RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is a relative lack of detailed reports regarding clinical presentation and outcome of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in Asians. This study aims to describe the clinical features and treatment outcomes of Korean patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension from one hospital and retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 11 hospitals in Korea. We collected data regarding preceding medical conditions or suspected medication exposure, headache phenotypes, other associated symptoms, detailed neuroimaging findings, treatments, and outcomes after 1-2 and 3-6 months of treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-nine (83.1% women) patients were included. The mean body mass index was 29.11 (standard deviation, 5.87) kg/m2; only 27 patients (45.8%) had a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m2. Fifty-one (86.4%) patients experienced headaches, patterns of which included chronic migraine (15/51 [29.4%]), episodic migraine (8/51 [15.7%]), probable migraine (4/51 [7.8%]), chronic tension-type headache (3/51 [5.9%]), episodic tension-type headache (2/51 [3.9%]), probable tension-type headache (2/51 [3.9%]), and unclassified (17/51 [33.3%]). Medication overuse headache was diagnosed in 4/51 (7.8%) patients. After 3-6 months of treatment, the intracranial pressure normalized in 8/32 (25.0%), improved in 17/32 (53.1%), no changed in 7/32 (21.9%), and worsened in none. Over the same period, headaches remitted or significantly improved by more than 50% in 24/39 patients (61.5%), improved less than 50% in 9/39 (23.1%), and persisted or worsened in 6/39 (15.4%) patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the features of Asian patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension may be atypical (i.e., less likely obese, less female predominance). A wide spectrum of headache phenotypes was observed. Medical treatment resulted in overall favorable short-term outcomes; however, the headaches did not improve in a small proportion of patients.
Sujet(s)
Syndrome d'hypertension intracrânienne bénigne , Humains , Femelle , Mâle , République de Corée/épidémiologie , Adulte , Résultat thérapeutique , Syndrome d'hypertension intracrânienne bénigne/thérapie , Syndrome d'hypertension intracrânienne bénigne/traitement médicamenteux , Syndrome d'hypertension intracrânienne bénigne/diagnostic , Études rétrospectives , Adulte d'âge moyen , Jeune adulte , Études prospectivesRÉSUMÉ
New-onset altered level of consciousness (ALC) is a challenge in real-world clinical practice. Although its presentation is nonspecific and its etiology is intricate, the term ALC is frequently used in the emergency room (ER). This study aimed to clarify and classify the etiologies and outcomes of the ALC in the ER. We retrospectively investigated ALC patients in the ER of four tertiary referral centers from February 2018 to January 2020. The etiology of ALC was comprehensively analyzed by a consortium of university professors, board-certified clinicians in neurology, emergency medicine, or internal medicine. The time point to determine the etiology of ALC was at the time of discharge from the ER. A total of 315,526 patients who visited ER due to ALC were reviewed and found 7988 eligible patients, of which 4298 (53.8%) were male and 5282 (66.1%) were older than 60. The overall mortality was 13.5%. Except undetermined, the 9 etiologies (n = 7552) were categorized into extra- (n = 4768, 63.1%) or intracranial etiology (n = 2784, 36.9%). The most common etiology of ALC in the ER was metabolic cause (n = 1972, 24.7%), followed by systemic infection (n = 1378, 17.3%). The majority of ALC in the ER was derived from extracranial etiology. ALC in the ER is a neurological manifestation of diverse etiologies; not all can be confirmed in the ER. Not only neurological but also critical systemic illnesses should be considered to assess the protean manifestations of ALC in the ER.
Sujet(s)
Troubles de la conscience , Neurologie , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Études rétrospectives , Troubles de la conscience/étiologie , Service hospitalier d'urgences , Sortie du patientRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is one of the most common non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the confounding effects of dopaminergic medication on sleep are a major challenge in understanding the impact of sleep disturbance in PD. We investigated the sleep disturbance and associated clinical features in patients with de novo, untreated PD. METHODS: One-hundred-eight patients with de novo, untreated PD were included. Night sleep disturbance was evaluated using the night sleep subscale of the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease (SCOPA-Sleep). Depression, anxiety, and apathy were assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES), respectively. Early perfusion and dopamine transporter imaging of F-18 FP-CIT PET/CT were performed together with statistical parametric mapping analysis. RESULTS: The night sleep SCOPA-Sleep sub-score was correlated with the AES (p = 0.014), BAI (p = 0.014), and GDS (p = 0.023) scores. Patients with poor night sleep were more apathetic (p = 0.013). Additionally, there was increased perfusion in the left posterior cingulate in patients with sleep disturbance and apathy compared to those with sleep disturbance only. CONCLUSIONS: Night sleep disturbance was related to mood disorders, particularly apathy, in patients with de novo, untreated PD.
