Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 94(3): 159-64, 2012 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22507718

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: After a cholecystectomy, the current and traditional practice is to send each resected gallbladder to the pathologist for analysis. Some reports have suggested the possibility of selecting only those gallbladders that need to be analysed. The purpose of this study was to show a simple method for selecting which gallbladders should be sent to the pathologist. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was carried out. Two 'tests' were performed in 150 patients to detect or rule out gallbladder cancer. The first test included the patient's variables and a macroscopic gallbladder analysis performed by the surgeon (MGAS). The second test was the analysis performed by the pathologist. The results were compared. RESULTS: Of the 150 patients, 132 were women and 18 men; 130 were under 60 years old. One patient had inflammatory bowel disease, seven had changes on ultrasonography and in four cases intra-operative disturbances were observed. During the MGAS, disturbances were found in 30 patients. Eighty-one cases (54%) had at least one or more risk factors for gallbladder cancer.


Sujet(s)
Adénocarcinome/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs de la vésicule biliaire/anatomopathologie , Anatomopathologie clinique/méthodes , Orientation vers un spécialiste , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Cholécystectomie/méthodes , Dissection/méthodes , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Palpation/méthodes , Soins postopératoires/méthodes , Études prospectives , Procédures superflues/statistiques et données numériques
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE