RÉSUMÉ
Insufficient evidence is available for treating steroid-resistant immune checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). Although guidelines recommend the use of immunosuppressants, the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has not been sufficiently verified. We report two cases of steroid-resistant CIP treated with MMF. Both patients responded to initial treatment with prednisolone (PSL), but the CIP flared up repeatedly as the steroids were gradually tapered off. Upon receiving MMF in addition to PSL, their subjective symptoms improved, and the shadows gradually disappeared, allowing for a reduction in the steroid dose. Ultimately, no CIP recurrence was observed despite discontinuing PSL and MMF. Both cases were completely resolved by treatment with MMF. This indicates that MMF may be effective in treating steroid-resistant CIP. In the future, the effects and safety of MMF should be investigated in large-scale clinical trials targeting patients with steroid-resistant CIP.
RÉSUMÉ
The double-ring sign found in contrast-enhanced computed tomography, which reflects inflammatory changes in the adventitia and oedema of the intima, is thought to be characteristic of Takayasu arteritis; however, herein, it was also observed for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced vasculitis.
RÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Computed tomography is useful for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia. However, many types of interstitial lung diseases and even bacterial pneumonia can show abnormal chest shadows that are indistinguishable from those observed in COVID-19 pneumonia. Thus, it is necessary to identify useful biomarkers that can efficiently distinguish COVID-19 pneumonia from COVID-19 pneumonia-like diseases. Herein, we investigated the usefulness of serum Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) and surfactant protein D (SP-D) for identifying patients with COVID-19 pneumonia among patients with abnormal chest shadows consistent with COVID-19 pneumonia. Method: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent evaluation of serum KL-6 and SP-D at a single center from February 2019 to December 2020. A total of 54 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and 65 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia-like diseases were enrolled in this study from the source population. Serum KL-6 and SP-D levels in both groups were analyzed. Result: The serum levels of KL-6 and SP-D in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were significantly lower than those in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia-like disease (median [interquartile range]: 208.5 [157.5-368.5] U/ml vs. 430 [284.5-768.5] U/ml, p < 0.0001 and 24.7 [8.6-51.0] ng/ml vs. 141 [63.7-243.5] ng/ml, p < 0.0001, respectively). According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the areas under the ROC curves (95% confidence intervals) of serum KL-6 and SP-D levels for distinguishing COVID-19 pneumonia from COVID-19 pneumonia-like diseases were 0.761 (0.675-0.847) and 0.874 (0.812-0.936), respectively. The area under the ROC curve of serum SP-D was significantly larger than that of serum KL-6 (p = 0.0213), suggesting that serum SP-D can more efficiently distinguish COVID-19 pneumonia from COVID-19 pneumonia-like diseases. Conclusion: Serum SP-D is a promising biomarker for distinguishing COVID-19 pneumonia from COVID-19 pneumonia-like diseases. Serum SP-D can be useful for the management of patients with abnormal chest shadow mimicking COVID-19 pneumonia.
