RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Gabapentin reduces anxiety in psychiatric patients. In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, we investigated whether a single dose of gabapentin as a premedicant reduces preoperative anxiety, and improves patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval and written consent, 210 patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups of oral premedication: placebo, hydroxyzine 75 mg, or gabapentin 1200 mg. Anxiety level was assessed 3 times, using a 100-mm visual analogue scale: before premedication, in the preoperative holding area, and just before induction of general anaesthesia. In the postoperative period, patients were asked about their satisfaction with their premedicant. Data were presented as mean +/- SD. VAS scores were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by a Bonferroni test as appropriate. The chi-square test was used to analyze categorical data. All p values less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Baseline anxiety was not statistically different among the 3 groups. Anxiety level in the gabapentin group was significantly lower in the holding area, and before induction of anaesthesia (20 mm +/- 21), than in the hydroxyzine group (33 mm +/- 26 ; p = 0.023) and in the placebo group (36 mm +/- 28; p = 0.004). Anxiety decreased significantly overtime only in the gabapentin group. The gabapentin and hydroxyzine groups had a higher proportion of "satisfied or extremely satisfied" patients (73% and 70% respectively) as compared to the placebo group (48%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: A single dose of gabapentin has proven to be an effective premedication to reduce preoperative anxiety.
Sujet(s)
Amines/usage thérapeutique , Anxiolytiques/usage thérapeutique , Anxiété/traitement médicamenteux , Acides cyclohexanecarboxyliques/usage thérapeutique , Satisfaction des patients , Prémédication anesthésique , Acide gamma-amino-butyrique/usage thérapeutique , Adulte , Méthode en double aveugle , Femelle , Gabapentine , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études prospectivesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: There are conflicting results concerning the pre-emptive effect of ketamine on central sensitization following surgery. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to assess the effect of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine on postoperative morphine consumption and pain score after remifentanil-based anaesthesia in adult patients scheduled for tonsillectomy. METHODS: We studied 40 adult patients undergoing elective tonsillectomy. Total intravenous anaesthesia was induced and maintained with remifentanil (0.125-1.0 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) and propofol target-controlled infusion. Patients in group K received a bolus dose of ketamine 0.5 mg kg(-1) immediately after anaesthetic induction, followed by a continuous infusion of 2 microg kg(-1) min(-1). Saline was administered in the same sequence in group S. Propofol, remifentanil, and the study drug infusions were discontinued at the end of surgery. RESULTS: Intraoperative remifentanil consumption (0.57 +/- 0.18 in group K vs. 0.55 +/- 0.14 microg kg(-1) min(-1) in group S), morphine requirement in the PACU (11 +/- 3 in group K vs. 9 +/- 4 mg in group S) and in the ward (22 +/- 11 in group K vs. 25 +/- 14 mg in group S), median time to first analgesia in the ward (338 +/- 126 in group K vs. 328 +/- 144 min in group S), and VAS pain scores were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: Small-dose of ketamine does not seem to be a useful adjunct to remifentanil-based anaesthesia during short, painful surgical procedures.
Sujet(s)
Anesthésie intraveineuse/méthodes , Kétamine/pharmacologie , Douleur/physiopathologie , Pipéridines/usage thérapeutique , Complications postopératoires/physiopathologie , Amygdalectomie/méthodes , Adulte , Analgésiques/pharmacologie , Analgésiques morphiniques/usage thérapeutique , Analyse de variance , Anesthésiques intraveineux/usage thérapeutique , Méthode en double aveugle , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Morphine/usage thérapeutique , Mesure de la douleur/méthodes , Satisfaction des patients/statistiques et données numériques , Études prospectives , Rémifentanil , Chlorure de sodium/administration et posologie , Facteurs temps , Amygdalectomie/effets indésirablesRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to evaluate real-life experience and the quality of labor epidural analgesia (LEA) by the patients, from the anaesthesia consultation to leaving the clinic after childbirth. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study took place over a period of 8 weeks, at the level I obstetric clinic in Martinique. One hundred and thirty-four successive patients completed an anonymous questionnaire following childbirth. RESULTS: During the study period (134 patients completed the questionnaire, corresponding to 100% return) 127 women had asked for LEA (94%), which was possible in 94%, with a patient satisfaction level of 94% and an average mark for quality at 18/20. The quality of information given at the anaesthesia consultation was judged excellent for 97%, and 91% were reassured by the consultation. The delay between the demand and the LEA procedure was less than 15 min in 63%, and in 39% the procedure was done during the night. The procedure was painless in 63%, and 97% of women were ready to begin the same procedure again. CONCLUSION: This study seems to underline the fact that the needs and the acceptability of LEA are the same in Martinique as in mainland France. This study does not support the hypothesis of the cultural barrier to justify the low level of LEA in the Overseas Departments. An obvious result seems to be that good organization of anaesthesia and obstetric services results in a natural increase in LEA demand.
Sujet(s)
Analgésie péridurale/statistiques et données numériques , Analgésie obstétricale/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte , Barrières de communication , Assistance , Culture (sociologie) , Femelle , Humains , Martinique , Adulte d'âge moyen , Satisfaction des patients , Grossesse , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for evaluation and management of cardiac function in brain-dead patients vary from country to country. The aim of the present study was to describe the results of the evaluation of brain-dead patients as potential cardiac donors in a French teaching hospital that manages the largest number of brain-dead patients in France. METHODS: Demographic parameters, the causes of brain death, clinical evolution, hemodynamic parameters, doses of inotropic and/or vasopressive drugs, the results of echocardiographic examination, and several biochemical markers of myocardial cell injury were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Seventy-one consecutive brain-dead patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the Academic Hospital of Nancy from October 1st, 1998 to September 30, 1999 were analyzed. Twenty-nine patients were considered as potential heart donors: 22 males and 7 females aged 33 +/- 3 years (Mean + SEM). The cause of brain death was head trauma in 17 cases (59%), cerebrovascular disease in 10 cases (34%), and cerebral anoxia related to cardiac arrest in 2 cases (7%). Eighteen hearts (18/29 or 66%) were harvested and transplanted with a favorable outcome at one month in 17 cases. In 11 cases, the heart was not harvested, nine (9/29 or 31%) because of myocardial dysfunction upon subsequent echocardiographic examination and 2 because of the lack of matched recipients. CONCLUSION: Comparison of these results with those of other groups suggests that hormonal substitution with insulin and triiodothyronine in the presence of myocardial dysfunction could be of potential interest to correct myocardial dysfunction and increase the number of donor hearts.