Lasofoxifene versus fulvestrant for ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation: results from the randomized, phase II ELAINE 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: Acquired estrogen receptor alpha (ER/ESR1) mutations commonly cause endocrine resistance in ER+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Lasofoxifene, a novel selective ER modulator, stabilizes an antagonist conformation of wild-type and ESR1-mutated ER-ligand binding domains, and has antitumor activity in ESR1-mutated xenografts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, phase II, multicenter, ELAINE 1 study (NCT03781063), we randomized women with ESR1-mutated, ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) mBC that had progressed on an aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) to oral lasofoxifene 5 mg daily or IM fulvestrant 500 mg (days 1, 15, and 29, and then every 4 weeks) until disease progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were safety/tolerability. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients received lasofoxifene (n = 52) or fulvestrant (n = 51). The most current efficacy analysis showed that lasofoxifene did not significantly prolong median PFS compared with fulvestrant: 24.2 weeks (∼5.6 months) versus 16.2 weeks (∼3.7 months; P = 0.138); hazard ratio 0.699 (95% confidence interval 0.434-1.125). However, PFS and other clinical endpoints numerically favored lasofoxifene: clinical benefit rate (36.5% versus 21.6%; P = 0.117), objective response rate [13.2% (including a complete response in one lasofoxifene-treated patient) versus 2.9%; P = 0.124], and 6-month (53.4% versus 37.9%) and 12-month (30.7% versus 14.1%) PFS rates. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events with lasofoxifene were nausea, fatigue, arthralgia, and hot flushes. One death occurred in the fulvestrant arm. Circulating tumor DNA ESR1 mutant allele fraction (MAF) decreased from baseline to week 8 in 82.9% of evaluable lasofoxifene-treated versus 61.5% of fulvestrant-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lasofoxifene demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity versus fulvestrant and was well tolerated in patients with ESR1-mutated, endocrine-resistant mBC following progression on AI plus CDK4/6i. Consistent with target engagement, lasofoxifene reduced ESR1 MAF, and to a greater extent than fulvestrant. Lasofoxifene may be a promising targeted treatment for patients with ESR1-mutated mBC and warrants further investigation.

Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus docetaxel versus capecitabine plus docetaxel with planned crossover to the alternate single agent in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD) and capecitabine plus docetaxel (CD) were compared in patients with metastatic breast cancer, where the alternate crossover monotherapy (GD→C or CD→G) was predetermined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 3-week cycles of either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 or capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) day 1. Upon progression, patients received crossover monotherapy. Primary end point was time to progression (TtP). Secondary end points evaluated overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Despite over-accrual of 475 patients, the trial matured with only 324 of 385 planned TtP events due to patient discontinuations. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was not captured in this study. More CD patients (28%) discontinued due to AEs than GD patients (18.0%, P = 0.009). TtP [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.101, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885-1.370, P = 0.387] and OS (HR = 1.031, 95% CI 0.830-1.280, P = 0.785) were not significantly different comparing GD and CD. ORR was not statistically different (P = 0.239) comparing GD (72 of 207, 34.8%) and CD (78 of 191, 40.8%). TtP, OS, and ORR were not significantly different comparing crossover groups. GD caused greater fatigue, hepatotoxicity, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia but not febrile neutropenia; CD caused more hand-foot syndrome, gastrointestinal toxicity, and mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: GD and CD produced similar efficacy and toxicity profiles consistent with prior clinical experience.

