RÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Eosinophils have widespread procoagulant effects. In daily practice, eosinophil-related cardiovascular toxicity consists of endomyocardial damage, eosinophilic vasculitis and arterial or venous thrombosis. Here we aim to report on the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with unexplained ophthalmic vascular manifestations and eosinophilia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study and a literature review of patients with eosinophilia (≥0.5 x109/L) and concomitant ophthalmic vascular manifestations independent of the underlying eosinophilic disease but with no alternative cause for ophthalmic manifestations. Results: Fifty-seven patients were included (20 from the observational study and 37 from the literature review). Ophthalmic vascular features were the initial manifestation of eosinophil-related disease in 34 (59%) patients and consisted of 29 central retinal artery occlusions, six branch retinal artery occlusions, five central retinal vein occlusions, two branch retinal vein occlusions, seven retinal vasculitides, two retinal vasospasms, 12 Purtscher's retinopathies, 13 anterior ischemic optic neuropathies and two posterior ischemic optic neuropathies. The median [IQR] absolute eosinophil count at onset of ophthalmic vascular manifestations was 3.5 [1.7-7.8] x109/L. Underlying eosinophil-related diseases included eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n=32), clonal hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) (n=1), idiopathic HES (n=13), lymphocytic HES (n=2), adverse drug reactions (n=3), parasitosis (n=2), polyarteritis nodosa (n=1), IgG4-related disease (n=1), eosinophilic fasciitis (n=1) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (n=1). Other extra-ophthalmologic arterial or venous thromboses related to eosinophilia were reported in four (7%) and nine (16%) patients, respectively. Visual prognosis was poor: only eight (10%) patients achieved full recovery of ophthalmologic symptoms. After a median follow-up of 10.5 [1-18] months, one patient (3%) had a recurrence of an ophthalmic vascular manifestation, and three patients (10%) had a recurrence of other vascular symptoms (deep vein thrombosis in two and pulmonary embolism in one patient). At the time of recurrence, absolute eosinophil counts were above 0.5 x109/L in all cases (n=4). Discussion: This study broadens the spectrum of vascular manifestations associated with hypereosinophilia by adding ophthalmic vascular manifestations. In patients with ophthalmological vascular manifestations and hypereosinophilia, aggressive treatment of the underlying pathology (and normalization of blood count) should be implemented.
Sujet(s)
Éosinophilie , Granulocytes éosinophiles , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Éosinophilie/étiologie , Granulocytes éosinophiles/immunologie , Sujet âgé , AdulteRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) unresponsive to medical therapy often require lung transplantation (LTx), which prolongs quality of life and survival. Ideal timing for referral for LTx remains challenging, with late referral associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Among other criteria, patients with ILD should be considered for LTx if forced vital capacity (FVC) is less than 80% or diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) is less than 40%. However, data on referral rates are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate referral rates for LTx based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and identify barriers associated with non-referral. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective cohort study. METHODS: The study consisted of ILD patients who performed PFT between 2014 and 2020. Patients with FVC < 80% or a DLCO < 40% were included in the study. Patients with absolute contraindications to LTx were excluded. Referral rates were computed, and a comparison was made between referred and non-referred subjects. RESULTS: Out of 114 ILD patients meeting criteria for referral to LTx, 35 were referred (30.7%), and 7 proceeded to undergo LTx. Median time from PFT to referral for assessment was 255 days [interquartile range (IQR) 35-1077]. Median time from referral to LTx was 89 days (IQR 59-143). Referred patients were younger (p = 0.003), had lower FVC (p < 0.001), DLCO (p < 0.001), and a higher rate of pulmonary hypertension (p = 0.04). Relatively better PFT, and older age, were significantly associated with non-referral of patients. CONCLUSION: There is under-referral of ILD patients who are eligible for LTx, which is associated with severe disease and missed opportunities for LTx. Further research is required to validate these findings.
Lung transplants: addressing referral gaps for lung disease patientsPatients with severe lung diseases that are unresponsive to medical treatments often require lung transplants to enhance their quality of life and survival. Determining the optimal timing for considering a transplant is challenging, as delaying it can lead to complications. Our study aimed to assess how frequently individuals with lung problems, particularly interstitial lung diseases, were referred for lung transplants based on lung function tests. We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records for patients with lung diseases who underwent lung function tests between 2014 and 2020. We selected patients whose test results indicated impaired lung function, excluding those who were ineligible for lung transplants due to other medical reasons. Subsequently, we examined the number of patients referred for a lung transplant and compared them to those who were not referred. Our findings revealed that out of 114 patients eligible for a lung transplant, only 35 were referred, representing a referral rate of approximately 31%. Among these, only 7 patients actually underwent the transplant procedure. The time elapsed between the lung function test and the referral for a transplant assessment was notably long, averaging around 255 days. Additionally, once referred, patients waited an average of 89 days for the transplant assessment. Referred patients tended to be younger and had more severe lung disease, characterized by lower lung function test results and a higher likelihood of pulmonary hypertension. Conversely, patients who were not referred generally enjoyed better overall health and were older. This discrepancy highlights the missed opportunities for patients to improve their health and quality of life through lung transplantation. Further research is essential to verify the accuracy of these findings, but this study represents a crucial step toward ensuring that individuals with lung diseases receive the appropriate care they require.
Sujet(s)
Pneumopathies interstitielles , Transplantation pulmonaire , Humains , Études rétrospectives , Qualité de vie , Poumon , Pneumopathies interstitielles/diagnostic , Pneumopathies interstitielles/chirurgie , Transplantation pulmonaire/effets indésirables , Orientation vers un spécialisteRÉSUMÉ
We report 8 cases of persistent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia in patients previously treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Polymerase chain reaction of nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 was negative in most cases; viral cell cultures confirmed that viable SARS-Co-2 virus was present. Four patients were treated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 hyperimmune globulins with rapid resolution of disease.
RÉSUMÉ
Severe respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 often requires mechanical ventilation, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In rare cases, lung transplantation (LTx) may be considered as a last resort. However, uncertainties remain about patient selection and optimal timing for referral and listing. This retrospective study analyzed patients with severe COVID-19 who were supported by veno-venous ECMO and listed for LTx between July 2020 and June 2022. Out of the 20 patients in the study population, four who underwent LTx were excluded. The clinical characteristics of the remaining 16 patients were compared, including nine who recovered and seven who died while awaiting LTx. The median duration from hospitalization to listing was 85.5 days, and the median duration on the waitlist was 25.5 days. Younger age was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of recovery without LTx after a median of 59 days on ECMO, compared to those who died at a median of 99 days. In patients with severe COVID-19-induced lung damage supported by ECMO, referral to LTx should be delayed for 8-10 weeks after ECMO initiation, particularly for younger patients who have a higher probability of spontaneous recovery and may not require LTx.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Methacholine challenge tests (MCTs) are used to diagnose airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in patients with suspected asthma where previous diagnostic testing has been inconclusive. The test is time consuming and usually requires referral to specialized centers. Simple methods to predict AHR could help determine which patients should be referred to MCTs, thus avoiding unnecessary testing. Here we investigated the potential use of baseline spirometry variables as surrogate markers for AHR in adults with suspected asthma. METHODS: Baseline spirometry and MCTs performed between 2013 and 2019 in a large tertiary center were retrospectively evaluated. Receiver-operating characteristic curves for the maximal expiratory flow-volume curve indices (angle ß, FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF50%, FEF25-75%) were constructed to assess their overall accuracy in predicting AHR and optimal cutoff values were identified. RESULTS: A total of 2983 tests were analyzed in adults aged 18-40 years. In total, 14% of all MCTs were positive (PC20 ≤ 16 mg/ml). All baseline spirometry parameters were significantly lower in the positive group (p < 0.001). FEF50% showed the best overall accuracy (AUC = 0.688) and proved to be useful as a negative predictor when applying FEF50% ≥ 110% as a cutoff level. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the role of FEF50% in predicting AHR in patients with suspected asthma. A value of ≥ 110% for baseline FEF50% could be used to exclude AHR and would lead to a substantial decrease in MCT referrals.