Sujet(s)
Apathie , Maladie de Parkinson , Troubles de la veille et du sommeil , Sujet âgé , Humains , Maladie de Parkinson/complications , Maladie de Parkinson/imagerie diagnostique , Tomographie par émission de positons couplée à la tomodensitométrie , Sommeil , Troubles de la veille et du sommeil/étiologieRÉSUMÉ
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological illness marked by a strong desire to move one's legs, usually in association with uncomfortable sensations. Recent studies have investigated brain networks and connectivity in RLS. The advent of network analysis has greatly improved our understanding of the brain and various neurological disorders. A few studies have investigated alterations in functional connectivity in patients with RLS. This article reviews functional connectivity studies of patients with RLS, which have identified significant alterations relative to healthy controls in several brain networks including thalamic, salience, default-mode, and small-world networks. In addition, network changes related to RLS treatment have been found, including to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcutaneous spinal cord direct-current stimulation, and dopaminergic drugs. These findings suggest that the underlying pathogenesis of RLS includes alterations in the functional connectivity in the brain and that RLS is a network disorder.
RÉSUMÉ
Altered levels of consciousness (ALCs) is a challenging issue; however, data describing its etiology and frequency are lacking. This study aimed to clarify and classify the etiologies of ALCs in the emergency room (ER) and to evaluate their destinations and the form of discharge. This retrospective study included patients with an ALC who visited the ER of a university hospital between January 2018 and December 2020. The cause and classification of the ALCs were carefully determined by a consortium of board-certified faculty members in emergency medicine, internal medicine, and neurology. The reference point for determining the etiology of ALC was discharge from the ER. In total, 2028 patients with ALCs were investigated. More than half (1037, 51.1%) visited the ER between 9:00 and 18:00. The most common etiology was systemic infection (581, 28.6%), followed by metabolic causes (455, 22.4%), and stroke (271, 13.4%). The two leading etiologies were extracranial and had a majority of the cases (1036, 51.5%). The overall mortality rate was 17.2%. This study provides fundamental information on ALC in the ER. Although intracranial etiologies have been foregrounded, this study demonstrated that extracranial etiologies are the main cause of ALC in the ER.
Sujet(s)
Troubles de la conscience , Conscience , Troubles de la conscience/étiologie , Service hospitalier d'urgences , Humains , Sortie du patient , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Cluster headache (CH) is a rare, primary headache disorder, characterized of excruciating, strictly one-sided pain attacks and ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms. Given the debilitating nature of CH, delayed diagnosis can increase the disease burden. Thus, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic delay, its predictors, and clinical influence among patients with CH. METHODS: Data from a prospective multicenter CH registry over a 4-year period were analyzed. CH was diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 criteria, and diagnostic delay of CH was assessed as the time interval between the year of the first onset and the year of CH diagnosis. Patients were classified into three groups according to the tertiles of diagnostic delay (1st tertile, <1 year; 2nd tertile, 1-6 years; and 3rd tertile, ≥7 years). RESULTS: Overall, 445 patients were evaluated. The mean duration of diagnosis delay was 5.7 ± 6.7 years, (range, 0-36 years). Regarding the age of onset, majority of young patients (age <20 years) belonged to the third tertile (60%), whereas minority of old patients (>40 years) belonged to the third tertile (9.0%). For year of onset, the proportion of patients in the 3rd tertile was the highest for the groups before the publication year of the ICHD-2 (74.7%) and the lowest for the groups after the publication year of the ICHD-3 beta version (0.5%). Compared with the first CH, episodic CH [multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 5.91, 95% CI = 2.42-14.48], chronic CH (aOR = 8.87, 95% CI = 2.66-29.51), and probable CH (aOR = 4.12, 95% CI = 1.48-11.43) were associated with the tertiles of diagnostic delay. Age of onset (aOR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95-0.99) and PHQ-9 score (aOR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93-0.99) were inversely associated with the tertile of diagnostic delay. The prevalence of suicidal ideation was highest in the patients of the third tertile. The mean HIT-6 score increased significantly with the diagnostic delay (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a younger onset of CH have a higher risk of diagnostic delay. Nevertheless, the rate of delayed diagnosis gradually improved over time and with the publication of the ICHD criteria, supporting the clinical significance of diagnostic clinical criteria and headache education to reduce the disease burden of CH.
RÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: We investigated sex differences in the effect of seizures on social anxiety in persons with epilepsy. METHOD: In this cross-sectional multicenter study, social anxiety was measured using the short forms of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS-6) and Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS-6). SPS-6 scoresâ¯≥â¯9 and SIAS-6 scoresâ¯≥â¯12 were considered to indicate social phobia and social interaction anxiety, respectively. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Stigma Scale-Revised, and Family Adaptation-Partnership-Growth-Affection-Resolve scale were also completed. A logistic regression analysis with an interaction term was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Out of 285 participants, a SPS-6 scoreâ¯≥â¯9 and a SIAS-6 scoreâ¯≥â¯12 were noted in 62 (21.8%) and 36 (12.6%) of participants, respectively. There was no difference in the prevalence of social anxiety between men and women. Intractable seizures and lack of seizure freedom were associated with a SPS-6 scoreâ¯≥â¯9 and a SIAS-6 scoreâ¯≥â¯12, but statistical significance was lost in the adjusted models. However, intractable seizures and lack of seizure freedom significantly interacted with sex for a SPS-6 scoreâ¯≥â¯9 (pâ¯=â¯0.018) and a SIAS-6 scoreâ¯≥â¯12 (pâ¯=â¯0.048) in both the separate and adjusted models. Specifically, intractable seizures tended to be positively associated with SPS-6 scoresâ¯≥â¯9 than non-intractable seizures in men only (odds ratioâ¯=â¯2.602, pâ¯=â¯0.068), whereas lack of seizure freedom tended to be negatively associated with SIAS-6 scoresâ¯≥â¯12 than seizure freedom in women only (odds ratioâ¯=â¯4.804, pâ¯=â¯0.053). CONCLUSION: We found significant sex differences in seizure effects on social anxiety. Intractable seizures were associated with social phobia in men, whereas lack of seizure freedom in the last year was associated with social interaction anxiety in women.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Individualized anti-epileptic drug (AED) selection in patient with epilepsy is crucial. However, there is no unified opinion in treating patients with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). This survey aimed to make a consolidate consensus with epileptologists' perspectives of the treatment for Korean DRE patients by survey responses. METHODS: The survey was conducted with Korean epilepsy experts who have experience prescribing AEDs via e-mail. Survey questionnaires consisted of six items regarding prescription patterns and practical questions in treating patients with DRE in Korea. The research period was from February 2021 to March 2021. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 83.3% (90/108). Most (77.8%) of the responders are neurologists. The proportion of patients whose seizures were not controlled by the second AED was 26.9%. The proportion of patients who had taken five or more AEDs is 13.9%, and those who are currently taking five or more AEDs are 7.3%, of which 54.5% and 37.9% reported positive effects on additional AED, respectively. The majority (91.1%) of respondents answered that the mechanism of action was the top priority factor when adding AED. Regarding data priority, responders considered that expert opinion should have the top priority, followed by clinical experiences, reimbursement guidelines and clinical evidence. Responders gave 64.9 points (range from 0 to 100) about overall satisfaction on reimbursement system of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service for AED. CONCLUSIONS: This study on AED therapy for DRE patients is the first nationwide trial in Korean epilepsy experts. In five drug failure, the top priorities on AED selection are mechanism of action and expert opinion. These findings might help to achieve consensus and recognize the insight on optimal therapy of AED in DRE.
RÉSUMÉ
Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most serious neurologic emergencies. SE is a condition that encompasses a broad range of semiologic subtypes and heterogeneous etiologies. The treatment of SE primarily involves the management of the underlying etiology and the use of antiepileptic drug therapy to rapidly terminate seizure activities. The Drug Committee of the Korean Epilepsy Society performed a review of existing guidelines and literature with the aim of providing practical recommendations for antiepileptic drug therapy. This article is one of a series of review articles by the Drug Committee and it summarizes staged antiepileptic drug therapy for SE. While evidence of good quality supports the use of benzodiazepines as the first-line treatment of SE, such evidence informing the administration of second- or third-line treatments is lacking; hence, the recommendations presented herein concerning the treatment of established and refractory SE are based on case series and expert opinions. The choice of antiepileptic drugs in each stage should consider the characteristics and circumstances of each patient, as well as their estimated benefit and risk to them. In tandem with the antiepileptic drug therapy, careful searching for and treatment of the underlying etiology are required.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to survey the expert opinions on treatments for convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in adults. METHODS: Forty-two South Korean epileptologists participated in this survey. They completed an online questionnaire regarding various patient scenarios and evaluated the appropriateness of medications used to treat CSE and NCSE. RESULTS: Initial treatment with a benzodiazepine (BZD) followed by either a second BZD or an antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy was the preferred treatment strategy. More than two-thirds of the experts used a second BZD when the first one failed, and consensus was reached for 84.8% of the survey items. The preferred BZD was intravenous (IV) lorazepam for the initial treatment of status epilepticus. IV fosphenytoin and IV levetiracetam were chosen for AED monotherapy after the failure of BZD. The treatments for NCSE were similar to those for CSE. Continuous IV midazolam infusion was the treatment of choice for iatrogenic coma in refractory CSE, but other AEDs were preferred over iatrogenic coma in refractory NCSE. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey are consistent with previous guidelines, and can be cautiously applied in clinical practice when treating patients with CSE or NCSE.
RÉSUMÉ
Autoimmune epilepsy is a newly emerging area of epilepsy. The concept of "autoimmune" as an etiology has recently been revisited thanks to advances in autoimmune encephalitis and precision medicine with immunotherapies. Autoimmune epilepsy presents with specific clinical manifestations, and various diagnostic approaches including cerebrospinal fluid analysis, neuroimaging, and autoantibody tests are essential for its differential diagnosis. The diagnosis is often indeterminate despite performing a thorough evaluation, and therefore empirical immunotherapy may be applied according to the judgment of the clinician. Autoimmune epilepsy often manifests as new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). A patient classified as NORSE should receive empirical immunotherapy as soon as possible. On the other hand, a morecautious, stepwise approach is recommended for autoimmune epilepsy that presents with episodic events. The type of autoimmune epilepsy is also an important factor to consider when choosing from among various immunotherapy options. Clinicians should additionally take the characteristics of antiepileptic drugs into account when using them as an adjuvant therapy. This expert opinion discusses the diagnostic and treatment approaches for autoimmune epilepsy from a practical point of view.
RÉSUMÉ
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder that is mainly treated using antiepileptic drugs. Several antiepileptic drugs such as phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and ethosuximide were developed in the early 20th century. More than 10 types of antiepileptic drugs have been developed since the 1990s, and there are now more than 20 antiepileptic drugs in active clinical use. The choice of antiepileptic drugs is based on the clinical features of the seizure types, electroencephalogram findings, epileptic syndrome, and drug stability. Currently there are 19 antiepileptic drugs approved by the Korean Food and Drug Administration, 18 of which (with the exclusion of brivaracetam) are covered by the National Health Insurance Service in Korea. We reviewed the selection of antiepileptic drugs according to the classification of epileptic seizures.
RÉSUMÉ
The incidence and prevalence of epilepsy are highest in elderly people, and the etiologies of epilepsy in the elderly differ from those in other age groups. Moreover, diagnosing and treating epilepsy in elderly people may be challenging due to differences in clinical characteristics and physiological changes associated with aging. This review focuses on the pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in elderly patients.
RÉSUMÉ
Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the primary treatment strategy for epilepsy. As the use of AEDs has become more widespread and diverse over the past century, it has become necessary to refine the associated prescription strategies. This prompted the Drug Committee of the Korean Epilepsy Society to perform a systemic review of both international and domestic guidelines as well as literature related to medical treatment of epilepsy, and prepared a series of reviews to provide practical guidelines for clinicians to follow. This article is the first in a series on AED treatments for epilepsy in South Korea.
RÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Literature regarding family stigma related to epilepsy is scarce. This study investigated the prevalence of family stigma and depressive symptoms and the associated factors among the family members of patients with epilepsy. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, Stigma Scale-Revised scoreâ¯≥â¯4 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scoreâ¯≥â¯10 were considered indicative of moderate-to-severe stigma and depressive symptoms, respectively. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 482 family members, a mean age was 47.1⯱â¯9.4â¯years, and 73.4% were female. Of the patients, a mean age was 25.5⯱â¯16.7â¯years, and 45.0% were female. Idiopathic generalized epilepsy and focal epilepsy were noted in 22.4% and 65.6% of patients, respectively. Family stigma and depressive symptoms were noted in 10.0% and 11.2% of family members, respectively. Family stigma was significantly associated with high seizure frequency and being a sibling or offspring of a patient independent of their depressive symptoms. By contrast, depressive symptoms in family members were significantly associated with polytherapy, being parents of a patient, and neurological comorbidities independent of family stigma. In a subset of patients and their family, patients had higher proportion of stigma and depressive symptoms than their family. Depressive symptoms and stigma among patients were significantly correlated with those among parents, but not spouse. CONCLUSION: Family stigma is common in families with epilepsy and is closely related to depressive symptoms. Frequent seizures, polytherapy, neurological comorbidities, and the relationship to a patient may be factors that are independently associated with family stigma and depressive symptoms in family members.
Sujet(s)
Dépression/épidémiologie , Dépression/psychologie , Épilepsie/épidémiologie , Épilepsie/psychologie , Famille/psychologie , Stigmate social , Adolescent , Adulte , Enfant , Études transversales , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Autorapport , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to gather the expert opinions of Korean epileptologists regarding the treatment of adult patients with epilepsy. METHODS: A total of 42 neurologists who specialized in epilepsy were surveyed. They completed an online questionnaire describing multiple patient scenarios. Using these scenarios, they evaluated treatment strategies and gave their preference for specific antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used to treat genetically mediated generalized epilepsy and focal epilepsy. RESULTS: Initial AED monotherapy, followed by a second form of alternative monotherapy or an add-on combination therapy, was the preferred treatment strategy. The experts reached consensus for 87.2% of the items. The most commonly selected AEDs for the initial monotherapy for patients with generalized epilepsy were levetiracetam or valproate. For those with focal epilepsy, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, or lamotrigine were the most popular selections. Ethosuximide was the treatment of choice only for patients with generalized epilepsy with prominent absence seizures. Levetiracetam was preferred as an add-on therapy for both generalized and focal epilepsy. For special populations of patients, such as elderly adults or those with comorbid diseases, levetiracetam or lamotrigine was selected as the treatment of choice. CONCLUSION: Most of the survey results were in accordance with the US expert opinion survey published in 2016. This survey can assist clinicians in making clinical decisions when treating individual adult patients with epilepsy.
Sujet(s)
Anticonvulsivants/usage thérapeutique , Épilepsies partielles/traitement médicamenteux , Petit mal épileptique/traitement médicamenteux , Épilepsie généralisée/traitement médicamenteux , Expertise , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Épilepsies partielles/épidémiologie , Petit mal épileptique/épidémiologie , Épilepsie généralisée/épidémiologie , Expertise/méthodes , Femelle , Humains , Lamotrigine/usage thérapeutique , Lévétiracétam/usage thérapeutique , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Oxcarbazépine/usage thérapeutique , République de Corée/épidémiologie , Résultat thérapeutique , Acide valproïque/usage thérapeutique , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in stigma, disclosure management of epilepsy, and knowledge about epilepsy between patients with epilepsy who recognized and did not recognize the new Korean term for epilepsy. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study. The Stigma Scale-Revised, the Disclosure Management Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and a questionnaire assessing knowledge about epilepsy were used. The set of questionnaires had two versions, using either the old or new name for epilepsy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: A total of 341 patients with epilepsy and 509 family members were recruited. Approximately 62% of patients felt some degree of epilepsy-related stigma. Mild stigma, severe concealment of epilepsy diagnosis, and increased knowledge about epilepsy were independently identified as factors associated with recognition of the new term in patients. Recognition of the new term was more prevalent in patients and family members with higher education, female family members, and family members having patients with younger age at seizure onset and shorter duration of epilepsy. There were no significant differences between the two types of questionnaires. About 81% of patients and 93% of family members had a positive attitude about renaming epilepsy. CONCLUSION: The use of the new Korean term for epilepsy (cerebroelectric disorder) increased knowledge about epilepsy but did not reduce stigma and concealment of epilepsy diagnosis in Korean adults with epilepsy. Higher education may be an important factor for knowing the new term in patients and family members.