Single-agent lapatinib for HER2-overexpressing advanced or metastatic breast cancer that progressed on first- or second-line trastuzumab-containing regimens.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lapatinib in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer that progressed during prior trastuzumab therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stage IIIB/IV HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were treated with single-agent lapatinib 1250 or 1500 mg once daily after protocol amendment. Tumor response according to RECIST was assessed every 8 weeks. HER2 expression was assessed in tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry and FISH. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled in the study. Investigator and independent review response rates [complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)] were 7.7% and 5.1%, and clinical benefit rates (CR, PR, or stable disease for >or=24 weeks) were 14.1% and 9.0%, respectively. Median time to progression was 15.3 weeks by independent review, and median overall survival was 79 weeks. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash (47%), diarrhea (46%), nausea (31%), and fatigue (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent lapatinib has clinical activity with manageable toxic effects in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer that progressed on trastuzumab-containing therapy. Studies of lapatinib-based combination regimens with chemotherapy and other targeted therapies in metastatic and earlier stages of breast cancer are warranted.

Clinical experience with edrecolomab: a monoclonal antibody therapy for colorectal carcinoma.

Edrecolomab (monoclonal antibody 17-1A) is a murine monoclonal antibody that recognizes the human tumor-associated antigen Ep-CAM (otherwise known as 17-1A). It is being developed for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer. In a study of 189 patients with resected stage III colorectal cancer, treatment with edrecolomab resulted in a 32% increase in overall survival compared with no treatment (P<0.01) and decreased the tumor recurrence rate by 23% (P<0.04). In terms of safety, edrecolomab was well tolerated. Based on these study results, edrecolomab is currently under investigation in large multicenter phase III studies both as monotherapy and in combination with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the treatment of stage III colon cancer. Although these studies are still ongoing, an interim analysis of safety data indicated that the combination of edrecolomab with chemotherapy is well tolerated. In addition, edrecolomab monotherapy demonstrated a favorable safety profile compared with chemotherapy. Edrecolomab is also currently being tested in large multicenter adjuvant phase III studies in stage II/III rectal cancer and stage II colon cancer. Edrecolomab represents a novel therapeutic approach and has the potential to become a treatment of choice as monotherapy in stage II colon cancer and in combination with chemotherapy in stage II/III rectal and stage III colon cancer.

Short-term autologous tumor cell lines for the active specific immunotherapy of patients with metastatic melanoma.

We established short-term cell lines for 108/170 (64%) patients with metastatic melanoma. Tumor cell numbers were expanded to 10(8), then cells were irradiated, aliquoted, and cryopreserved for clinical use. Vaccines have been used to treat 69 patients with clinical follow up for 33 who had measurable metastatic disease at the time vaccine therapy was initiated (METS), and 33 who had no evidence of disease (NED) at the time of vaccine therapy following surgical resection of metastases. The protocol called for a baseline test of delayed tumor hypersensitivity (DTH), three weekly injections, a repeat of the DTH test, then monthly injections for an additional 5 months. Objective tumor responses were noted in 3/26 (12%) patients who received a minimum of three vaccinations, one complete, and two partial, with survivals of 36, 46+, and 78+ months. Only 6/64 (9.4%) had a positive DTH (>10 mm) at baseline, including three METS, all of whom progressed within 4 months and died within a year, and three who are still NED after more than 5 years. Conversion of DTH from negative to positive was documented in 18/44 (41%) patients who were tested at week 0 and 4. At a median follow up of greater than 5 years, the median overall survival (OS) was 40 months for "NED" with a 5-year survival rate of 39%, and 8.6 months with a 5-year survival rate of 10% for "METS" The 18 patients who had conversion of their DTH had a median event-free survival (EFS) of 15.8 months and 5-year EFS of 32% compared to 4.2 months and 9% for the 26 non-converters (P=0.012, two-tailed, log-rank test). Among patients who were NED when treatment started, the 12 patients whose DTH converted had a median overall survival of 61.4 months with 5-year survival of 63% compared to 9.7 months and 0% for the 13 non-converters (P=0.0026). This treatment approach is feasible, produces minimal toxicity, and is associated with long-term survival in a significant subset of patients.

Breast tumor contamination of PBSC harvests: tumor depletion by positive selection of CD34(+) cells.

BACKGROUND: Positive selection of CD34(+) cells may reduce or eliminate tumor cells contaminating PBSC harvests of breast cancer (BrCa) patients. However, to assess tumor purging accurately methods may be needed that are of higher sensitivity than standard immunocytochemistry (ICC) assays. METHODS: BrCa-cell depletion, resulting from CD34(+) cell selection, was evaluated using a novel, highly sensitive assay based upon immunomagnetic enrichment with ICC detection in 36 BrCa patients undergoing highdose chemotherapy with autologous PBSC support. RESULTS: The prevalence of BrCa-cell contamination was significantly lower (P = 0.0078) in selected CD34(+) cell fractions (17/35, 49%) from apheresis collections compared with CD34(-) cell fractions (25/35, 71%). In 8/34 (24%) patients, BrCa cells were detected in CD34(-) cell fractions, but not in paired CD34(+) cell fractions. Significantly lower total numbers (P < 0.0005) of BrCa cells were enumerable in CD34(+) cell fractions compared with corresponding apheresis harvests. The median total BrCa-cell content of selected CD34(+) cell fractions with measurable contamination was 22 BrCa cells (range, 6-73 BrCa cells), compared with 3297 BrCa cells (range, 10-98 400 BrCa cells) in apheresis harvests. The median log depletion of BrCa cells achieved by positive CD34(+) cell selection in specimens with detectable contamination both before and after selection was 2.2 (range, 1.7-4.0). Total pre-selection BrCa cell number was significantly predictive (P = 0.004) of residual detectable post-selection contamination. DISCUSSION: Positive CD34(+) cell selection is an effective tumor purging strategy. The prevalence of PBSC contamination in BrCa patients is substantially higher than formerly appreciated.

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (CY) in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized trial of 3 vs 4 g/m2 of CY.

The purpose of this study was to develop a regimen of docetaxel, cyclophosphamide (CY) and filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 66). A phase I trial of CY 2, 3 or 4 g/m2 with docetaxel 100 mg/m2, in consecutive cohorts of four patients each, did not reveal any dose-limiting toxicities and subsequent patients were randomized to receive 3 or 4 g/m2 of CY. The median yield of CD34+ cells from all patients was 11.06x10(6)/kg (range, 0.03-84.77) from a median of two aphereses (range, 1-7); 6.52x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg/apheresis (range, 0.01-52.07). Target CD34+ cell doses > or =2.5 and > or =5.0x10(6)/kg were achieved in 89% and 79%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in CD34+ cell yields or target CD34+ cell doses achieved following 3 or 4 g/m2 of CY. Patients with only one prior chemotherapy regimen yielded a median of 12.82x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg/apheresis compared to 5.85 for those receiving > or =2 regimens (P = 0.03). It was concluded that the combination of docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, CY 3 g/m2 without mesna could be administered with acceptable toxicity with collection of adequate quantities of PBSC from the majority of patients.

Adjuvant dose-intense chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support in stage II-III breast cancer with five to nine involved axillary lymph nodes.

The purpose of this study is to determine outcomes for patients with high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support. Forty-three patients with stage II-III disease, five to nine positive axillary lymph nodes, and a median age of 44 years (range, 27-60 years) were enrolled in a study that included: 1) standard dose doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate adjuvant therapy; 2) cyclophosphamide, etoposide, filgrastim, and peripheral blood stem cell harvest; and 3) high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) followed by peripheral blood stem cell infusion. All 43 patients received doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate, 42 (98%) received etoposide, and 41 (95%) received CTCb. Thirty-two patients (74%) are alive, 28 (65%) without relapse at a median of 55 months (range, 41-87 months). Two died (5%) of treatment-related causes, (subclavian catheter complication after etoposide and late radiation pneumonitis), and nine other deaths (21%) were associated with recurrent breast cancer. The probabilities of overall and event-free survival at 4 years were 0.77 and 0.67, respectively, compared with 0.82 and 0.69, respectively, for 72 similar patients with 10 or more positive axillary nodes receiving the same sequence of therapy. Thus, patients with five to nine positive axillary lymph nodes have a similar risk of failure after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell support as patients with 10 or more positive axillary lymph nodes.

