Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrer
1.
J Pediatr ; 116(3): 329-37, 1990 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2137875

RÉSUMÉ

The 1980 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Febrile Seizures identified five circumstances in which it might be appropriate to consider anticonvulsant prophylaxis after a first febrile seizure: (1) a focal or prolonged seizure, (2) neurologic abnormalities, (3) afebrile seizures in a first-degree relative, (4) age less than 1 year, and (5) multiple seizures occurring within 24 hours. We performed a metaanalysis of 14 published reports to evaluate the strength of association between each of these indications and recurrent febrile seizures. Young age at onset (less than or equal to 1 year) and a family history of febrile seizures (not listed in the recommendations) each distinguished between groups with approximately a 30% versus a 50% risk of recurrence. Family history of afebrile seizures was not consistently associated with an increased risk. Focal, prolonged, and multiple seizures were associated with only a small increment in risk of recurrence. The data were not adequate to assess the risk associated with neurologic abnormalities. By considering children with combinations of risk factors, some studies were able to distinguish between groups with very low and very high recurrence risks. Only age at onset was consistently predictive of having more than one recurrence. These results suggest that the great majority of children who have a febrile seizure do not need anticonvulsant treatment even if one of the factors listed in the Consensus Statement is present, and that the rationale and indications for treating febrile seizures need to be reconsidered.


Sujet(s)
Crises convulsives fébriles/étiologie , Facteurs âges , Humains , Nourrisson , Méta-analyse comme sujet , Récidive , Facteurs de risque , Crises convulsives fébriles/thérapie
3.
J Pediatr ; 107(1): 31-7, 1985 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4009338

RÉSUMÉ

Despite its effectiveness, cerebrospinal shunting for hydrocephalus continues to be accompanied by considerable complications and morbidity. Medical therapy with acetazolamide 100 mg/kg/day and furosemide 1 mg/kg/day can be an effective alternative to shunting by halting progression of hydrocephalus until such time as sutures can become fibrosed and spontaneous arrest can occur. In an appropriately selected population older than 2 weeks with hydrocephalus of varied origin, our success rate in avoiding shunting is greater than 50%. The dramatic difference between the number of hospitalizations of patients with shunts and those treated medically, and the potential to avoid shunt dependence would appear to make an initial trial with medical therapy worthwhile.


Sujet(s)
Acétazolamide/administration et posologie , Furosémide/administration et posologie , Hydrocéphalie/traitement médicamenteux , Acétazolamide/effets indésirables , Troubles de l'équilibre acidobasique/induit chimiquement , Facteurs âges , Dérivations du liquide céphalorachidien/effets indésirables , Association de médicaments , Études de suivi , Furosémide/effets indésirables , Humains , Hydrocéphalie/étiologie , Hydrocéphalie/chirurgie , Nourrisson , Nouveau-né , Durée du séjour
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE