Severe Impairment of Left Ventricular Regional Strain in STEMI Patients Is Associated with Post-Infarct Remodeling.

Background: Measures of global left ventricular (LV) systolic function have limitations for the prediction of post-infarct LV remodeling (LVR). Therefore, we tested the association between a new measure of regional LV systolic function­the percentage of severely altered strain (%SAS)- and LVR after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). As a secondary objective, we also evaluated the association between %SAS and clinical events during follow-up. Methods: Of 177 patients undergoing echocardiography within 24 h from primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty, 172 were studied for 3 months, 167 for 12 months, and 10 died. The %SAS was calculated by dividing the number of LV myocardial segments with ≥−5% peak systolic longitudinal strain by the total number of segments. LVR was defined as the increase in end-diastolic volume >20% at its first occurrence compared to baseline. Results: LVR percentage was 10.2% and 15.8% at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Based on univariable analysis, a number of clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic variables were associated with LVR. Based on multivariable analysis, %SAS and TnI peak remained associated with LVR (for %SAS 5% increase, OR 1.226, 95% CI 1.098−1.369, p < 0.0005; for TnI peak, OR 1.025, 95% CI 1.004−1.047, p = 0.022). %SAS and LVR were also associated with occurrence of clinical events at a median follow-up of 43 months (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.0−1.04, p = 0.0165). Conclusions: In patients treated for acute STEMI, acute %SAS is associated with post-infarct LVR. Therefore, we suggest performing such evaluations on a routine basis to identify, as early as possible, STEMI patients at higher risk.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Intraventricular Flow Dynamics by the HyperDoppler Technique: First Application to Normal Subjects, Athletes, and Patients with Heart Failure.

Background: HyperDoppler is a new echocardiographic color Doppler-based technique that can assess intracardiac flow dynamics. The aim of this study was to verify the feasibility and reproducibility of this technique in unselected patients and its capability to differentiate measures of vortex flow within the left ventricle (LV) in normal sedentary subjects, athletes, and patients with heart failure. Methods: Two hundred unselected, consecutive patients presenting at the echocardiographic laboratory, 50 normal subjects, 30 athletes, and 50 patients with chronic heart failure and LV ejection fraction <50% were enrolled. Images were acquired using a MyLab X8 echo-scanner. Area, intensity, depth, length, and kinetic energy dissipation (KED) of vortex flow were measured. Results: The HyperDoppler technique feasibility was 94.5%. According to the intraclass correlation coefficient evaluations, repeatability and reproducibility of vortex flow measures were good for vortex area (0.82, 0.85), length (0.83, 0.82), and depth (0.87, 0.84) and excellent for intensity (0.92, 0.90) and KED (0.98, 0.98). Combining different vortex flow measures, the LV flow profile of healthy sedentary individuals, athletes, and heart failure patients could be differentiated. Conclusions: HyperDoppler is a feasible, reliable, and practical technique for the assessment of LV flow dynamics and may distinguish normal subjects and patients with heart failure.

[Changes in cardiac implantable electronic device follow-up induced by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: report of a single-centre experience]. / Variazioni del follow-up dei dispositivi elettronici cardiaci impiantabili indotte dalla pandemia COVID-19 nel 2020: esperienza di un singolo centro.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has greatly modified outpatient follow-ups. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the organizational modalities and clinical effects of rearrangements of pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) outpatient visits performed in our centers at Ravenna and Lugo Hospitals, Italy, during the pandemic outbreak in 2020. METHODS: All scheduled in-person device follow-up visits in March-December 2020 have been considered. On the basis of documented past functioning of each device and of remote monitoring (RM) capabilities, in-person visits were either performed or postponed at variable times. The characteristics of the follow-ups and the device-related clinically relevant events were analyzed, the latter being further divided into serious malfunction and problems to be corrected by device reprogramming. RESULTS: Overall, 27% of in-person visits were postponed (n = 576) (36% of ICDs and 25% of PMs), peaking 62% in March-May 2020. RM compensated nearly all hold-ups in ICDs and just 63% of postponements in PMs. The postponement-caused delay between in-person visits was 5.6 ± 1.1 months for ICDs and 4.7 ± 1.2 months for PMs; in 24% of ICDs the time interval between in-person visits was ≥18 months. Clinically relevant events were 56 (18 [4.4%] in ICDs, 38 [2.1%] in PMs), with no deaths and 21 serious malfunctions (4 [1%] in ICDs, 15 [0.8%] in PMs). RM identified all ICD malfunctions, while it was not available in the affected PMs. In comparison with the year 2019, serious malfunctions increased, though the difference was not significant. Monthly RM transmissions increased by 2.3 fold. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center experience during the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous in-person PM/ICD follow-up visits were postponed, and delays were well beyond the previously recommended time limits. However, device-related malfunctions did not increase, notably, when RM capabilities were used.

Indirect ultrasound evaluation of left ventricular outflow tract diameter implications for heart failure and aortic stenosis severity assessment.

BACKGROUND: Whereas dependency of left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTD) from body surface area (BSA) has been established and a BSA-based LVOTD formula has been derived, the relationship between LVOTD and aortic root and LV dimensions has never been explored. This may have implications for evaluation of LV output in heart failure (HF) and aortic stenosis (AS) severity. METHODS: A cohort of 540 HF patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography was divided in a derivation and validation subgroup. In the derivation subgroup (N = 340), independent determinants of LVOTD were analyzed to derive a regression equation, which was used for predicting LVOTD in the validation subgroup (N = 200) and compared with the BSA-derived formula. RESULTS: LVOTD determinants in the derivation subgroup were sinuses of Valsalva diameter (SVD, beta = 0.392, P < .001), BSA (beta = 0.229, P < .001), LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, beta = 0.145, P = .001), and height (beta = 0.125, P = .037). The regression equation for predicting LVOTD with the aforementioned variables (LVOTD = 6.209 + [0.201 × SVD] + [1.802 × BSA] + [0.03 × LVEDD] + [0.025 × Height]) did not differ from (P = .937) and was highly correlated with measured LVOTD (R = 0.739, P < .001) in the validation group. Repeated analysis with LV end-diastolic volume instead of LVEDD and/or accounting for gender showed similar results, whereas BSA-derived LVOTD values were different from measured LVOTD (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Aortic root and LV dimensions affect LVOTD independently from anthropometric data and are included in a new comprehensive equation for predicting LVOTD. This should improve evaluation of LV output in HF and severity of AS when direct LVOTD measurement is difficult or impossible.

New measures of right ventricle-pulmonary artery coupling in heart failure: An all-cause mortality echocardiographic study.

AIMS: Right ventricle-pulmonary artery coupling (RVPAC) has emerged from pathophysiology to clinical interest for prognostic implication in heart failure and is commonly measured as the ratio between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (TAPSE/SPAP). However, feasibility of SPAP is limited (down to 60% in trials, and maybe lower in clinical practice). We ought to assess the prognostic value of the TAPSE times pulmonary acceleration time (TAPSE x pACT) product and TAPSE to peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TAPSE/TRV) ratio as new alternative measures of RVPAC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two-hundred patients hospitalized with heart failure were followed-up (median time of 2.7 years) and 82 died. Non survivors had significantly lower TAPSE/SPAP, TAPSE x pACT and TAPSE/TRV than survivors (0.31 vs 0.40 mm/mmHg, 130 vs 156 cm·ms, 5.0 vs 5.8 ms, respectively). Four multivariate models were performed, each one including TAPSE, TAPSE/SPAP, TAPSE x pACT or TAPSE/TRV. TAPSE/SPAP resulted the most powerful predictor of mortality (HR 0.74 per mm/mmHg increase, P < 0.001, C-Statistic 0.778), followed by TAPSE x pACT (HR 0.95 per 10 cm·ms increase, P = 0.013, C-Statistic 0.776), TAPSE/TRV (HR 0.76 per ms increase, P < 0.001, C-Statistic 0.774) and TAPSE (HR 0.91 per mm increase, P = 0.003, C-Statistic 0.769). Cutoff values of 140 cm·ms and 5.5 ms were respectively identified for TAPSE x pACT and TAPSE/TRV with receiving operating characteristic analysis for mortality. CONCLUSION: TAPSE x pACT product and TAPSE/TRV ratio are alternative measures of RVPAC for prognostic assessment in heart failure that can be applied if TAPSE/SPAP is not feasible.

Left ventricular output indices in hospitalized heart failure: when "simpler" may not mean "better".

Assessment of left ventricular (LV) output in hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) is important to determine prognosis. Although echocardiographic LV ejection fraction (EF) is generally used to this purpose, its prognostic value is limited. In this investigation LV-EF was compared with other echocardiographic per-beat measures of LV output, including non-indexed stroke volume (SV), SV index (SVI), stroke distance (SD), ejection time (ET), and flow rate (FR), to determine the best predictor of all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with HF. A final cohort of 350 consecutive patients hospitalized with HF who underwent echocardiography during hospitalization was studied. At a median follow-up of 2.7 years, 163 patients died. Non-survivors at follow-up had lower SD, SVI and SV, but not ET, FR and LV-EF than survivors. At multivariate analysis, only age, systolic blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and SVI remained significantly associated with outcome [HR for SVI 1.13 (1.04-1.22), P = 0.003]. In particular, for each 5 ml/m2 decrease in SVI, a 13% increase in risk of mortality for any cause was observed. SVI is a powerful prognosticator in HF patients, better than other per-beat measures, which may be simpler but partial or incomplete descriptors of LV output. SVI, therefore, should be considered for the routine echocardiographic evaluation of patients hospitalized with HF to predict prognosis.

Current Role of Echocardiography in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: from Cardiac Mechanics to Flow Dynamics Analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to summarily explain what LV synchrony, coordination, myocardial work, and flow dynamics are, trying to clarify their advantages and limitations in the treatment of heart failure patients undergoing or with implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). RECENT FINDINGS: CRT is an established treatment for patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In the current guidelines, CRT implant indications rely only on electrical dyssynchrony, but in the last years, many aspects of cardiac mechanics (including contractile synchrony, coordination, propagation, and myocardial work) and flow dynamics have been studied using echocardiographic techniques to better characterize patients undergoing or with implanted CRT. However, the concepts, limits, and potential applications of all these echocardiographic evaluations are unclear to most clinicians. The use of left ventricular dyssynchrony and discoordination indices may help to identify those significant mechanical alterations whose correction may increase the probability of a favorable CRT response. Assessment of myocardial work and intracardiac flow dynamics may overcome some limitations of the conventional evaluation of cardiac mechanics but more investigations are needed before extensive clinical application.

Right Atrial Pressure Is Associated with Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure and Indeterminate Left Ventricular Filling Pressure.

BACKGROUND: In a significant proportion of patients with left-sided heart failure (HF), left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) may not be estimated using echocardiography, so filling pressure status may remain indeterminate. In these patients, mean right atrial pressure (mRAP) has been suggested as a surrogate of LVFP. The aim of this study was to determine whether high mRAP has prognostic value in patients with HF with indeterminate pressure (IP) and whether mRAP-based reclassification of patients with IP has an impact on outcomes. METHODS: A cohort of 465 patients hospitalized with HF was retrospectively studied and divided into groups with normal pressure (n = 102), high pressure (n = 265), and IP (n = 98). A composite end point of all-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization was evaluated after a median follow-up duration of 2.5 years. RESULTS: There were 282 events in the entire population (53 in the normal pressure group, 173 in the high pressure group, and 56 in the IP group; P = .047). High mRAP was independently associated with outcome only in patients with IP (hazard ratio, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.25-5.9; P = .012). Evaluation of LVFP after mRAP-based reclassification of patients with IP resulted in higher risk stratification capability than current recommendations alone (log-rank χ2 = 15.057 vs 8.148). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with inconclusive determination of LVFP, echocardiographic estimation of mRAP is associated with outcomes. This finding corroborates previous observation of mRAP as a surrogate marker of elevated LVFP in left-sided HF and suggests its use in clinical practice.

Paradoxical low-flow phenotype in hospitalized heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Low flow (LF) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a paradox but is associated with worse prognosis. Determinants of LF in HFpEF have not been clarified but their assessment could corroborate recognition and definition of such a paradoxical condition. METHODS: A cohort of 193 patients hospitalized with HFpEF was retrospectively studied and divided in a group with LF (N = 45), defined by a left ventricular (LV) stroke volume index (SVI) < 30 ml/m2, and a group with normal flow (N = 148). A small LV cavity was pre-defined as LV end diastolic diameter index (EDDI) below median values (<25 mm/m2 for males and <26 mm/m2 for females). Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) was defined as the ratio between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and systolic pulmonary artery pressure < 0.36 mm/mmHg. An endpoint of all-cause mortality was evaluated after a median follow-up of 2.4 years. RESULTS: RVD (OR = 7.4; P < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (AF) during echocardiography (OR = 3.26; P = 0.008), and small LV cavity (OR = 3.81; P = 0.003) were independently associated with LF. After adjusting for age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, renal function, chronic obstructed pulmonary disease, use of ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, moderate tricuspid regurgitation, RVD), LF was associated with mortality (HR = 3.69; P < 0.001) whereas the combination of the determinants of LF was not. CONCLUSION: Paradoxical LF in HFpEF is associated with small LV cavity, AF and RVD. None of the combination of different factors associated with LF could substitute direct assessment of LF status in predicting prognosis in this cohort.

Novel Echocardiographic Approach to Hemodynamic Phenotypes Predicts Outcome of Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Although in clinical practice heart failure (HF) patients are classified using left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), this categorization is insufficient for prognosis, especially when LVEF is preserved or there is a concomitant right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. We hypothesized that a combined noninvasive evaluation of LV forward flow, filling pressure, and RV function would be better than LVEF in predicting all-cause mortality of hospitalized patients with HF. METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiographic examinations of 603 patients hospitalized with HF were analyzed. In a subsample of 200 patients with HF, LV stroke volume index, LV filling pressure estimation, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure were combined to determine 4 hemodynamic profiles: normal flow-normal pressure, normal flow-high pressure, low flow without RV dysfunction, and low flow with RV dysfunction profile. This model was then applied in a validation cohort (n=403). RESULTS: Prognosis worsened from the normal flow-normal pressure profile to the low flow with right ventricular dysfunction profile. At the multivariate survival analysis, the model showed independent high risk-stratification capability (P<0.001), even in subgroups of patients with LVEF < or ≥50% (P=0.011 and P<0.001, respectively) and < or ≥40% (P=0.044 and P<0.001, respectively). LVEF and HF classification based on LVEF did not predict outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic-derived profiling of LV forward flow, filling pressure, and RV function allowed categorization of patients hospitalized with HF and predicted all-cause mortality independently of LVEF. This model is based on conventional echocardiography, is easy to apply, and is, therefore, suggested for clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by means of flexible-tip irrigated catheters.

PURPOSE: Irrigated-tip ablation catheters increase safety and efficacy of ablation procedures, but their use in atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of AVNRT by means of the novel flexible-tip open-irrigated catheter FlexAbility™ and a 3D electroanatomic mapping (EAM) system. METHODS: This is a single-center and single-operator study on 80 patients referred for AVNRT catheter ablation. Outcome included acute and long-term procedural success as well as complications reported over a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range 6-24 months). RESULTS: Acute success was achieved in all 80 patients. One procedure-related major complication, involving the vascular access, occurred. Mean fluoroscopy time was 106 ± 71 s. One patient (1.2%) suffered long-term AVNRT recurrence. Five patients (6.2%) underwent ablation for AVNRT combined with ablation for other clinical arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: Irrigated RF ablation of AVNRT by means of the novel flexible-tip open-irrigated catheter associated to 3D EAM system is effective and safe. Success rates are comparable to those of other techniques. Complication rate is very low.

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Left Ventricular Output in Patients with Heart Failure: A Per-Beat or Per-Minute Approach?

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) output is a predictor of adverse outcome in patients with heart failure. It can be evaluated using a per-beat approach, measuring stroke volume index (SVI), or a per-minute approach, calculating cardiac index (CI). However, the prognostic value of these two approaches has never been compared. METHODS: A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted in 396 hospitalized patients who underwent echocardiography for suspected heart failure. In a group of 138 consecutive patients, SVI and CI cutoff values of 30 mL/m2 and 2.3 L/min/m2, respectively, were derived to separate normal from low LV forward flow conditions. Subsequently, the association of these values with all-cause mortality was compared in a group of 258 consecutive patients. Median follow-up duration was 2.6 years (interquartile range: 2-3.2 years). RESULTS: After adjustment for other outcome predictors, SVI <30 mL/m2 was independently associated with all-cause mortality with a hazard ratio of 2.67 (95% confidence interval, 1.74-4.1; P < .001), whereas CI was not. Additionally, three different subgroups of SVI (<30, 30-35, and >35 mL/m2) and CI (<1.8, 1.8-2.2, and ≥2.3 L/min/m2) were compared, and no incremental benefit of this risk stratification model was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Low LV output on the basis of a per-beat definition (SVI <30 mL/m2) is strongly associated with all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with heart failure. A per-minute approach seems to add no further information to risk stratification. These findings may have implications for selecting the LV output index when evaluating prognosis in patients with heart failure.

Intracardiac flow analysis in cardiac resynchronization therapy: A new challenge?

In the past years, assessment of cardiac function has become possible through the analysis of intracardiac flow dynamics, performed noninvasively using phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance and contrast and noncontrast ultrasound techniques. From 2013 to 2019, 9 echocardiographic investigations have considered 215 patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as a model for assessing flow dynamics within the left ventricle. Preliminary results have been reported about the acute hemodynamic effects of CRT and programming of the CRT device, showing the potential of an approach based on analysis of intracardiac flows. At present, there are only scarce data on the capability of intracardiac flow dynamics to predict LV remodeling after CRT and no information on clinical outcome prediction. Future investigations should be aimed at clarifying the mechanisms and impact of maladaptive intracardiac vortex dynamics on progressive LV remodeling as well as the prognostic meaning of implanted CRT device based on cardiac flow analysis.

Prognosis after pacemaker implantation in extreme elderly.

AIMS: Significant comorbidities may limit the potential benefit of pacemaker (PM) implantation in extreme elderly. A short-term mortality risk prediction score, able to identify high-risk patients, may be a useful tool in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed 538 patients aged >80 years at the time of implant who underwent PM implantation. Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify patient, procedural or complication variables predictive of death. The ACP (Aging in Cardiac Pacing) Score was constructed by assigning weighted values to the variables identified by hazard ratios, combined into an additive mortality risk score equation. One, two and three-year overall mortality rate was 11%, 21% and 32% respectively. Renal failure (HR 1.63; CI 1.15-2.31; p = .006), active neoplasia (HR 1.78; CI 1.27-2.51; p = .008), connective tissue disorder (3.07; CI 1.34-7.08; p = .048), cerebrovascular disease (HR 1.75; CI 1.25-2.46; p = .001) and the use of a single lead device (HR 2.27; CI 1.6-3.24; p < .001) were independently associated with worse survival. The ACP Score showed discrete predictive ability (AUC 0,6792 CI 0,63-0,73). Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing low vs high ACP Scores demonstrated that low ACP scores were associated with reduced mortality rates (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant comorbidities were associated with worse survival after PM implantation in extreme elderly. The ACP Score is a novel tool that may help to identify patients with high mortality risk after device implantation.

[Treatment of secondary ischemic mitral regurgitation: controversial issues]. / Aspetti controversi nel trattamento dell'insufficienza mitralica secondaria ischemica.

The presence of secondary mitral regurgitation is an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. This type of regurgitation can be treated with medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy, surgically or percutaneously but each strategy has controversial aspects. The purpose of this review is to discuss the most debated issues relative to the various modalities available to treat ischemic secondary mitral regurgitation, highlighting also future perspectives.

Intracardiac Flow Analysis: Techniques and Potential Clinical Applications.

Analysis of intracardiac flows has gained increasing interest in the last years. This analysis has become possible due to the development of technologies for noninvasive cardiovascular imaging, which allow visualization and quantitation of intracardiac flow dynamics. Several studies have shown that abnormalities in cardiac function are related to changes in intracardiac vortical flows. Thus, analysis of cardiac vortex has been used for better understanding of the pathophysiology in many heart diseases and to test initial clinical hypotheses. The aims of this review are to introduce the reader to the topic of intracardiac flow dynamics, to briefly describe current cardiac imaging techniques for analysis of the intracardiac vortex, and to indicate potential clinical applications of a vortex-based approach to the study of cardiac function.

[Echocardiography in ST-elevation myocardial infarction]. / L'ecocardiografia nell'infarto miocardico con sopraslivellamento del tratto ST.

Echocardiography is an imaging technique of paramount importance for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In particular, this technique may be useful for diagnosis and is essential for prognosis and to guide drug therapy. The role in the recognition of mechanical complications and in the identification and management of other complications such as pericarditis and left ventricular thrombosis is also crucial. Finally, echocardiography offers important information for the prediction of the arrhythmic risk and the study of left ventricular remodeling. In recent years, speckle-tracking echocardiography has been added to conventional echocardiographic techniques, showing additional value for diagnostic and prognostic indications, but further confirmations are needed.

[How severe is mitral regurgitation? Possibilities and problems of echocardiographic evaluation in clinical practice]. / Quanto è grave un'insufficienza mitralica? Possibilità e problemi della valutazione ecocardiografica nella pratica clinica.

Echocardiography is the most commonly used technique for evaluating patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) and estimating MR severity. However, in clinical practice, echocardiographic assessment of MR severity remains challenging in many cases, particularly in patients with forms of intermediate or borderline severity. The main causes are the improper application of the echocardiographic methods for assessment of MR severity and the lack of a validated standardized approach for quantification of various types of MR, including organic and functional MR. In this review, we describe how best to use echocardiography for assessing MR severity in the light of current knowledge and guidelines.