Single-agent paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support.

The purpose of this trial was to determine the effects of paclitaxel in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer scheduled to receive high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support. Eighty-four patients received anthracycline-based induction and two doses of paclitaxel at 170 mg/m2 (n = 52) or 250 mg/m2 (n = 32). Eighty-two (98%) received cyclophosphamide and etoposide (n = 50) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 32) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells, and 79 (94%) received cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with peripheral blood stem cell support. One patient (1%) died of infection and 56 (67%) died of progressive disease. For patients with measurable disease, the complete response rate was 21% after induction and 29% after paclitaxel (p = 0.54). Results were compared with those of 125 patients who received the same sequence of therapy without paclitaxel. The complete response rate after high-dose chemotherapy was 54% for patients receiving paclitaxel and 62% for those not receiving paclitaxel (p = 0.60). The probabilities of overall survival and event-free survival at 3 years for patients receiving paclitaxel were 46% and 24%, respectively, compared with 54% and 22%, respectively, for patients not receiving paclitaxel (p = 0.62). Further trials evaluating this dose and schedule of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy are not warranted.

Sequential treatment including high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support in patients with high-risk stage II-III breast cancer: outpatient administration in community cancer centers.

The authors determined outcomes for patients with localized high-risk breast cancer undergoing sequential outpatient treatment with conventional-dose adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy, and growth factor mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with PBSC support in community cancer centers. Ninety-six patients with stage II-IIIB noninflammatory breast cancer with 10 or more positive lymph nodes and a median age of 46 years (range, 22-60 years) were treated with: 1) doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and methotrexate (AFM), four courses at 2-week intervals; 2) cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and etoposide (600 mg/m2) (CE), followed by filgrastim (6 microg/kg per day) and PBSC harvest; and 3) cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2), and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) (CTCb), followed by PBSC infusion. All 96 patients received AFM, 95 (99%) received CE, and 95 (99%) received CTCb with a median hospital stay of 12 days (5-34 days) for all phases of treatment. Sixty-nine patients (72%) are alive, 55 (57%) without relapse at a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 37-77 months). One patient (1%) died of acute myeloid leukemia and all other deaths were associated with recurrent breast cancer. The probabilities of event-free survival (EFS) at 4 years for patients with or without locally advanced disease were 0.37 and 0.69, respectively (p = 0.004), and 0.71 and 0.48 for patients who were estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) positive or ER/PR negative, respectively (p = 0.016). In multivariate analyses, locally advanced disease (relative risk, 2.3; p = 0.021) and ER/PR-negative hormone receptor status (relative risk, 2.2; p = 0.014) were the only adverse risk factors for EFS identified. Patients with zero, one, or two of these adverse risk factors had 4-year EFS of 0.80, 0.56, and 0.33, respectively. The sequential administration of AFM, CE, and CTCb followed by PBSC in an outpatient community setting was well tolerated in patients with high-risk stage II-III breast cancer. More intensive or more novel treatment strategies will be required to decrease relapses in patients who have ER/PR-negative tumors and/or have locally advanced disease.

Phase I-II evaluation of rapid sequence tandem high-dose melphalan with peripheral blood stem cell support in patients with multiple myeloma.

This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of high-dose melphalan (HDM), with peripheral blood stem cell support, that could be given twice within 90 days to patients with multiple myeloma. Twenty patients received tandem HDM at 160, 180 or 200 mg/m2 and a total of 55 were treated at the estimated MTD of 200 mg/m2. Seventeen of 55 (31%) did not receive cycle 2; six because of low CD34+ cell yields, three because of severe (n = 1) or fatal toxicities (n = 2) and eight for other reasons. The median interval between doses for 38 patients was 70 days (range 41-225). Three of 55 patients (5%) died of treatment-related causes. In patients completing two cycles of HDM, at any dose level, the complete remission rate improved from 15% following cycle 1 to 55% following cycle 2. The probabilities of survival, event-free survival and relapse or progression at 18 months for the 55 patients treated at the MTD were 0.84, 0.76 and 0.20, respectively, with a median follow-up of 19 months (range 9-36) from mobilization chemotherapy. It was concluded that two cycles of HDM, 200 mg/m2, could be administered to approximately 70% of patients under the age of 66 with multiple myeloma in a median interval of 70 days, with improvement in CR rates.

Second attempts at mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with initial low CD34+ cell yields.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of second mobilization strategies in patients who yielded < 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ PBSC/kg after initial mobilization. Repeat mobilization attempts were made with chemotherapy and G-CSF (n = 61) or G-CSF alone (n = 58) in patients who failed initial mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF (n = 92) or G-CSF alone (n = 27). A median of 0.27 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg per apheresis was collected after the second mobilization, compared with 0.16 with initial harvests (p = 0.0001). Forty-eight percent achieved a target CD34+ cell dose > or = 2.5 x 10(6)/kg when harvests from the first and second mobilizations were combined. Fifteen of 17 patients (88%) with > or = 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg harvested after first mobilization had > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg collected when first and second harvests were combined, as compared with 42 of 102 (41%) achieving < 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg with first PBSC harvests (p = 0.0001). Second mobilizations with chemotherapy and G-CSF or G-CSF alone resulted in similar CD34+ cell yields. Toxicities of second mobilizations were comparable with those of first mobilizations. Seventy-nine patients (66%) received high-dose chemotherapy with PBSC support, with recovery of neutrophils and platelets in a median of 11 and 15 days, respectively. Transplant-related mortality was 4%, and event-free survival at 2 years was 0.34. It was concluded that second mobilization attempts in patients who fail to achieve > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg on initial mobilization were successful in 48% of patients. G-CSF alone was as effective as chemotherapy plus G-CSF in mobilizing CD34+ cells and was associated with less morbidity.

High-dose chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: evaluation of infusing peripheral blood stem cells containing occult tumor cells.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of detecting occult tumor cells in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvests and to determine the impact of infusing such cells on relapses after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Peripheral blood stem cell harvests from 223 patients with breast cancer were examined by an immunocytochemistry (ICC) method for detection of occult tumor cells, and infused after HDC without consideration of test results. Two hundred and four patients, 114 with stage II-III and 90 with stage IV disease who received only PBSC, that were tested by ICC were evaluated for time to relapse. Five hundred and eighty-one of 619 PBSC harvests (94%) from 223 patients were tested. Fifty-three of 581 harvests (9%), 8% from stage II-III and 10% from stage IV patients, were positive by ICC (P = 0.68). Forty-one of 223 patients (18%), 17/122 (14%) with stage II-III and 24/101 (24%) with stage IV disease, had positive harvests (P = 0.06). Eleven percent of patients who had 1-2 harvests tested were positive as compared to 32% of patients who had > or =3 PBSC harvests tested (P < 0.001). Nineteen patients who were infused with a mixture of ICC negative and untested PBSC harvests were excluded from analyses of relapse. The probabilities of relapse at 18 months for the 97 patients with stage II-III disease infused with ICC-negative and the 17 with ICC-positive PBSC were 0.19 and 0.13, respectively (P = 0.48). The probabilities of relapse at 18 months for patients achieving a CR or a CR in non-bone sites and improvement in bone lesions were 0.55 for the ICC-negative group (n = 30) and 0.45 for the ICC-positive group (n = 11) (P = 0.60). It was concluded that occult tumor cells were detected by ICC in PBSC harvests from a relatively small fraction of women with breast cancer, but were not associated with a significant increase in the probability of early relapse or progression when infused after HDC.

A randomized trial of two doses of cyclophosphamide with etoposide and G-CSF for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in 318 patients with stage II-III breast cancer.

The purpose of this study was to develop a less toxic outpatient chemotherapy regimen for mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Three hundred eighteen patients with newly diagnosed stage II-III breast cancer who had received conventional dose adjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to receive intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 6 micrograms/kg/day (ID-Cy, n = 162) or high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and the same doses of etoposide and G-CSF (HD-Cy, n = 156) followed by collection of PBSC. Three hundred seventeen of 318 patients had apheresis performed, and 315 received high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by PBSC support. The median numbers of CD34+ cells collected in a median of two apheresis following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 19.9 and 22.2 x 10(6)/kg, respectively (p = 0.04). The fractions of patients achieving CD34+ cell doses > or = 2.5 or > or = 5.0 x 10(6)/kg were not different between the two regimens. More patients receiving HD-Cy had grade 3-4 nausea (p = 0.001), vomiting (p = 0.03), and mucositis (p = 0.04). The fractions of patients having a neutrophil nadir < 0.5 x 10(9)/L following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 0.83 and 0.95, respectively (p = < 0.001). The fractions of patients having a platelet nadir < 25 x 10(9)/L following ID-Cy and HD-Cy were 0.13 and 0.51, respectively (p = < 0.001). More patients in the HD-Cy group received platelet (p < 0.001) and red blood cell (p < 0.001) transfusions and were admitted to the hospital more frequently (p = 0.03) than patients receiving ID-Cy. Three hundred fifteen patients received HDC followed by infusion of PBSC. There were no significant differences in the incidence of transplant-related death or early survival between patients receiving ID-Cy or HD-Cy followed by HDC. It was concluded that a regimen of Cy 2 g/m2 with etoposide and G-CSF was effective for mobilization of PBSC with low morbidity and resource utilization in patients with limited prior chemotherapy exposure.

Clinical experience with autologous tumor cell lines for patient-specific vaccine therapy in metastatic melanoma.

Because of their patient specificity and proliferative capacity, tumor cell lines established from autologous metastatic melanoma tumor samples may be an excellent immunogen for patient-specific vaccine therapy. Between October 1990 and July 1996, the Hoag Cancer Center cell biology laboratory received 136 fresh metastatic melanoma samples from 122 different patients. Tumor cell lines were successfully established for 92 of 136 samples (68%), for 87 of 122 patients (71%). Successful cultures were expanded to 10(8) cells (total culture time about 8 weeks), confirmed to be sterile, irradiated, and stored frozen in aliquots of 10(7) cells. Vaccines were prepared from 72 lines, and 62 vaccines were used in 57 different patients. Subcutaneous vaccination took place on weeks 1, 2 and 3, and then monthly for a total of 6 months. A delayed tumor hypersensitivity skin test (DTH) was administered at week zero and week 4. Various adjuvants were co-administered including BCG, alpha- or gamma-interferon, and GM-CSF. Patients were monitored for failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) from the date of the first vaccination. Follow-up data is available for 52 patients, 27 who had no evident disease (NED) at the time of vaccination and 25 who had metastatic disease at the time of treatment. There were two partial responses which persisted 11.9 and 39.8+ months among the 25 patients who had detectable metastatic disease whün treatment was initiated (8%, 1 to 26%, 95%-Ci). Twenty patients had negative skin tests at week 0 and week 4; six were positive both times, and 13 converted their DTH from negative to positive, for a conversion rate of 13 of 33 (39%). Patients who received interferon-gamma and/or GM-CSF as an adjuvant had a higher rate of DTH conversion compared to patients who received other adjuvants (13 of 20 v 2 of 13, P = 0.003). For patients who were NED, nine of 19 (47%) converted their DTH test compared to four of 14 (29%) patients with metastatic disease (p = 0.33). For patients whose DTH converted from negative to positive after 3 weeks of vaccination, median FFS and OS were superior compared to patients whose DTH remained negative (19.4 v 4.0 months FFS, p = 0.0052 and 39.6 v 18.3 months OS, p = 0.0602). The autologous cell line approach to active specific immunotherapy is feasible for patients who have resectable foci of metastatic disease. Administration of such patient-specific vaccines improves survival for those patients who are NED at the time of vaccination and convert their DTH skin test, compared to those whose DTH test remains negative.

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells after the administration of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of 497 patients.

BACKGROUND: There is great interpatient variability in the number of peripheral blood stem cells collected, as measured by CD34+ cell content, after the administration of chemotherapy and a growth factor. The ability to predict patients who fail to yield adequate quantities of CD34+ cells would be of value. However, very few reports include large numbers of patients treated in an identical fashion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between 1991 and 1995, 497 consecutive patients with a variety of malignant diseases received cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (6 micrograms/kg/day) for mobilization and collection of a target dose > or = 2.5 x 10(8) CD34+ cells per kg. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with failure to achieve this target harvest. RESULTS: A median of 14.71 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 0.08-137.55) was harvested with a median of 2 (range, 1-11) apheresis procedures. Ninety-one percent of patients yielded > or = 2.5 x 10(5) CD34+ cells per kg. Patients with Stage II-III breast cancer, who had pretreatment platelet counts > or = 150 x 10(9) per L and patients who underwent < or = 1 prior chemotherapy regimen had improved CD34+ cell yields. However, most patients with adverse risk factors yielded > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. CONCLUSION: A regimen of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor led to the successful collection of adequate numbers of CD34+ cells in most patients without excessive toxicity. These observations confirm previous reports that intense prior therapy adversely affects the quantity of CD34+ cells harvested. Pretreatment and posttreatment variables did not predict with any certainty the small fraction of patients who fail to yield > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg via multiple apheresis procedures.

Engraftment and outcomes of patients receiving myeloablative therapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cells with a low CD34+ cell content.

Engraftment kinetics after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) were evaluated in patients receiving autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusions with a low CD34+ cell content. Forty-eight patients were infused with < 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; 36 because of poor harvests and 12 because they electively received only a fraction of their harvested cells. A median of 2.12 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (range, 1.17-2.48) were infused following one of seven different HDC regimens. All patients achieved absolute neutrophil counts > or = 0.5 x 10(9)/l at a median of day 11 (range, 9-16). Forty-seven patients achieved platelet counts > or = 20 x 10(9)/l at a median of day 14 (range, 8-250). Nine of 47 (19%) had platelet recovery after day 21, 4/47 (9%) after day 100 and one died on day 240 without platelet recovery. Twenty-six patients (54%) died of progressive disease in 51-762 days; 22 (46%) are alive at a median of 450 days (range, 94-1844), 17 (35%) of whom are surviving disease-free at a median of 494 days (range, 55-1263). No patient died as a direct consequence of low blood cell counts. These data demonstrate that PBSC products containing 1.17-2.48 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg resulted in relatively prompt neutrophil recovery in all patients but approximately 10% had delayed platelet recovery.

Collection of peripheral blood stem cells following administration of paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and filgrastim in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities and efficacy of paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide (Cy), and recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) administered for mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in patients with breast and ovarian cancer. METHODS: One hundred and forty-one patients with breast (n = 115) or ovarian cancer (n = 26) received paclitaxel 170 mg/m2 and Cy 2 gm/m2 (n = 42) or paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, Cy 3 gm/m2 (n = 99), and filgrastim (6 micrograms/kg/day) followed by collection of PBSC by apheresis. RESULTS: The 2 dose levels of paclitaxel and Cy tested were well tolerated. The median yield of CD34+ cells from all patients was 6.53 x 10(6)/kg (range, 0.11-51.76) collected with a median of 2 aphereses (range, 1-8). The target dose of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was achieved in 85% of patients. The mean daily collection of CD34+ cells was 5.46 x 10(6)/kg for patients receiving 200 mg/m2 of paclitaxel and 3 gm/m2 of Cy as compared to 2.77 for patients receiving the lower doses (p = 0.0005). Increasing the dose of paclitaxel and Cy did not significantly increase the fraction of patients achieving a target dose of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (87% vs 81%, p = 0.367) but did increase the fraction achieving a target of 5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (73% vs 45%, p = 0.002). The mean daily collection of CD34+ cells for patients who had received only 1 prior chemotherapy regimen was 6.59 x 10(6)/kg as compared to 3.47 for patients who had received more than 1 prior chemotherapy regimen (p < 0.0001). Prior radiation therapy (p = 0.003) and patient performance status (p = 0.047) were adverse risk factors for achieving a target dose of > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, Cy, and filgrastim can be administered with acceptable toxicity, allowing collection of adequate quantities of PBSC from the majority of patients with breast and ovarian cancer. Increasing the doses of paclitaxel and Cy increased the number of CD34+ cells collected and decreased the number of apheresis procedures necessary to collect target cell doses. However, increasing drug doses did not increase the fraction of patients yielding the minimum CD34+ target dose of 2.5 x 10(6)/kg. Collection of PBSC early in the disease course is the best strategy to assure optimal CD34+ cell doses in all patients.

Treatment-related mortality in 1000 consecutive patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in community cancer centers.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) is being increasingly utilized as a therapeutic modality for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive disease. Several published HDC regimens have become relatively widely used. The purpose of this analysis was to determine treatment-related mortality (TRM) following administration of five different HDC regimens in community cancer centers. A retrospective evaluation of 1000 consecutive patients with leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, sarcoma, ovarian cancer, or breast cancer who received one of five published HDC regimens followed by PBPC infusion over a 5-year period in community cancer centers was performed to determine TRM. Fifty-nine patients (5.9%) died within 100 days of PBPC infusion. Twenty-five patients (2.5%) died predominantly of causes related to disease progression. Thirty-four patients (3.4%) died of TRM, 15 patients (1.5%) died from infection and 19 (1.9%) died from regimen-related toxicities (RRT). In a logistic model, increasing age (P = 0.001) and lower numbers of CD34+ cells/kg (P = 0.003) were associated with an increased risk of 100-day TRM. High-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin was associated with a lower risk of mortality than other regimens (P = 0.0001). High-dose chemotherapy and autologous PBPC support can be performed in community cancer centers with relative safety. Patient age, the type of preparative regimen and the number of CD34+ cells infused were important determinates of mortality.

Induction, mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC), high-dose chemotherapy and PBSC infusion in patients with untreated stage IV breast cancer: outcomes by intent to treat analyses.

We investigated the outcomes of patients with breast cancer undergoing induction chemotherapy, mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with PBSC infusion. One hundred and fourteen patients with untreated stage IV breast cancer, with a median age of 46 years (range 24-62), were entered on a phase II trial consisting of; (1) doxorubicin, 5-flurouracil, methotrexate (AFM) x 4 courses at 2 week intervals; (2) cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), cisplatin (105 mg/m2) (CEP), filgrastim (6 micrograms/kg/day) and PBSC collection; (3) cyclophosphamide (6 g/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/m2), carboplatin (800 mg/m2), (CTCb) followed by PBSC infusion. All patients received AFM, 107 (94%) received CEP, 93 (82%) received CTCb and PBSC as per protocol and 99 (87%) ultimately received HDC and PBSC. There was one infectious death after AFM and all other deaths were associated with progressive disease. Fifty-two patients (46%) are alive, 21 (18%) without progression, at a median 31 months (range 22-47). The probabilities of survival and progression-free survival at 3.5 years were 0.40 and 0.17, respectively. All 62 patients with visceral disease and/or a prior history of doxorubicin adjuvant therapy have relapsed or progressed. We conclude that the sequential administration of AFM, CEP and CTCb followed by PBSC resulted in long-term PFS only in patients who were NED, had bone-only disease or had lymph node or soft tissue disease with or without bone disease. Other strategies, aimed at improving responses to initial therapy, improving HDC regimens and/or developing immunomodulatory therapies, will be necessary to improve PFS for patients who fail doxorubicin adjuvant or who have visceral disease.