Sexual dysfunctions and short-term glucose variability in young men with type 1 diabetes.

PURPOSE: Erectile dysfunction (ED) and premature ejaculation (PE) are common sexual disorders in people with diabetes. Glucose variability (GV) has been recognized as a predictor of microvascular complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between glucose variability and sexual dysfunctions in young men with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: One hundred and twelve patients with type 1 diabetes, aged 18-30 years, were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to glucose variability [group 1 (high GV with coefficient of variation ≥ 36%)] and group 2 (low GV with coefficient of variation < 36%)). The presence of sexual dysfunctions was investigated with validated questionnaires. RESULTS: ED and PE prevalence rates in group 1 were 26% and 13%, respectively. Similarly, in group 2, the prevalence of ED was 24%, and the prevalence of PE was 13%. In both groups, no significant associations between sexual dysfunctions and parameters of glucose variability were found. Multiple regression analysis identified age and depression as independent predictors of ED and PE. CONCLUSION: Young male patients affected by type 1 diabetes with high or low glucose variability show a similar prevalence of sexual dysfunctions. ED is the most common sexual dysfunction in diabetic men. Age and depression were the only independent predictive factors for sexual dysfunctions in this population.

Glycemic control in people with type 1 diabetes using a hybrid closed loop system and followed by telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.

AIMS: This study aims at evaluating the metrics of glycemic control in people with type 1 diabetes using the hybrid closed loop (HCL) system during the COVID-19 lockdown. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of thirty adults with type 1 diabetes using HCL and followed with telemedicine at an Italian University Hospital. Data on metrics of glucose control were collected at different times: two weeks before the lockdown (Time 0), first two weeks of lockdown (Time 1), last two weeks of lockdown (Time 2) and first two weeks after the lockdown (Time 3). The primary endpoint was the change in glucose management indicator (GMI) across the different time points. RESULTS: GMI did not worsen over time (Time 1 vs Time 3, 7% vs 6.9%, P < 0.05), whereas a reduction of mean glucose (P = 0.004) and indices of glucose variability was observed. Time in range (TIR) significantly increased (68.5% vs 73.5%, P = 0.012), and time above range (TAR) level 2 (251-400 mg/dL) significantly decreased (P = 0.002). The improvement of TIR and glucose variability was mainly observed in participants < 35 years. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with type 1 diabetes using HCL showed a significant improvement of most of the metrics of glucose control during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Gender-differences in glycemic control and diabetes related factors in young adults with type 1 diabetes: results from the METRO study.

PURPOSE: To describe gender differences concerning glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, diabetic complications, concomitant pathologies, and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), in a population of young adults with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We collected data from 300 consecutively patients (168 males and 132 females), aged 18-30 years, among those admitted at Diabetes Unit of University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (Naples, Italy) from March 2012 to January 2017. Circulating levels of seven EPCs phenotypes were determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: As compared to men, women with type 1 diabetes had a significantly higher HbA1c levels (%, 8.4 ± 1.3 vs. 8.1 ± 1.3, P = 0.020), body mass index (Kg/m2, 24.8 ± 4.2 vs. 23.9 ± 3.9, P = 0.034), HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL, 61.7 ± 13.7 vs. 54.7 ± 13.9, P < 0.001), and a lower count of both CD133+KDR+ and CD34+KDR+CD133+ EPCs (P = 0.022, P < 0.001, respectively). A higher proportion of women had overweight/obesity, and thyroiditis; smoking and sexual dysfunctions were more prevalent in men than in women. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults with type 1 diabetes present gender differences with regard to glycemic control, prevalence of some cardiovascular risk factors, sexual dysfunctions and circulating levels of EPCs, most often to the detriment of women.