Dolutegravir Plus 3TC in Virologically Suppressed PLWHIV: Immunological Outcomes in a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Dolutegravir (DTG) based dual therapies for treating PLWHIV are a standard of care nowadays. Switching to DTG and lamivudine (3TC) safety and efficacy were proven in TANGO randomized clinical trial. This multicenter retrospective study included 1032 HIV virologically suppressed patients switching to DTG+3TC from 13 Spanish hospitals. DTG+3TC provided high rates of undetectable viral load over 96%, corresponding to 96.6% (889/921) at 24 weeks, 97.5% (743/763) at 48 weeks, and 98.3% (417/425) at 96 weeks. No significant differences are evident when comparing the total population according to sex, presence of comorbidity, or presence of AIDS. The analysis for paired data showed an increase in CD4+ cell count. A statistically significant increase in CD4+ lymphocyte count was found in those without comorbidities in the three-time series analyzed [average increase at 24 weeks: 48.7 (SD: 215.3) vs. 25.8 (SD: 215.5), p-value = 0.050; a mean increase at 48 weeks: 75.1 (SD: 232.9) vs. 42.3 (SD: 255.6), p-value = 0.003; a mean increase at 96 weeks: 120.1 (SD: 205.0) vs. 63.8 (SD:275.3), p-value = 0.003]. In conclusion, our cohort demonstrates that DTG+3TC is an effective treatment strategy for virologically-suppressed PLWHIV independent of age, sex, and HIV stage, as well as a safe and durable strategy.

Shorter Time to Discontinuation Due to Treatment Failure in People Living with HIV Switched to Dolutegravir Plus Either Rilpivirine or Lamivudine Compared with Integrase Inhibitor-Based Triple Therapy in a Large Spanish Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Standard therapy for HIV treatment has consisted of two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) paired with a third agent. Use of two-drug regimens (2DR) has been considered for selected patients in part to avoid toxicities associated with the use of NRTIs. This study aimed to compare the real-world outcomes of integrase inhibitor (INSTI)-based three-drug regimens (3DR) versus 2DR of dolutegravir (DTG) + rilpivirine (RPV) or DTG + lamivudine (3TC). METHODS: All patients in the Spanish VACH cohort switching to INSTI-based 3DR or a 2DR consisting of DTG + RPV or DTG + 3TC between May 2, 2016 and May 15, 2019 were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess time to/risk of discontinuation due to treatment failure (TF) (defined as virologic failure [VF], immunologic failure, or disease progression) and adverse events (AEs). Three secondary analyses were performed: (1) in restricting the analysis to patients who were virologically suppressed (HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL) at switch; (2) matched analysis (2:1, matched by age, sex, number of previous VFs, and line of regimen), and (3) using VF as the primary endpoint in all patients. RESULTS: Overall, 5047 3DR and 617 2DR patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics differed between groups; 2DR patients were older, more treatment experienced, and more likely to be virologically suppressed at switch. Time to discontinuation due to TF was significantly shorter for 2DR (P = 0.002). The hazard ratio (HR) for discontinuation due to TF on 2DR vs 3DR was 2.33 (P = 0.003). No difference was observed for time to discontinuation (P = 0.908) or risk of discontinuation due to AEs (HR = 0.80; P = 0.488). Results were qualitatively similar in virologically suppressed patients, matched analysis, and for VF. CONCLUSION: In the real world, the risks of discontinuation due to TF and VF were more than two times higher in patients switching to DTG-based 2DR than INSTI-based 3DR, with no difference in discontinuation due to AEs.

People living with HIV (PLHIV) need lifelong treatment to prevent progression to AIDS. Standard HIV treatments use three different drugs in combination, but these can potentially cause unwanted side effects. Treatments using just two drugs have been developed. These aim to reduce side effects and treat HIV effectively. This study included 5664 participants in Spain who were split into two groups: 5047 participants switched from their old treatment to a three-drug regimen (3DR), and 617 participants switched to a two-drug regimen (2DR). The researchers measured how long it took for the participants to stop taking their treatment because it was not working, or it caused too many side effects. At the end of the study, more than 70% of participants in either group were still taking the same treatment. Of the 30% of participants who stopped treatment because it stopped working, those taking a 2DR stopped sooner than those taking a 3DR. This difference started to appear at about 18 months and got bigger until the study ended, which was 3 years after starting treatment. Participants taking a 2DR were twice as likely to stop treatment because it was not working than those taking a 3DR. There was no difference between the groups for how long it took for participants to stop their treatment because of side effects. These results show that for some PLHIV, the 2DR stopped working sooner than 3DR, without the benefit of fewer side effects.

eGFR-EPI changes among HIV patients who switch from F/TDF to F/TAF while maintaining the same third agent in the Spanish VACH cohort.

Background: Evidence from clinical practice on the effects of switching from emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) to emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF)-based triple-therapy (TT) regimens on renal parameters is limited.Objective: This retrospective analysis evaluated the effects on renal function of switching from F/TDF to F/TAF-based TT regimens with no change in third agent among people living with HIV (PLWH).Methods: Data were from a multicenter Spanish PLWH cohort. Patients with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-EPI) measurement, ≥1 follow-up measurement, ≥30 days treatment with F/TAF, and who switched from F/TDF to F/TAF with no change in third agent were included. Multivariate mixed linear models were used to evaluate change from baseline over time in eGFR-EPI. eGFR-EPI changes before and after switch were analyzed in a matched patient subgroup.Results: Overall, 340 patients were included. Mean (95% CI) eGFR-EPI in patients with baseline eGFR-EPI <90 ml/min/1.73m2 (n = 125) was 79.6 (78.0; 81.2) ml/min/1.73m2 at baseline and 81.3 (79.9; 82.7) ml/min/1.73m2 at 12 months after switch. In the patient-matched subgroup (n = 175), median annual eGFR-EPI declined -4.24 ml/min/1.73m2 while on F/TDF and increased +0.93 ml/min/1.73m2 after switch to F/TAF (P < 0.0001). In patients with baseline eGFR-EPI <90 ml/min/1.73m2, median annual eGFR-EPI increased +4.19 mL/min/1.73m2 after switch (P < 0.0001).Conclusion: Switching from F/TDF to F/TAF-based TT regimens while maintaining the same third agent numerically improved eGFR-EPI in PLWH with baseline eGFR-EPI <90 mL/min/1.73m2. eGFR-EPI improved significantly when comparing progression while on F/TDF vs progression after switch, confirming beneficial renal effects of switching to F/TAF in a clinical practice setting.

Impact of interferon-free therapies in HIV/HCV co-infected patients on real clinical practice: results from a multicenter region-wide cohort study (2014-2018).

BACKGROUND: Here, we assess the efficacy and safety of direct antiviral agents (DAAs) in a real-world cohort of co-infected individuals, and evaluate the consistency between clinical practice and guideline recommendations. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective cohort study of HIV/HCV co-infected patients followed-up in nine sites in Spain. All patients with detectable HCV-RNA naive to second-generation DAAs were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the assessment of sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12). We performed intention-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP), and multivariable analyses to identify factors associated with therapeutic failure. We compared the DAAs we administered to available guideline recommendations. Schemes not perfectly adjusted to the recommendations were defined as sub-optimal. RESULTS: Overall, 316 patients (82.1% male) received a total of 330 treatments. Of these, 43.9% were cirrhotic and 40.6% were treatment-experienced. In the ITT and PP analyses, SVR12 was achieved in 90.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 87.3-93.6] and 93.7% (95% CI 90.5-95.6), respectively. Only alcohol abuse [odds ratio (OR): 0.33; 95% CI 0.138-0.789, P = 0.013] and a higher basal bilirubin level (OR: 0.595; 95% CI 0.416-0.851, P = 0.004) were independently associated to therapeutic failure. A progressive decrease in the proportion of sub-optimal treatments was observed over time, from 75% in 2014 to 0% in 2018. Being treated with a sub-optimal regimen was not associated with failure. CONCLUSION: Despite numerous difficulties in treatment access and in adaptation to the changing guidelines, we detected no differences among the DAAs used, nor did we detect a lower efficacy when the chosen treatment was not optimal.

