IFN-λ uniquely promotes CD8 T cell immunity against SARS-CoV-2 relative to type I IFN.

Optimization of protective immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 remains an urgent worldwide priority. In this regard, type III IFN (IFN-λ) restricts SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro, and treatment with IFN-λ limits infection, inflammation, and pathogenesis in murine models. Furthermore, IFN-λ has been developed for clinical use to limit COVID-19 severity. However, whether endogenous IFN-λ signaling has an effect on SARS-CoV-2 antiviral immunity and long-term immune protection in vivo is unknown. In this study, we identified a requirement for IFN-λ signaling in promoting viral clearance and protective immune programming in SARS-CoV-2 infection of mice. Expression of both IFN and IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) in the lungs were minimally affected by the absence of IFN-λ signaling and correlated with transient increases in viral titers. We found that IFN-λ supported the generation of protective CD8 T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 by facilitating accumulation of CD103+ DC in lung draining lymph nodes (dLN). IFN-λ signaling specifically in DCs promoted the upregulation of costimulatory molecules and the proliferation of CD8 T cells. Intriguingly, antigen-specific CD8 T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 was independent of type I IFN signaling, revealing a nonredundant function of IFN-λ. Overall, these studies demonstrate a critical role for IFN-λ in protective innate and adaptive immunity upon infection with SARS-CoV-2 and suggest that IFN-λ serves as an immune adjuvant to support CD8 T cell immunity.

The retina-specific basigin isoform does not induce IL-6 expression in mouse monocytes.

Purpose: Basigin gene products are positioned on adjacent cell types in the neural retina and are thought to compose a lactate metabolon important for photoreceptor cell function. The Ig0 domain of basigin isoform 1 (basigin-1) is highly conserved throughout evolution, which suggests a conserved function. It has been suggested that the Ig0 domain has proinflammatory properties, and it is hypothesized to interact with basigin isoform 2 (basigin-2) for cell adhesion and lactate metabolon formation. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine whether the Ig0 domain of basigin-1 binds to basigin-2 and whether the region of the domain used for binding is also used to stimulate interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression. Methods: Binding was assessed using recombinant proteins corresponding to the Ig0 domain of basigin-1 and endogenously expressed basigin-2 from mouse neural retina and brain protein lysates. The proinflammatory properties of the Ig0 domain were analyzed with exposure of the recombinant proteins to the mouse monocyte RAW 264.7 cell line and subsequent measurement of the IL-6 concentration in the culture medium via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: The data indicate that the Ig0 domain interacts with basigin-2 through a region within the amino half of the domain and that the Ig0 domain does not stimulate the expression of IL-6 in mouse cells in vitro. Conclusions: The Ig0 domain of basigin-1 binds to basigin-2 in vitro. In addition, contrary to previous reports, there was no evidence that the Ig0 domain potentiates IL-6 expression in a mouse monocyte cell line in vitro. However, it is possible that the Ig0 domain stimulates the expression of proinflammatory cytokines other than IL-6, or that the potential involvement of the Ig0 domain of basigin-1 in the acute inflammatory response is dependent on species.