Minimally invasive tubular removal of spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma - a case series of 49 patients and review of the literature.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive tubular removal of spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma. In this single-centre study, we retrospectively analysed 49 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive removal of a total of 51 benign spinal nerve sheath tumors using a non-expandable (n = 18) or expandable tubular retractor (n = 33) retractor system between June 2007 and December 2019. The extent of resection, surgical complications, neurological outcome, operative time, and estimated blood loss were recorded. Histopathology revealed 41 schwannomas and 10 neurofibromas. After a mean follow-up of 30.8 months, postoperative MRI showed gross total resection in 93.7%, and subtotal resection in 6.3% of the tumors. Three patients were lost to follow up. Of the subtotal resections, one was a schwannoma (2.4% subtotal resections in schwannomas) and two were neurofibromas (20.0% subtotal resections in neurofibromas). Intraspinal and paraspinal tumor localizations were equally accessible by minimally invasive tubular surgery. Conversion to open surgery was not required in any case. The mean operative time was 167 ± 68 min, and estimated blood loss was 138 ± 145 ml. We observed no major surgical complications. Spinal schwannoma and neurofibroma can be removed effectively and safely using a minimally invasive tubular approach, with satisfying extent of tumor resection comparable to the conventional open surgical technique and no increased risk for neurological deterioration.

Decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment versus best medical treatment alone for spontaneous severe deep supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: a randomised controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether decompressive craniectomy improves clinical outcome for people with spontaneous severe deep intracerebral haemorrhage. The SWITCH trial aimed to assess whether decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment in these patients improves outcome at 6 months compared to best medical treatment alone. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded trial conducted in 42 stroke centres in Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland, adults (18-75 years) with a severe intracerebral haemorrhage involving the basal ganglia or thalamus were randomly assigned to receive either decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment or best medical treatment alone. The primary outcome was a score of 5-6 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 180 days, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClincalTrials.gov, NCT02258919, and is completed. FINDINGS: SWITCH had to be stopped early due to lack of funding. Between Oct 6, 2014, and April 4, 2023, 201 individuals were randomly assigned and 197 gave delayed informed consent (96 decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment, 101 best medical treatment). 63 (32%) were women and 134 (68%) men, the median age was 61 years (IQR 51-68), and the median haematoma volume 57 mL (IQR 44-74). 42 (44%) of 95 participants assigned to decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment and 55 (58%) assigned to best medical treatment alone had an mRS of 5-6 at 180 days (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0·77, 95% CI 0·59 to 1·01, adjusted risk difference [aRD] -13%, 95% CI -26 to 0, p=0·057). In the per-protocol analysis, 36 (47%) of 77 participants in the decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment group and 44 (60%) of 73 in the best medical treatment alone group had an mRS of 5-6 (aRR 0·76, 95% CI 0·58 to 1·00, aRD -15%, 95% CI -28 to 0). Severe adverse events occurred in 42 (41%) of 103 participants receiving decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment and 41 (44%) of 94 receiving best medical treatment. INTERPRETATION: SWITCH provides weak evidence that decompressive craniectomy plus best medical treatment might be superior to best medical treatment alone in people with severe deep intracerebral haemorrhage. The results do not apply to intracerebral haemorrhage in other locations, and survival is associated with severe disability in both groups. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation, Inselspital Stiftung, and Boehringer Ingelheim.

Case report: Concurrent low-volume subdural hematoma and ipsilateral ischemic stroke presenting as capsular warning syndrome: a complex case with anticoagulation dilemma and dual pathology.

Background: The simultaneous emergence of low-volume subdural hematoma and ipsilateral ischemic stroke in an atrial fibrillation patient who is under anticoagulation therapy is a rare and intricate clinical case. This report accentuates the diagnostic and treatment complexities associated with these consecutive neurological conditions. Case presentation: An 83 years-old male patient initially presented with acute dyspnea, raising the suspicion of pulmonary embolism. After exclusion of pulmonary embolism through CT angiography, the patient experienced a sudden onset of left-sided hemiparesis without prior history of head trauma but with chronic intake of apixaban due to atrial fibrillation. Subsequent cranial CT tomography revealed a small right parietal subdural hematoma. After reversal of the anticoagulation therapy, surgical evacuation of the subdural hematoma was successfully performed. However, in the postoperative period, the patient developed new neurological symptoms that could not be explained by the reduced size of the subdural hematoma on a follow-up CT scan. Cranial MRI revealed the coexistence of acute ischemic stroke in the right corona radiata. The recent surgical procedure precluded guideline-recommended stroke treatment. Discussion: This case underscores the complexities of diagnosing and treating concomitant small volume subdural hematoma and ischemic stroke, especially if the latter occurs in the corona radiata resulting in fluctuating symptoms known as "capsular warning syndrome." Reversal and secondary discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy for surgical intervention highlight the inherent risk of thrombotic events in anticoagulated patients. The development of tailored treatment strategies requires a multidisciplinary approach, and further research and guidelines are required in similar complex scenarios. Conclusion: The presence of both a small subdural hematoma and an ipsilateral ischemic stroke presenting as capsular warning syndrome in an anticoagulated patient highlights the intricacy of their care. This case calls for a comprehensive and collaborative strategy to address complicated clinical scenarios.