RÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Multidisciplinary clinics aim to coordinate care between multiple specialties for children with medical complexity yet may result in information overload for caregivers. The after-visit summary (AVS) patient instruction section offers a solution by summarizing visit details and recommendations. No known studies address patient instruction optimization and integration within a multidisciplinary clinic setting. This project aimed to improve the quality of patient instructions to support better postvisit communication between caregivers and providers in a multidisciplinary pediatric neuromuscular program. Methods: A multidisciplinary stakeholder team created a key driver diagram to improve postvisit communication between caregivers and providers in the clinic. The first specific aim was to achieve an 80% completion rate of AVS patient instructions within 6 months. To do so, a standardized electronic medical record "text shortcut" was created for consistent information in each patient's instructions. Feedback on AVS from caregivers was obtained using the Family Experiences with Coordination of Care survey and open-ended interviews. This feedback informed the next specific aim: to reduce medical jargon within patient instructions by 25% over 3 months. Completion rates and jargon use were reviewed using control charts. Results: AVS patient instruction completion rates increased from a mean of 39.4%-85.0%. Provider education reduced mean jargon usage in patient instructions, from 8.2 to 3.9 jargon terms. Conclusions: Provider education and caregiver feedback helped improve patient communication by enhancing AVS compliance and diminishing medical jargon. Interventions to improve AVS patient instructions may enhance patient communication strategies for complex medical visits.
RÉSUMÉ
ABSTRACT: The importance of the clinician educator (CE) role in delivery of competency-based medical education is well recognized. There is, however, no formal mechanism to identify when faculty have the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to be successful CEs. In 2020, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine convened a workgroup of 18 individuals representing multiple medical specialties and diverse institutions in the United States, including nonphysician educators, a medical student, and a resident, to develop a set of competencies, subcompetencies, and milestones for CEs.A 5-step process was used to create the Clinician Educator Milestones (CEMs). In step 1, the workgroup developed an initial CEM draft. Through brainstorming, 141 potential education-related CE tasks were identified. Descriptive statements for each competency and developmental trajectories for each subcompetency were developed and confirmed by consensus. The workgroup then created a supplemental guide, assessment tools, and additional resources. In step 2, a diverse group of CEs were surveyed in 2021 and provided feedback on the CEMs. In step 3, this feedback was used by the workgroup to refine the CEMs. In step 4, the second draft of the CEMs was submitted for public comment, and the CEMs were finalized. In step 5, final CEMs were released for public use in 2022.The CEMs consist of 1 foundational domain that focuses on commitment to lifelong learning, 4 additional domains of competence for CEs in the learning environment, and 20 subcompetencies. These milestones have many potential uses for CEs, including self-assessment, constructing learning and improvement plans, and designing systematic faculty development efforts. The CEMs will continue to evolve as they are applied in practice and as the role of CEs continues to grow and develop.
Sujet(s)
Modèle de compétence attendue , Corps enseignant et administratif en médecine , Humains , États-Unis , Modèle de compétence attendue/méthodes , Compétence clinique/normes , Enseignement spécialisé en médecine/méthodes , Agrément/normes , Compétence professionnelle/normesRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: This study explored family satisfaction and perceived quality of care in a pediatric neuromuscular care clinic to assess the value of the multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) model in delivering coordinated care to children with neuromuscular disorders, such as cerebral palsy. METHODS: Caregivers of 22 patients were administered a qualitative survey assessing their perceptions of clinic efficiency, care coordination, and communication. Surveys were audio-recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was completed using both deductive and inductive methods. RESULTS: All caregivers reported that providers adequately communicated next steps in the patient's care, and most reported high confidence in caring for the patient as a result of the clinic. Four major themes were identified from thematic analysis: Care Delivery, Communication, Care Quality, and Family-Centeredness. Caregivers emphasized that the MDC model promoted access to care, enhanced efficiency, promoted provider teamwork, and encouraged shared care planning. Caregivers also valued a physical environment that was suitable for patients with complex needs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that caregivers believed the MDC model was both efficient and convenient for pediatric patients with neuromuscular disorders. This model has the potential to streamline medical care and can be applied more broadly to improve care coordination for children with medical complexity.
Sujet(s)
Aidants , Maladies neuromusculaires , Équipe soignante , Qualité des soins de santé , Humains , Aidants/psychologie , Enfant , Femelle , Mâle , Maladies neuromusculaires/thérapie , Maladies neuromusculaires/rééducation et réadaptation , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Adolescent , Recherche qualitative , Adulte , Paralysie cérébrale/rééducation et réadaptation , Paralysie cérébrale/thérapie , Communication , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic reshaped the delivery of medical education, necessitating novel modes of instruction to facilitate distance learning. Online medical education resources provide opportunities for self-directed and asynchronous learning. GISIM is a free, open access educational website dedicated to gastroenterology (GI)/hepatology, which teaches pathophysiology and disease management, and supports clinical reasoning skill development through interactive, dynamic, case presentation-based journeys. AIMS: (1) To describe the creation of a mobile-optimized, GI/hepatology educational resource for medical trainees, and (2) to report on trainee feedback on completing and authoring GISIM cases. METHODS: GISIM was created on WordPress and modeled after NephSIM, an e-learning platform dedicated to Nephrology. Content was developed by internal medicine residents and GI/hepatology fellows and attendings. Cases are interactive, prompting users to select differential diagnoses and management plans, with immediate feedback provided on response. Self-reported user demographics and website feedback were collected with an embedded survey. A separate survey evaluated case authors' experiences. RESULTS: GISIM launched in February 2021 and received 12,184 website views and 2003 unique visitors between February 1 2021 and February 28 2022. New cases are disseminated bimonthly. Sixty-one user surveys were collected, with a majority completed by fellows (38%) and residents (26%). All users found the website easy to use and most reported enhanced understanding of case topic areas. Nine author surveys were collected. Authors reported significant learning on chosen topics and improved clinical knowledge through their participation. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a novel GI/hepatology case-based resource that enables distance learning and was perceived as a valuable educational tool by users and authors.
Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Enseignement médical , Gastroentérologie , Humains , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Pandémies , Apprentissage , Enseignement à distance , Gastroentérologie/enseignement et éducation , Apprentissage par problèmesRÉSUMÉ
Purpose of Review: The world's population is aging rapidly, with 40% of patients seen in US gastroenterology (GI) clinics being 60 years or older. Many gastrointestinal problems are more common or unique to the older adult because of progressive damage to the structure and function of the GI tract. Until recently, the epidemiology of disorders of gut-brain interaction (such as irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia) was not well-characterized. Recent Findings: Forty percent of persons worldwide have disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), with varying global patterns of incidence in older adults. There are multiple first-line approaches to managing DGBI which can also be combined including pharmacologic (e.g., neuromodulators) and nonpharmacologic approaches including dietary therapies and brain-gut behavioral therapies. However, there are considerations clinicians must account for when offering each approach related to unique biopsychosocial factors in the older adult population. In this review, we aim to critically review recent literature on the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and special considerations for diagnosing and managing DGBI in the older adult population. Summary: There have been many advances in the management of DGBI over the past decades. Given the increase in the number of older adults in the USA and worldwide, there is an urgent need for evidence-based guidance to help providers guide comprehensive care for specifically our aging patient population with respect to DGBI.
RÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are highly prevalent, estimated to affect about 40% of the global population. Patients with DGBI are still inadequately treated and face stigma which adversely impacts their disease course. METHODS: A 12-question multiple-choice anonymous survey was distributed electronically to all adult gastroenterology fellowship program directors across the United States. Data were collected on demographics, training, attitudes, and knowledge in managing patients with DGBI. RESULTS: 9.8% and 15.9% of all trainees reported that their attendings and peers often demonstrated a dismissive attitude towards patients with DGBI, respectively. 21.4% of all trainees often felt frustrated or burned out when seeing patients with DGBI with increasing odds of burnout by years of training (OR 4.4 for F3 trainees, trainees in their third year of training). Significantly, more female trainees reported frustration and burnout when seeing patients with DGBI (p = 0.005). 28.6% of all trainees report they often do not want to see patients with DGBI in their outpatient GI practice, including 39.6% of F3 trainees. 27.1% of F3 trainees reported that they were uncomfortable with titrating neuromodulators and only 31.6% of all trainees were comfortable knowing when to refer to a gastropsychologist. DISCUSSION: Many trainees expressed some unwillingness and discomfort in managing patients with DGBI. Potential interventions will require a multi-pronged and longitudinal approach with education and training initiatives at the trainee level and beyond and exploring systemic healthcare delivery innovations to remove barriers.
Sujet(s)
Gastroentérologie , Adulte , Encéphale , Femelle , Gastroentérologie/enseignement et éducation , Humains , Enquêtes et questionnaires , États-UnisSujet(s)
Enseignement spécialisé en médecine/normes , Endoscopie gastrointestinale , Gastroentérologie , Maladies du foie , Compétence clinique , Endoscopie gastrointestinale/enseignement et éducation , Endoscopie gastrointestinale/normes , Gastroentérologie/enseignement et éducation , Gastroentérologie/organisation et administration , Gastroentérologie/normes , Humains , Maladies du foie/épidémiologie , Maladies du foie/thérapie , Transplantation hépatique/enseignement et éducation , Professionnalisme , Amélioration de la qualité/organisation et administration , Compétences sociales , États-UnisSujet(s)
Enseignement spécialisé en médecine , Corps enseignant et administratif en médecine/enseignement et éducation , Bourses d'études et bourses universitaires , Gastro-entérologues/enseignement et éducation , Gastroentérologie/enseignement et éducation , Transplantation hépatique/enseignement et éducation , Compétence clinique/normes , Consensus , Programme d'études/normes , Enseignement spécialisé en médecine/normes , Niveau d'instruction , Corps enseignant et administratif en médecine/normes , Bourses d'études et bourses universitaires/normes , Gastro-entérologues/normes , Gastroentérologie/normes , Humains , Transplantation hépatique/normes , Mise au point de programmesRÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Individual and organizational response to an adverse event is a key part of the life cycle of a patient safety event. Just culture is a safety concept that emphasizes system drivers of human behavior. We developed a learning activity for medical students to teach and discuss just culture as part of a patient safety curriculum. Methods: This small-group, discussion-based learning activity was aimed at third-year medical students. Over 5 years, 628 students participated in it. The session had three components: a presession case-based survey, a didactic lecture, and a facilitated small-group discussion. Participants evaluated the session using our institution's standard learner assessment. They also took a postcourse test that contained multiple-choice questions relating to the session. Results: On a 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 3 = good, 5 = excellent), students rated the large-group lecture (3.2) and small-group discussion (3.2) moderately. Over 85% of students answered all knowledge items on a course posttest correctly. Discussion: This learning activity provides an easy-to-implement case-based discussion to introduce the concepts of just culture.