[Moxibustion Plus Medication Can Relieve Refractory Nausea and Vomiting and Improve Quality of Life of Advanced Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemical Therapy].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of moxibustion combined with medication in the treatment of refractory nausea and vomiting and quality of life (QOL) in advanced cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 266 advanced cancer patients with nausea and vomiting were randomly assigned to Metoclopramide group (M group, n＝70), Metoclopramide plus Haloperidol group (MH group, n＝65), moxibustion ＋ M group (n＝63), and moxibustion ＋ MH group (n＝68). Moxibustion was applied to bilateral Zusanli (ST 36), and Guanyuan (CV 4), Qihai (CV 6) for 20 min every time, twice a day for 2 weeks. The Rhodes' Index of nausea, Vomiting and Retching (INVR) was used for assessing the state of these symptoms in duration, frequency and severity (40 points), the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD, 0－76 points) was employed to measure the patients' depression severity, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G, including physical, social/family, emotional, and functional dimensions, 27 items, 108 points) was adopted to measure the cancer patients' QOL. RESULTS: Following the treatment, the INVR and HAMD scores were significantly decreased in the M, MH, moxibusion＋M and moxibustion＋MH groups in comparison with their own pretreatment (P<0.05) and were significantly lower in the moxibustion＋MH group than in the M, MH and moxibustion＋M groups (P<0.05). The FACT-G scoring outcomes showed that the scores of physical well-being, emotional well-being, and total score of QOL were significantly higher in the MH, moxibustion＋M and moxibustion＋MH groups than in the M group, and were significantly higher in the moxibustion＋MH group than in the MH and moxibustion＋M groups (P<0.05). No significant differences were found between the MH and moxibustion＋M groups in the INVR and HAMD scores, and in the scores of physical well-being, emotional well-being and total score of QOL (P>0.05)．. CONCLUSION: Moxibustion plus Metoclopramide and Haloperidol can relieve refractory nausea and vomiting, and better depression and QOL in advanced cancer patients, being worthy of popularization in clinical practice.

Adjuvant Efficacy of Nutrition Support During Pulmonary Tuberculosis Treating Course: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition and tuberculosis (TB) tend to interact with each other. TB may lead to nutrition deficiencies that will conversely delay recovery by depressing immune functions. Nutrition support can promote recovery in the subject being treated for TB. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of nutrition support on promoting the recovery of adult pulmonary TB patients with anti-TB drug therapy. METHODS: English database of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, PubMed, EMBASE, and Chinese database of CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WANFANG were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing nutrition support (given for more than 2 weeks) with no nutrition intervention, nutrition advice only, or placebo-control for TB patients being anti-TB treated were included. Two reviewers conducted data extraction, assessed the quality of the studies independently, and any discrepancies were solved by the third reviewer. Data were entered and analyzed by RevMan 5.2 software, and meta-analysis was done using risk ratios (RR s) for dichotomous variables and mean differences (MDs) for continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI s). RESULTS: A total of 19 studies (3681 participants) were included. In nutritional support for TB patients, pooled RR and its 95% CI of sputum smears- or culture-negative conversion rate and chest X-ray (CXR) absorption rate were 1.10 (1.04, 1.17) and 1.22 (1.08, 1.39), respectively, the pooled MD and its 95% CI of body mass index (BMI) and time of sputum smears or culture negativity were 0.59 (0.16, 1.2) and - 5.42 (-7.93, -2.92), respectively, compared with the control group. The differences in outcomes of CXR zone affected, TB score, serum albumin, and hemoglobin were not statistically significant (P = 0.76, 0.24, 0.28, and 0.20, respectively) between the intervention group and the control group. No systemic adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: During anti-TB course, nutrition support may be helpful in treatment of TB patients by improving both sputum smears- or culture-negative conversion rate and BMI, shortening the time of sputum conversion negative. Whether it can improve the final clinical effect, there still needs high-level quality studies to confirm in the future.