Episode-level and clinical characterization of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation events.

INTRODUCTION: Not all patients experience debilitating symptoms during Atrial Fibrillation (AF), some are asymptomatic. The reasons for this inter- and intrasubject variability is unknown. PURPOSE: The study objective was NOAH characterize episode-level and clinical characteristics associated with symptomatic versus asymptomatic episodes of AF in patients with an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). METHODS: Patients with an AF episode detected on an ICM between 2007 and 2021 with overlapping clinical data from aggregated Electronic Health Records in the Optum® deidentified data set were included. Symptomatic episodes were labeled in real-time by the patient. Heart rate (HR) at onset, mean HR, AF Evidence Score (a measure of beat-to-beat irregularity), episode duration and Activity Index were evaluated for association with symptom status using multivariable regression modeling. RESULTS: 11 267 patients had AF episodes with clinical data available. The 1776 (15.8%) patients who reported symptomatic AF episodes were younger (67 ± 12 years vs. 71 ± 11 years old, p < .001) and had fewer cardiovascular co-morbidities than patients with asymptomatic AF exclusively. Symptomatic episodes were longer (5.5 [2.4, 14.4] h vs. 3.7 [1.7, 11] h, p < .001), had higher mean HR (103 ± 22 bpm vs. 88 ± 22 bpm, p < .001) and higher AF evidence scores (98 ± 27 vs. 82 ± 24, p < .001). These features were independently associated with symptomatic episodes on multivariable regression analysis and per-subject analysis in patients who had both symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes. DISCUSSION: Episode-level characteristics differed between symptomatic AF episodes versus asymptomatic episodes in patients with ICMs. Symptomatic patients also had less comorbidities. These parameters may be useful in understanding variable symptomatic manifestation and remote stratification of AF episodes.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and impact on clinical outcomes.

Aims: Catheter ablation is the most effective rhythm-control option in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is currently considered an option mainly for improving symptoms. We aimed to assess the impact of catheter ablation on hard clinical outcomes. Methods and results: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing catheter ablation vs. optimized medical treatment. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on 8 January 2024, for trials published ≤10 years. We pooled data through risk ratio (RR) and mean differences (MDs), with 95% confidence interval (CI), and calculated the number needed to treat (NNT). Sub-group and sensitivity analyses were performed for the presence/absence of heart failure (HF), paroxysmal/persistent AF, early ablation, higher/lower quality, and published ≤5 vs. >5 years. Twenty-two RCTs were identified, including 6400 patients followed for 6-52 months. All primary endpoints were significantly reduced by catheter ablation vs. medical management: all-cause hospitalization (RR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.85, P = 0.006), AF relapse (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.39-0.58, P < 0.00001), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.86, P = 0.0007, NNT = 44.7, driven by trials with HF patients). A benefit was also demonstrated for all secondary endpoints: cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.87), cardiovascular (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.96), and HF hospitalizations (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.89), AF burden (MD = 20.6%, 95% CI 5.6-35.5), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery (MD = 5.7%, 95% CI 3.5-7.9), and quality of life (MLHFQ, AFEQT, and SF-36 scales). Conclusion: Catheter ablation significantly reduced hospitalizations, AF burden, and relapse, and improved quality of life. An impact on hard clinical outcomes, with an important mortality reduction and improvement in LVEF, was seen for patients with AF and HF.

Temporal Association Between Atrial Fibrillation Burden in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and the Risk of Heart Failure Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) events in cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are temporally associated with stroke risk. This study explores temporal differences in AF burden associated with HF hospitalization risk in patients with CIEDs. METHODS: Patients with HF events from the Optum de-identified Electronic Health Records from 2007 to 2021 and 120 days of preceding CIED-derived rhythm data from a linked manufacturer's data warehouse were included. AF burden ≥5.5 h/d was defined as an AF event. The AF event burden in the case period (days 1-30 immediately before the HF event) was considered temporally associated with the HF event and compared with the AF event burden in a temporally dissociated control period (days 91-120 before the HF event). The odds ratio for temporally associated HF events and the odds ratio associated with poorly rate-controlled AF (>110 bpm) were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 7257 HF events with prerequisite CIED data were included; 957 (13.2%) patients had AF events recorded only in either their case (763 [10.5%]) or control (194 [2.7%]) periods, but not both. The odds ratio for a temporally associated HF event was 3.93 (95% CI, 3.36-4.60). This was greater for an HF event with a longer stay of >3 days (odds ratio, 4.51 [95% CI, 3.57-5.68]). In patients with AF during both the control and case periods, poor AF rate control during the case period also increased HF event risk (1.78 [95% CI, 1.22-2.61]). In all, 222 of 4759 (5%) patients without AF events before their HF event had an AF event in the 10 days following. CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world population of patients with CIED devices, AF burden was associated with HF hospitalization risk in the subsequent 30 days. The risk is increased with AF and an uncontrolled ventricular rate. Our findings support AF monitoring in CIED algorithms to prevent HF admissions.

