Sujet(s)
Épidermolyse bulleuse , Hospitalisation , Humains , Enfant , États-Unis , Épidermolyse bulleuse/économie , Épidermolyse bulleuse/thérapie , Hospitalisation/économie , Hospitalisation/statistiques et données numériques , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Mâle , Femelle , Adolescent , Nourrisson , Coûts hospitaliers/statistiques et données numériques , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The population of the United States is becoming increasingly diverse, yet dermatology, especially Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), lags behind. OBJECTIVE: This survey study investigates perceived barriers of underrepresented groups in medicine (URM) who are pursuing fellowship in Mohs micrographic surgery and dermatologic oncology (MSDO). METHODS AND MATERIALS: An IRB-approved survey was distributed electronically to accredited dermatology residencies between December 2020 and April 2021. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three dermatology residents responded to the survey and of the participants, 21% identified as a URM. There was no significant difference in those interested in applying for MSDO fellowship between URMs and non-URMs. URMs rated the following factors significantly higher when deciding to pursue MSDO fellowship: lack of perceived diversity in target patient population (mean 3.61, SD 1.66), race/ethnicity/gender of past MSDO fellows (mean 3.25, SD 1.71), perceived attitudes of MSDO fellowships towards an applicant’s race or ethnicity (mean 3.25, 1.65 SD), and lack of diversity of trainees and faculty in MMS (mean 3.61, SD 1.47). CONCLUSION: This study is one of the first to evaluate perceived barriers to diversifying the MMS workforce. The perceived barriers we have identified are complex and require concerted efforts for improvement. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(5): doi:10.36849/JDD.7083.
Sujet(s)
Dermatologie , Internat et résidence , Humains , États-Unis , Chirurgie de Mohs , Bourses d'études et bourses universitaires , Dermatologie/enseignement et éducation , Effectif , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Nearly half of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) report dissatisfaction with their treatment. However, factors related to treatment satisfaction have not been explored. OBJECTIVES: To measure associations between treatment satisfaction and clinical and treatment-related characteristics among patients with HS. METHODS: Treatment satisfaction was evaluated utilizing data from a cross-sectional global survey of patients with HS recruited from 27 institutions, mainly HS referral centres, in 14 different countries from October 2017 to July 2018. The primary outcome was patients' self-reported overall satisfaction with their current treatments for HS, rated on a five-point scale from 'very dissatisfied' to 'very satisfied'. RESULTS: The final analysis cohort comprised 1418 patients with HS, most of whom were European (55%, 780 of 1418) or North American (38%, 542 of 1418), and female (85%, 1210 of 1418). Overall, 45% (640 of 1418) of participants were either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with their current medical treatment. In adjusted analysis, patients primarily treated by a dermatologist for HS had 1·99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·62-2·44, P < 0·001] times the odds of being satisfied with current treatment than participants not primarily treated by a dermatologist. Treatment with biologics was associated with higher satisfaction [odds ratio (OR) 2·36, 95% CI 1·74-3·19, P < 0·001] relative to treatment with nonbiologic systemic medications. Factors associated with lower treatment satisfaction included smoking (OR 0·78, 95% CI 0·62-0·99; active vs. never), depression (OR 0·69, 95% CI 0·54-0·87), increasing number of comorbidities (OR 0·88 per comorbidity, 95% CI 0·81-0·96) and increasing flare frequency. CONCLUSIONS: There are several factors that appear to positively influence satisfaction with treatment among patients with HS, including treatment by a dermatologist and treatment with a biologic medication. Factors that appear to lower treatment satisfaction include active smoking, depression, accumulation of comorbid conditions and increasing flare frequency. Awareness of these factors may support partnered decision making with the goal of improving treatment outcomes. What is already known about this topic? Nearly half of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa report dissatisfaction with their treatments. What does this study add? Satisfaction with treatment is increased by receiving care from a dermatologist and treatment with biologics. Satisfaction with treatment is decreased by tobacco smoking, accumulation of comorbid conditions including depression, and higher flare frequency. What are the clinical implications of this work? Awareness of the identified factors associated with poor treatment satisfaction may support partnered decision making and improve treatment outcomes.
