Safety and effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder in a real-life clinical setting in India: results from an interventional, flexible-dose study.

OBJECTIVE: Vortioxetine has demonstrated safety and efficacy in improving symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD), including overall functioning in real-world settings. This is the first study in a real-life clinical setting in India to evaluate effectiveness and safety of vortioxetine in patients with MDD. METHODS: This interventional, open-label study consisted of a 12-week treatment period with flexible doses of vortioxetine (5-20 mg/day) in adult patients (aged 18-65 years) with a confirmed MDD diagnosis. Effectiveness outcomes included change from baseline to week 12 in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores, along with CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) scores at week 12, using a mixed model for repeated measures. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded for safety outcome assessments. RESULTS: Of 395 patients who received vortioxetine, 42.3% were women mean age 38.9 years; 322 patients completed the study. Significant improvement in depressive symptoms was observed in change from baseline to week 12 least squares (LS) mean (SE) PHQ-9 total score (-9.36 [0.276]; p<.0001) and CGI-S score (-2.14 [0.065]; p<.0001). LS mean (SE) CGI-I score showed significant improvement at week 12 (1.93 [0.067]; p<.0001). Subgroup analysis across age, sex, disease severity, and body mass index showed significant improvements in depression symptoms and severity. A total of 35.4% (n = 140) of patients experienced treatment-emergent AEs (mostly mild-moderate); nausea and pruritus were the most frequent (6.6%, n = 26 each). CONCLUSION: Safety and effectiveness of vortioxetine in improving symptoms of MDD over a 12-week period was demonstrated in a real-life clinical setting in India. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Open-label, flexible-dose study of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder in India; Clinical Trials.gov ID: NCT04288895; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04288895.

The Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST): Clinically meaningful response threshold in patients with major depressive disorder receiving antidepressant treatment.

BACKGROUND: Functional impairment is common in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) provides a detailed clinician-rated assessment of functioning across multiple aspects of daily life. This study aimed to establish clinically relevant response thresholds for the FAST in patients with MDD receiving antidepressant treatment. METHODS: Data were derived from three 8-week clinical trials of antidepressant therapy in patients with MDD that included assessment of functioning using the FAST as a pre-specified endpoint. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and threshold for response in terms of change in FAST total score were determined using anchor-based methods. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of antidepressant treatment, the mean reduction in FAST total score in patients considered clinically minimally improved (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement [CGI-I] score of 3) was 7-9 points (~20 % reduction). The threshold for functional response (reduction in FAST total score from baseline in patients with a CGI-I score of ≤2 at week 8) was 16-19 points (~50 % reduction). The threshold for functional response was higher in patients with MDD and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder than in those with MDD alone (mean reduction in FAST total score at 8 weeks: 26 points [63 %]). LIMITATIONS: Short-term studies. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide further validation of the FAST for assessing functioning in patients with MDD. In patients with MDD, the suggested MCID for FAST total score is 7-9 points and the proposed threshold for response is a reduction from baseline of approximately 50 %.

Minimal clinically important change in the MADRS anhedonia factor score: A pooled analysis of open-label studies with vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: It is previously reported that the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) anhedonia factor score is correlated with scales assessing function in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: This was an analysis of a database including 5 long-term, extension studies of prior controlled trials, which evaluated the effects of open-label, maintenance treatment with vortioxetine (5-20 mg/day over 1-year) in adults with MDD. We assessed the association of changes in MADRS anhedonia factor scores with changes in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S), Sheehan Disability scale (SDS), and the SF-36. A minimal clinically important change (MCIC) for MADRS anhedonia factor scores was determined using the CGI-S as anchor. RESULTS: In patients who had completed the prior controlled studies, MADRS anhedonia factor scores continued to improve over 1-year of maintenance treatment (mean ± SE change from baseline of -6.2 ± 0.2 at Month 12). Change in MADRS anhedonia factors score correlated with change in CGI-S (Week 4, r = 0.71), SDS (Week 24 r = 0.60) and SF-36 domains (Week 24 r = -0.19 to -0.61) scores. Using a 1 level improvement on CGI-S as anchor, the MCIC for MADRS anhedonia factor scores versus baseline were - 4.6 at Week 4, -5.5 at Week 24, and - 5.3 at Week 52. LIMITATIONS: Neither the MADRS scale, nor the primary studies, were specifically designed to assess anhedonia. CONCLUSIONS: These open-label data suggest that patients treated with vortioxetine continued to show clinically relevant improvements in their anhedonia over 1-year of maintenance therapy. Improvements in anhedonia correlated with improvements in measures of functioning and quality of life.

Effectiveness of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and early-stage dementia: The MEMORY study.

BACKGROUND: Depression and dementia are highly prevalent in older adults and often co-occur. This Phase IV study investigated the effectiveness and tolerability of vortioxetine in improving depressive symptoms, cognitive performance, daily and global functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid early-stage dementia. METHODS: Patients (n = 82) aged 55-85 years with a primary diagnosis of MDD (onset before age 55 years) and comorbid early-stage dementia (diagnosed ≥6 months before screening and after onset of MDD; Mini-Mental State Examination-2 total score, 20-24) received vortioxetine for 12 weeks (initiated at 5 mg/day and up-titrated to 10 mg/day at day 8, with flexible dosing thereafter [5-20 mg/day]). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week 12. RESULTS: Significant improvement in depressive symptom severity was seen from week 1 onwards (P < 0.0001). At week 12, the least-square mean (standard error) change in MADRS total score from baseline was -12.4 (0.78). Significant improvements in cognitive performance were observed (from week 1 for the Digit Symbol Substitution Test and week 4 for the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test). Patients also experienced significant improvements in daily and global functioning, and HRQoL. Vortioxetine was well tolerated. From week 4 onwards, more than 50 % of patients were receiving 20 mg/day. LIMITATIONS: Open-label study. CONCLUSIONS: Vortioxetine demonstrated effectiveness in clinically significantly improving depressive symptoms, cognitive performance, daily and global functioning, and HRQoL in patients with MDD and comorbid early-stage dementia treated for 12 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04294654.

Long-term safety and efficacy, including anhedonia, of vortioxetine for major depressive disorder: findings from two open-label studies.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of vortioxetine in the management of major depressive disorder (MDD) in two open-label one-year studies, including a post-hoc analysis of its effects on symptoms related to anhedonia. METHODS: Both studies were 52-week, open-label, flexible-dose extension studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vortioxetine in adult patients with MDD following prior double-blind studies. Patients in the first study (NCT00761306) were flexibly treated with vortioxetine 5 or 10 mg/day (N = 74), and patients in the second study (NCT01323478) received vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/day (N = 71). RESULTS: The safety and tolerability profile of vortioxetine was similar between the two studies; treatment-emergent adverse events with the highest incidence were nausea, dizziness, headache, and nasopharyngitis. Across both studies, improvements achieved during the preceding double-blind studies period were maintained, and additional improvements were observed with open-label treatment. Patients showed a mean ± SD reduction (improvement) in Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from open-label baseline to Week 52 of 4.3 ± 9.2 points in the 5-10 mg study, and 10.9 ± 10.0 in the 15-20 mg study. Post-hoc MMRM analyses of MADRS anhedonia factor scores also showed continued improvements over long-term treatment; patients showed a mean ± SE reduction from an open-label baseline to Week 52 of 3.10 ± 0.57 points in the 5-10 mg study, and 5.62 ± 0.60 in the 15-20 mg study. CONCLUSIONS: Data from both studies confirm the safety and efficacy of flexibly dosed vortioxetine over 52 weeks of treatment and demonstrate that MADRS anhedonia factor scores continue to improve with long-term maintenance treatment.

Efficacy and safety of vortioxetine in treatment of patients with major depressive disorder and common co-morbid physical illness.

BACKGROUND: The multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine is effective in reducing somatic symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), but little is known about its effects in reducing depressive symptoms in patients with common comorbid physical illnesses. METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of 13 randomized, placebo-controlled trials which evaluated the efficacy (using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) and safety of vortioxetine (5-20 mg/day) in adult patients with MDD. We evaluated stable somatic comorbid conditions that were verified by a diagnosis and had sufficient database representation. RESULTS: Of the 5982 patients included in the database, 963 (16.1%) patients had a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, 152 (2.5%) had diabetes mellitus and 26 (0.4%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). At Week 8, adjusted mean[95%CI] treatment differences (vortioxetine vs. placebo) on MADRS total scores were -2.7[-4.2, -1.3] (p = 0.0002) points for the cardiovascular disease, -4.0[-7.7, -0.4] (p = 0.03) for the diabetes, and -6.2[-21.3, 8.9] (p = 0.36) for the COPD groups. The rate and pattern of adverse events were similar across the sub-groups with comorbidities and was consistent with that expected for vortioxetine treatment. LIMITATIONS: The primary studies were not designed to investigate the relationship between vortioxetine and comorbidities, nor were the post hoc analyses powered to detect group differences. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MDD and comorbid cardiovascular disease or diabetes respond to vortioxetine in a similar way to the broader MDD population. Vortioxetine was generally safe and well tolerated and without unexpected adverse events in these subpopulations, most of whom are taking multiple concomitant medications.

Intravenous vortioxetine to accelerate onset of effect in major depressive disorder: a 2-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

This 2-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled fixed-dose study (NCT02919501) explored the potential of accelerating onset of antidepressant efficacy and plasma exposure with single-dose intravenous vortioxetine at oral vortioxetine treatment initiation. Outpatients (ages 18-65 years) with major depressive disorder and a current depressive episode (Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score ≥30) were randomized to an initial single dose of either intravenous vortioxetine 17 mg (n = 27) or intravenous placebo (n = 28), both treatments followed by 2 weeks of oral vortioxetine (10 mg/day). From baseline to day 7, both groups exhibited fast and substantial improvements by approximately 14 Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale points, with no statistically significant treatment difference for this primary endpoint. Improvements were substantial already within 24 hours, with numerical treatment differences of 1.3 and 1.6 points at days 1 and 3, respectively, in favour of intravenous vortioxetine + oral vortioxetine. Pharmacokinetic data confirmed that intravenous vortioxetine facilitated reaching steady-state plasma concentration within 24 hours. Intravenous vortioxetine + oral vortioxetine was safe and well-tolerated, with nausea as the most common adverse event. This study supported intravenous vortioxetine as a means of rapidly reaching therapeutic vortioxetine blood levels.