Advancing drug development for atrial fibrillation by prioritising findings from human genetic association studies.

BACKGROUND: Drug development for atrial fibrillation (AF) has failed to yield new approved compounds. We sought to identify and prioritise potential druggable targets with support from human genetics, by integrating the available evidence with bioinformatics sources relevant for AF drug development. METHODS: Genetic hits for AF and related traits were identified through structured search of MEDLINE. Genes derived from each paper were cross-referenced with the OpenTargets platform for drug interactions. Confirmation/validation was demonstrated through structured searches and review of evidence on MEDLINE and ClinialTrials.gov for each drug and its association with AF. FINDINGS: 613 unique drugs were identified, with 21 already included in AF Guidelines. Cardiovascular drugs from classes not currently used for AF (e.g. ranolazine and carperitide) and anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g. dexamethasone and mehylprednisolone) had evidence of potential benefit. Further targets were considered druggable but remain open for drug development. INTERPRETATION: Our systematic approach, combining evidence from different bioinformatics platforms, identified drug repurposing opportunities and druggable targets for AF. FUNDING: KK is supported by Barts Charity grant G-002089 and is mentored on the AFGen 2023-24 Fellowship funded by the AFGen NIH/NHLBI grant R01HL092577. RP is supported by the UCL BHF Research Accelerator AA/18/6/34223 and NIHR grant NIHR129463. AFS is supported by the BHF grants PG/18/5033837, PG/22/10989 and UCL BHF Accelerator AA/18/6/34223 as well as the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) under the UK government's Horizon Europe funding guarantee EP/Z000211/1 and by the UKRI-NIHR grant MR/V033867/1 for the Multimorbidity Mechanism and Therapeutics Research Collaboration. AF is supported by UCL BHF Accelerator AA/18/6/34223. CF is supported by UCL BHF Accelerator AA/18/6/34223.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Blood groups and Rhesus status as potential predictors of outcomes in patients with cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improves prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) however the role of ABO blood groups and Rhesus factor are poorly understood. We hypothesise that blood groups may influence clinical and survival outcomes in HF patients undergoing CRT. A total of 499 patients with HF who fulfilled the criteria for CRT implantation were included. Primary outcome of all-cause mortality and/or heart transplant/left ventricular assist device was assessed over a median follow-up of 4.6 years (IQR 2.3-7.5). Online repositories were searched to provide biological context to the identified associations. Patients were divided into blood (O, A, B, and AB) and Rhesus factor (Rh-positive and Rh-negative) groups. Mean patient age was 66.4 ± 12.8 years with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 29 ± 11%. There were no baseline differences in age, gender, and cardioprotective medication. In a Cox proportional hazard multivariate model, only Rh-negative blood group was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR 0.68 [0.47-0.98], p = 0.040). No association was observed for the ABO blood group (HR 0.97 [0.76-1.23], p = 0.778). No significant interaction was observed with prevention, disease aetiology, and presence of defibrillator. Rhesus-related genes were associated with erythrocyte and platelet function, and cholesterol and glycated haemoglobin levels. Four drugs under development targeting RHD were identified (Rozrolimupab, Roledumab, Atorolimumab, and Morolimumab). Rhesus blood type was associated with better survival in HF patients with CRT. Further research into Rhesus-associated pathways and related drugs, namely whether there is a cardiac signal, is required.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