Does fibrosis really regress in HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients after treatment with direct antiviral agents?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the progression of liver stiffness after treatment with direct antiviral agents (DAAs), to identify predictive factors of fibrosis regression and to analyze the changes of scores AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) after treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective cohort study of HIV/HCV co-infected patients conducted within the GECMEI cohort, Spain. METHODS: Individuals were eligible if they were willing to start DAAs and underwent two transient elastographies: at baseline and after the end of treatment (EOT). All patients with detectable HCV RNA naïve to DAAs were consecutively enrolled from nine medical hospitals. Liver stiffness results were categorized in four Metavir stages (F1: <7.1; F2 : 7.1--9.5; F3 : 9.5--2.4; F4: >12.4 kPa). The APRI and FIB-4 scores were calculated at baseline, EOT and 12 weeks after EOT. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-eight patients were examined throughout a follow-up of 16.3 months (IQR: 12.5-25). The median of liver stiffness decrease was 2.6 kPa (IQR: 0-6.3). A greater improvement was observed in F3-F4 compared with F1-F2, (6.4 vs. 0.91 kPa, P < 0.001; P = 0.001, respectively). A decline between baseline and EOT measures was observed in APRI and FIB-4 (P < 0.001). Sustained virological response (SVR12) achievement was the only predictor of fibrosis regression [OR:17.4 (95% CI: 1.8-164.6; P = 0.013)]. CONCLUSION: Most patients experienced a significant reduction of liver stiffness and APRI and FIB-4 scores. This improvement was greater in those with advanced liver disease. SVR12 was the only predictor of fibrosis regression. The significance of this reduction is unclear and could reflect a decline in inflammation rather than true fibrosis regression.

Raltegravir plus abacavir/lamivudine in virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients: 48-week results of the KIRAL study.

BACKGROUND: Long-term combination antiretroviral therapy often results in toxicity/tolerability problems, which are one of the main reasons for switching treatment. Despite the favorable profile of raltegravir (RAL), data on its combination with abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) are scarce. Based on clinical data, we evaluated this regimen as a switching strategy. DESIGN: Multicenter, non-controlled, retrospective study including all virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients who had switched to RAL+ABC/3TC. METHODS: We evaluated effectiveness (defined as maintenance of HIV-1-RNA <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks) safety, tolerability, laboratory data, and CD4+ count at week 48 of this switching strategy. RESULTS: The study population comprised 467 patients. Median age was 49 years (IQR: 45-53). Males accounted for 75.4%. Median CD4+ count at baseline was 580 cells/µL (IQR, 409). The main reasons for switching were toxicity/tolerability problems (197; 42.2%) and physician's criteria (133; 28.5%). At week 48, HIV-1 RNA remained at <50 copies/mL in 371/380 (97.6%; 95%CI: 96.4-99.0) when non-virological failure was censured. Virological failure was recorded in 1.9% patients and treatment failure in 20.5% of patients (96/467 [95%CI, 16.9-24.2]). The main reasons for treatment failure included switch to fixed-dose combination regimens (31; 6.6%), toxicity/poor tolerability (27; 5.8%), and physician's decision (17; 3.6%). A total of 73 adverse events were detected in 64 patients (13.7%). These resolved in 43 patients (67.2%). Of the 33 cases related or likely related to treatment, 30 were Grade-1 (90.9%). CD4+ count and renal, hepatic, and lipid profiles remained clinically stable over the 48 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that RAL+ABC/3TC could be an effective, safe/tolerable, and low-toxicity option for virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients.

