Anal Cancer in the Era of Dose Painted Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Implications for Regional Nodal Therapy.

Since the initial development of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin as a standard of care platform for definitive anal cancer chemoradiotherapy, multiple studies have evaluated the optimal chemotherapy regimen, and radiotherapy technique. Refinements in treatment technique have taken place during an era of improved diagnostic imaging, including incorporation of FDG-PET, with implications for a possible stage migration effect. This has introduced an opportunity to develop stage-specific recommendations for primary tumor, involved nodal, and elective nodal irradiation dose. Elective nodal irradiation remains standard given the low rates of elective nodal failure with current practice, although may be subject to evolving controversy for patients with early stage disease. In this review, development of the current standard of care for anal cancer chemoradiotherapy is reviewed in the context of modern staging and dose-painted radiotherapy treatment techniques.

A Contemporary Update on the Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Liver Metastases in the Evolving Landscape of Oligometastatic Disease Management.

Metastases to the liver are common, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a recognized tool for ablation of liver metastases. Colorectal cancers commonly metastasize to the liver, and long-term survival is possible after metastasectomy. However, many patients are not candidates for surgical resection, which opened the door to early studies investigating noninvasive techniques such as liver SBRT. Multiple prospective trials have demonstrated excellent local control with this approach coupled with an excellent safety record. The oligometastatic disease state is now appreciated across many histologies, and treatment of liver metastases as a component of oligometastatic disease management has emerged as a rational and relevant strategy. To this end, recent randomized studies in oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer demonstrated improved progression-free survival with consolidative local therapy, and this approach is the topic of ongoing cooperative group studies inclusive of patients with an array of primary histologies. Further, there is a push to explore the role of radiation as a means to enhance the efficacy of immune enabling drugs. Recent prospective data evaluating the safety and response of SBRT with anti-CTLA-4 therapy for patients with lung or liver metastasis demonstrated clinical benefit (out of field immune-related partial response or immune-related stable disease ≥6 months) in about a quarter of enrolled patients. Interestingly, SBRT to liver metastases was found to elicit a greater systemic immune response than SBRT to lung metastases. Classic management paradigms for metastatic disease are rapidly being supplanted by approaches that are improving outcomes for patients previously offered best supportive care or palliation alone. In this article, we will review the established and emerging potential indications for liver SBRT in this new era of oncologic care.

Brachytherapy should not be omitted when treating locally advanced neuroendocrine cervical cancer with definitive chemoradiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine cervical cancer is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis, yet there is a paucity of data to guide treatment decisions when managing patients with this diagnosis. Specifically, there are little data to aid practitioners in deciding if there is added value to brachytherapy given the additional time, cost, discomfort, and toxicity to patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify women with locally advanced neuroendocrine cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy to determine if the addition of brachytherapy improves outcomes in this disease. We also assessed outcomes based on chemotherapy timing in this cohort. RESULTS: We identified 100 patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic neuroendocrine cervical cancer that were treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy between 2004 and 2012. There was a substantial improvement in overall survival when brachytherapy was administered in addition to external beam radiotherapy. In multivariate analysis, the addition of brachytherapy, compared with external beam radiotherapy alone, was associated with an improved median survival of 48.6 vs. 21.6 months (hazard ratio (HR), 0.475; 95% CI, 0.255-0.883; p = 0.019). We observed no difference in overall survival for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with the group who received chemotherapy started concurrently with radiation (HR, 0.851; 95% CI, 0.483-1.500; p = 0.578). CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy should be considered an essential component of definitive chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of neuroendocrine cervical cancer. Chemotherapy timing, however, does not impact outcome.

Treatment Selection and Survival Outcomes With and Without Radiation for Unresectable, Localized Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Most patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma present with locally advanced disease not amenable to surgical resection. For these inoperable patients, chemotherapy alone is generally considered the standard of care, with limited data regarding the role of radiotherapy. We used the National Cancer Database to investigate care patterns and the impact of radiation as a component of combined modality therapy on overall survival. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with nonmetastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed from 2001 to 2011. Those undergoing surgery were excluded. All included patients were coded as having received chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimates and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to account for indication bias and mitigate heterogeneity between treatment groups. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred thirty-six patients were identified with a median follow-up of 11.3 months. Median age was 63 years; 23% received combined modality therapy with radiation. Two-year overall survival for the entire cohort was 21%, and for the chemotherapy-alone and combined modality therapy groups, it was 20% versus 26%, respectively. On univariate analysis, overall survival was improved with combined modality therapy. On multivariate analysis, combined modality therapy remained significantly associated with improved overall survival, as did younger age, female sex, higher median income, lower comorbidity score, and earlier stage. Propensity score matched analysis confirmed the overall survival benefit associated with combined modality therapy. DISCUSSION: In this largest reported analysis of combined modality therapy for localized, inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, the addition of radiation to chemotherapy was associated with an improvement in overall survival. Three quarters of inoperable patients in the United States do not receive radiation. Survival remains relatively poor for all patients, and we enthusiastically support ongoing randomized trials seeking to incorporate radiotherapy as a possible means to improve outcomes.

Phase I feasibility trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in incidence and the majority of patients are not candidates for radical therapies. Therefore, interest in minimally invasive therapies in growing. METHODS: A Phase I dose escalation trial was conducted at Indiana University to determine the feasibility and toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for primary HCC. Eligible patients had Child-Turcotte-Pugh's Class (CTP) A or B, were not candidates for resection, had 1-3 lesions and cumulative tumour diameter less than or equal to 6 cm. Dose escalation started at 36 Gy in 3 fractions (12 Gy/fraction) with a subsequent planned escalation of 2 Gy/ fraction/level. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 grade 3 or greater toxicity. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with 25 lesions were enrolled. Dose was escalated to 48 Gy (16 Gy/fraction) in CTP-A patients without DLT. Two patients with CPC-B disease developed grade 3 hepatic toxicity at the 42-Gy (14 Gy/fraction) level. The protocol was amended for subsequent CTP-B patients to receive a regimen of 5 fractions starting at 40 Gy (8 Gy/fraction) with one patient experiencing progressive liver failure. Four additional patients were enrolled (one died of unrelated causes after an incomplete SBRT course) without DLT. The only factor related to more than one grade 3 or greater liver toxicity or death within 6 months was the CTP score (p=0.03). Six patients underwent a liver transplant. Ten patients are alive without progression with a median FU of 24 months (10-42 months), with local control/stabilisation of the disease of 100%. One and two-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival are 75% and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is a non-invasive feasible and well tolerated therapy in adequately selected patients with HCC. The preliminary local control and survival are encouraging. A confirmatory Phase II trial is currently open to accrual.