The BLISTER Score: A Novel, Externally Validated Tool for Predicting Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections, and Its Cost-Utility Implications for Antimicrobial Envelope Use.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial envelopes reduce the incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device infections, but their cost restricts routine use in the United Kingdom. Risk scoring could help to identify which patients would most benefit from this technology. METHODS: A novel risk score (BLISTER [Blood results, Long procedure time, Immunosuppressed, Sixty years old (or younger), Type of procedure, Early re-intervention, Repeat procedure]) was derived from multivariate analysis of factors associated with cardiac implantable electronic device infection. Diagnostic utility was assessed against the existing PADIT score (Prior procedure, Age, Depressed renal function, Immunocompromised, Type of procedure) in both standard and high-risk external validation cohorts, and cost-utility models examined different BLISTER and PADIT score thresholds for TYRX (Medtronic; Minneapolis, MN) antimicrobial envelope allocation. RESULTS: In a derivation cohort (n=7383), cardiac implantable electronic device infection occurred in 59 individuals within 12 months of a procedure (event rate, 0.8%). In addition to the PADIT score constituents, lead extraction (hazard ratio, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.9-6.1]; P<0.0001), C-reactive protein >50 mg/L (hazard ratio, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.4-6.4]; P=0.005), reintervention within 2 years (hazard ratio, 10.1 [95% CI, 5.6-17.9]; P<0.0001), and top-quartile procedure duration (hazard ratio, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.6-4.1]; P=0.001) were independent predictors of infection. The BLISTER score demonstrated superior discriminative performance versus PADIT in the standard risk (n=2854, event rate: 0.8%, area under the curve, 0.82 versus 0.71; P=0.001) and high-risk validation cohorts (n=1961, event rate: 2.0%, area under the curve, 0.77 versus 0.69; P=0.001), and in all patients (n=12 198, event rate: 1%, area under the curve, 0.8 versus 0.75, P=0.002). In decision-analytic modeling, the optimum scenario assigned antimicrobial envelopes to patients with BLISTER scores ≥6 (10.8%), delivering a significant reduction in infections (relative risk reduction, 30%; P=0.036) within the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-utility thresholds (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, £18 446). CONCLUSIONS: The BLISTER score (https://qxmd.com/calculate/calculator_876/the-blister-score-for-cied-infection) was a valid predictor of cardiac implantable electronic device infection, and could facilitate cost-effective antimicrobial envelope allocation to high-risk patients.

The frequency of gene variant reclassification and its impact on clinical management in the inherited arrhythmia clinic.

BACKGROUND: Genetic testing in the inherited arrhythmia clinic informs risk stratification, clinical management, and family screening. Periodic review of variant classification is recommended as supporting evidence accrues over time. However, there is limited reporting of real-world data on the frequency and impact of variant reclassification. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the burden of variant reclassification in our inherited arrhythmia clinic and the impact on clinical management. METHODS: Genetic testing reports for patients referred to our clinic from 2004-2020 were reviewed. Reported variants were reinvestigated using ClinVar, VarSome, and a literature review. Classification was updated using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria and tested for association with arrhythmic events and modification of medical management. RESULTS: We identified 517 patients (median age 37 years) who underwent gene panel testing. A variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was reported for 94 patients (18.2%) and more commonly identified when using large gene panels (P <.001). A total of 28 of 87 unique VUSs (32.2%) were reclassified to pathogenic/likely pathogenic (n = 11) or benign/likely benign (n = 17). Of 138 originally reported pathogenic variants, 7 (5.1%) lacked support using ACMG criteria. Variant reclassification was not associated with arrhythmic events; however, it did impact genotype-specific counseling and future therapeutic options. CONCLUSION: In our large real-world patient cohort, we identify a clinically important proportion of both pathogenic variants and VUSs with evidence for reclassification. These findings highlight the need for informed pretest counseling, a regular structured review of variants reported in genetic testing, and the potential benefits to patients for supporting genotype-guided therapy.