Sujet(s)
Épilepsie , Connaissances, attitudes et pratiques en santé/ethnologie , Stigmate social , Terminologie comme sujet , Adulte , Études transversales , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , République de Corée/ethnologieRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine social anxiety in South Korean adults with epilepsy and to identify associated factors. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional, multicenter study in South Korea. Social anxiety was assessed using short forms of the Social Phobia Scale (SPS-6) and Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS-6). The SPS-6 scores ≥9 and SIAS-6 scores ≥12 were considered indicative of social phobia and social interaction anxiety, respectively. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); Stigma Scale-Revised (SS-R); Disclosure Management Scale; Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, Resolve (F-APGAR) scale; and a questionnaire assessing knowledge about epilepsy were also used. RESULTS: Of a total of 219 patients with epilepsy, 21% and 11% had SPS-6 scores ≥9 and SIAS-6 scores ≥12, respectively. In logistic regression analysis, SPS-6 scores ≥9 were independently associated with SS-R scores of 4-9 (odds ratio [OR]: 8.626, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.515-29.587, pâ¯=â¯.001), SS-R scores 1-3 (OR: 5.496, 95% CI: 1.757-17.197, pâ¯=â¯.003), and PHQ-9 scores ≥10 (OR: 4.092, 95% CI: 1.823-9.185, pâ¯=â¯.001). In contrast, SIAS-6 scores ≥12 were related only to PHQ-9 scores ≥10 (OR: 8.740, 95% CI: 3.237-23.599, pâ¯<â¯.001). Belonging to a dysfunctional family and lack of knowledge about epilepsy tended to be associated with social phobia (pâ¯=â¯.071) and social interaction anxiety (pâ¯=â¯.090), respectively. Epilepsy-related variables were not related to social anxiety. CONCLUSION: Social anxiety is not rare in patients with epilepsy. In this study, social phobia was associated with perceived stigma and depressive symptoms, whereas social interaction anxiety was related only to depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy.
Sujet(s)
Épilepsie/épidémiologie , Épilepsie/psychologie , Phobie sociale/épidémiologie , Phobie sociale/psychologie , Stigmate social , Adulte , Anxiété/diagnostic , Anxiété/épidémiologie , Anxiété/psychologie , Études transversales , Épilepsie/diagnostic , Femelle , Humains , Relations interpersonnelles , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Phobie sociale/diagnostic , Échelles d'évaluation en psychiatrie , République de Corée/épidémiologie , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
This study evaluated suicidality and its risk factors in patients with tension-type headache (TTH). We recruited new patients with TTH who visited general hospitals. We recorded their clinical characteristics and conducted the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) for assessment. We also interviewed the patients to identify major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and suicidality with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus Version 5.0.0 (MINI). The frequency of suicidality was compared between TTH patients and healthy controls. Major risk factors for suicidality were also determined. A total of 332 TTH patients with the same number of healthy controls were recruited from five general hospitals. Suicidality was observed in 82 (24.7%) TTH patients. The frequency of suicidality was significantly higher in patients with TTH than in the controls. Furthermore, the frequency of suicidality was higher in patients with chronic TTH (CTTH) than in the controls. The major risk factors for suicidality were MDD, GAD, a low education level, insomnia, chronicity of TTH, and pericranial tenderness. Suicidal ideation or attempt seems to be a common feature in TTH. Therefore, it is important to identify risk factors related to suicidality in TTH patients, which may help reduce suicidality.