Characteristics and outcome of AIDS-related Hodgkin lymphoma before and after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed survival, therapeutic response, and prognostic factors in patients with HIV-related Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated or not with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: This study included 104 patients with HL, treated (n = 83) or not (n = 21) with HAART. Outcomes and prognostic factors of complete remission (CR), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed by an intention-to-treat analysis of all patients who received at least 1 chemotherapy course. RESULTS: No differences were found between groups at baseline in the specific characteristics of HIV and HL. The proportion of patients receiving appropriate-for-stage therapy for HL was similar for both groups. The CR rates in the HAART (-) and HAART (+) groups were 14 (70%) of 20 versus 71 (91%) of 78 (P = 0.023). The median OS in the HAART (-) group was 39 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0 to 89) and was not reached in the HAART (+) group (P = 0.0089). The median DFS in the HAART (-) group was 85 months (95% CI: 73 to 97) and was not reached in the HAART (+) group (P = 0.129). Factors independently associated with CR by logistic regression analysis were appropriate-for-stage therapy of HL, HAART, and baseline CD4 count > or =100 cells/microL. CR was the only factor independently associated with OS by Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The achievement of CR was independently associated with appropriate-for-stage therapy for HL, with HAART, and with a baseline CD4 count > or =100 cells/microL. The only variable independently associated with OS was the achievement of CR.

Evaluación de dos pautas de quimioprofilaxis tuberculosa en pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana / Assessment of two chemoprophylaxis regimens for tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients

Objetivo: Evaluar la cumplimentación, tolerancia y eficacia de una pauta corta de quimioprofilaxis para tuberculosis con isoniacida y rifampicina durante 3 meses frente a una pauta estándar de isoniacida durante 12 meses en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). Pacientes y métodos: Ensayo clínico prospectivo, comparativo, aleatorizado y abierto realizado en cuatro hospitales generales y un centro penitenciario de Castilla-La Mancha. La profilaxis se administró en pacientes PPD positivos y pacientes anérgicos de acuerdo con las normas de los Centers for Diseases Control (CDC) de 1991. Los pacientes se distribuyeron de forma aleatoria en dos pautas: pauta de rifampicina a los que se les administraron 300 mg/día de isoniacida y 600 mg/día de rifampicina durante 3 meses, y pauta de isoniacida a los que se les administraron 300 mg/día de isoniacida durante 12 meses. Resultados: Se incluyeron 133 pacientes: 64 en la pauta isoniacida y 69 en la pauta rifampicina. Se toleró mejor la pauta de rifampicina, con un 28 por ciento de efectos adversos frente a un 55 por ciento en la pauta de isoniacida. La hepatotoxicidad fue más frecuente en la pauta de isoniacida, con un riesgo relativo (RR) de 2,2 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95 por ciento, 1,23-4,01). La hepatotoxicidad grave, que obligó a suspender el tratamiento, se relacionó con el tiempo de administración del fármaco, siendo más frecuente en la pauta de 12 meses. Se cumplimentó mejor la pauta corta, pero sin diferencias valorables. La incidencia de tuberculosis fue de 4,23 casos por 100 personas-año para la pauta de isoniacida y 2,08 para la pauta de rifampicina, con un riesgo relativo para desarrollar tuberculosis con la pauta de rifampicina de 0,51 (IC del 95 por ciento, 0,09-2,8) frente a la pauta de isoniacida, no estadísticamente significativo. La estancia en prisión se asoció con un riesgo significativo de tuberculosis, independientemente de la pauta de tratamiento (RR = 9,2; IC del 95 por ciento; 1,06-80,2). Conclusiones: En pacientes con infección por el VIH con PPD positivo o anérgicos, la pauta de rifampicina es al menos igual de eficaz para prevenir el desarrollo de tuberculosis que la pauta de isoniacida, y presenta menos efectos adversos (AU)