DOACs vs Vitamin K Antagonists During Cardiac Rhythm Device Surgery: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data comparing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) at the time of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery. Furthermore, the best management of DOACs (interruption vs continuation) is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the incidence of device-related bleeds and thrombotic events based on anticoagulant type (DOAC vs VKA) and regimen (interrupted vs uninterrupted). METHODS: This was an observational multicenter study. We included patients on chronic oral anticoagulation undergoing CIED surgery. Patients were matched using propensity scoring. RESULTS: We included 1,975 patients (age 73.8 ± 12.4 years). Among 1,326 patients on DOAC, this was interrupted presurgery in 78.2% (n = 1,039) and continued in 21.8% (n = 287). There were 649 patients on continued VKA. The matched population included 861 patients. The rate of any major bleeding was higher with continued DOAC (5.2%) compared to interrupted DOAC (1.7%) and continued VKA (2.1%) (P = 0.03). The rate of perioperative thromboembolism was 1.4% with interrupted DOAC, whereas no thromboembolic events occurred with DOAC or VKA continuation (P = 0.04). The use of dual antiplatelet therapy, DOAC continuation, and male sex were independent predictors of major bleeding on a multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world cohort, a continued DOAC strategy was associated with a higher bleeding risk compared to DOAC interruption or VKA continuation in patients undergoing CIED surgery. However, DOAC interruption was associated with increased thromboembolic risk. Concomitant dual antiplatelet therapy should be avoided whenever clinically possible. A bespoke approach is necessary, with a strategy of minimal DOAC interruption likely to represent the best compromise.

Feasibility of double-blinded, placebo-controlled interventional study for assessing catheter ablation efficacy in persistent atrial fibrillation: Insights from the ORBITA AF feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: To date, there are no randomized, double-blinded clinical trials comparing catheter ablation to DC cardioversion (DCCV) with medical therapy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Conducting a large-scale trial to address this question presents considerable challenges, including recruitment, blinding, and implementation. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a definitive placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: This prospective trial was carried out at Barts Heart Centre, United Kingdom, employing a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled design. Twenty patients with PersAF (duration <2 years) were recruited, representing 10% of the proposed larger trial as determined by a power calculation. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either PVI ± DCCV (PVI group) or DCCV + Placebo (DCCV group). The primary endpoint of this feasibility study was to evaluate patient blinding. Patients remained unaware of their treatment allocation until end of study. RESULTS: During the study, 35% of patients experienced recurrence of PersAF prior to completion of 12 months follow-up. Blinding was successfully maintained amongst both patients and medical staff. The DCCV group had a trend to higher recurrence and repeat procedure rate compared to the PVI group (recurrence of PersAF 60% vs 30%; p = .07 and repeat procedure 70% vs 40%; p = .4). The quality of life experienced by individuals in the PVI group showed improvement, as evidenced by enhanced scores on the AF specific questionnaire (AF PROMS) (3 [±4] vs 21 [±8]) and SF-12 mental-component raw score (51.4 [±7] vs 43.24 [±15]) in patients who maintained sinus rhythm at 12 months. CONCLUSION: This feasibility study establishes the potential for conducting a blinded, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of PVI versus DCCV in patients with PersAF.

Meshless Simulation of Multi-site Radio Frequency Catheter Ablation through the Fragile Points Method.

Computational models for radio frequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of cardiac arrhythmia have been developed and tested in conditions where a single ablation site is considered. However, in reality arrhythmic events are generated at multiple sites which are ablated during treatment. Under such conditions, heat accumulation from several ablations is expected and models should take this effect into account. Moreover, such models are solved using the Finite Element Method which requires a good quality mesh to ensure numerical accuracy. Therefore, clinical application is limited since heat accumulation effects are neglected and numerical accuracy depends on mesh quality. In this work, we propose a novel meshless computational model where tissue heat accumulation from previously ablated sites is taken into account. In this way, we aim to overcome the mesh quality restriction of the Finite Element Method and enable realistic multi-site ablation simulation. We consider a two ablation sites protocol where tissue temperature at the end of the first ablation is used as initial condition for the second ablation. The effect of the time interval between the ablation of the two sites is evaluated. The proposed method demonstrates that previous models that do not account for heat accumulation between ablations may underestimate the tissue heat distribution.Clinical relevance- The proposed computational model may be used to build and update a heat map for ablation guidance taking into account the contribution from previously ablated sites. Being a meshless model, it does not require significant input from the user during preprocessing. Therefore, it is suitable for application in a clinical setting.