Sujet(s)
Produits biologiques , Hidrosadénite suppurée , Humains , Femelle , Hidrosadénite suppurée/traitement médicamenteux , Hidrosadénite suppurée/complications , Études transversales , Satisfaction personnelle , Satisfaction des patients , Produits biologiques/usage thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
A 32-year-old multiparous obese woman was referred to our center at 37 weeks of twin gestation. She was referred for birth planning following an accidentally discovered high international normalised ratio (INR) in routine preoperative labs. Her history was significant for recurrent pregnancy-associated deep venous thrombosis as well as two early pregnancy losses. Further work-up revealed transaminitis, mild splenomegaly and high lupus anticoagulant titre. A multidisciplinary team of physicians from the high-risk pregnancy, anaesthesiology, haematology, gastroenterology and hepatology departments put a management plan; it culminated into uncomplicated delivery of the patient by repeated caesarian section. The team was also able to figure out the cause of the patient's high INR that is associated with thrombophilia rather than haemophilia.
Sujet(s)
Déficit en facteur VII/complications , Rapport international normalisé , Thrombophilie/complications , Thrombose veineuse , Adulte , Antinéoplasiques d'origine végétale/usage thérapeutique , Césarienne , Déficit en facteur VII/génétique , Femelle , Humains , Inhibiteur lupique de la coagulation/sang , Stéatose hépatique non alcoolique/diagnostic , Stéatose hépatique non alcoolique/traitement médicamenteux , Plasma sanguin , Grossesse , Complications hématologiques de la grossesse/sang , Complications hématologiques de la grossesse/traitement médicamenteux , Silibinine/usage thérapeutique , Thrombophilie/génétique , Thrombose veineuse/complications , Thrombose veineuse/génétiqueSujet(s)
Éruptions acnéiformes/induit chimiquement , Aminophénols/effets indésirables , Benzodioxoles/effets indésirables , Agonistes de canaux chlorure/effets indésirables , Mucoviscidose/traitement médicamenteux , Toxidermies/étiologie , Indoles/effets indésirables , Pyrazoles/effets indésirables , Pyridines/effets indésirables , Pyrrolidines/effets indésirables , Quinolinone/effets indésirables , Éruptions acnéiformes/anatomopathologie , Adulte , Association médicamenteuse , Toxidermies/anatomopathologie , Humains , MâleRÉSUMÉ
Immuno-oncology is a rapidly evolving field with growing relevance in the treatment of numerous malignancies. The prior study of immunotherapy in dermatologic oncology has largely focused on cutaneous melanoma. However, recent focus has shifted to the use of immunotherapy to treat non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). NMSCs represent the most ubiquitous cancers globally and, while they have a lower propensity to develop into advanced disease than cutaneous melanoma, their absolute mortality burden has recently surpassed that of melanoma. Patients with advanced NMSC are now benefiting from the successes of immunotherapy, including checkpoint inhibition with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies. In this review, we discuss the existing clinical evidence for immunotherapy in the treatment of NMSCs, with an emphasis on checkpoint inhibitor therapies. We highlight key studies in the field and provide up-to-date clinical evidence regarding ongoing clinical trials, as well as future study directions. Our review demonstrates that checkpoint inhibitors are positioned to provide unparalleled results in the previously challenging landscape of advanced NMSC treatment.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: A needs assessment for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) will support advancements in multidisciplinary care, treatment, research, advocacy, and philanthropy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate unmet needs from the perspective of HS patients. METHODS: Prospective multinational survey of patients between October 2017 and July 2018. RESULTS: Before receiving a formal HS diagnosis, 63.7% (n = 827) of patients visited a physician ≥5 times. Mean delay in diagnosis was 10.2 ± 8.9 years. Patients experienced flare daily, weekly, or monthly in 23.0%, 29.8%, and 31.1%, respectively. Most (61.4% [n = 798]) rated recent HS-related pain as moderate or higher, and 4.5% described recent pain to be the worst possible. Access to dermatology was rated as difficult by 37.0% (n = 481). Patients reported visiting the emergency department and hospital ≥5 times for symptoms in 18.3% and 12.5%, respectively. An extreme impact on life was reported by 43.3% (n = 563), and 14.5% were disabled due to disease. Patients reported a high frequency of comorbidities, most commonly mood disorders. Patients were dissatisfied with medical or procedural treatments in 45.9% and 34.6%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Data were self-reported. Patients with more severe disease may have been selected. CONCLUSION: HS patients have identified several critical unmet needs that will require stakeholder collaboration to meaningfully address.
