The mean percentage of rescue medication free days (months 4-6) was significantly greater in participants receiving data on their rescue use compared with controls. ACT scores improved in all study arms with no significant differences between groups.A CIS can improve adherence to maintenance medication and reduce rescue medication use in patients with uncontrolled asthma.


Sujet(s)
Antiasthmatiques , Asthme , Administration par inhalation , Adulte , Salbutamol/usage thérapeutique , Antiasthmatiques/usage thérapeutique , Asthme/traitement médicamenteux , Bronchodilatateurs/usage thérapeutique , Association médicamenteuse , Humains , Adhésion au traitement médicamenteux , Nébuliseurs et vaporisateurs
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE