Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 11: 337, 2011 Dec 14.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22168957

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Most services provided by health and social care organisations for older people living at home rely on interprofessional working (IPW). Although there is research investigating what supports and inhibits how professionals work together, less is known about how different service models deliver care to older people and how effectiveness is measured. The aim of this study was to describe how IPW for older people living at home is delivered, enacted and evaluated in England. METHOD: An online survey of health and social care managers across England directly involved in providing services to older people, and a review of local strategies for older people services produced by primary care organisations and local government adult services organisations in England. RESULTS: The online survey achieved a 31% response rate and search strategies identified 50 local strategies that addressed IPW for older people living at home across health and social care organisations. IPW definitions varied, but there was an internal consistency of language informed by budgeting and organisation specific definitions of IPW. Community Services for Older People, Intermediate Care and Re-enablement (rehabilitation) Teams were the services most frequently identified as involving IPW. Other IPW services identified were problem or disease specific and reflected issues highlighted in local strategies. There was limited agreement about what interventions or strategies supported the process of IPW. Older people and their carers were not reported to be involved in the evaluation of the services they received and it was unclear how organisations and managers judged the effectiveness of IPW, particularly for services that had an open-ended commitment to the care of older people. CONCLUSION: Health and social care organisations and their managers recognise the value and importance of IPW. There is a theoretical literature on what supports IPW and what it can achieve. The need for precision may not be so necessary for the terms used to describe IPW. However, there is a need for shared identification of both user/patient outcomes that arise from IPW and greater understanding of what kind of model of IPW achieves what kind of outcomes for older people living at home.


Sujet(s)
Personnel administratif/psychologie , Services de santé communautaires/organisation et administration , Services de santé pour personnes âgées/normes , Services de soins à domicile , Vie autonome , Relations interprofessionnelles , Services sociaux et travail social (activité)/organisation et administration , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Services de santé communautaires/normes , Angleterre , Enquêtes sur les soins de santé , Humains , Modèles d'organisation , Programmes nationaux de santé , Équipe soignante/organisation et administration , Soins de santé primaires/organisation et administration , Recherche qualitative , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Effectif
2.
J Interprof Care ; 25(4): 280-6, 2011 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21554059

RÉSUMÉ

New models of interprofessional working are continuously being proposed to address the burgeoning health and social care needs of older people with complex and long-term health conditions. Evaluations of the effectiveness of these models tend to focus on process measures rather than outcomes for the older person. This discussion paper argues that the concept of frailty, and measures based on it, may provide a more user-centred tool for the evaluation of interprofessional services - a tool that cuts across unidisciplinary preoccupations and definitions of effectiveness. Numerous frailty scales have been developed for case identification and stratification of risk of adverse outcomes. We suggest that they may also be particularly suitable for evaluating the effectiveness of interprofessional working with community-dwelling older people. Several exemplars of frailty scales that might serve this purpose are identified, and their potential contributions and limitations are discussed. Further work is required to establish which is the most suitable scales for this application. The development of an appropriate frailty scale could provide an opportunity for interprofessional debate about the forms of care and treatment that should be prioritised to improve the health and well-being of this population.


Sujet(s)
Vieillissement , Services de santé communautaires , Personne âgée fragile , Évaluation gériatrique/méthodes , Indicateurs d'état de santé , Relations interprofessionnelles , Facteurs âges , Sujet âgé , Sujet âgé de 80 ans ou plus , Femelle , Besoins et demandes de services de santé , Humains , Mâle
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...