Sujet(s)
Hidrosadénite suppurée/thérapie , Évaluation des besoins , Adolescent , Adulte , Femelle , Enquêtes sur les soins de santé , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études prospectives , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
As interest in complementary and alternative medicine has grown, the relationship between diet and skin health has become an active area of research. Various supplements, plant derivatives, and antioxidants have gained attention as possible tools to prevent signs of aging and improve skin conditions. As such, knowledge of clinical trial data is important to counsel patients appropriately on risks and benefits of these complementary treatments and lifestyle modifications. Herein, we review the role of diet and supplements in preventing photoaging and treating common skin conditions.
Sujet(s)
Antioxydants/usage thérapeutique , Compléments alimentaires , Vieillissement de la peau , Maladies de la peau/diétothérapie , Maladies de la peau/prévention et contrôle , Vitamines/usage thérapeutique , Régime alimentaire , Humains , Peau/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Peau/physiopathologie , Maladies de la peau/physiopathologieSujet(s)
Acné juvénile/épidémiologie , /statistiques et données numériques , Disparités d'accès aux soins , Hidrosadénite suppurée/épidémiologie , Facteurs socioéconomiques , Adolescent , Adulte , Enfant , Femelle , Accessibilité des services de santé , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , New York (ville)/épidémiologie , Études rétrospectives , Indice de gravité de la maladie , Facteurs sexuels , Jeune adulteSujet(s)
Choix de carrière , Dermatologie/enseignement et éducation , Minorités/enseignement et éducation , Racisme , Étudiant médecine/statistiques et données numériques , Compréhension , Enseignement médical premier cycle/méthodes , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Facteurs socioéconomiques , Enquêtes et questionnaires , États-UnisRÉSUMÉ
PURPOSE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of pediatric disability and mortality. Together with sight-threatening ocular injuries, TBIs may lead to devastating consequences in developing children and complicate rehabilitation. We sought to investigate this relationship in pediatric patients admitted with major trauma. METHODS: The records of pediatric patients admitted with ocular injury and concomitant TBI were reviewed retrospectively using the National Trauma Data Bank (2008-2014). RESULTS: Of 58,765 pediatric patients admitted for trauma and also had ocular injuries, 32,173 were diagnosed with TBI. Mean patient age was 12.3 ± 7 years. Most were male (69.8%) and White (61.2%). The most frequent injuries were contusion of the eye/adnexa (39.1%) and orbital fractures (35.8%). The youngest age groups had greatest odds of falls in home locations, whereas older groups were more likely to suffer motor vehicle trauma as occupants (MVTO), struck by or against (SBA) injuries, and firearms injuries in street locations (P < 0.001). Blacks and Hispanics were most likely to suffer assault (P < 0.001) and Whites, unintentional (P < 0.001) and self-inflicted (P < 0.012) injury. Blacks were at a higher risk of firearms injury, Whites of MVTO, and Hispanics of motor vehicles as pedestrians (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TBI frequently is experienced by trauma patients with concomitant ocular injury and should be considered in children admitted with major trauma. Resultant demographic patterns may help identify patients that have a higher risk of TBI leading to earlier diagnosis and treatment.
Sujet(s)
Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale/épidémiologie , Lésions traumatiques de l'oeil/épidémiologie , Enregistrements , Adolescent , Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale/complications , Lésions traumatiques de l'encéphale/diagnostic , Enfant , Enfant d'âge préscolaire , Lésions traumatiques de l'oeil/complications , Lésions traumatiques de l'oeil/diagnostic , Femelle , Études de suivi , Humains , Incidence , Nourrisson , Nouveau-né , Mâle , Études rétrospectives , Taux de survie/tendances , Indices de gravité des traumatismes , États-Unis/épidémiologie , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
Acne vulgaris and postacne scarring are common in the general population. Even after lesions have resolved, scarring can lead to detrimental psychologic effects and can negatively impact patients' quality of life. Fortunately, there have been several recent advances in therapeutic options to treat acne scarring. This article discusses these treatments with a focus on microneedling, lasers, chemical peels, and dermal fillers.