Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Drug Metab Pharmacokinet ; 56: 101009, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38547661

RÉSUMÉ

Everolimus is used for immunosuppression after renal transplantation. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model of everolimus using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data of patients under long-term multiple immunosuppressive therapy, including tacrolimus. To develop the model, 185 renal transplant recipients with 3358 everolimus blood concentrations during a median postoperative period of 35.3 months were included. The PopPK model is described as a one-compartment model with first-order absorption. The population mean of apparent clearance is 8.92 L/h (relative standard error = 3.6%), and this negatively correlated with the dose-normalized concentration (C/D) of tacrolimus and hematocrit value, and positively correlated with a daily dose of everolimus (i.e. TDM effect). The usefulness of dose adjustment using the final popPK model was assessed by a simulation study. The ratio of the first trough measurement within the therapeutic range of 3-8 ng/mL increased from 69.8% in the original dose to 87.9% in the individual dose calculated by the final PopPK model. The tacrolimus C/D ratio before initiating everolimus therapy and the hematocrit value were useful to estimate the initial dose of everolimus and can improve the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy involving everolimus.


Sujet(s)
Surveillance des médicaments , Évérolimus , Immunosuppresseurs , Transplantation rénale , Humains , Évérolimus/pharmacocinétique , Évérolimus/administration et posologie , Évérolimus/sang , Immunosuppresseurs/pharmacocinétique , Immunosuppresseurs/administration et posologie , Immunosuppresseurs/sang , Mâle , Femelle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Surveillance des médicaments/méthodes , Sujet âgé , Tacrolimus/pharmacocinétique , Tacrolimus/administration et posologie , Tacrolimus/sang , Jeune adulte , Modèles biologiques
2.
Infection ; 47(6): 1037-1045, 2019 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31605309

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an educational intervention on reducing the inappropriate use of oral third-generation cephalosporins, the prevalence of resistant bacteria, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A before-after study was conducted to compare the data for 1 year before and after intervention at a Japanese university hospital. Educational intervention included lectures for all medical staff on oral antibiotics and educational meetings with each medical department. The primary outcome was the use of oral third-generation cephalosporins in inpatients as measured by the monthly median days of therapy (DOTs) per 1000 patient days. Secondary outcomes included the use of each oral antibiotic in inpatients and outpatients, proportion of ß-lactamase-nonproducing ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae (BLNAR), penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing Escherichia coli (ESBLEC), the incidence of hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection (HA-CDI), and hospital mortality. RESULTS: The use of oral third-generation cephalosporins in inpatients was significantly decreased after intervention [DOTs (interquartile range): 24.2 (23.5-25.1) vs. 3.7 (0.0-7.1), P < 0.001], and the value in outpatients was also decreased significantly. The use of fluoroquinolones and macrolides did not increase after intervention. The proportion of BLNAR, PRSP and ESBLEC did not change significantly during the study period. The incidence of HA-CDI was significantly decreased, and hospital mortality did not change after intervention. CONCLUSION: Educational intervention was effective in reducing the use of oral third-generation cephalosporins without increasing the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and worsening clinical outcome. The prevalence of resistant bacteria did not change during the study period.


Sujet(s)
Antibactériens/usage thérapeutique , Céphalosporines/usage thérapeutique , Résistance bactérienne aux médicaments , Hôpitaux universitaires/statistiques et données numériques , Prescription inappropriée/prévention et contrôle , Japon
3.
Infection ; 46(2): 215-224, 2018 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29134582

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effects of comprehensive antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) on antibiotic use, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Before-after study. SETTING: National university hospital with 934 beds. INTERVENTION: Implementation in March 2010 of a comprehensive ASPs including, among other strategies, weekly prospective audit and feedback with multidisciplinary collaboration. METHODS: The primary outcome was the use of antipseudomonal antibiotics as measured by the monthly mean days of therapy per 1000 patient days each year. Secondary outcomes included overall antibiotic use and that of each antibiotic class, susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the proportion of patients isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among all patients isolated S. aureus, the incidence of MRSA, and the 30-day mortality attributable to bacteremia. RESULTS: The mean monthly use of antipseudomonal antibiotics significantly decreased in 2011 and after as compared with 2009. Susceptibility to levofloxacin was significantly increased from 2009 to 2016 (P = 0.01 for trend). Its susceptibility to other antibiotics remained over 84% and did not change significantly during the study period. The proportion of patients isolated MRSA and the incidence of MRSA decreased significantly from 2009 to 2016 (P < 0.001 and = 0.02 for trend, respectively). There were no significant changes in the 30-day mortality attributable to bacteremia during the study period (P = 0.57 for trend). CONCLUSION: The comprehensive ASPs had long-term efficacy for reducing the use of the targeted broad-spectrum antibiotics, maintaining the antibiotic susceptibility of P. aeruginosa, and decreasing the prevalence of MRSA, without adversely affecting clinical outcome.


Sujet(s)
Gestion responsable des antimicrobiens , Infections bactériennes/traitement médicamenteux , Infections bactériennes/épidémiologie , Clostridiales , Commission sur les activités et les professionnels des hôpitaux , Études contrôlées avant-après , Rétroaction , Humains , Communication interdisciplinaire , Japon/épidémiologie , Staphylococcus aureus résistant à la méticilline , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Résultat thérapeutique
4.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 131(5): 801-7, 2011.
Article de Japonais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21532276

RÉSUMÉ

Alendronate, an oral bisphosphonate (e.g., Fosamax(®)), is effective in the treatment of osteoporosis, and the Fosamax(®) package insert advises that the bioavailability is reduced when taken with mineral water containing high levels of metal cations (Ca(2+), Mg(2+), etc.). However, standards regarding the water used when taking alendronate are unclear. In this study, the influence of mineral water on the absorption of oral alendronate was investigated based on urinary excretion of its unchanged form in rats. Alendronate was diluted in each water sample and administered orally (0.7 mg/kg) to male Wistar rats after 24-hour fast. Urine samples were collected until 24 h after dosing. Urine samples were alkalinized, and alendronate in urine was precipitated as a calcium salt, followed by loading on an anion exchange cartridge. Eluted alendronate was derivatized with 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) chloride and determined by HPLC with fluorescent detection. Cumulative urinary excretion recoveries of alendronate were calculated from the amounts of urinary excretion. Alendronate was rapidly excreted in the first 6 h, and similar elimination rate constants were seen (from 0.28 to 0.45 h(-1/2)) among the water samples. Cumulative urinary excretion recoveries with tap water, evian(®) and 100% deep ocean water were 0.98±0.17%, 0.80±0.18% and 1.01±0.16% (mean±S.E., n=4). Those with Contrex(®) (0.33±0.07%) were significantly lower when compared with ultrapure water (1.56±0.35%, p<0.01). These findings suggest that the absorption of alendronate decreases based on the calcium concentration of mineral water. In conclusion, mineral water containing high levels of calcium is not recommended when alendronate is taken.


Sujet(s)
Alendronate/pharmacocinétique , Agents de maintien de la densité osseuse/pharmacocinétique , Eau minérale/effets indésirables , Administration par voie orale , Alendronate/administration et posologie , Alendronate/urine , Animaux , Agents de maintien de la densité osseuse/administration et posologie , Agents de maintien de la densité osseuse/urine , Calcium/analyse , Interactions aliments-médicaments , Mâle , Eau minérale/analyse , Rats , Rat Wistar , Facteurs temps
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE