Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus profile in preterm neonates (26-34 weeks' gestation) undergoing surfactant replacement therapy in India: a prospective observational study.

Surfactant administration significantly improves respiratory outcomes in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). However, surfactant administration may lead to hemodynamic alterations, particularly in the heart, affecting the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), the consequences of which are not fully understood. This prospective observational study took place in an Indian neonatal care unit from July 2019 to November 2020, enrolling preterm neonates (26-34 weeks' gestation) with RDS needing non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. They were divided into two groups: those who received surfactant while on respiratory support and those who did not. All newborns in the study had an initial echocardiogram within 24 h to detect PDA flow. Subsequent echocardiograms were conducted between 48 and 72 h or earlier based on symptoms. Of 220 infants requiring respiratory support, 84 were enrolled, with 42 in each group. While demographic variables were similar, the surfactant group had a lower median gestational age (29.0 vs. 31.0 weeks). In the surfactant group, a significantly higher percentage of neonates had hemodynamically significant PDA (hsPDA) compared to the non-surfactant group (54.76% vs. 26.19%, P-value = .008). Multiple logistic regression found no significant association between gestation, birth weight, or shock and hsPDA occurrence. Pulmonary hemorrhage occurred more often in the surfactant group. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) > grade 2, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) ≥ grade 2 did not differ significantly between the groups. Surfactant therapy via the less invasive surfactant administration technique was associated with a higher incidence of hsPDA. While surfactant is crucial for neonatal respiratory care, its potential hemodynamic effects, including hsPDA, should be considered.

Noninvasive high-frequency oscillation ventilation as post- extubation respiratory support in neonates: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (NHFOV) is increasingly being adopted to reduce the need for invasive ventilation after extubation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of NHFOV as post-extubation respiratory support in newborns compared to other non-invasive respiratory support modes. MATERIAL & METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials comparing NHFOV with other non-invasive modes post-extubation in newborns. Data sources were MEDLINE (via Pubmed), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WHO international clinical trials registry platform and Clinical Trial Registry, forward and backward citation search. Methodological quality of studies was assessed by Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool 1.0. RESULTS: This systematic review included 21 studies and 3294 participants, the majority of whom were preterm. NHFOV compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) reduced reintubation within seven days (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.53) after extubation. It also reduced extubation failure (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.51) and reintubation within 72 hrs (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.53), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.94) and pulmonary air leak (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.79) compared to NCPAP. The rate of reintubation within seven days (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.14) was similar whereas extubation failure (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.83) and reintubation (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.89) within 72 hrs were lower in NHFOV group compared to nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. There was no effect on other outcomes. Overall quality of the evidence was low to very low in both comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: NHFOV may reduce the rate of reintubation and extubation failure post-extubation without increasing complications. Majority of the trials were exclusively done in preterm neonates. Further research with high methodological quality is warranted.

Comparison of efficacy between beractant and poractant alfa in respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants (28-33+6 weeks gestational age) using the less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) technique: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Exogenous surfactant therapy is vital in managing respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants, with less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) gaining popularity. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and short-term outcomes of LISA using beractant and poractant alfa. STUDY DESIGN: In a randomized controlled trial, we enrolled preterm infants (28-33+6 weeks) with RDS requiring surfactant. LISA was employed, with beractant at 100 mg/kg or poractant-alfa at 200 mg/kg. Primary outcome was the need for intubation within 72 hours. RESULTS: Among 120 infants, 3.3% in both groups required intubation within 72 hours (p value 1.00, 95% CI 0.14-6.86). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were noted. However, beractant was significantly more economical than poractant-alfa, with a significantly lower surfactant cost and total care cost for infant hospital stays. CONCLUSION: Beractant and poractant-alfa exhibit similar efficacy in LISA for preterm infants with RDS. Economic considerations, especially in LMICs, favour beractant. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTATION: (CTRI/2023/03/050375).

Experience of less invasive surfactant administration with a 5F infant feeding tube in a tertiary center of low- and middle-income countries.

BACKGROUND: Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) results in less need for mechanical ventilation and a reduction in death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and intraventricular hemorrhage as outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and short-term outcomes of surfactant administration by the LISA method using an 5F infant feeding tube in preterm infants. METHODS: During the period from May, 2019 to August, 2022, we carried out a prospective observational study that included all premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome who were admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit. The study involved collecting and analyzing data on the procedural efficacy of LISA, vital parameters, and short-term outcomes. RESULTS: Our study included a total of 110 infants with an average gestational age of 30.9 ± 1.9 weeks and a mean birthweight of 1347.5 ± 354.1 g. Of these infants, two required intubation during the LISA procedure, whereas 11 infants required intubation within 72 h after LISA. Infants with a higher pre-surfactant fraction of inspired oxygen (Fi O2 ) requirement, an elevated Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal Extension (SNAPPE), and the presence of sepsis were associated with the need for intubation within the first 72 h of life. Thirty-one infants also experienced a drop in saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2 ) below 80% for more than 1 min. CONCLUSIONS: Less invasive surfactant administration was feasible and safe to administer via an orotracheally introduced 5F infant feeding tube in non-invasive ventilation to support spontaneously breathing infants between 28+0 and 33+6 weeks of gestation.