Sujet(s)
Asthme/diagnostic , Hyperréactivité bronchique/diagnostic , Tests de provocation bronchique , Bronchoconstricteurs/administration et posologie , Chlorure de méthacholine/administration et posologie , Spirométrie , Adulte , Asthme/physiopathologie , Hyperréactivité bronchique/physiopathologie , Études transversales , Femelle , Volume expiratoire maximal par seconde , Humains , Israël , Modèles logistiques , Mâle , Valeur prédictive des tests , Courbe ROC , Études rétrospectives , Capacité vitale , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
Clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis is an uncommon autoimmune disorder in the Middle East. The clinical picture of clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis is characterized mainly by pulmonary and dermatological manifestations. Occasionally muscle symptoms are observed as well. Serum anti-MDA5 autoantibody positivity is associated with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease among clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis patients. Moreover, high serum ferritin level is correlated with poor prognosis and high mortality. Herein we describe the case of an Israeli patient with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease and without pathognomonic dermatological features who was diagnosed with anti-MDA5 positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis and did not survive despite immunomodulatory therapy followed by reduction in serum ferritin levels.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are a group of syndromes that affect the central and peripheral neuromuscular system in association with cancer. Specific antibodies may assist in the diagnosis of PNS. The antibodies tested can be classified into those directed against intracellular neuronal proteins ("well characterized" PNS: Hu, Yo, RI, CV2, amphiphysin, Ma1, Ma2) and those directed against neural surface antigens (autoimmune encephalitis syndromes: NMDA, AMPA, LGI1, CASPR2, GABAR). We aimed to characterize patients with unexplained neuropsychiatric symptoms, in whom positive PNS antibodies were detected in the Sheba medical center, a large referral hospital. METHODS: Clinical and demographic data of patients with positive PNS antibodies were collected during the years 2002-2016. Antibodies were tested by either Line immunoassay or by cell-based indirect immunofluorscent assay. RESULTS: During the follow up of 14â¯years, 4010 PNS tests were performed in patients with unexplained neuropsychiatric symptoms. Seventy-two were found to be positive; among them we had full clinical data access to 44. The most frequent antibodies were anti-Hu (31.8%), anti-Yo (18.2%), anti-CV2 (13.6%), and anti-NMDA (9.1%), and the most common cancers were small-cell lung (SCLC) and ovarian cancers. In the well characterized paraneoplastic group, cancer was diagnosed in 55.9% of the patients, and in the autoimmune encephalitis group, 40.0% were diagnosed with cancer. A positive correlation between antibody titer and the presence of cancer was found. Ninety percent of the tests in patients who were found positive were ordered by a neurologist or neuro-oncologist. CONCLUSIONS: The titers of PNS auto-antibodies can predict cancer in patients whom anti-PNS antibodies are tested. In addition, consultation with a specialist should be considered before this test is ordered.
Sujet(s)
Autoanticorps/sang , Maladies du système nerveux/diagnostic , Syndromes paranéoplasiques/diagnostic , Adolescent , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Antigènes Hu de l'encéphalomyélite paranéoplasique/immunologie , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Protéines membranaires/immunologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Protéines de tissu nerveux/immunologie , Maladies du système nerveux/immunologie , Syndromes paranéoplasiques/immunologie , Valeur prédictive des tests , Récepteurs du N-méthyl-D-aspartate/immunologie , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite the thorough mapping of brain pathways involved in eating behavior, no treatment aimed at modulating eating dysregulation from its neurocognitive root has been established yet. We aimed to evaluate the effect of N.I.R. H.E.G. (Near Infra-Red Hemoencephalography) neurofeedback training on appetite control, weight and food-related brain activity. METHODS: Six healthy male participants with overweight or mild obesity went through 10 N.I.R. H.E.G. neurofeedback sessions designed to practice voluntary activation of the prefrontal cortex. Weight, eating behavior, appetite control and brain activity related to food and self-inhibition based on fMRI were evaluated before and after neurofeedback training. RESULTS: Our study group demonstrated a positive trend of increased self-control and inhibition related to food behavior, reduced weight and increased activation during an fMRI response-inhibition task (Go-No-Go - GNG) in the predefined region of interest (ROI): superior orbitofrontal cortex (sOFC). CONCLUSIONS: N.I.R. H.E.G. holds a promising potential as a feasible neurofeedback platform for modulation of cortical brain circuits involved in self-control and eating behavior and should be further evaluated and developed as a brain modifying device for the treatment and prevention of obesity.