Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrer
1.
BMJ Open ; 13(8): e071893, 2023 08 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37541755

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: Clinical guidelines for acute non-specific low back pain (LBP) recommend avoiding imaging studies or invasive treatments and to advise patients to stay active. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of acute non-specific LBP in the emergency departments (ED). SETTING: We invited all department chiefs of Swiss EDs and their physician staff to participate in a web-based survey using two clinical case vignettes of patients with acute non-specific LBP presenting to an ED. In both cases, no neurological deficits or red flags were present. Guideline adherence and low-value care was defined based on current guideline recommendations. RESULTS: In total, 263 ED physicians completed at least one vignette, while 212 completed both vignettes (43% residents, 32% senior/attending physicians and 24% chief physicians). MRI was considered in 31% in vignette 1 and 65% in vignette 2. For pain management, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, paracetamol and metamizole were mostly used. A substantial proportion of ED physicians considered treatments with questionable benefit and/or increased risk for adverse events such as oral steroids (vignette 1, 12% and vignette 2, 19%), muscle relaxants (33% and 38%), long-acting strong opioids (25% and 33%) and spinal injections (22% and 43%). Although guidelines recommend staying active, 72% and 67% of ED physicians recommended activity restrictions. CONCLUSION: Management of acute non-specific LBP in the ED was not in agreement with current guideline recommendations in a substantial proportion of ED physicians. Overuse of imaging studies, the use of long-acting opioids and muscle relaxants, as well as recommendations for activity and work restrictions were prevalent and may potentially be harmful.


Sujet(s)
Douleur aigüe , Lombalgie , Médecins , Humains , Lombalgie/thérapie , Analgésiques morphiniques , Études transversales , Douleur aigüe/diagnostic , Douleur aigüe/thérapie , Imagerie par résonance magnétique , Service hospitalier d'urgences
2.
Z Rheumatol ; 82(1): 3-9, 2023 Feb.
Article de Allemand | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36094629

RÉSUMÉ

The majority of patients with acute back pain have no serious underlying disease; however, many internal diseases can be manifested as acute or chronic back pain. Therefore, in the assessment of patients with back pain the clinical history and clinical examination are important in order to detect indications for a possible underlying disease. Particularly red flags that indicate an acute or life-threatening disease should not be missed. In most cases where such red flags, risk factors or clinical indications are not present, no systematic search for internal underlying diseases is necessary. This article summarizes the most relevant differential diagnoses and clinical indications as well as warning symptoms.


Sujet(s)
Lombalgie , Humains , Lombalgie/diagnostic , Lombalgie/étiologie , Diagnostic différentiel , Dorsalgie/diagnostic , Dorsalgie/étiologie , Facteurs de risque , Examen physique/effets indésirables
3.
BMJ Open ; 11(10): e048531, 2021 10 13.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34645660

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is among the top three most common diseases worldwide, resulting in a life with pain-related disability. To date, no study has assessed the efficacy of metamizole (dipyrone), a non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic prodrug compared with the conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen, in patients with an acute LBP episode. Further, it is unclear, whether a short educational intervention is superior to usual care alone. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to assess first, whether metamizole is non-inferior to ibuprofen in a new episode of acute or subacute LBP. Second, we aim to assess whether a short educational intervention including evidence-based patient information on the nature of LBP is superior to usual care alone. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An investigator-initiated multicentre, randomised, double blind trial using a factorial design will be performed. A total of 120 participants with a new episode of LBP will be recruited from GP practices, outpatient clinics and from emergency departments, and randomised into four different treatment groups: ibuprofen alone, ibuprofen and short intervention, metamizole alone, metamizole and short intervention. The primary endpoint for the medical treatment will be change in pain assessed on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale after 14 days. The primary outcome for the short intervention will be change in the Core Outcome Measures Index assessed after 42 days. ETHICS, DISSEMINATION AND FUNDING: This study has been approved by the responsible Ethics Board (Ethikkommission Bern/2018-01986) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic/2019DR4002). Results will be published in open access policy peer-reviewed journals. The study is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 32 003B-179346). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04111315.