Efficacy of a 3D Electrospun Synthetic Polymer Matrix on Hard-to-Heal Wounds.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a 3D electrospun synthetic polymer matrix (3DESPM) on hard-to-heal wounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective case series took place at four sites. The primary endpoints were the percentage area reduction (PAR) in wound area at four and eight weeks. Secondary endpoints included time to heal (Kaplan-Meier analysis) and the proportion of healed wounds at 12 weeks. After applying 3DESPM, the physician applied sterile saline, as appropriate, to adhere the matrix to the wound bed and facilitate the polymer degradation process. A nonadherent dressing, a secondary dressing, and additional bandages (as needed) were then applied. The physician left the product on the wound until complete degradation was observed, as appropriate, and reapplied, as appropriate. Combination advanced therapies were applied, per physician discretion. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (mean age: 64.3 years [SD: 17.6]) with 50 wounds (35 chronic, 70%) participated. The mean number of comorbidities per patient was 4.4 (2.3). All wounds received 3DESPM; 12 wounds (24%) received combination therapies; and 38 wounds (76%) completed the study. The mean (SD) PAR at four and eight weeks was 67.6% (38%) and 80% (35%), respectively. Thirty-three wounds (66%) healed at 12 weeks. The Kaplan-Meier mean time to heal for all wounds was 49.0 days (95% confidence interval: 41.3-56.7). CONCLUSIONS: In a complex patient population with severe comorbidities and heterogeneous wounds, 3DESPM appeared to accelerate the stalled healing process to contribute to wound closure. Further investigation of 3DESPM on a larger patient population and in a controlled setting is pending.

Right coronary artery compromise following radiofrequency catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia: cases reports.

Background: Coronary compromise is a serious potential complication following catheter ablation; however, procedural details in the literature are often lacking, preventing the identification of learning opportunities. Case summary: We report two cases of right coronary compromise following catheter ablation for symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia. After radiofrequency energy delivery at the coronary sinus ostium in both cases, inferior lead ST-elevation was observed. Diagnostic coronary angiography identified an occluded posterior left ventricular branch of the coronary artery, and optical coherence tomography demonstrated a high thrombus burden at this location. Electrocardiographic ST-segments settled with implantation of a drug-eluting stent. Discussion: Coronary compromise was likely secondary to energy delivery during catheter ablation. This case series highlights the need for electrophysiologist to understand coronary anatomy relative to anatomical landmarks, to anticipate the risk of vascular injury as physical distance from the site of ablation is likely important. Risk for coronary compromise, while a rare complication, needs to be discussed with patients during the consenting process. We also demonstrate the importance of an efficient multi-disciplinary team process for managing acute procedural complications.

Atrial fibrillation cryoablation is an effective day case treatment: the UK PolarX vs. Arctic Front Advance experience.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). There are limited data on the PolarX Cryoballoon. The study aimed to establish the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of same day discharge for Cryoballoon PVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multi-centre study across 12 centres. Procedural metrics, safety profile, and procedural efficacy of the PolarX Cryoballoon with the Arctic Front Advance (AFA) Cryoballoon were compared in a cohort large enough to provide definitive comparative data. A total of 1688 patients underwent PVI with cryoablation (50% PolarX and 50% AFA). Successful PVI was achieved with 1677 (99.3%) patients with 97.2% (n = 1641) performed as day case procedures with a complication rate of <1%. Safety, procedural metrics, and efficacy of the PolarX Cryoballoon were comparable with the AFA cohort. The PolarX Cryoballoon demonstrated a nadir temperature of -54.6 ± 7.6°C, temperature at 30 s of -38.6 ± 7.2°C, time to -40°C of 34.1 ± 13.7 s, and time to isolation of 49.8 ± 33.2 s. Independent predictors for achieving PVI included time to reach -40°C [odds ratio (OR) 1.34; P < 0.001] and nadir temperature (OR 1.24; P < 0.001) with an optimal cut-off of ≤34 s [area under the curve (AUC) 0.73; P < 0.001] and nadir temperature of ≤-54.0°C (AUC 0.71; P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale UK multi-centre study has shown that Cryoballoon PVI is a safe, effective day case procedure. PVI using the PolarX Cryoballoon was similarly safe and effective as the AFA Cryoballoon. The cryoablation metrics achieved with the PolarX Cryoballoon were different to that reported with the AFA Cryoballoon. Modified cryoablation targets are required when utilizing the PolarX Cryoballoon.

