Ascorbic acid PEG-2L is superior for early morning colonoscopies in colorectal cancer screening programs: A prospective non-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The quality of colon cleansing and the tolerability of anterograde preparation are essential to the success of colorectal cancer screening. AIM: To compare the tolerability and efficacy of low-volume preparations vs the standard regimen in individuals scheduled for an early morning colonoscopy. Study: Participants in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program using the fecal immunochemical test who were scheduled for a colonoscopy from 09:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m. were prospectively included and assigned to: (1) control group (PEG-ELS 4L): PEG 4L and electrolytes; (2) group AscPEG-2L: a combination of PEG and ascorbic acid 2L; and (3) group PiMg: sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate 500 mL plus 2 L of clear fluids. Tolerability was evaluated with a questionnaire and the quality of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. RESULTS: A total of 292 participants were included: 98 in the PEG-ELS 4L control group, 96 in the AscPEG-2L study group and 98 in the PiMg study group. Low-volume treatments were better tolerated than the standard solution (AscPEG-2L 94.8% and PiMg 93.9% vs PEG-ELS 4L 75.5%; p < 0.0001). The effectiveness of AscPEG-2L was superior to that of PEG-ELS 4L and PiMg (p = 0.011 and p = 0.032, respectively). Patient acceptance was higher for single-dose than for split-dose administration but efficacy was higher with the split dose than with other doses. CONCLUSIONS: In early morning colonoscopies, ascPEG-2L appears to be the best option, especially when administered in a split-dose

ANTECEDENTES: La calidad de la limpieza del colon y la tolerancia a la preparación anterógrada son claves para el éxito de un programa de cribado de cáncer colorrectal. OBJETIVO: Comparar la tolerancia y eficacia de las preparaciones de volumen reducido frente a la preparación estándar en pacientes programados para colonoscopia a primera hora de la mañana. Estudio: Individuos del programa de cribado poblacional con test de sangre oculta en heces programados para colonoscopia entre las 09:00 y 10:20 a.m fueron prospectivamente asignados a: 1) Grupo Control (PEG-ELS 4L): PEG con electrolitos 4 litros; 2) Grupo AscPEG-2L: PEG más ácido ascórbico 2 litros; y 3) Groupo PiMg: picosulfato sódico más citrato de magnesio 500 ml seguido de 2 litros de líquidos claros. Se evaluó la tolerancia mediante cuestionario y la calidad mediante la Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 292 sujetos: 98 en el grupo control PEG-ELS 4L, 96 en el grupo a estudio AscPEG-2L y 98 en el grupo a estudio PiMg. Las soluciones de volumen reducido fueron mejor toleradas que la solución estándar (AscPEG-2L 94.8% y PiMg 93.9% vs PEG-ELS 4L 75.5%; p < 0.0001). La calidad de la preparación fue superior en el grupo AscPEG-2L que en el grupo control PEG-ELS 4L y grupo PiMg (p = 0.011 and p = 0.032, respectivamente). Las dosis partidas fueron peor aceptadas por los sujetos pero resultaron en una mayor calidad de la preparación. CONCLUSIONES: AscPEG-2L es la mejor opción para las colonoscopias programadas a primera hora de la mañana, especialmente cuando se administra en dosis partida

Ascorbic acid PEG-2L is superior for early morning colonoscopies in colorectal cancer screening programs: a prospective non-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The quality of colon cleansing and the tolerability of anterograde preparation are essential to the success of colorectal cancer screening. AIM: To compare the tolerability and efficacy of low-volume preparations vs the standard regimen in individuals scheduled for an early morning colonoscopy. STUDY: Participants in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program using the fecal immunochemical test who were scheduled for a colonoscopy from 09:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m. were prospectively included and assigned to: (1) control group (PEG-ELS 4L): PEG 4L and electrolytes; (2) group AscPEG-2L: a combination of PEG and ascorbic acid 2L; and (3) group PiMg: sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate 500 mL plus 2L of clear fluids. Tolerability was evaluated with a questionnaire and the quality of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. RESULTS: A total of 292 participants were included: 98 in the PEG-ELS 4L control group, 96 in the AscPEG-2L study group and 98 in the PiMg study group. Low-volume treatments were better tolerated than the standard solution (AscPEG-2L 94.8% and PiMg 93.9% vs PEG-ELS 4L 75.5%; p < 0.0001). The effectiveness of AscPEG-2L was superior to that of PEG-ELS 4L and PiMg (p = 0.011 and p = 0.032, respectively). Patient acceptance was higher for single-dose than for split-dose administration but efficacy was higher with the split dose than with other doses. CONCLUSIONS: In early morning colonoscopies, ascPEG-2L appears to be the best option, especially when administered in a split-dose.