Sujet(s)
Analgésiques non narcotiques , Lombalgie , Métamizole sodique/usage thérapeutique , Méthode en double aveugle , Humains , Ibuprofène/usage thérapeutique , Lombalgie/traitement médicamenteux , Études multicentriques comme sujet , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet
4.
Int J Cardiol ; 170(3): 419-25, 2014 Jan 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24342396

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Left atrium (LA) dilation and P-wave duration are linked to the amount of endurance training and are risk factors for atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of LA anatomical and electrical remodeling on its conduit and pump function measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). METHOD: Amateur male runners >30 years were recruited. Study participants (n=95) were stratified in 3 groups according to lifetime training hours: low (<1500 h, n=33), intermediate (1500 to 4500 h, n=32) and high training group (>4500 h, n=30). RESULTS: No differences were found, between the groups, in terms of age, blood pressure, and diastolic function. LA maximal volume (30±5, 33±5 vs. 37±6 ml/m(2), p<0.001), and conduit volume index (9±3, 11±3 vs. 12±3 ml/m(2), p<0.001) increased significantly from the low to the high training group, unlike the STE parameters: pump strain -15.0±2.8, -14.7±2.7 vs. -14.9±2.6%, p=0.927; conduit strain 23.3±3.9, 22.1±5.3 vs. 23.7±5.7%, p=0.455. Independent predictors of LA strain conduit function were age, maximal early diastolic velocity of the mitral annulus, heart rate and peak early diastolic filling velocity. The signal-averaged P-wave (135±11, 139±10 vs. 148±14 ms, p<0.001) increased from the low to the high training group. Four episodes of non-sustained AF were recorded in one runner of the high training group. CONCLUSION: The LA anatomical and electrical remodeling does not have a negative impact on atrial mechanical function. Hence, a possible link between these risk factors for AF and its actual, rare occurrence in this athlete population, could not be uncovered in the present study.


Sujet(s)
Fibrillation auriculaire/épidémiologie , Fibrillation auriculaire/physiopathologie , Fonction auriculaire gauche/physiologie , Remodelage auriculaire/physiologie , Endurance physique/physiologie , Course à pied/physiologie , Adaptation physiologique/physiologie , Adulte , Fibrillation auriculaire/imagerie diagnostique , Études transversales , Échocardiographie , Électrocardiographie , Fibrose/imagerie diagnostique , Fibrose/épidémiologie , Fibrose/physiopathologie , Rythme cardiaque/physiologie , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Facteurs de risque , Nerf vague/physiologie
5.
Br J Sports Med ; 48(15): 1179-84, 2014 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24357641

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Ultra-endurance sports are becoming increasingly popular in middle-aged amateur athletes. Right ventricular (RV) arrhythmogenic remodelling has been described in high-level endurance athletes, like professional cyclists. The clinical relevance for amateurs is unknown. DESIGN: We investigated male amateur runners of the 2011 Grand Prix of Bern, a popular 10-mile race in Switzerland. Participants were stratified according to their former participations in long-distance competitions: active controls (leisure-time runners), marathon runners and ultra-endurance athletes (78 and 100 km runners, long-distance triathletes). RV function and morphology were assessed by echocardiography, including two-dimensional speckle tracking. Primary endpoint was RV global strain. Ventricular ectopy was assessed by 24 h ambulatory Holter monitoring. Results were adjusted for lifetime training hours. RESULTS: 97 normotensive athletes were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 42±8 years. Compared with active controls and marathon runners, ultra-endurance athletes had significantly more lifetime training hours and participated more often in competitions. Groups showed no differences with regard to RV global strain (-21.8±2.9 vs -23.3±2.8 vs -21.7±2.3%; p=0.973) and RV end-diastolic area (22.1±2.9 vs 22.9±4.2 vs 23.2±3.5 cm(2); p=0.694). The number of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) was weakly associated with the RV size (r=0.208; p=0.042). Overall ventricular ectopy was low (0-486 PVCs/24 h) and equally distributed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our small sample of amateur athletes, long-term ultra-endurance sport practice was not associated with RV dysfunction or complex ventricular arrhythmias.


Sujet(s)
Adaptation physiologique/physiologie , Troubles du rythme cardiaque/physiopathologie , Course à pied/physiologie , Fonction ventriculaire droite/physiologie , Adulte , Échocardiographie/méthodes , Électrocardiographie ambulatoire/méthodes , Humains , Mâle , Recueil de l'anamnèse/méthodes , Biais de l'observateur , Endurance physique/physiologie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...