Hypoxia Promotes Atrial Tachyarrhythmias via Opening of ATP-Sensitive Potassium Channels.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia-ischemia predisposes to atrial arrhythmia. Atrial ATP-sensitive potassium channel (KATP) modulation during hypoxia has not been explored. We investigated the effects of hypoxia on atrial electrophysiology in mice with global deletion of KATP pore-forming subunits. METHODS: Whole heart KATP RNA expression was probed. Whole-cell KATP current and action potentials were recorded in isolated wild-type (WT), Kir6.1 global knockout (6.1-gKO), and Kir6.2 global knockout (6.2-gKO) murine atrial myocytes. Langendorff-perfused hearts were assessed for atrial effective refractory period (ERP), conduction velocity, wavefront path length (WFPL), and arrhymogenicity under normoxia/hypoxia using a microelectrode array and programmed electrical stimulation. Heart histology was assessed. RESULTS: Expression patterns were essentially identical for all KATP subunit RNA across human heart, whereas in mouse, Kir6.1 and SUR2 (sulphonylurea receptor subunit) were higher in ventricle than atrium, and Kir6.2 and SUR1 were higher in atrium. Compared with WT, 6.2-gKO atrial myocytes had reduced tolbutamide-sensitive current and action potentials were more depolarized with slower upstroke and reduced peak amplitude. Action potential duration was prolonged in 6.1-gKO atrial myocytes, absent of changes in other ion channel gene expression or atrial myocyte hypertrophy. In Langendorff-perfused hearts, baseline atrial ERP was prolonged and conduction velocity reduced in both KATP knockout mice compared with WT, without histological fibrosis. Compared with baseline, hypoxia led to conduction velocity slowing, stable ERP, and WFPL shortening in WT and 6.1-gKO hearts, whereas WFPL was stable in 6.2-gKO hearts due to ERP prolongation with conduction velocity slowing. Tolbutamide reversed hypoxia-induced WFPL shortening in WT and 6.1-gKO hearts through ERP prolongation. Atrial tachyarrhythmias inducible with programmed electrical stimulation during hypoxia in WT and 6.1-gKO mice correlated with WFPL shortening. Spontaneous arrhythmia was not seen. CONCLUSIONS: KATP block/absence leads to cellular and tissue level atrial electrophysiological modification. Kir6.2 global knockout prevents hypoxia-induced atrial WFPL shortening and atrial arrhythmogenicity to programmed electrical stimulation. This mechanism could be explored translationally to treat ischemically driven atrial arrhythmia.

Amplified sinus-P-wave analysis predicts outcomes of cryoballoon ablation in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicentre study.

Introduction: Outcomes of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) remain suboptimal. Non-invasive stratification of patients based on the presence of atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) could allow to identify the best responders to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods: Observational multicentre retrospective study in patients undergoing cryoballoon-PVI for non-paroxysmal AF. The duration of amplified P-wave (APW) was measured from a digitally recorded 12-lead electrocardiogram during the procedure. If patients were in AF, direct-current cardioversion was performed to allow APW measurement in sinus rhythm. An APW cut-off of 150 ms was used to identify patients with significant ACM. We assessed freedom from arrhythmia recurrence at long-term follow-up in patients with APW ≥ 150 ms vs. APW < 150 ms. Results: We included 295 patients (mean age 62.3 ± 10.6), of whom 193 (65.4%) suffered from persistent AF and the remaining 102 (34.6%) from long-standing persistent AF. One-hundred-forty-two patients (50.2%) experienced arrhythmia recurrence during a mean follow-up of 793 ± 604 days. Patients with APW ≥ 150 ms had a significantly higher recurrence rate post ablation compared to those with APW < 150 ms (57.0% vs. 41.6%; log-rank p < 0.001). On a multivariable Cox-regression analysis, APW≥150 ms was the only independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence post ablation (HR 2.03 CI95% 1.28-3.21; p = 0.002). Conclusion: APW duration predicts arrhythmia recurrence post cryoballoon-PVI in persistent and long-standing persistent AF. An APW cut-off of 150 ms allows to identify patients with significant ACM who have worse outcomes post PVI. Analysis of APW represents an easy, non-invasive and highly reproducible diagnostic tool which allows to identify patients who are the most likely to benefit from PVI-only approach.